ML16340B010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-275/80-11 on 800401-25.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Testing,Fire Protection & Operator Training
ML16340B010
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/1980
From: Sternberg D, Thomas Young
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML16340B011 List:
References
50-275-80-11, NUDOCS 8006060084
Download: ML16340B010 (6)


See also: IR 05000275/1980011

Text

QlY

i b80

U. S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE

OF

INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION

V

Report

No.

50-275/80-11

Docket No.

License

No.

Safeguards

Group

Licensee:

Pacific Gas

and Electric Company

77 Scale Street

San Francisco,

California 94106

'I'! <<!<<!

!

!

<< lpga

--

<<!'

<<

Facility Name:

Inspection at:

Inspection

condu

ed:

Ap

Inspectors:

Tolbert Young Jr.

esident

r Inspector

Dat

Signed

gate Signed

Diablo Canyon Unit 1

Diablo Canyon Si.te,

San Luis Obispo County, California

<<!

Approved by:

Summary:

D. H. Sternberg, Chi~~c or Projects Section t

Date Signed

<<

!"VP

<<

!

Ins ection of A ril 1-25

1980

Re ort 50-275/80-11

Areas Ins ected:

Routine inspection of preoperational

testing, plant

tour, fire protection/prevention,

operator training and witnessing of

testing in progress.

This inspection involved 101 inspector<<hours

onsite by one

NRC resident inspector.

Results:

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

soosos~>sg

IE:Y Form 219 (2)

0

r

l

DETAII.S

1.

Persons

Contacted

  • R. D, Ramsay,

Plant Superintendent

R.

D. Etzler, Project Superintendent

N. Norem, Resident

Startup Engineer

  • C. M. Seward,

Acting QA Supervisor

+J.

S.

Diamonon,

QC Supervisor

"<J. M. Gisclon,

Power Plant Engineer

  • D. A. Backons,

Supervisor of Maintenance

  • R. Patterson,

Supervisor of Operations

The inspector also talked with and interviewed

a number of other licensee

employees

including members of general construction,

the operations staff

and

QA personnel.

  • Denotes those attending

the exit interview.

2.

Fire Protection/Prevention

The control room and the cable spreading

rooms were inspected.

The fire

alarm, extinguishing equipment,

actuating controls

and fire fighting

equipment were verified to be operable

in the cable spreading

rooms

and

25%

of the balance of the plant.

The new cable penetration

seal material

was

verified not to be flammable.

No items of noncompliance

or deviations

were identified.

3.

Plant Tour

The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on a weekly

basis

to observe activities in progress;

to inspect

the general state of

cleanliness,

housekeeping

and adherence

to fire protection rules; to check

the proper approval of "man on the line, caution and clearance"

tags

on

equipment,

and to review with operation personnel

the status of various

systems

in the plant.

The inspector noted that the status of the systems

and the housekeeping

appeared

consistent with construction activities.

The reactor cavity is

still being maintained as a clean area and extra personnel

are still assigned

to

cleanup

crews.

Cleanliness

and housekeeping

of the plant is still improving.

No items of noncompliance

or deviations

were identified.

0

-2-

4.

Operator Trainin

The operations division is continuing their intensive retraining program for

the operators

to include two weeks at the Westinghouse

simulator.

The inspector

has monitored

some of these

classes

and will monitor more

classes

throughout the training program.

No items of noncompliance or deviations

were identified.

5.

Preo erational Testin

a.

Portions of the followingtests were witnessed

by the inspector:

17.2A1

34.1

18.1A6

Reflush intake cooler pumps

Fuel transfer

system functional test

Reflush parts of firewater system

b.

While witnessing the above testing (in some tests only parts of the tests

were being performed or redone),

the inspector verified that the

procedures

were technically adequate;

the latest revt,sions

were available

and approved;

the overall crew performance

was adequate

and, in the case

of completed tests,

the acceptance criteria were met.

Administrative

controls for design change

and documentation

were .followed.

No items of noncompliance

or deviations

were identified.

6.

Administrative Procedure

AP

AP No. Cl "Design Changes"

was

examined to determine its conformance with

the FSAR, ANSI N45.2.11-1974,

ANSI N18.7-1976

and the proposed 'technical

specifications.

No items of noncompliance or deviations

were identified.

7.

Exit Interview

The inspector met with a senior licensee

representative

on a weekly basis

and with the representatives

denoted in Paragraph

1 on April 25,

1980.

The scope

and findings of the inspection were

summarized

by the inspector.

C