ML16207A657

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 to Updated Safety Analysis Report, Section 2.5.A, Figure 2.5.A.3-1 Through Figure 2.5.A.7-3A
ML16207A657
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/2016
From:
South Texas
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16207A547 List: ... further results
References
NOC-AE-16003371
Download: ML16207A657 (14)


Text

UFSAR Section 2.5.A

A' P."

I I

40 20

-20

-40

-so

-eo

-100

-120

-160

-lBO

?

-200

-220

-240 S IL TY SAND: DCNS' FlNE

- 260

?

-280 40 20

-20 t

A' ~~~

{

~

~

e.

A'"

t:!Q.Ili; I. JIS TERJ S!o:S 1*1 IIID ICI!.TE~IlS OE.lERHHIEO 9Y

~U:CTR:t;"' *:...

RESTSTtlf!TY U Jt:.

2.S1ANOAROSPL1TSrDDtlr£tr:::: -

TRATI!lN HST Bl.OH r;-('ll..:t:1S

~~g~:~~J lEFT SlOE OF (~II

3. SEE SECTION B-B *-e*

~'rc~iir~c~,~1~~~NG 1\\t()

40 4. lj ~~ lf~~ES I OT /IL DEI'it4

--60

--eo

-120

- 140

. -160

    • -180

-200

-220

-240

-260

-280 S. QESICtlt>R~Ioi A. t F. R TP- ~:. ~ rOR

'*~H~h i~~~~

~ r)lf IS C\\.E \\' 'l t I Otl

6. I'IEIIR Sl.l'lFIKE STR~TA ll.!"t IDENTlrfEO 9Y LElTE~S '. H*RU E HHtCH HIOIC/ITE.

STP.~C!.=l:J F'ROJECTLI'.'fEROESrGW'If!C'IS,

~Bot DESCRIPTION m POORLY - CRilOEOS,I'.t..: cSPt ISH SILTY!=iAJiil (SMI ITIIJ

[~G~~:.~ ~~r* VERT

~ :t'5ir:u~fA~i~~ I~~ 1~ I T CJ 0 ~~ :i/\\t~IOF H!l;ll SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 SOIL PROFILE FOR ECW PIPELINE ALONG SECTION A-A' -A" Figure 2.5.A.3-1 Revision 0

- 240

-260

-200 576E

?

Sl.l...ILt..L.l HARO HITH !ti Ll

'.~liS 8"

I 209

('..2&.J *

,!~;~i.Ei:'"~~ r\\J. 2-~:i:~

-eo

- tOO

- teo

- 200

-220

-240 tl!!I~SJ I.IISftRI'SICS I* IJNO(t"1(UNITS O::TER"JiiEOf'YE.l{CIAJCN.

qcSiill'IITYLOC:

Z- ~g~:,~~:~~~~n:

J.SEESECT101li-8' - B'"

FOR n'PICAl BEDOH£ MD 8"'CICFILLOE I.I'I IL$.

4.

TOit1DlCATES IOTALOEPTI-l

~ BOR Utc.

S. OESlC"(;Al)UtiiJ'ofMEA '"f'LEFOFI NORMAlCOUO!TIONISELEVA!J[J<4

  • Zlif£[T.MSl..
6. N£AASt.IH'AC£SIR,11TAME

!:~H~~!~~~~~:~L~7~~

~$J11QDL OESCRIPTIQH

[j POCRLT-CFf..'f.£0 SAHD (Sf'/

11m s.n.n Sill-() (SI'IJ llill :~~:;:~~:.';I* wE"'

EJ

~~B.ti\\H~~~~i~~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 TC

~ ~t~i ~ ~~i,~~~~('f HIGH CAT[C(JIIl'l AELIIHYEct:!<ISHY tiC ttl"' OF 114 JSEREI)JIM:OIO EQAT[l['I'Ail()H5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 SOIL PROFILE FOR ECW PIPELINE ALONG SECTION B-B'-B" Figure 2.5.A.3-2 Revision 0

~0 2 0

- 20

- 40

-eo

-100

- 120

-1 40

- 180

- 200

- 26 0

-280 12 1

'"-L.l'6..11 '

E 2'.9q:;,osJ tl 361.<117

?

?

100

__ N2GE /

105 EL.<'6.6' F.2. 9.25.02:0 H

J6 1. 86~

SJt TY TO $AN9~THC;j~~~"~~~ S£ AMS

? -

?

f0300' EL. -.?7J. 3' TDJOO'EL 250 El.

