ML16336A160

After Action Report/Improvement Plan for Medical Services and Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station Drill on 09/15/2016

ML16336A160
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	11/01/2016
From:	US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	NRC Region 4
Shared Package
ML16336A156	List: ML16313A064 ML16336A160
References
Download: ML16336A160 (28)

Text

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I After Action Report/Improvement Plan I

Drill Date: September 15 - 16, 2016 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I

I Published: November 1, 2016 I

I

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Table of Contents Page I

Contents I

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 4 I Section 1: Exercise Overview ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Exercise Details ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ....................................................................... 5 I 1.3 Participating Organizations ...................................................................................... 6 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ................................................................................... 7 I 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities, and Activities .................................................... 7 2.3 Scenario Summary........................................................................................ *........... 7 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities ................................................................................................... 8 I 3 .1 Exercise Evaluation and Results .............................................................................. 8 3.2 Summary Results of Drill Evaluation ...................................................................... 8 3 .3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries ............................................................................. 1O I 3.3.1 RiskJurisdictions ................................................................................................ 10 3.3.2 Support Jurisdictions .......................................................................................... 11 3.3.3 PrivateJurisdictions ............... *............................................................................. 14 I Section 4: Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix A: Improvement Plan ...................................................................................................... 16 Appendix B: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders ..................................................................... 17 I Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................... 18 Appendix D: Extent-of-Play Agreement and Scenarios ................................................................. 19 I

I I

I I

I 3

I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I

Executive Summary I

I On September 15 and 16, 2016, out of sequence drills (Medical Services and Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station) were conducted forthe Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (Waterford 3), located near Taft, St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Personnel from I

the U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) Region VI, evaluated all activities. The purpose of the drills was to assess the I

level of preparedness oflocal responders to react to a simulated radiol9gical emergency at Waterford 3. The previous exercise at this site was a Hostile Action Based exercise conducted I on June 24, 2015.

Personnel from the State of Louisiana, Waterford 3, West Jefferson Medical Center, St. Charles I

Parish Hospital Emergency Medical Services, KennerFire Department, and Kenner Police Department participated in the drills. Evaluation areas demonstrated included: Emergency I

Operations/Facilities, Protective Action Implementation, and Support Operations/Facilities.

Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants was evident during the drills and DHS/FEMA I wishes to acknowledge these efforts.

This report contains the final evaluation of the out of sequence drills. The participants I

demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and adequately demonstrated them. There were no Level 1 Findings identified. Four Level 2 Findings were I

observed and corrected on the spot. In addition, one Plan Issue was identified as a result of the drills. I I

I I

I I

4 I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Section 1: Exercise Overview I 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name I 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP)

Program Evaluated Exercise I Type of Exercise Drill I Exercise Date(s)

September 15 and 16, 2016 I Program Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Federal Emergency Management Agency I (FEMA) REP Program Scenario Type I Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership I

Nan Williams I RAC Chair FEMA Region VI 800 N. Loop 288 I Denton, Texas 76209 940-898-5398 Nan.Calhoun@fema.dhs.gov I

Linda Gee I Federal Evaluation Team Lead FEMA Region VI Technological Hazards Branch I 800 N. Loop 288 Denton, Texas, 76209 940-898-5368 I Linda.Gee@fema.dhs.gov I

5 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Toni Booker I

State Planning Team Lead Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Scientist Supervisor I

602 N. Fifth Street Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 225-219-3627 I

Toni.Booker@la.gov Donald Vincent I

Utility Planning Team Lead Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Senior Emergency Planner I

172265 River Rd Killona, Louisiana 70057 504-739-6406 I

Dvincent2@entergy.com I

1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the followingjurisdictions participated in the 2016 I

Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station drills:

State Jurisdictions:

I Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Jurisdictions:

• I St. Charles Parish Ambulance Service Support Jurisdictions:

Kenner Fire Department I Kenner Police Department Private Organizations:

West Jefferson Medical Center I I

I I

I 6

I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Section 2: Exercise Design Summary I 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design The DHS/FEMA Region VI Office evaluated drills conducted on September 15 and I 16, 2016 were to assess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Procedures I to. protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving Waterford 3. The purpose of this report is to present the results and findings on I the performance of the offsite response organizations during a simulated radiological emergency.

I 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities, and Activit~es I Exercise objectives and identified Capabilities/REP Criteria selected to be exercised are discussed in the Exercise Plan, Appendix D.

