ML16340D983

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-275/83-34 & 50-323/83-24 on 831011-14.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee & Contractor Actions in Response to Nuclear Svcs Corp Aug- Sept 1977 Audit of Pullman Power Products Const Activities
ML16340D983
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  
Issue date: 10/26/1983
From: Hernandez G, Kirsch D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML16340D982 List:
References
50-275-83-34, 50-323-83-24, NUDOCS 8311160139
Download: ML16340D983 (28)


See also: IR 05000275/1983034

Text

U. S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

Report Nos. 50-275/83-34

and 50-323/83-24

Docket Nos. 50-275

and 50-323

License

No. DPR-76

Construction Permit No.

CPPR-69

Licensee:

Pacific Gas

and Electric

Co

an

77 Beale Street

Room 1435

San Francisco

California 94106

Facility Name:

Diablo Can on Units

1 and 2

Inspection at:

Diablo Can on Site

San Luis Obis

o Count

California

. Inspected

conducted:

October

11-14

1983

Inspectors:~ G.

H. Hernandez,

Reactor Inspector

~

Date Signed

Approved by:

D. F. Kirsch, Chief

Reactor Projects

Section

No'.

3

ate Signed

~Summa

Ins ection Durin

the Period of October

11-14

1983

(NRC Ins ection

Re ort

Nos. 50-275/83-34

and 50-323 83"24

Areas Ins ected:

A special,

unannounced

inspection by a regional-based

inspector to examine licensee

and contractor actions in response

to an audit

conducted

by Nuclear Services

Corporation in August-September

1977 of Pullman

Power Products

construction activities.

A copy of this audit was included in

documents

provided

on September

9, 1983, to the Atomic and Safety licensing

Appeals Board by the "Joint Intervenors" to supplement their motion for

re-opening the record

on Construction Quality Assurance

(CQA).

The inspection involved 22 inspection-hours

by one

NRC inspector.

Results:

No items of noncompliance

or deviations

were identified.

SBl~MT~ 831028

PDR

ADOCK 05000275

G

PDR

T

DETAILS

l.

Individuals Contacted

a.

Pacific Gas

and Electric

Com an

(PGSZ)

  • R. D. Etzler, Field Construction

Manager

D. A. Rockwell, Project Field Engineer

  • W., K. Glenn, Quality Control Supervisor
  • C. M. Seward,

Acting Quality Assurance

Supervisor

M. E. Leppke, Mechanical Engineer

  • C. L. Eldridge, Operations Quality Control Supervisor

D. B. Miklush, Maintenance

Manager

  • J. Arnold, Resident Mechanical Engineer

b.

Pullman Power Products

Co

oration

(PPP)

  • H. W. Karner, Quality Assurance/Quality

Control Manager

  • Denotes attendees

at the

NRC exit management

meeting

on October

14,

1983.

In addition, Mr. M. Eli (LLNL) and Mr. C. Morton (EGSG),

NRC

consultants,

attended

the exit management

meeting.

2.

~Back racad

On September

9,,1983,

the Joint Intervenors filed with the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Appeals

Board

a document to supplement their pending motion

to re-open the record

on the issue of Construction Quality Assurance

(CQA).

The documents

included (1)

a proposal for an independent

audit of

Pullman Power Products

(PPP)

by Nuclear Services

Corporation

(NSC) and,

(2) the results of a previous Nuclear Services

Corporation audit.

The

NSC audit was conducted

from August 22 - September

20,

1977,

and covered

Pullman's construction activities from 1971 through September

1977.

3.

Re ion V Actions

The Joint Intervenors'otion

and

PGSZ's

response

to the Joint

Intervenors

Supplement

to Motion To Reopen

The Record

On Construction

Quality Assurance

was reviewed by the

NRC Region

V staff,

and

a staff

response

provided to the

ASLAB on this subject

on October 4,

1983.

Based

on the review of the aforementioned

documents,

discussions

with licensee

personnel

and

a review of NRC Region IV and Region

V Inspection Reports

during the referenced

period,

(1971 through Sept>>mber

1977) the staff

concluded that the Pullman Quality Assurance

Program did not suffer a

major breakdown

and for those instances

where isolated

breakdowns

did

occur, those problems

were identified, addressed,

and resolved

by the

licensee's

Quality Assurance

Program or the

NRC inspection program in

effect at the time.

a

~

~

The staff did not attempt to reconcile each

and every

NSC audit finding.

Rather,

the staff verified that the licensee

made every effort to

throughly address,

investigate,

and resolve

each concern identified in

the

NSC audit.

However,

a review of the licensee's

response

indicated

that three areas

required further clarification to assure

that the

licensee's

response

to the

NSC audit findings complied with regulatory

and code requirements.

