ML16266A149
| ML16266A149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1992 |
| From: | Matthews D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Taylor J BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-M81536, TAC-M81537, TAC-M81538, NUDOCS 9203310133 | |
| Download: ML16266A149 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES 0NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 March 25, 1992 Docket Nos.
50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 Mr. J. H. Taylor, Manager Licensing Services B&W Nuclear Technologies 3315 Old Forest Road P. 0. Box 10935 Lynchburg, Virginia 24506-0935
Dear Mr. Taylor:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 (TAC NOS. M81536/M81537/M81538)
By application and affidavit dated February 26, 1992, B&W Nuclear Technologies (BWNT) requested that the BWNT Technical Document No. 32-1174827-04, "Leak Rate of Rolled Orifice Plugs," dated September 4, 1991, be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.
BWNT stated that the submitted document contains information that is considered proprietary in accordance with the following criteria:
- a.
The use of the information by a competitor would decrease his expenditures, in time or resources, in designing, producing or marketing a similar product.
- b.
The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage to B&W.
- c.
The information reveals special aspects of a process, method, component or the like, the exclusive use of which results in a competitive advantage to B&W.
We have reviewed BWNT's application and the material based on the requirements and criteria of 10 CFR 2.790 and, on the basis of BWNT's statement, have 01 determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains aCK proprietary commercial information.
0oo Therefore, the proprietary information will be withheld from public disclosure m
In pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended.
"o Withholding from public disclosure shall not affect the right, if any, of o<
persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in c0:
this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have ign d the oacn.
appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. A. V. Carr, Esquire Mr. M. E. Patrick Duke Power Company Compliance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.
Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief Washington, DC 20005 Project Branch #3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Robert B. Borsum 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Babcock & Wilcox Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Nuclear Power Division Suite 525 Ms. Karen E. Long 1700 Rockville Pike Assistant Attorney General Rockville, Maryland 20852 North Carolina Department of Justice Manager, LIS P. 0. Box 629 NUS Corporation Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Mr. R. L. Gill, Jr.
Licensing Senior Resident Inspector Duke Power Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 1007 Route 2, Box 610 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Mr. 3. W. Hampton Regional Administrator, Region II Vice President, Oconee Site U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Duke Power Company 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 P. 0. Box 1439 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Office of Intergovernmental Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621
Mr. J. H. Taylor 2 -
March 25, 1992 If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC.
You should also understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
Sincerely, David B. Matthews, Director Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
Mr. J. H. Taylor 2 -
March 25, 1992 If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You should also understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
Sincerely,
/s/
David B. Matthews, Director Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page Distribution (Docket File/
D. Matthews NRC & Local PDRs OGC (MPSiemien)
PDII-3 R/F E. Jordan Oconee R/F ACRS (10)
S. Varga L. Reyes, RII G. Lainas L. Wiens L. Berry LA:PDII&3 PM I-3 OGC D: D 3
LBe y LWiens/rst MPSiemien DMattews 1 /92
//y/92 3 /?3192
/1'/92 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
A:0C0123.PRO