I I 2.3 Scenario Summary I The drill scenarios were developed to evaluate the response of drill participants to an incident requiring evacuation of the public from the Emergency Planning Zone surrounding Waterford 3. The scenarios provided for an out of sequence Emergency I Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station drill and an out of sequence Medical Services drill.

I The Medical Services drill was developed to evaluate the response of drill participants I to an* incident at Waterford 3 requiring the transportation, treatment, and d.econtamination of a radiologically contaminated injured individual. The medical I services drill scenario provided for the evaluation of West Jefferson Medical Center and St. Charles Parish Hospital Emergency Medical Services.

I Additionally, a scenario was provided for evaluation of the Kenner Fire Department's Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station's ability to conduct I

7 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I

monitoring, decontamination, and registration for emergency workers and their I'

vehicles and equipment.

I I Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results I,

This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the September 15 and 16, 2016 evaluated drills to test the offsite I

emergency response capabilities of local governments in the Emergency Planning Zone surrounding Waterford 3. I Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on their demonstration of Capabilities and their equivalent REP criteria as delineated in the FEMA REP Program Manual dated January 2016.

I 3.2 Summary Results of Drill Evaluation I The matrix presented in the table on the following page presents the status of all exercise evaluation area criteria which were scheduled for demonstration during these I

drills by all participating junsdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status is indicated by the use of the following I letters:

M- Met (No Levell or Level 2 Findings assessed, and no unresolved ARCAs from I

prior exercise) 1- Levell Finding(s); formerly Deficiency assessed I

2 - Level 2 Finding(s); formerly area requiring corrective action assessed or an I

unresolved Level 2 Finding from a prior drill or exercise P - Plan Issue I

I I

I 8

I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Table 3.2 - Summary of Drill Evaluation I DATE: September 15-16, 2016 (/]

~

(/]

Cl SITE: Waterford 3 ~ ~

I M: Met, 1: Level I Finding, 2: Level 2 Finding, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated u

~ u =

<!.)

o:l

...c:

~

~

<!.)

=

<!.)

~ cil ~

'*I Emergency Operations Management Alert and Mobilization Facilities Direction and Control

!al

!bl lei Communications Equipment !di Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations !el M M M I P~otectiveActioil Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control Dose Assessment & P ARs & P ADs for the Emergency Event 2al 2bl I Dose Assessment & P ARs & P ADs for the Emergency Event PADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 2b2 2cl Radiological Assessment and Decision-making for the Ingestion I

2dl Exposure Pathway Radiological Assessment & Decision-making Concerning Post-Plume 2el Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return P;otective Action implembnt~tion

• I Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized Individuals and the 3al M M M 3bl Public I Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and access/functional needs 3cl Implementation of Protective Actions for persons with disabilities and 3c2 I access/functional needs Implementation of Traffic and Access Control Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl 3d2 Implementation oflngestion Pathway Decisions 3el Implementation oflngestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation of Post-Plume Phase Relocation, Reentry, and Return 3fl Decisions c

Field Measurement and Analysis RESERVED 4al Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling Laboratory Operations 4a3 4bl 4cl I Emergency,Notificatioµ and Public Info -

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System RESERVED Sal 5a2 I

Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System 5a3 9

I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification Svstem 5a4 I

S~rmortOp\)rations/Fa.cilities * ' .. ..

~ .

I Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring & Decontamination 6bl p Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport & Care 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 6dl M M I

3.3.1 RiskJurisdictions I 3.3.1.1 St. Charles Parish Hospital Emergency Medical Services I

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows: a. MET: 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.d.1 I

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: 3.a.1 I ISSUE NO.: 70-16-3al-L2-01 I CRITERION: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans/procedures. I Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI to emergency workers. I CONDITION: Emergency workers were unsure of how to tum on the Dosicard Electronic Alarming Dosimeter (EAD) issued during the drill. They had been trained on the use of a pencil I dosimeter prior to the drill.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Introducing new dosimetry equipment into the field without prior training for emergency workers.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.3.a, b; K.4 REP Program Manual, Part III, Assessment Area 3, Criterion 3.a.1 St. Charles Parish Hospital Policy & Procedure Manual (7/2016)

I EFFECT: Emergency workers could have been at risk of excess radiation exposure, potentially causing serious health issues, and making them unaware of the need to remove themselves from the area and/or event.

I CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: A timeout was called and training was I 10 I

I Unclassified

• Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I conducted for the emergency workers (EWs). The EWs turned on their Dosicard and reported the readings to the Control Point Attendant.

I d.

e.