These

areas

of concern are discussed

below in

paragraph

4 of this report.

4.

Ins ection Results

During this inspection the inspector

met with licensee

personnel

who

participated in the April - June

1978 licensee

followup audit of Pullman

Power Products.

This audit was conducted

as

a direct result of the

NSC

audit findings and was performed to assure

that Pullman's Quality

Assurance

Program

and physical work complied with regulatory

and

'contractual

requirements

in effect during the time the work was

performed.

The results of the licensee's

and Pullman's

response

to the

NSC audit findings were reviewed with the above referenced

individuals.

The review/discussions

reaffirmed the earlier staff conclusion that the

NSC audit findings had been properly addressed,

and every affort had been

made by the licensee

to throughly address

and resolve the

NSC audit

findings.

The three areas

of concern were resolved

as follows:

a 0

Criterion III, "Measuring and Test Equipment" finding No.

2 to the

NSC audit states

that,

"The calibration program did not require

recalibration of themocouples until June

16,

1976.

Therefore,

there

is no assurance

of the accuracy of thermocouples

used for pre- and

post-welding heat treatment prior to June

16,

1976.

Newly purchased

thermocouples

were required to be calibrated by the manufacturer.

However, the manufacturer's

calibration does not assure

that the

thermocouples

have not been

damage

during handling and shipping."

The Pullman response

states,

in part, that, "All thermocouples

have

been

and are purchased

with calibration.

Prior to June,

1976, there

were no requirements

of recalibration to thermocouples.

When the

program

was initiated, all existing thermocouples

were recalibrated

and none were found to be out of calibration."

The inspector

reviewed thermocouple

record packages

and confirmed

that the documentation

supported

the licensee

response

that

thermocouples

were purchased

with calibration requirements,

and that

when all existing theomocouples

were re-calibrated

on June

15,

1976

and July 10,

1976 and that all were found within calibration

requirements.

The inspector

has

no further questions

on this subject.

b.

Criterion IX, "Special Processes"

item 10.o (2) of the

NSC audit

finding states

that,

"Tempil sticks were not used."

The Pullman response

states

that, "In cases

where welders

were noted

without Tempil Sticks in Internal Audit Findings, there

was

no

indication on the "Welders Audit Sheet" that the interpass

temperature

was too high. It is, therefore,

concluded

that, weld

quality was not affected;

Ferrite checks of welds where tempil

sticks were not used

show acceptable

results."

This

NSC audit finding may have been based

on findings. of previously

conducted

Pullman audits.

The inspector interprets

the

NSC audit

finding as implying that Tempil sticks were not used at all by

Pullman welders.

The Pullman response

makes it clear that only for

those

cases identified by the Pullman auditor was there

a question

as to whether the welders audited were using Tempil sticks.

The

inspector

found that Tempil sticks were used by Pullman welders

as

a

matter practice during the period.

The inspector

has

no further questions

on this subject.

C ~

Criterion IX, "Special Processes",

finding 10g of the

NSC audit

states

that,

"Welder BF

(W. Adair, 251) performed welding on FW-70,

72, 73, 76, 77,

78,

100B,

132;

and

133 in isometric package

21-7 and

FW-88, 90,

92,

134,

135,

and

160B in isometric package

21-8.

This

welder was not qualified for the thickness

range;

and 'the welds were

reported

on DR's

25367 2538'539'nd

2899.

In accordance

with

Pacific Gas

6 Electric Company disposition,

some of the welds were

radiographed

and found acceptable;

welder

BF was qualified to the

thickness

range;

and all the welds in question were accepted.

This

disposition is not permitted by B31.1, B31.7,

and

ASME Section IX,

which all specify that the welder must be qualified prior to making

production welds."

The Pullman response

states:

The deviation cited was found by Pullman Quality Assurance

and reported to

PGGE on appropriate deviation records.

Reference

to DR-2536 is incorrect.

The auditor is completely incorrect in indicating that

ASIDE

Section IX, B31.1 and B31.7

do not permit welding prior to

qualification.

No such prohibitions exist.

DR-2538 Revision

1 and DR-2539, Revision

1 dated July,

1975

report 2-2" butt welds in Diesel Fuel Oil (160B and

100B) made

12/17/73.

Welder was not qualified for small diameter

(3"- and

under) unitl 2/28/74.

Both DR's use the option to qualify the welder by radiography

(see

1971 Section IX Winter 71 Addendum - Paragraph

Q2(a)).

Both production welds

(160B and

100B) were radiographed

and

found acceptable.

PG&E accepted qualification on this basis.

P

C

~

4

DR-2899 dated August,

19'75 reported

14 butt welds

made prior to

2/18/74.

Investigation

shows these

were

2 1/2" pipe size.

