ML16207A635
Text
UFSAR Section 15.4
r L
<i. z o::-
w:E
- cO oz
- a. La..
~0 wz
..JO o-
=>t-z~
0::
TIME <SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18£ 2 NUCLEAR POWER TRANI ENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAl CONDITION fiGURE 15. 4-1 REVISION 5 e
L8771!1. 051
_j
- 1.
_q X :::>-
.8
_J...J LJ..<J:
z
.7
~---
<I:~
wo.6
- x:Z wLJ..
oD.5
<rz.4 O:o w_
>t-
.3
<ru w<r a:: a::.2 0~
u
.1 0
L 0
5 10 TIME 15 20 25 30
<SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18c 2 THERMAL FLUX TRANSIENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRJTJCAL CONDITION FIGURE 15. 4-2 REVIS_ION 5 e
L0771.051
_j
2200 w
2000 c.:>
t, 1600
<I w
....JO:
1400 w~
~...,_
U.<!
1200 a:
.,_w 00..
1000 O...L
<f>W 800 0
I 600 400 w
800 0::
~
t-*
750
<I 0::
w a..
700 L w t- -
au.
<I:.,
650
....J u
t-600 0 a..
(j')
550 0
I 500 L
- 0.
- 5.
0 5
- 10.
- 15.
- 20.
- 25.
- 30.
TIME <SECONDS>
10 15 20 25 30 TIME <SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 8c *2 FUEL AND CLAD TEMPERATURE TRANSIENTS FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAL CONDITION FIGURE 15.4-3 REVISI~ 5 e
tem.es1
_j
L 0 c:
.E 0
- z: -
0 0 c 1-4 1.2 0+-~L-~~~~~~-.-L~~J-,_~~~-.~~~~~
0 10 2Q 30 40 Time (Seconds) 1-4....---------------------------,
- E 1.2 0 :z:
0+-~~L-~~~~~-.~~~~--~~~--~-L~~~
0 10 20 JO Time (Seconds) 40 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT NUCLEAR POWER TRANSIENT & CORE HEAT FLUX TRANSIENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM FEEDBACK AND 3 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE FIGURE 15. 4-4 REVISION 12 U?J773. 121 L0773. CIT
L
~~--------------------------------------~--,
I., I I.
I I
o o
0 I
il:i 2200
,N
§
~
01 1--
~
a: 2.100-.................................................
~~------------~------------------------~--~
~
~
~
s
~
~ 21XXJ -......... ~....... - -
~......... ~..*.... *. ~... -. *.*...
~
~ 1500-......... ~.......... ~........ - ~..... -... ~.........
~
_j_~
N
- ~ 1COO 01
~
a..
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PRESSURIZER PRESSURE & WATER VOLUME TRANSIENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM FEEDBACK AND 3 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE FIGURE 15.4-5 REVISION 12 Uil774. 121 L0774. CIT _j
L
~cr~----------------------------------------~
..!::::.. &40....*.......*....*............. '.......*..*...
f!
- J e. !ill 2{
~ eoo L*.:_* -~* ~--~-:;* *_:_* :..:_* *..:_:* *;_* :._.* -~*.:...:* *_.;..* ~--~-.:...:* *....:_* :.._.;.*
- ~
- *~
- _,__....._..~.
-=-=*
.""':"'. ~-
~SBD J
- ~****
- ***~*-****
-********~*****~*****
- *-~****~i*
- 2ll lime (Seconds)
~~------~~----~~~----------------~~
7.*... *.... :...*.... ':..*....*. :.. '.*.... : *....... '
6...........*..**. -... -.*. -... :....*.... : *....*.*.
o o
o I
0 o
o I
I o'
- o o
o o
o I
0 0
o o
- o 0
o 0
o o
o 4
o *' 0 I
0 0 *' I o
o o
o o
I o: 1 o 11
. *.*.to:
- 1 t
1 o
- 1:
- 1 o
I o
r I
o o
J o
6 0
o o
o,', o '"o:
- o "o
o
"'o o: I o
- 0.
o I
- o:
I
+
o o
o o
o 20 Time (Seconds}
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT CORE AVG.