PLAN ISSUES: None NOTDEMONSTRATED: None

f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None I g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None I 3.3.2 SupportJurisdictions I 3.3.2.1 Kenner Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

I a. MET: 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.b.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None I c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: 6.b. l ISSUE NO.: 70-16-6bl-L2-02 I CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

I CONDITION: At the Vehicle Monitoring Station, via inject (Cue Card 2B), contamination was found on the driver's side front wheel. The EW reported the contamination but did not take note I that the survey meter had pegged out and did not change the scale from x 0.1 to x 1.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Insufficient training on survey meter use.

I

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b REP Program Manual, Part III, Assessment Area 6, Criterion 6.b. l I Kenner Decon Station Checklist 2 Vehicle Monitor, Rev. 5 (09/07 /16)

EFFECT: If survey meters are on the wrong scale, inaccurate readings could be interpreted as nq I contamination, placing a dirty vehicle in a clean vehicle lot and potentially spreading contamination.

I CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATION: A timeout was called and training conducted, and EWs demonstrated changing the meter scale accordingly and reported accurate readings.

I I

11 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I ISSUE NO.: 70-16-6bl-L2-03 I

CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

I CONDITION: Members of the Decontamination Team were unable to determine correct background readings. I POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Monitor performed the mathematical calculations on a differing scale incorrectly. I

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.~, b REP Program Manual, Part III, Assessment Area 6, Criterion 6.b. l Kenner Decon Station Checklist 4 Decontamination Monitor, Rev. 5 (09/07/16)

I EFFECT: Incorrect readings that were lower than the actual readings were used. This miscalculation could cause contamination to go undetected leading to the spread of I

contamination and increase in exposures to the EW and others.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATION: A timeout was called and retraining I

conducted. The team member then demonstrated the proper way to read the survey meter.

I ISSUE NO.: 70-16-6bl-L2-04 CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring I

and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

CONDITION: After surveying the contaminated EW, the Personnel Monitoring Recorder I

placed the Personnel Contamination Report Form into the same plastic bag that held the EW's personal belongings. I POSSIBLE CAUSE: Insufficient training on contamination control.

I

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b REP Program Manual, Part III, Assessment Area 6, Criterion 6.b. l Kenner Decon Station Checklist 3 Personnel Monitor, Rev. 5 (09/07 /16) I EFFECT: The EW' s personal belongings were contaminated, the Personnel Contamination Report Form would also be contaminated. Contamination could be spread to other areas outside I of the decontamination area upon removal of the Personnel Contamination Report Form from the plastic bag.

I CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATION: A timeout was called and retraining conducted. The Team Member then correctly demonstrated this in accordance to their I

12 I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I checklist.

I d. PLAN ISSUES: 6.b.l ISSUE NO.: 70-16-6bl-P-05 I CRITERION: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

I COND'rTION: Plans and procedures do not specifically address what to do with personal items during the decontamination process.

I POSSIBLE CAUSE: The procedure needs to provide a specific process for removal, contamination survey, decontamination (if needed), tracking, and disposition of personal items.

I

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b I REP Program Manual, Part III, Assessment Area 6, Criterion 6.b.1 Kenner Decon Station Checklist 3 Personnel Monitor, Rev. 5 (09/07 /16)

I EFFECT: Lack of instructions in plans and procedures on the proper way to process personal items could lead to further spread of contamination to the emergency worker or evacuee if I personal items are not properly processed for contamination and decontaminated prior to return to the evacuee.

I RECOMMENDATION: Currently procedures contain instructions to remove, bag and mark personal items, but do not address monitoring items for contamination, specific method to track personal items, and disposition of personal items. Update plans and procedures to I address how personal items will be surveyed for contamination, decontaminated (if appropriate), tracked and returned to individuals once assured that they are free of contamination.

I e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None I g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None I

I I

13

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I 3.3.3 Private Jurisdictions I

3.3.2.2 West Jefferson Medical Center I In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.d.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None I

c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None I

f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

14 I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report/Improvement Plan 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station I Section 4: Conclusion I Based on the results of the drill, the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the State of Louisiana and the affected local jurisdictions are deemed adequate I to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. Therefore, 44 CFR Part 350 approval of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the State of I Louisiana site-specific to Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station will remain in effect.