Prior qualification by DR-2538 Revision

1 and DR-2539 Revision

1 covers qualification of these

seams.

No further NDE

required..."

The inspector questioned

the response

to the finding because

the

code

does not allow a welder to perform production welding prior to

qualification to the particular process.

The inspector

considered

that to adequately

resolve this finding the licensee

should have

radiographed

the other fourteen welds in question.

Investigation

into this item determined that during the

1978

HOSGRI modifications

the diesel oil fuel piping was re-routed.

During the re-routing

process,

the two piping runs containing fifteen of the sixteen welds

in question

were eliminated.

The'only currently installed weld

(Weld No.

160B)

was

one of the two welds originally radiographed

by

the licensee

to justify the acceptance

of the other fourteen welds.

The radiographs

for weld 160B were reviewed

and found acceptable.

Additionally, the inspector noted that the original NSC audit

finding came

from a Pullman internal audit that originally

identified the discrepancy.

Therefore, it is apparent that the

Pullman Quality Assurance

Program

was in effect and was actively

identifying problems in Pullman's welding program.

The inspector

has

no further'uestions

on this subject.

5.

Mana ement Meetin

On October

14,

1983, the inspector

met with licensee

representatives

denoted in paragraph

1.

The inspection

scope,

observations,

and findings

were discussed.

~ vV'~Q ~

C

f

'I

II~

S

gPN 10 I84

DISTR I B

ION

Document Control (50-275)

PRC System

JLee (2)

DOCKET NO(S).

50-275

The Honorable Alan Simpson,

Chairman

Subcommittee

on Nuclear Regulation

Committee on Environment and Public Works

United States

Senate

llashington,

D.C.

205l5

. SUBJECT:

PACIFIC GAS ft ELECTRIC COMPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1

, dated

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your information:

Notice of Receipt of Application.

DraftiFinal Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Kj Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No. 2O

81 2l, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to ApplicationiSAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

Facility, Operating License No.

, Amendment No.

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

, dated

Enclosures:

As stated

cc: Senator

Gary Hart

bcc:

OCA

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

OFFICEtI

SURNAME/

DATEP

L 'j/I3,

ft

~ ~ ~

~ ~ 0

~

P ~ ~

~ ~

/84

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

NRC FORM 318 (I0/80) NRCM 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

n

'

-/

t

P

5

I

P

STRI BUT ION

Uocument Control

(50-275)

PRC System

JLee

(2)

DOCKET NO(S).

50<<275

The Honorable Norris K. Udall, Chairman

Subcommittee

on Energy and the Environment

Committee

on Interior and insular Affairs

United States

House of Representatives

Washington,

D.C.

20515

PACIFIC GAS

8t ELECTRIC COhIPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your information.

Notice of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

H Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement No

20 5 21

dated

December

1983

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

,dated

Facility Operating License No.

, Amendment No.

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

, dated

Enclosures:

As stated

Representative

Nanuel

Lujan

bcc:

OCA

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

oFFIcE Ih

SURNAMEt/

DATEP

~ ~ ~

~ ~ 0

1

B¹3

ft

/84

NRC FORM 318 u0/80) NRCM 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.0

r

r

RIBUTION

Document Control

(50-275)

PRC System

JLee (2)

Jgg 10 1984

DOCKET NO(S).

5o-275

The Honorable Richard Ottinger, Chairman

Subcommittee

on Energy Conservation

add Power

Committee on Energy and Coltnierce

United States

House of Representatives

Washington.

D.C.

20515

PACIFIC GAS 5 ELECTRIC COMPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1

, Amendment No

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your

information.'otice

of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No.

2O

8I 21, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operating License No.

, dated

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

Enclosures:

As stated

cc:

Representative

Carlos Moorhead

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

bcc:

OCA

OFFICE/

SURNAME/

DATEP

'A3

~

~

~ ~

~

~:ft

./

/84

NRC FORM 318 (10/80) NRCM 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

0

I

$i/~~

~ mM

"'STRIBUTION

.ument Control

(50-275)

PRC System

JLee (2)

DEC 2 2 583

DOCKET NOlS).

50-275

The Honorable Richard Ottinger,

Chairman

Submommittee

on Energy Conservation

and

Power

Committee on Energy and

Commerce

United States

House of Representatives

llashington.

D.C.

20515

PACIFIC GAS

81 ELECTRIC COMPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POllER PLANT, UNIT 1

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your

information.'otice

of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Xl Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No. 19, dated

October 1983

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit..

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operating License No.

, Amendment No.

