ML16200A088

License Termination Plan - Chapter 4 - Remediation Plan, Rev. 0

ML16200A088
Person / Time
Site:	La Crosse  File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date:	06/27/2016
From:	LaCrosseSolutions
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
Download: ML16200A088 (31)

Text

LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 4 REMEDIATION PLAN

La Cross License T Revision 4.

Site 4.1.

4.2.

4.2.

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

4.2.

4.3.

4.4.

4.4.

4 4

4 4

4 4.4.

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

4 4

4.5.

se Boiling W Termination n 0 Remediatio Rem Rem 1.

Str

.2.1.1. Sca

.2.1.2. Nee

.2.1.3. Chi

.2.1.4. Spo

.2.1.5. Pre

.2.1.6. Wa

.2.1.7. Hig

.2.1.8. Gri

.2.1.9. Rem

.2.1.10. Add 2.

Soi Rem AL 1.

AL

.4.1.1. Cal

.4.1.2. AL

.4.1.3. Cal

.4.1.4. Cal and

.4.1.5. Res 2.

AL

.4.2.1. AL

.4.2.2. Rem

.4.2.3. Tra

.4.2.4. Non

.4.2.5. Tra

.4.2.6. Wo

.4.2.7. Mo

.4.2.8. Tot

.4.2.9. Res

.4.2.10. Con Ref Water Reactor Plan on Plan........

mediation A mediation A uctures.......

abbling and S edle Guns...

ipping.........

onge and Ab ssure Washi ashing and W gh-Pressure W it Blasting...

moval of Ac ditional Rem il.................

mediation A LARA Evalu LARA Analy lculation of B LARA Analy lculation of C lculation of T d Disposal..

sidual Radio LARA Analy LARA Analy medial Actio ansport and D n-Radiologic ansportation orker Dose E onetary Cost tal Cost (Cos sidual Radio nclusion.....

ferences.....

r TABLE O Actions and A Actions.........

Shaving.......

brasive Blast ing...............

Wiping..........

Water Blasti ctivated/Cont medial Actio Activities Imp uation...........

ysis of Soil R Benefits......

ysis Paramete Costs...........

Total Cost fo oactivity in S ysis for Rem ysis Equation on Costs......

Disposal of t cal Risks (C Risks (CostT Estimates (Co of Dose to t stT)..............

oactivity in B 4-i OF CONTE ALARA Eva ting..............

ing...............

taminated C ns................

pact on the R Remediation ers...............

or Soil Reme Soils that are mediation of B n..................

the Waste (C CostACC)........

TF)...............

ostWDose)......

the Public (C Basement Str ENTS aluations......

Concrete.......

Radiation Pr n...................

ediation by E e ALARA....

Basement St CostWD)........

CostPDose).....

ructures that rotection Pro Excavation tructures......

t are ALARA ogram..........

A.................

... 4-1

... 4-1

... 4-2

... 4-2

... 4-3

... 4-3

... 4-3

... 4-3

... 4-4

... 4-4

... 4-4

... 4-4

... 4-5

... 4-5

... 4-5

... 4-6

... 4-7

... 4-8

... 4-8

... 4-9

. 4-10

. 4-10

. 4-12

. 4-13

. 4-14

. 4-15

. 4-17

. 4-17

. 4-17

. 4-18

. 4-18

. 4-19

. 4-19

. 4-21

. 4-26

La Cross License T Revision Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Table 4-3 Table 4-4 se Boiling W Termination n 0 1

Vo 2

Rad 3

BF 4

AL Str Water Reactor Plan olume of Con dionuclide H M Insitu Do LARA Analy uctures.......

r LIST ncrete in Bas Half-Life(s),

ose using Co ysis for Volu 4-ii OF TABLE sement Struc Decay Cons ompliance B umetrically C ES cturesa.........

stant(s) and BIL with Mix Contaminate Dose Factor xture Fractio ed Subsurfac rs.................

ons...............

ce

. 4-20

. 4-20

. 4-21

. 4-22

La Cross License T Revision AF ALARA AMCG BIL BFM DCGL DF EMC FSS G-3 HEPA LACBW LLRW LSA LTP MARSSI NRC ROC RPT SAFSTO STS TEDE TSD WGTV WTB se Boiling W Termination n 0 Area F As Lo Avera Basem Basem Deriv Dose Elevat Final Genoa High E WR La Cr Low L Low S Licen IM Multi-Nucle Radio Radia OR SAFe Sourc Total Techn Waste Waste Water Reactor Plan LIST OF Factor ow As Reaso age Member ment Invento ment Fill Mo ed Concentr Factor(s) ted Measure Status Surve a 3 Fossil St Efficiency P rosse Boiling Level Radioa Specific Act se Terminati

-Agency Rad ear Regulator onuclides of ation Protecti STORage e Term Surv Effective Do nical Suppor e Gas Tank V e Treatment r

ACRONYM onably Achie of the Critic ory Level odel ration Guide ement Comp ey tation Particulate A g Water Reac active Waste ivity ion Plan diation Surv ry Commiss Concern ion Technici vey ose Equivale rt Document Vault Building 4-iii MS AND AB evable cal Group line Levels arison Air ctor e

vey and Site ion ian ent BBREVIAT Investigatio TIONS n Manual

La Cross License T Revision se Boiling W Termination n 0 Water Reactor Plan r

Page Intent 4-iv tionally Leftft Blank

La Cross License T Revision

4.