TEMP.
TRANSIENT AND DNBR TRANSIENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM FEEDBACK AND 3 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE FIGURE 15.4-6 REVISION 12 L0775. 121 L0775. CIT _j
~
Cll z 0
E
- J.s
.5
- 2 L
2.4...------------------------,
- --e-- MDNBR ( mniiTU.Jm reactivity feedback, tau3=tau6=2sec)
- __ Q ** _ MDNBR (maxirrum reactivity feedback, tau3=tau6=2sec}
2.2 -
2.0 ---
~
1.8 --
i-1.6 -r
.*. _. _. LDNBR (=1.52) 0-'
~ -
"OTATTrip r**.
.._*--.\\
High Neutron Flux Trip 1\\..
i-i-
1.4 -t--....__.............1......... 1..........,+-
,__,___.,,_.r.....L.......
- '-'-~"i', __...._...............L...L.J..I.L
'1--'-'-'----L.....L-.I-LJL...L.Lf I
I 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 Reacti~ty Insertion Rate (pcm/sec)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT MINIMUM DNBR vs. REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE ROD WITHDRAWL AT POWER
< 100% POWER)
FIGURE 15. 4-10 REVISION 12 L0779. 121 L0779. CIT _j
4.0 3.6 3.2 0::
ID 25 2.8 E E 2.4
- c:
~
2.0 1.6 1.2 L
f-
--e---- MDNBR (mnim.Jm reactivity feedback, tau3=tau6=2sec)
- __ o- __ llii:NBR (maxirrum reactivity feedback, tau3=tau6=2sec}
__
- __. _ LONBR (=1.52)
High Neutron Flux Trip OTATTrip r.
... X 0
~.
-. __ 0-ri
\\~'-
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 Reactivity Insertion Rate (pcm/sec)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT MINIMUM DNBR vs. REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE ROD WITHORAWL AT POWER (60% POWER)
FIGURE 15. 4-11 REVISION 1 2 U?J780. 121 L0780. CIT _j
L 5.2 -r-------.-----------------,
1-
-IVVNBR (rrinimJm reactivity feedback, tau3=tau6=2sec) 4.8 :..
4.4 4.0 a::
~ 3.6 0
~
E 3.2
- J
- g 2.8
~ *
~
2.4 2.0 1.6
.** o- ** MDNBR(maxirrum reactivity feedback, tau3-=tau6::;;2sec)
- LDNBR (=1.52)
OTDTTrip
- -*o_ otl go OTDTTrip High Pressure Trip High Neutron Aux Trip
~
1, 2 +---L--I.-1-.1-.LJ..oUf--..L--.L...J..~.J...I.L!--l-...Jl-J-.L..J...I.Llf---'--..1..-J.....l..L.L..L4 I
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 R;eacti\\4ty Insertion Rate (pcm/sec}
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT MINIMUM DNBR vs. REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE ROD WITHDRAWL AT POWER
<101. POWER)
FIGURE 15.4-12 REVISION 12 L0781. 121 L0781. CIT _j
1*4.,..--------------------.,
~ !1*:7\\_j*****:*****:*****:**.: *
~.s...........................................................
u e
~.8 L-
<IJ
~.4 I...
f-0
-D
.2
- I.
1-
- z:
I 100 150 200 Time (Seconds)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 8c 2 NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX TRANSIENTS FOR ROD CLUSTER CONTROL ASSEMBLY MISOPERATION
<SHEET 1 OF 2)
FIGURE 1 5. 4-1 3 REVISION 12 L0782. 121 L0782. CIT
1*4........-------------------------.
-g
~1*2~-- --A****** -*:**
~, V.. --~-~-~......... :......... :......... ~.........