ZG.S '

E2. '345.!50 I~

l6Z, l OS 163 rL, zs.e*

(2.945. 370 u

J G.l -'522' r

2 39 20

~ <,~

~~'

6)

~-=~

tLill~.;

0

1. fi.STER I S¥.5 t
  • J tt:OtcAT E Ur<ITS g~~~~~ : ~~~,P.zngl !0:'~1 cf\\

2.

S l i' ~IDII;::'J SPL l T SP J~/ l PHt:-

- 20 i~~7 ~';~~~ ~ r ~ ~;,B§?;~ cg~~ ~~- ~c~

3. ~5~ ~~~g~~ ~~~~i~; ~ rllJ 8t\\CKF'I I.I tlf_ TP. l L.'i.

_40 4, 6 ~ ~ b~lfi~~f.S 10111:. CEPH I S. OES I~ r

~ROU~ IQWF1fP 11\\[IL[ F"OI'!

~g~:-o~~ F ~~~~J1 ~ 0' : 1'5 ELE V F1TIO~ I

-60 ~

  • 1 1

1~~ r i~~t~~~l~~~~~'t:~~ TI ~U E H~IIC H JtJO I CF11 i S JllUQARO PROJ I:C l' LII'I' !;R

~S:r::* J.II J i UI'lS, SOIL S YMBQ.I,__Q_<_g_R I PT! ON

-1 00~ £:;] PO~L 'f - CP.fi. Dt:J sn:;r; ISFI 1--

tml siL TY 51\\Kl 15 "11

~ fiiiH'ti~G~~.'~ ~~: ;. VFP.Y

- 120 ; El ~t8~B~tJ~A§~i; t9~ ~2~, TO

§ r_a,.rrs~ ~glivc~~~~~c~ HI GH

-1 40 ~

VERll CAlSC:AlE 50 IOC' I-IOFl:l ZOttt Al OISTPJ J C~ NOT t O SC~ L E

-180

- 200

- 22o SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

- 240 1 -2so L-280 UNITS 1 & 2 SOIL PROFILE FOR ECW PIPELINE ALONG SECTION (-C'-C" Figure 2.5.A.3-3 Revision 0

I

-- --w -

I 11' -o" ___..

r

-* -m--- ~ -*.

--r~ --- !j\\

--Tr--

~:tJ I

1:")
j; NIJ: TES.

l,

r. F ~l E R /11. U*II)VT f R(lM !;'.ROW ~ f,. ROO T, I NC.

OJlAto~IWi HO. 0 -V -O:'l'*O-Z, YfiRD - CIVT\\,

  • f"L IJT FLMI, t.. r LMH ARE/I. ElCCA'I"I\\TI ON OAT(() 7. JW'H 1'17:>

W I T~t PEV t 'ilf) ~ Of Zfi JIUr.UST l91'j,

(:,

AR(.t. TO U V( RIF J£() IN UN IT 1 ~Ill lH PP.[PAR£05111\\!.QIJEN TLY P.IJTP RIIJRJ')

(t},....,f ~ C I NG 11!1\\lf I("A I t nlt, SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 UNIT 1-WUNDATION VERIFICATION ZONES Figure 2.5.A.4-1 Revision 0

f-u w

J Zl.l'>

0 ow N

-z a:

1-o c.. ~

O::::N oz

(/) ~

3~

etC/)

01-

~c:(

W-

  • u 1-2 Ni:.:
r:::>>

t:O::

zw I-0

(/)

