ML16341G311
| ML16341G311 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/08/1991 |
| From: | Reese J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Shiffer J PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341G312 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9110220127 | |
| Download: ML16341G311 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000275/1991022
Text
~p,g Rfqy
0
Cy
I
)
ClO
I
~,
Cy
1'~
/f )i***4
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
1460 MARIALANE. SUITE 210
WALNUTCREEK, CALIFORNIA94596-6368
OCT - II
Ie."I
Docket Nos.
50-275 and 50-323
License
Nos.
DPR-80 and
Pacific Gas
and Electric Company
77 Beale Street,
Room 1451
San Francisco,
California 94106
Attention:
Mr. J.
D. Shiffer, Senior Vice President
and General
Manager
Nuclear
Power Generation
Business
Unit
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION
REPORT 50-275/91-22
AND 50-323/91-22
On September
16-20,
1991, Messrs.
D. Schaefer
and
M. Schuster of this office
conducted
an announced initial inspection of your Fitness-For-Duty
(FFD)
program at Diablo Canyon
Power Plant
(DCPP).
On September
20, 1991, at the
conclusion of the site visit, the preliminary inspection findings were
discussed
with Mr.
D. Miklush, Acting Plant Manager,
DCPP,
and other
members
of your staff identified in the enclosed
inspection report.
On September
25,
1991,
PG8E voluntarily provided
a written response
to many of the preliminary
inspection findings.
This response,
enclosed at Attachment A, was reviewed
in-office on September
27, 1991.
The inspection consisted of selective
examinations
of your Drug Prevention
Policy, Nuclear Plant Administrative Procedure
(NPAP) for your
FFD program,
implementing supplements
to this procedure,
interviews with employees
and
contractors,
observations
of your site collection facilities, and review of
pertinent records
and reports.
Based
on this inspection,
we have determined that the development
and
implementation of your FFD program are responsive to both the spirit and
intent of the
FFD rule,
and that the program is aggressive
and comprehensive.
As described in the enclosed report,
we are pleased to note
numerous
strengths
in your program:
Management's
strong support for the program; professionalism
and technical expertise exhibited by personnel
involved in administering the
program;
employee
awareness
and acceptance
of the program;
and the effective
organization
and operation of the two collection facilities at the site.
However, within the scope of this inspection,
there
was
one area in which your
activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements,
as specified in
the enclosed
Notice of Violation (Notice).
This apparent violation has
been
categorized
into the severity level
as described in the
NRC Enforcement
Policy,
You are required to respond to this letter
and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice when
preparing your response.
In your response,
you should document the specific
actions taken,
and any additional actions you plan, to prevent recurrence.
After reviewinq your response
to the Notice, including your proposed
corrective act)ons
and the results of future inspections,
the
NRC will
determine whether further enforcement action is necessary
to ensure
compliance
with NRC regulatory requirements.
9110220127
911008
ADDCK 05000275
8
'
"
In addition,
two unresolved
items were identified in your
FFD program
pertaining to your past practice of not submitting blind performance test
samples
for the complete
panel of drugs,
and your failure to report to the
NRC
a confirmed positive test of a contract
Foreman performing supervisory duties.
These
items will be forwarded to
NRC Headquarters
for resolution,
The response
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
provisions of the Office of Management
and Budget,
otherwise required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
In accordance
with Section
2.790 of the
NRC's "Rules of Practice"
Part 2,
Title 10,
Code of Federal
Regulations,
a copy of this letter and its
enclosures will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
Should you have
any questions
concerning this letter,
we would be pleased to
discuss
them with you.
Si
rely,
Sa
g
and
H.
Reese,
Chic
uards,
Emergency
Preparedness
Non-Power Reactor
Branch
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
No. 50-275/91-22
and 50-323/91-22
cc w/enclosure:
J.
A. Sexton,
PG8E
J.
D. Townsend,
Vice President,
Diablo Canyon
Power Plant,
PG8E
R.
F.
Locke, Esq., Attorney,
PGEE
D. Taggert, Director, equality Support,
Diablo Canyon
G. Grebel,
Supervisor,
Regulatory Compliance,
Diablo Canyon
R. Weinberg,
News Service (Diablo Canyon)
. Resident Inspector,
Diablo Canyon
P.
McKee,
NRR/RSGB
L. Bush,
NRR/RSGB
G.
McPeek,
NRR/RSGB
L. Norderhaug,
Region
V
Regions I, II, III, and IV
State of California
bcc w/enclosure:
Docket File
G.
Cook
B. Faulkenberry
J.'Martin
R.
Zimmerman
K. Perkins
Project Inspector
Resident
Inspector
bcc w/o enclosure:
J. Zollicoffer
M. Smith
J.
Bianchi
REGION V/d4
. flG5
DSchaefer4g-
MSchustet
lo/ g /~qi
iz:/r /I/
AJohns
n
JReese
lo/
/gl
0/ g/
(
[
YE
NO
] [
YE
NO
] [
YES
NO
] [
E
NO
]