~.8............................................................
~
0
~.6
- 7.
~
f..
0 f..
~ o+~J-~~-L~'-L~~~*~~~~~~~~~*~~L
~
roo 1ro 200 2AG 3 >>
Time (Seconds)
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX TRANSIENTS FOR ROD CLUSTER CONTROL ASSEMBLY MISOPERATION (SHEET 2 OF 2)
FIGURE 1 5. 4-1 3 REVISION 12 L0783. 121 L0783. 121
2500 -r---------------------------,
0 o
0 o
~
o o
o o
o 4
o o
o o
o o
o o
0 o
o o
o
~
o o
o o
1 o
o o
o 4
o 0
o I
o o
o o
t o
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 8c 2 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSIENT AND CORE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE TRANSIENT FOR ROD CLUSTER CONTROL ASSEMBLY MISOPERATION
<SHEET 1 OF 2)
FIGURE 15.4-14 REVISION 12 L0784. 121 L0784. CIT
~~----------------------------------------------~
r2"'
-640-....... 0
- 0
- 0 0
- 0
- 0 **
0 0
0 ********** 0
t-zu 2
\\
<C*
0::
0 0
5 10 15 20 25 30 T 1 ME <SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 NUCLEAR POWER TRANSIENT OURlNG STARTUP OF AN INACTIVE LOOP F'JGURE 15.4-16 REVISION 5 L
e L8786.05t
_j
L 1.4,....------------------------.....
1.2
- 1.
5 HOT CHANNEL 10 15 20 25 30 TIME <SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18c 2 AVERAGE AND HOT CHANNEL HEAT FLUX TRANSIENTS DURING STARTUP OF AN INACTIVE LOOP F'l GURE 1 5. 4-1 7 REVISION 5 e
Le787.051
_j
2.2
- 2.
1.8
--;i z 1.6
~
3: 0 1.4 oz
~ lL 1.2 0
~ z 1.
oo u;: 8
~*
~.6
.4
.2 0
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 TIME <SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 CORE FLOW DURING STARTUP OF AN INAVTIVE LOOP FJGURE 15. 4-18 REVISION 5 L
e LB7SS.051
_j
o=
2400
(/)
(/)
w 2300 o= a.._
<(
o=- 2200 I.&JV)
~~
0::
2100
(/)
(/)
w o=
2000 a..
lq00 1800 620 610 w
600 o=
~ sq0
<(
0::
~ 580
~
~-570
~
~:.. 560
<(
o=
~ 550 w
540 o=
0 0
530 520 0
0 5
10 15 5
10 15 TIME <SECONDS>
20 25 30 20 25 30 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1& 2 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSIENT AND CORE AVERAGE TEMP.TRANSJENT
~INQ STARTUP OF AN INACTIVE LOOP rJ GURE 1 5. 4-1 9 REVISI.ON 5 e
urnl9. 051
_j
- 6.
5.5
- 5.
I 4.5 4.*
a::.3.5 m
z
.3.
0 2.5
- 2.
1.5-1.0.
2.5
- 5.
7.5
- 10.
12.5
- 15.
17.5
- 20.
22.5 25.
