ML16251A098

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Part 21 - Potential Failure of Battery System Connections
ML16251A098
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Perry, Indian Point, Point Beach, Columbia, Surry, North Anna, San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 09/02/2016
From: Ross W
EnerSys
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
52216
Download: ML16251A098 (5)


Text

0910212016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report Pagel Part 21 (PAR) Event# 52216 Rep Org: ENERSYS Notification Date I Time: 09/01/2016 14:51 (EDT)

Supplier: ENERSYS Event Date I Time: 09/01/2016 (EDT)

Last Modification: 09/02/2016 Region: 1 Docket#:

City: READING Agreement State: Yes County: License#:

State: PA NRC Notified by: WILLIAM ROSS Notifications: RAY POWELL R1DO HQ Ops Officer: STEVEN VITTO JONATHAN BARTLEY R2DO Emergency Class: NON EMERGENCY BILLY DICKSON R3DO 10 CFR Section: GREG WARNICK R4DO 21,21(a)(2) INTERIM EVAL OF DEVIATION PART 21/50.55 REACTORS EMAIL PART 21 - POTENTIAL FAILURE OF BATTERY SYSTEM CONNECTIONS "This letter will serve as notification from Enersys to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission of an identified deviation in published literature information. The literature defines requirements for resistance in both cell to cell and cell to terminal connections in supplied battery systems. High connection resistance causes increased cell voltage drop and a potential failure to meet run time requirements.

"Internal investigation by Enersys confirms that no defects exist in systems tested before shipment to customer utilities as internal documented procedures define correct parameters. However, the potential of less than desired performance exists if the values noted in the literature are used during installation and test at utility sites.

"Enersys does not have the ability to evaluate if a defect exists at customer utilities so per the provisions of Part 21, notification is being made to both the Commission and affected Enersys customers."

POC: 800-538-3627 ext. 1974

  • *
  • UPDATE FROM WILLIAM ROSS TO STEVEN VITTO AT 1339 EDT on 09/02/2016 * * *

"The literature in question is the Enersys Safety, Storage, Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manual for Flooded Lead-Acid Batteries C, D, E, F and G, number US-FL-IOM-002 dated January 2007. The errors are located in Section 7.4.3.8c line 2. The current wording of' ... connection is more than 30 percent or 5 Mohms above the average .. .' should read 'connection is more than 10 percent or 5 micro-ohms, whichever is greater, above the average'."

0910212016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Report Page 2 Licensees affected are Dominion North Anna, Dominion Surry Nuclear Power Plant, Energy Northwest Columbia Generating Station, Entergy Nuclear Operations IP2, First Energy Beaver Valley NPP, NextEra Energy Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, and San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Notified R1 DO(Powell), R2DO (Bartley), R3DO (Dickson), R4DO (Warnick), and Part 21 Group via email.

SEP/02/2016/FR! 01:39 PM Quality FAX No. 610-208-1971 P. 001 EnerSys P.O. Box 14145 Reading, PA 19612 FAX TO: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-001 FAX No.: 301-816-5151 FROM: Enersys DATE: September 2, 2016 RE: Notification Follow-up As a follow-up from the letter of notification from Enersys dated August 31, 2016, attached please find a list of affected customers that will be notified and a copy of the letter for your information.

SEP/02/2016/FRI 01:40 PM Quality FAX No. 610-208-1971 P. 002 List of GN customers for Part 21 Customer Notification Letter Customer Entity Ship to Street Address City, State ZIP Brookhaven National Labs Brookhaven National Labs Upton, NY 11973-5000 Dominion North Anna 1022 Haley Dr Mineral, VA 23117 Dominion Surry Nuclear Power 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, VA 23883 Plant Edison Material Supply 14300 S. Mesa R.oad San Clemente, CA 92672 Energy Northwest Columbia 76 North Power Plant Loop Richland, WA 99354 Generating Station EnerSys De Mexico II S de RL de Ave Lopez Mateos 4210 Col. Casa San Nicolas De Los Garza, NL CV Blanca 66475 Mexico Enersys Hungary Ltd. H-2040 Budaors Gyar utca 2 Entergy Nuclear Operations IP2 450 Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511 First Energy Beaver Valley NPP Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077 NextEra Energy Point Beach 6590 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241 Nuclear Plant Perry Nuclear Power Plant 10 Center Road Perry, OH 44081 San Onofre Nuclear Generating 14300 S. Mesa Road San Clemente, CA 92672 Station State Nuclear Power Building 2, Tianlin Road 888 200233 Shanghai, PRC Engineering Corp. Ltd.

Westinghouse EJectric Company 1000 Westinghouse Drive, Build 6) Cranberry Township, PA Suite 653 16066

SEP/02/2016/FRI 01 :40 PM Quality FAX No. 610-208-1971 P. 003 EnerSys P.O. Box 14145 Reading, PA 1961.2-4145 800-538-3627 x 1974 Fax 61 Q..208*1971 email: bill.ros~@eogrs:is.com www.enersvs.com William R. Ross

~s Systems Manager August 31, 2016 Customer name Customer address

Dear Purchasing Manager,

This letter will serve as notification from Enersys of an identified deviation in published literature information. The literature defines requirements for resistance in both cell to cell and cell to terminal connections in supplied battery systems. High connection resistance causes in.creased cell voltage drop and potentially failure to meet nm time requirements.

The literature in question is the Enersys Safety, Storage, Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manual for Flooded Lead-Acid Batteries C, D, E, F and G, number US-FL-IOM-002 dated January 2007. The errors are located in Section 7.4.3.8c line 2. The current wording of" ... connection is more than 30% or 5 Mohms above the average ...

should read "connection is more than 10% or 5 micro-ohms, whichever is greater, above the average".

Internal investigation by Enersys indicates that no defects exist in systems tested before shipment to customer utilities as internal documented procedures define correct parameters. However, the potential ofless than desired performance exists if the values noted in the literature are used during installation and test at utility sites.

Enersys does not have the ability to evaluate if a defect exists at customer utilities so per the provisions of Part 21, notification is being made to potentially affected Enersys customers.

Please contact me with questions.

  • Regards, William Ross Cc: B. Furr, J. Lewis, J. Reber, S. Vechy, QA file