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

15 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I

Appendix A: Improvement Plan I ISSUE NUMBER: 70-l6-6b 1-P05~ *

• Ctiteridn:. 6bL

• I CONDITION: The Kenner Fire Department Decon Station (Rev. 9) plans and procedures do ot specifically address what to do with personal items during the decontamination process. I RECOMMENDATION: Currently procedures contain instructions to remove, bag and mark personal items, but do not address monitoring items for contamination, specific method to track personal items, and disposition of personal items. Update plans and procedures to address I

how personal items will be surveyed for contamination, decontaminated (if appropriate),

tracked and returned to individuals once assured that they are free of contamination.

I CORRECTIVEACTIONDESCRIPTION: The Kenner Fire Department will incorporate segregation and survey procedures for personal items into the written procedures.

I PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

START DATE: I AGENCYPOC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 16 I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I Appendix B: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders I Chair: Nan Williams Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)

Section Chief: Denise Bordelon Site Specialist: Linda Gee I

',.:. :: ; ,;-* ~. *,:, ~*~'. '

I St. Charles Parish Hospital Emergency Medical Services Elsa Lopez FEMA RVI

• Linda Gee FEMA RVI I Kenner Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station imPflieger lsaLopez FEMARVI FEMARVI FEMARVI

• Linda Gee I West Jefferson Medical Center Linda Gee FEMARVI

• Tim Pflieger FEMARVI I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 17 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations I Acronym Meaning AAR After Action Report I I

CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS CPA Department of Homeland Security Control Point Attendant I

CPM DRD Counts Per Minute Direct Reading Dosimeter I

EAD EMS Electronic Alarming Dosimeter Emergency Medical Services I EOC Emergency Operations Center EW EWMDS Emergency Worker Emergency Worker and Vehicle Monitoring and I

EPZ Decontamination Station Emergency Planning Zone I

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency KFD Kenner Fire Department I KI Potassium Iodide mR MS-1 Milhroentgens Medical Services Drill I

NUREG-0654/

FEMAREP.-1 NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteriafor Preparation and Evaluation ofRadiological Emergency I Response Plans and Preparedness in Support ofNuclear OIC Power Plants," November 1980 Officer in Charge I

OSL Optically Stimulated Luminescent PRD R

Permanent Record Dosimeter Roentgen I

REA REP Radiation Emergency Area Radiological Emergency Preparedness I

RSO TLD Radiation Safety Officer Thermoluminescent Dosimeter I I

I 18 I

I WATERFORD 3 2016 OUT OF SEQUENCE EVALUATION MS1 & EWMDS SEPTEMBER 15 & 16, 2016 I Appendix D: Extent-of-Play Agreement and Scenarios I

WATERFORD 3 STEAM I

ELECTRIC STATION 2016 I OFFSITE DRILLS I

I September 15 & 16, 2016 I

I Evaluated Organizations I WEST JEFFERSON MEDICAL CENTER I ST CHARLES PARISH AMBULANCE SERVICE I KENNER FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY WORKER MONITORING AND DECONTAMINATION STATION I

I I

I I

I I

WATERFORD 3 2016 OUT OF SEQUENCE EVALUATION MS1 & EWMDS SEPTEMBER 15 & 16, 2016 I

TABLE OF CONTENTS I PAGE I Table of Contents I. Introduction 4 I

II.

Ill.

Extent of Play Objectives 5

9 I

IV. Guidelines A1;u;~endices 10 I

A West Jefferson Medical Center and St Charles Ambulance Service 11 I (A)V Narrative Summary 12 I (A)VI Sequence of Events 13 (A)Vll Cue Cards 14 I

B Kenner Fire Department Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station 49

• I (B)V (B)VI Narrative Summary Sequence of Events 50 50 I

c (B)Vll Cue Cards Charts, Graphs, and Tables 51 67 I

D Drill Team Assignments 68 I E Drill Team Instructions 69 F References 70 I I

I I

I I

I WATERFORD 3 2016 OUT OF SEQUENCE EVALUATION MS1 & EWMDS SEPTEMBER 15 & 16, 2016

'\

I I I. INTRODUCTION I In the interest of assuring the health and safety of the general public near the

. Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station, in the event of a radiological emergency, Waterford 3 periodically conducts drills jointly with the Federal, State and local I agencies.

This manual contains the scenario of activities and supporting data describing I the Waterford 3 Emergency Preparedness Medical Services, and Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station drills.

This scenario was developed by postulating events .that will require response by I offsite organizations.

I, During this drill, the support organizations will respond to the simulated events and conditions that have been selected to provide the level of activity necessary to meet the scenario objectives.

I City of Kenner Fire Department, West Jefferson Medical Center, and St Charles Parish Ambulance will participate in this drill.