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

, dated

Enclosures:

As stated

cc:

Representative

Car1os floorhead

bcc:

OCA

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

OFF1CEP

SURNAME/

DATEP

¹3:ff-

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~

.j Ze.8.3

NRC FORM 318 u 0/80) NRCM 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

I

I I ~ '

I ~

I

I

'

I

d

I

~

'

I

  • d

d

I

d

d

d ddd)

~

~

~

~

~

I

d ~

DISTRIBUTION

Document Control

(50-275)

PRC System

J Lee'(2)

J3EC 2 2 t9N

DOCKET NO(S).

5O 275

The Honorable Alan Simpson.

Chairman

Subcommittee

on Nuclear Regulation

Committee on Environment and Public Mork~;)

United States

Senate

Washington,

D.C.

20515

SUBJECT:

PACIFIC GAS 5 ELECTRIC CIIPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR P01lER PLANT, UNIT l

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your information.

Notice of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Z Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No. lg, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operating License No.

, Amendment No.

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specffy)

, dated

Enclosures:

As stated

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Senator

Gary Hart

bcc:

OCA

oFFIOEIh

SURNAME/

DATEP

¹3

~ ~ ~

~

~

~ft

ys3

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

NRC FORM 3I8 (10/80) NROh1 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

V

I

DEt', 3 2 $83

V

DISTRIBUTION

Document Control (50-275).

PRC System

JLee (2)

DOCKET NO(S). gP 275

The Honorabl'e Bort is K. Udall, Chairman

Subcommittee

on Energy and the Environment

Committee

on Interior and Insular Affairs

United States

House of Representatives

'I

llashington,

D. C.

20515

SUBJECT:

PACIFIC GAS 5 ELECTRIC COMPANY - DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1

.. The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your

information.'otice

of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

X Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No. "g, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operating License No.

, Amendment No.

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

, dated

Enclosures:

As stated

Representative

Hanuel Iujan

bcc:

OCA

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

OFFICE/

SURNAME/

DATEP

83

f.t..

Jg

S3

NRC FORM 318 (10/80) NRCM 0240

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

I

I,

r

11,

December 1, 1983

DOCKET NO(S).

5O-275

The Honorable Ri.chard Ot;tiger, Chairman

Subcommittee

on Energy Conservation

and, Parer

Cmmd.ttee

on Energy and, Caamerce

United States

House of Representatives

Washington,

D.Ci

20515

SUBJECT:

PACIFIC GAS

Ea EIZGTRIC CQ4PAHY - DIABLO CAHYON NUCLEAR PSHAW.HANT'NIT 1

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your information.

Notice of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No.

, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No. 'o Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operating License No. ~76, Amendment No. 7, dated

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated

cc: representative

Carlos Hoorhead

bcc:

OCA

OFFICE fF

SURNAME/

DATEP

~ ~ ~ ~

83...

I ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

NRO FOAM 318 (10/80) NRCM 0240

OFFlCIAL RECORD COPY

0

Il

ik

December l~ l983

DOCKET NO(S).

5O-275

The Honorable Norris K Udall, Chaimnan

Subcommittee

on Energy and the Environment

Camittee

on Interior an6 Xnsu.'Lar Affairs

United. States

House of Representatives

Nashingtonq

D+Go

205l5

SUBJECT:

PACXFIC GAS 4 EIZGTRIG CCMPANY

DIABLO CAHYGN NUCLZAR PQ'KR PXAHT8 UNIT 1

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your

information.'otice

of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No.

, dated

0 Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

1

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

f

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

,dated

IX ,;, ,,.~6, *

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated

cc:

Representative

Manuel Xi/an

bcc:

OGA

oFFIcEIh

SI/RNAME/

DATEP

0 ~ ~

~ ~

../,. 3...

NRC FORM 318 (10/80) NRCh1 0240

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

C

~

~

e

December 1, 1983

DOCKET NO(S). 50-275

T11e Honorable Alan Simpson,

Chairman

Subcanmittee

on Nuclear RegQation

Canmittee

on Environment and Phb1ic >forks

"

United States

Senate

Vashiagton0

D,Cra

20515

SUBJECT:

PACIFIC GAS 5 ELECTRIC CQIPANY- DIABM CANYON NUCLEAR PQfER PLANT0 UNIT 1

The following documents concerning our review of the subject facilityare transmitted for your information.

Notice of Receipt of Application.

Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Notice of Availabilityof Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated

Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement

No.

, dated

Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.

Application and Safety Analysis Report, Volume

Amendment No.

to Application/SAR dated

Construction Permit No. CPPR-

, Amendment No.

, dated

Facility Operattng Ltcenee No.

ytFgr7dr, Amendment No.~, dated

Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated

Other (Specify)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated

cc:

Senator Gary Hart

bcc:

OCA

OFFtCEP

SURNAME)

DATEty

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

NRC FOAM St 8 (t0/80) NRCM 0240

OFFICIAL R ECOR D COPY

t