ML16340A390
| ML16340A390 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1979 |
| From: | Sternberg D, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340A391 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-79-02, 50-275-79-2, NUDOCS 7903210207 | |
| Download: ML16340A390 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000275/1979002
Text
Report
No
50-275/79-02
U ~ S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO>MISSION
OFFICE
OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCE)'KiVT
REGIOiV V
Docket No.
cense
No
CPPR-39
Pacific Gas
and Electric Company
77 Beal e Str eet
San Francisco,
94106
Safeguards
Group
Facility Name:
Inspection at:
Diablo Canyon Unit
1
Diablo Canyon Site,
San Luis Obispo County, California
Inspection
co
ucted:
January'I'1-31,
1979
Inspectors:
T. Young, Jr.,
Residen
ea tor Inspector
ate Signed
Date Signed
Approved By:
Summary:
D. N. Sternberg,
Chief',
eactor Projects
Section
1
Reactor Operations
and Nuclear Support
Branch
Date Signed
Date Signed
Ins ection on Januar
1-31,
1979
Re ort No. 50-275/79-02
A~d:
p
i
tp
p
i
I
i .fi
prevention/protection,
environmental
protection, plant tour and witnessing
of testing in progress.
This inspection
involved
98 inspector-hours
onsite
by one
NRC resident inspector.
lt
Results:
No items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
790321,otic
7
RV Form 219(2)
'0
(~%
'
"." >XSlG()89
DETAILS
1.
Persons
Contacted
- R. D. Ramsay,
Plant Superintendent
R.
D. Etzler. Project Superintendent
- M. N. Norem, Resident Startup
Engineer
- M. E. Leppke, g.A. Supervisor
- J. S.
Diamonon, g.C. Supervisor
- R. Patterson,
Supervisor of Operations
- D. A. Backons,
Supervisor of Maintenance
J.
M. Gisclon,
Power Plant Engineer
'The inspector also talked with and interviewed
a number of other
licensee
employees,
including members of general
construction,
the
operations staff and g.A. organization
personnel.
- Denotes those attending
the exit interview.
2.
~0
Mr. Warren
Raymond is replacing Mr. Russell
llischow as director of
quality assurance
effective February 1, 1979.
3.
Fire Protection/Prevention
The control
room and the cable spreading
rooms were inspected.
The
fire alarm, extinguishing
equipment,
actuating controls
and fire
. fighting equipment were verified to be operable in the cable spreading
rooms
and 2N of the balance of the plant.
The modification of
cable penetration
seal material
was verified not to be flammable.
No items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
4.
Environmental
Protection
The inspector verified by direct observation that all of the air
particulate
and charcoal filter sampling stations
as described
in
the'SAR are installed
and operating.
The air particulate
samples
are routinely collected
on
a weekly basis
and the film badges
and
TLD measurements
are
made
on
a monthly basis.
No items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
'
5.
Plant Tour
The inspector walked through various areas of the plant on
a weekly
basis
to observe activities in progress;
to inspect the general
state of cleanliness,
housekeeping
and adherence
to fire protection
rules; to check the proper approval of "Han on the Line, Caution
and Clearance"
tags
on equipment;
and to review with operators
the
status of various
systems
in the plant.
The inspector
noted that the status of the systems
and the house-
keeping
appeared
consistent with construction activities.
iso items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
6.
Preo erational
Testin
a ~
Portions of the following tests
were witnessed
by the inspector:
8. 3. 3.
Boron Addition and Control
23. 3
24. 3
25. 6
Preoperational
Testing of Auxiliary and
Fuel Handling Building Ventilation
Purge
Gaseous
Radwaste
Containment
Class
I Instrument Air Per-
formance Demonstration
37.10
21.2 A-1
Steam
Dump Performance
Demonstiation
Reflush Diesel
Fuel Oil System Lines
b.
While witnessing
the above testing (in some tests only parts
of the tests
were being performed or redone),
the inspector
verified that the procedures
were technically adequate;
the
latest revisions
were available
and approved;
the overall
crew
performance
was adequate
and, in the case of completed tests,
the acceptance criteria were met.
Administrative controls for
design
change
and documentation
were followed.
No items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
'
-3-
c.
~Re ulator
Guide 1.68.2
(50-275/78-14)(Closed)
The licensee is planning to demon-
strate
the
new requirements
of this guide
(Paragraph
C.4)
"Cold Shutdown Demonstration"
during system verification
testing.
A procedure
has
been written and currently is in
draft form.
This item is considered
closed.
Ho items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
7.
Exit Interview
The inspector
met with.a senior licensee
representative
on
a weekly
basis
and with the representatives
denoted
in Paragraph
1 on the
last friday in the month on January
26,
1979.
The scope
and
findings of the inspection
were summarized
by the inspector.
0
'0