ML16341D201
| ML16341D201 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1985 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Palladino W NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341D202 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8502280618 | |
| Download: ML16341D201 (8) | |
Text
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chairman Pall adino FROM:
SUBJECT:
William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations DIABLO CANYON LICENSING STATUS In response to the questions raised during the NTOL briefing on January 8, 1985, regarding the pending allegations and operato~ qualifications for Diablo Canyon Unit 2, we have enclosed separate status reports addressing each of those issues.
Enclosures:
1.
Diablo Canyon Allegation Management
- Program, January 1985 Status 2.
Diablo Canyo~ Operator gualifications and Staffing cc w/enclosures:
Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Zech SECY OPE OGC CONTACT'.
- Grimes, NRR 49-28414 (Signed) Williamj. Dirclls William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations pg'.M~~ 4-l-It&
LB¹3 Reading File Docket No. 50-323 8502280hi8 850222 PDR ADOCK 05000275 P
PDR LB¹3:Dl.
- GKnighton 2/1/85 Eoo""3l Wl}ircks 2@+85 LOB
- HBooher 2/1/85 DISTRIBUTION Central Files=
NRC PDR L PDR WDircks EDO Reading File SEPB Reading File
- PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES OBTAINED SEPB:DL LB¹3:DL LB¹3:DL
- CGrimes:dk *MLey
- HSchierling 2/1/85 2/1/85 2/1/85 AD:L:DL D:DL D:
- TNovak
'0DEs t
HD ton 2/1/85 2/@'Q 2/y /85 D:DHFS
- HThompson 2/1/85
II II
~
1 t
III IW ~ Q le H
I 9
II PQIQ
>4 IIWll
- p1I, 4
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Chairman Palladino FROM:
SUBJECT'illiam J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations DIABLO CANYON LICENSING STATUS In response to the questions raised during the NTOL brief'ing on January 8, 1985, regarding the pendi allegations and operator qualifications for Diablo Canyon Unit 2, we have encl sed separate status reports addressing each of'hose issues.
Enclosures:
1.
Diablo Canyon Allegation Management
- Program, January 1985 Status.
2.
Diablo Canyon Operator Qualifications and Staffing.
cc w/enclosures:
Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Zech SECY OPE OGC CONTACT:
C. Grimes, NRR 49-28414 William J. Dircks ~
Executive Direct r for Operations DISTRIBUTION Central Files NRC PDR L PDR WDircks EDO Reading File SEPB Reading File SEPB:DS L853:DLC CGrimes:dk MLey 2/ \\ /85 2/
'i /85 L
.DL T ovak Eisenhut 2/
/85 2/Q/85 LB83:DL HSchier ng 2//85, D:NRR HDenton 2/
/85 EDO WDircks 2/
/85 L.<~< nQ concuc~z,A~ 4 LBB3 Reading File P"0 Docket No. 50-323 e~~l I znea; gnaaA g C,roc%2=l" 4or g Q~h~r
~aL 'D. kizmanil LQB D:DHFS +
G n'ton HBooher HThompson 2/
( /85 2/ ) /85 2/
1 /85
r t P
II I
yl
~'
'f
ENCLOSURE 1 DIABLO CANYON ALLEGATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JANUARY 1985 STATUS The review assignments and status for all of the Diablo Canyon allegations are graphically depicted in Attachment 1, for both Unit 1 and Unit 2.
Except for eight allegations directed specifically to Unit 2, all allegations were reviewed with respect to Unit 1 only, as described in SSERs 21, 22 and 26.
In November 1984, the staff began sorting the technical allegations for Unit 2 applicability, using the criteria described in Attachment 2.
The total number of allegations for the Diablo Canyon Project, as of January 31, 1985, is 1656.
This figure reflects all of those incorporated into the tracking system following the Region V review of the documentation and elimination of duplicates, as described in the attached Allegation Review Board Meeting Summary dated January 15, 1985 (Attachment 3).
While not all allegations have been resolved, all have been reviewed against the screening criteria presented in SSER 22.
This screening review indicated that none of the concerns are of sufficient safety significance to preclude continued operation of Unit 1 or low-power licensing of Unit 2.
Staff evaluation of the allegations resolved subsequent to SSER 26 (July 1984) will be presented in SSER 28 which is scheduled to be issued in February 1985.
The staff's review of the unresolved allegations is continuing in parallel with the applicability review for Unit 2.
We expect that the allegations applicable to Unit 2 will be identified within about the next two weeks.
As a result, the number of Unit 2 "open" allegations will correspondingly decrease where Unit 1 resolutions are found to apply'o Unit 2.
In addition, there are approximately five allegations which are being considered for referral to OIA because they may involve concerns regarding NRC staff practice.
I 4
DIABLO CANYON ALLEGATION STATUS AS OF JANUARY 31, 1985 Total Alfegationa 1656 Allegations Under Investigation by OI I
-'15 Allegations Under Inspection/Review l
1441 Resolved 16 Not Resol,ved 199 Resolved I
1268 Not Re olved 173 I
Resolution Required Prior Low Power Resolution Reso ution Required Does not Prior Impact Full Power Low or
'ull
- Power, I
Sta us Not Determined Resol tion Required Prior Low Power Redo ution Required Prior Full Power Reso ution, Does Not Impact Low or Full Power I
Sta us Not Determined
- Allegation reviews are continuing.
Applicability to Unit 2 has been established for 1333 allegations.
Resolution impact will be established at the completion of the review in March 1985.
ENCLOSURE 1
Attachment 1