ML16340A791
| ML16340A791 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1980 |
| From: | Salzman R NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | Panetta L HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340A792 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002220273 | |
| Download: ML16340A791 (2) | |
Text
~ Rangy
~4 O
ce A.0O I
e p
re w+n +**++
~
~
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMICSAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 January 25, 1980 The Honorable Leon E. Panetta United States House of Representatives 431 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D. C.
20515 r
j'in'cp+
Qo 5qe<~~~e, gj<<@4 p o'e:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company-(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant;= Units la2)
Docket'os.
50-275 OL and 50'-323 OL Dear Congressman Panetta:
Your letter of January 11, 1980 requesting that oral argument. in this case be held in San Luis Obispo, California, reached me today.
All the briefs in this case have not been filed.
For this reason, no final determination of the time and place for argument has been made.
As you may be aware, under Commission policy, "It is anticipated that oral argument
[before the Appeal Board] will be conducted in either Washington, D. C. or
- Bethesda, Md."
10 C.F.R. Part 2, App. A, SIX(e)
(1979 Rev. at page ill).
That policy is not inflexible, how-
- ever, and you may be assured that the factors pointed out in your letter respecting the place for argument will be weighed carefully before a final determination is made.
Sincerely, cc:
All parties Richard S.
- Salzman, t hairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board for the Di'ablo
'~an on proceeding 80082 po %75
I