I Drill participants will have no prior knowledge of the sequence of events. The drill scenario will allow those individuals and agencies assigned to respond during a radiological emergency to demonstrate their performance according to I current emergency preparedness plans and procedures.

I The scenario is a mechanism by which selected drill controllers will initiate and evaluate the activities of the drill participants. The individual drills will be initiated as shown below and each are expected to last approximately three hours.

I Participating organizations are shown in Section IV, Guidelines, of this manual.

I A. SCHEDULE

1. Thursday September 15, 2016 ii 2.

08:00 am West Jefferson Medical Center Friday September 16, 2016 I 07:30 am Kenner Fire Department Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Station I

I I

WATERFORD 3 2016 OUT OF SEQUENCE EVALUATION MS1 & EWMDS SEPTEMBER 15 & 16, 2016 I

II. EXTENT OF PLAY I

A. EVALUATION AREA 1: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS I

• MANAGEMENT Sub-Element 1.e - Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations I Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, potassium iodide (Kl) and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations_. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, H.7, 10; 1.7, 8, 9; J.10.a, b, I

e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)

1. Locations I

Jefferson Medical Center, St Charles Parish Ambulance, and Kenner Fire Department EWMDS I

2. Extent of Play Correction-on-the-spot will be conducted at these locations at the I

discretion of and concurrence between the evaluator and the controller. Caution should be exercised to insure that exercise play is not interrupted.

I

3. ARCAs I

None B. EVALUATION AREA 3: PROTECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION I Sub-Element 3.a - Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control I Criterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans and procedures. Emergency workers I

periodically and at the end of each mission read .their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart.

(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, J.1 O.e; K.3.a, b; K.4)

I

1. Locations I

Jefferson Medical Center, St Charles Parish Ambulance, and 2.

Kenner Fire Department EWMDS Extent of Play I

a. Area dosimetry may be used at the EWMDS, and hospital. I I

I

I WATERFORD 3 2016 OUT OF SEQUENCE EVALUATION MS1 & EWMDS SEPTEMBER 15 & 16, 2016 I

I b. Correction on the spot, at the discretion of and concurrence between the evaluator and the controller, may be acceptable at these locations.

I 3. ARCAs I None C. EVALUATION AREA 6: SUPPORT OPERATIONS/FACILITIES I Sub-element 6.b - Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency Workers and their Equipment and Vehicles I Criterion 6.b.1: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and I their equipment and vehicles. (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, K.5.a, b)

1. Locations I Kenner Fire Department

2. Extent of Play I a. Participants will be pre-staged at or near the EWMDS I b. Per the REP Manual, a minimum of two emergency workers

• need to be monitored. Two people will simulate workers for I the demonstration. One monitoring ~tation will be set up and the two workers processed. One ofthe two will be simulated contaminated. One monitoring station for contaminated.

,I I

emergency workers will be set up and the contaminated individual will be processed to the decontamination station.

Decontamination will be evaluated by demonstration and furt I her discussion.

c. Correction-on-the-spot will be considered at these locations

I at the discretion of and concurrence between the evaluator and the controller. Caution should be exercised to insure that exercise play is not interrupted.

I 3. ARCAs I None I Sub-Element 6.d - Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I Criterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO ha_s the appropriate space, adequate I

resources and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination and medical services to contaminated injured individuals.

(NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, F.2; H.1 O; K.5.a, b; L.1, 4)

I

1. Locations I!

St Charles EMS, West Jefferson Medical Center

2. Extent of Play I a

Attachment J -Aeromedical Transportation of Radioactively Contaminated Patient of Radiation Accident Plan will remain in place since this procedure is applicable to the patient transportation from I

utility. However, Louisiana Peacetime Radiological Response Plan does not include the use of Ochsner Flight Care and it will not be demonstrated.

I

a. All surgical procedures, X-rays, blood samples, starting of IV's, etc., will be simulated.

I

b. Ambulance travel times will be simulated.

I

c. Ambulance will be pre-staged at a location where simulated d.

contaminated patient loading will be demonstrated.

The lead controller initiates the drill by contacting the St I

Charles Ambulance Service and reporting a contaminated evacuee at the St Charles Parish West Bank Bridge Park I (simulated location).

i. Simulated contaminated patient will be loaded into the ambulance and transported to the West Jefferson I

ii.

Medical Center REA.