TIME CSECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1~ 2 DNBR TRANSIENT DURING STARTUP OF AN INACTIVE LOOP F I CURE 15.4-20 REVISION 5 L
e L0791.852
_j
R p
M M
l K
J H
G F
E D c B
A
.. 8.9
-7.~
I
-5.6
-9. I
-:-8.5 2
-8.2
-6.8
~.I 0.2
-3
-7.9 -8.2
-7.7
~
-8.~
~6.0
-3.8
-1.8 5
- 8.5
-8.~
-7.~
-5.5
-o.3 6
... 7. 7
-5.0
-1.2 i-1. 0 7
-7.7
-7.3
-5.9
-3.2 1.5 3.2 3." 3.6 8
-6.9 2.7 5.9 6.0 9
-3.~
0.7 10.6 10
-5.3
-1.8 5.9 J7.1 If.~
II I.3 12.3 2~.6 12 0.I 0.7 7.7
~'
23.6 13 2.5
"*7 II. I ~
- 17. 6
~~
- 2. I 6.5 IS REPRESENTATIVE PERCENT CHANGE IN LOCAL ASSEMBL V AVERAGE POWER CASE A SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2 INTERCHANGE BETWEEN REGION 1 AND REGION 3 ASSEMBLY Figure 15.4-21 Revision 0
R p
N M
L J(
J H
G F
E 0
c B
A 0.3 I.S I
3.2 0.8 3.2 6.0 2
1.2 o.o I
- 6 10.3 3
0.0 2.9 6.5
~
-2.2
-1.0 2.2 6.9 6.6 5
-I. 7 0.5 8.8 6
-3.2 5.2 16.7 5.~
7
-3.5
-3.~
-2.6
-0.7 II.~ ~
~I. 3 s.s
~.4 8
-3.6
-2.0 1 ~I 9
-2.;,
2.2
-3.8 1-3.8
-3.6
-2.9 0.s 10
-3.9
-4.3
-4.6
-1.5 II
-2.8 ~3. I 4.5 12
-~.a
-~.4
-2.6 I.~
13
..().4
-4.8
-4.a I~
-4.8
-~.s IS REPRESENTATIVE PERCENT CHANGE IN LOCAL ASSEMBLY AVERAGE POWER CASE B-1 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2 INTERCHANGE BETWEEN REGION 1 AND REGION 2 ASSEMBLY. BURNABLE ABSORBER RODS BEING RETAINED BY THE REGION 2 ASSEMBLY Figure 15.4-22 Revision 0
R p
N M
L K
J H
G F
E D
c B
A I.0 1.1 I
S.l LO 1.0 2
1.1 1.1 1.9
'L9 3
I. 7 I.7 1.~
ij 1.1 1.8 1.1 0.7 5
0.0 0.2 1.8 3.9
~.0 6
o.o 5.2 2.2
-o.3 7
-o. 1
-0.6 0.3
- s. 'J ~\\
1.5
-o.3 -o. 6 -0.7 8
\\~
I
-1.0
-1. I
-o.8
-0.9 9
-I.~
-3. I
-1.3 10
-o. 9
-I. 7
-1.7 H>.s II
-2.5
-2.9
-1.1 12 0.7
-1.9
-2.9 2.5 13 2.3
-2.8
-2.~
-o.a I~
-2.1
-2.8 15 REPRESENTATIVE PERCENT CHANGE IN LOCAL ASSEMBLY AVERAGE POWER CASE B-2 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2 INTERCHANGE BElWEEN REGION 1 AND REGION 2 ASSEMBLY, BURNABLE ABSORBER RODS BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE REGION 1 ASSEMBLY Figure 15.4-23 Revision 0
R p "
M L
K J
H G
F E
D c B
A
-2.2
-2.I I
2.0
-2.0
-2. I 2
-1.5
-1 *. 6
-1.0 2.0 3
-0.9 -1.0
-o."