~

j i:j

~

~

~~~'!!QL.f.LAI!

E $ SE Pj~l:'t.,_g).Q.b!!:!...G___:! ot.TER OI~' H AA..ff.J?!fil.lj::~

E JCCAVATIOH PLMt (S'i( I'(T'U,L CO O LIN~ WA.l (R IN1_A:~l!,~~

APP.tOIQ.I.U.TtSCAlf.I'*

  • O'*

g

/

/

/

I

/

/

/

'y/

/ "

I

/

/

I

'\\.

I

\\.

/

/

/

/

/

NOTE:

Shaded area delineates Category slope construction and t he area to be foundation verified.

The entire ECP area is subject to geologic mapping (ref.

Section 2.5.BJ SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 ESSENTIAL COOLING POND FOUNDATION VERIFICATION ZONES Figure 2.5.A.4-3 Revision 0

~

,...,~,........

"'"'""""~"""'

1 -~ :~*-E1 -~....... ~

""':;\\~'\\ '

...., H

! ! ! ii

'\\. *,_,... :** '-,

hJ... I~

I~

'~~ '\\,

j] ~ tr

'"(\\}.}~,--~~~"'"

~"'i i

'\\~...,... ~-

~~

1**,, I I

"**~,~,~~:.~R~**".*, ! t :j. l

'"'-* '*~ *'\\* '* I

' ~--

','~,.. ~,...... '*,.,,,. i

\\, '*'..y -,_ *f-l !

-...,",~.......,*.; 'l 1,__,.,,,.,,,

'~~"~ *::-**.....

<:~.., '" '.,

--2:--

NOTE:

ea deli neates t~:pped.

Shaade~o a~e geologi cal l y are g;

~*~

II'**. 'll!':L:... 1 ":.~:.~::*.:.~:::":

~

G ENEIU,T O~

f.., ""'"'"'

UNIT 2 I [ ---- -

L_L

10 l1 u

Yer1f1eatioa

.,ploco I

z... n&47 far vns.tic:acioD I &rAev 1**l~c ~:'int 1'.. vlu I 1 o.un1ne ~:U

1;;t:!...:!r~'::!:t:::!~: tacauoa ta'

_I

+

l~:"ua!~!!.:::::!~ ~~c:c:.==,..~ ~~J j

fortUed MecMd.* o.t 'l'aedial accua ciewloped ud iapl...... cd.

I SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 VERIFICATION EVENT DIAGRAM Figure 2.5.A.4-6 Revision 0.

r-------~-------T--------~------~------~~

~------~------~------~------~----~0 00 0

0 0

0 0

CD 1.0

~

N

% '3:JN3lHIO:J:JO :10 A:JN3003H:I 31\\llV101HO:J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE VS. NORMALIZED SHEAR STRENGTH PLANT AREA Figure 2.5.A.7*1 Revisiono 1

II'\\

N

c 1-1.:1
o. ~

a:

N t; a:

z::

en ffi N

a:

Q z 9

~------._ ______._ ______ ~------~----~0 0

0 0

0 0

0 g

~

~

N

% '3:JN31Jlfn:J:JO ~0 A:IN3nU31J~ 3AilV1nWn:J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE liS. NORMALIZED SHEAR STRENGTH ECP AND P1PlNG AREA Figure 2.S.A.7*1A Revision 0

zz o2

-~

~<I(

<Co o-z~

H~

ow Ll..>

~

~~

UJz Ll-~0 o~o

,_ow;.~

_C:(/)Q..

~~<l<(UJ

~ La.ICDUa..

~

Z*I.!>>-UJ a:LLJtJ'lZI-a:!..

UJO..UJ-

>~

3:

~a:>-...1"

<(...J<ll--&

O>ctUJ-<(

0 2

...J~>IDULL.-td-

~

I 0

(1) 0 10 0

"¢ 0,.._

0

<..0 0

U")

0

'l::t 0

rf) 0 C\\1 0

~

~

0 C\\1 0

0 z

0 i=

<(

a:

w z w

CL

<( >

Q w N

i

<(

IE a:

0 z ox. '3:>N3t:n:mooo :10 AON3no3~:1 3AI..L'*:nnwno SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE VS.

NORMALIZED TVA PENETRATION FOR ALL LAYERS Figure 2.5.A.7-2 Revision 0

0 g 3

on

~

0 N..:

1-in z w c 2

a:

~

c c w

N

i on
E 9

a:

0 z 0 g on Ot d

g d

0 0

0 0

0

~

N

% '30N31:n:mooo :10 AON3n031::1:1 3i\\l.l't1nwno SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE VS. NORMALIZED DRY DENSITY PLANT AREA Figura 2.5.A.7*3 Revision 0

0

~

10 C\\1

~

~

0

~

10

\\

~e

-I-

!;(<"'

c~~

z~~

ICI:<n oww u...>a:

z c =

c 3

~

~

l)

~

z<n

~

~

<=!:!!

<;;o w::::l Cllj;

~

~

i :

~

oC 10 I Cl g z 0 g 10 01 \\

d 0

(])

l d

(])

0 0

0 0

10 ID

~

C\\1 0~

"':!:JN:IIIIIO:J:JO ~0 A:JN30U311~ 31\\UYIOIIO:J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE VS. NORMAUZEO DRY DENSITY ECP AND PIPING AREA

Figure 2.5.A.7*3A Revisiono