If for some reason, the EMS unit is called into service I

in response to an actual event, the patient transportation will take place using an alternate vehicle. I

e. West Jefferson Medical Center will be contacted by ambulance crew reporting a contaminated, injured evacuee at the St Charles Parish West Bank Bridge Park being I

transported to their location.

i. The simulated estimated time of arrival (ETA) will I allow the hospital to completely mobilize u

I:

8 1;

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I IV. GUIDELINES To define the scope and extent of participation by organizations and participants, I the following guidelines are established in order to meet the objectives listed in Section 111 of this manual.

1. The offsite drills will be conducted as follows:

I a) September 15, 2016 (1) Medical Drill I b) September 16, 2016 (1) Emergency Worker Monitoring and I 2.

Decontamination Station Participation is limited to St Charles Parish Ambulance Service Staff, West Jefferson Medical Center Emergency Room Staff, and Kenner Fire I Department and the Drill Control Team. No Waterford 3 plant staff will participate.

I 3.

4.

All communications are preceded and ended with "THIS IS A DRILL."

A critique is conducted immediately following the termination of the drill.

I 5. Drill specific guidelines will be addressed in their individual appendices.

I I

I I

I I

I I

9 I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I I

(A)V. NARRATIVE

SUMMARY

An evacuee is injured in a motor vehicle accident and has been transported by relatives to the West Bank Bridge Park. The evacuee has been surveyed by I

members of the Parish staff and has been found to be contaminated. St Charles Ambulance Service was requested to provide treatment and transportation of a contaminated patient to the West Jefferson Medical Center for treatment.

11 The Drill Control Team simulates first aid. I At approximately 07:45, the St Charles Ambulance Service is (simulated) dispatched to the patient location. I*

At 08:00, the Drill Control Team calls the West Jefferson Medical Center to report the simulated medical emergency. The initial advisement to the

(

I ambulance has been that there is an injured individual located at the West Bank Bridge Park who is radiologically contaminated due to a radiological release from Waterford-3. I Once the ambulance arrives, the individual should be medically evaluated. A turnover (from the controller) of the radiological status will be provided to the I ambulance personnel. As medical treatment and patient transport continue, contamination control measures should proceed. The ambulance personnel should communicate with WJMC upon their departure from the simulated I

- West Bank Bridge. Park which should include medical and radiological information as well as an ETA (estimated time of arrival). ~I The EMTs will provide radio updates to WJMC during simulated transportation of the patient. I At approximately 08:30, the ambulance will arrive at WJMC. The patient will be taken into the REA, decontaminated and treated for the simulated injuries. After the patient has been removed from the REA and the proper removal of I

protective clothing has been demonstrated, the medical drill will be terminated.

A critique of the events will be conducted. I Any required x-rays or required samples may be simulated by hospital personnel after demonstrating knowledge of requirements and processes. I I

I 10 I

II I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I APPENDIX D - DRILL TEAM ASSIGNMENTS I A. West Jefferson Medical Center MS-1 I Lead Controller - TBD I Patient Transfer Controller- TBD REA Controller- TBD I Mobilization/Buffer Zone Controller- TBD I

B. Kenner Fire Department Emergency Worker Monitoring and I Decontamination Station

,I I

Lead Controller- TBD ii Vehicle Monitoring Controller - TBD Personnel Monitoring Controller- TBD Decontamination I Controller- TBD I

I II I

I

)

I I

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I APPENDIX E - DRILL TEAM INSTRUCTIONS A. All Drill Control Team members for the Offsite Drill will be briefed by I

B.

the Lead Controller prior to conducting the drill.

All Drill Control Team members will report as follows:

I

1. West Jefferson Medical Center

a. 07:30 am September 15, 2016 I

2. Kenner Fire Department EWMDS

b. 07:00 am September 16, 20016 I C. All Drill Control Team members will take accurate, complete notes of D.

the activities observed during the drill.

The Drill Control Team will conduct a critique of the drill, with I

the participants, immediately following the termination of the drill. I E. The Drill Control Team members will debrief with the Lead Controller after returning to the Waterford 3 plant site.

I

• I I

I I

I I

I I

I 12 I

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2016 Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station Nuclear Station I APPENDIX F - REFERENCES A. Waterford 3 SES Emergency Plan I B.

C.

Waterford 3 Emergency Medical Assistance Plan NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support I of Nuclear Power Plants D. 2016 FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Manual I E. West Jefferson Medical Center, Decontamination and Treatment of Radioactively Contaminated Patient(s)

I F. Emergency Worker Mol)itoring and Decontamination Station Procedure I

I I

I I

I 1*

I*

I I

I 13 I