4-
-0.~
I.2
-o.5
-l.ij 5
-2.1
-1.6 2.3 5.7
-2.0 6
1-3.2 9.7
- -1. 7 7
-2.3 i-1.6 1.8 13.6 [>(
5.6
-o.~ -I. 6 -2.1 8
-2.2 9.7 1.1
-2.2 9
o.. 3
"*5
...().9 10
-1.9
-o *"
I.8
'"'0.5
-t.9 II
-o.9
-o. 6
-1.1 12 O.ij
-I
- ij
-1.5 2.0 13 2.0
-2. I
-2.0
~-9 14
-1.9
~2.2 15 REPRESENTATIVE PERCENT CHANGE IN LOCAL ASSEMBLY AVERAGE POWER CASE C SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2 ENRICHMENT ERROR: A REGION 2 ASSEMBLY LOADED INTO THE CORE CENTRAL POSITION Figure 15.4-24 Revision 0
R p
N M
L K
J H
G F
E 0
c B
A
-II
-I~
I 0.~
-9.2
-12 2
-12
-I~
-IS
-13 3
3.2 I. 2
-II q
-1.5
-12
-IS
-16 5
9.8 7.1
-1.6
-8.0
-16 6
9.2
-2.3
-12
-114 7
20.0 17.8 10.8 0.8
-10
-lij *IS -16 8
27.2
-5.5
-II
-15 9
20.7 5.8
-12 10 "2.0 X
23.6 1.9
-8.6
-13 II
'"*0
.. J. 7
-8.9 12 38.6 20.14 2.8
-7.0 13 35.9 7.0
-3.3
-6.3 I~
15.3 2.9 15 REPRESENTATIVE PERCENT CHANGE IN LOCAL ASSEMBLY AVERAGE POWER CASED SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2 LOADING A REGION 2 ASSEMBLY INTO A REGION 1 POSITION NEAR CORE PERIPHERY Figure 15.4-25 Revision 0
0::
w
~
0 101
- a.
~
w
(.)
1~
z l.&.
0 z
0 t-10-1
(.)
0::
l.&.
10-2 0.
.5
- 1.
1.5 TIME L
- 2.
2.5
- 3.
3.5
- 4.
<SECONDS>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1~ 2 NUCLEAR POWER TRANSIENT BOL HZP ROD EJECTION ACCIDENT F'ICURE 15.4-26 REVISION 5 e
L0791.151
_j
r L
6000.-r-------------------------------------------
5000.
L:
4000.
0'
- 4) 9 w
a:
1-c(
a:
~ 2000.
- E w
1-1000.
- 0.
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
TIME <SECONDS>
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18c 2 HOT SPOT FUEl AND CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS Tl t.£. BOL HZP ROO EJECT I ON ACCIDENT FIGURE 15.4-27 REVISION 5 JSH e
LfJ792. 051
_j
- 3.
0:: 2.5 w
~
0 a.
~ 2.
w
...J 0
- > z lA.
1.5 0
z 0
- 1.
0 <
0::
I.&..
.5
- 0.
- 0.
- 1.
L
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2 NUCLEAR POWER TRANSIENT EOL HfP ROD EJECTION ACCIDENT fiGURE 15.4-28 REVISION 5 e
_j
6000 5000 4000 0'
CD e LLJ Q:
~
Q::
LLJ 2000 CL.
~
LLJ.-.
1000 0
0 2
L FUEL CENTER TEMPERATURE 3
4 T 1 ME <SECONDS>
5 6
9 8
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18c 2 HOT SPOT FUEL AND CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TJt-1:, Ea.. HFP ROO EJECT ION ACCIDENT FIGURE 15.4-29 REVISl.ON 5 Le794.e51
_j
L FQ vs. EJECTED ROD WORTH BOL-HFP 800r-----------------------------------------
700 8 600
- a. -
~ 500
~
0 3:: 400 0
0
~
0 300 1-(.) 200 w
""')
LaJ 100 ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE FQ <EJECTED>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 18c 2 BOL HFP ROD EJECTION ACCIDENT FQ vs.EJECTED ROD WORTH fiGURE 15. 4-30 REVJS*ION 5 e
L079S.e51 _j
1.30 1.25 E
1.20
(.) a. -
~
1.15 t--
Q:CI) o-o
~a 1.10 (I)
O::J oo Q:J:
1.05 t-o-
w t-1.00 u
1.&.1...,
1.&.1 0.95 0.90 L
FQ vs. EJECTED ROD WORTH EOL-HZP UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FQ <EJECTED>
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 8c 2 EOL HZP ROO EJECTION ACCIDENT FO vs.EJECTEO ROD WORTH f'1 GURE 15. 4-31 REVISION 5 e
1.8796.051 _j