S In accord the plan from Sub radiologi Dose Eq radiation (AMCG)

(ALARA Decontam Radiation procedur complian accommo documen Reactor Guide 1.

as guidan Terminat Protectio this LTP Decomm This cha compone criterion demonstr describes which the This chap that will 4.1.

R When di remain o annual do ALARA residual that are A The ALA radiation transport se Boiling W Termination n 0 Site Remed dance with 1 ns for site re bpart E of 1 ical criteria f quivalent (TE n must not b

) and 2) re A).

mination and n Protection res. These p nce. Revisio odate the c nted, process (LACBWR 187, Guidan nce. Consist tion Plans fo on Program t P, but perio issioning Ac apter describ ents and str in 10 CFR rating comp s in detail th ey will occu pter also pro be employed Remediation ismantlemen on building s ose criterion criterion, w radioactivity ALARA).

ARA evaluat n dose, conve tation accide Water Reactor Plan diation Pla 0 CFR 50.82 emediation 10 CFR 20 b for unrestric EDE) from be greater th esidual radi d dismantlem n, Safety and programs an ons have, an changing w sed and app R) adminis nce for Imple tent with Re for Nuclear P to address r dic updates ctivities Repo bes the met ructures. T 20.1402 is pliance with he remaining ur for each st ovides a sum d to address n Actions an nt and decon surfaces and n of 25 mrem which requir y to levels b tion calculat erted into do ents convert r

an 2(a)(9)(ii)(C

. These pla before the si cted use spec residual rad han 25 mrem ioactivity le ment activiti d Waste Man nd procedur nd will contin work environ proved in a strative pro ementation o gulatory Gu Power Reac remediation to the LAC ort (3) will p thods that m he methods also describ h the 25 mr g site remed tructure, syst mmary of the the impact o nd ALARA ntamination d in site soils m/yr. The re res an evalu below those tes the conce ollars, is equ ted into dol 4-1 C), the Licen ans must inc ite may be cified in 10 dioactivity t m/yr to the A evels must ies will be c nagement pr res are frequ nue to be m nment inher accordance w ocedures u of 10 CFR 50 uide 1.179, S ctors (2), de and decomm CBWR Deco provide such may be use s for demon bed. Note t rem/yr dose diation and d tem and/or c radiation pr of dismantle Evaluations actions are s at concent emaining re uation as to necessary t entration (or ual to the cos llars, worker nse Terminat clude the pr released for CFR 20.140 that is distin Average Me be As-Low conducted in rograms whi uently audite made to these rent to rea with existin using 10 C 0.59 Change Standard For etails regardi missioning a ommissionin h details.

ed to remed nstrating com that Chapter e criterion.

dismantleme component.

rotection me ement and re s

e completed trations that sidual radio whether it to meet the r activity) at sts of continu r and publi tion Plan (LT rovisions to r unrestricte 02 are: 1) th nguishable f ember of th w-As-Reason n accordance ich include ed for techn e programs a actor decom ng La Cross FR 50.59 es, Tests and rmat and Co ing changes activities are ng Plan and diate contam mpliance w r 6 provides Also note ent activities ethods and co mediation ac d, residual r correspond activity mus is feasible t dose criterio t which the a ued remedia ic doses ass TP) must pro meet the cr ed use. The he Total Effe from backgr he Critical G nably-Achiev e with establ approved w nical conten and procedur mmissioning se Boiling W and Regul d Experimen ontent for Lic to the Radi e not provid d Post-Shut minated sys with the AL the method e that Chap and the ord ontrol proce ctivities.

radioactivity to the maxi st also satisf to further re on (i.e., to l averted colle ation (e.g., ri sociated with ovide riteria e two ective round Group vable lished written nt and res to

and, Water latory nts (1) cense iation ded in tdown

tems, LARA ds for pter 3 der in dures may imum fy the educe levels ective isk of h the

La Cross License T Revision remediat activity).

correspon is justifie 4.2.

R Remedia methods remediat that may technique composit the princ Characte groundw 4.2.1.

The gene of on-sit Grade lev below th specific b House an with the require re G-3 Crib roads an compone removed The struc solid con altered to be realist dose to g static me the remai subsurfac Derived subsurfac activity i in 10 CFR Example include w abrasive se Boiling W Termination n 0 ion action If this c nd to the ma ed by ALAR Remediation ation actions and techno ion actions d y be taken d e(s), method tion and con cipal media rization surv water contami Structure eral approach e buildings, vel at LACB he 636 foot buildings th nd LACBWR Genoa 3 Fo emedial acti b House, will nd railways ents and stru during the d ctural surfac ncrete struct o a condition tically occup groundwater easurements, ining concre ce concrete Concentratio ce basement nventory lev R 20.1402.

s of remedi washing, wi blasting.

Water Reactor Plan converted in concentratio aximum annu RA.

n Actions are perform ologies are described m during the d d(s) and/or t nfiguration o a that will b vey results a ination ident es h to structur structures, BWR is at th elevation a hat are expec R Administr ossil Station ions; therefo l remain inta that travers uctural surfa decommissio es that will r tures which n which wou pied. The d r is referred

, insitu gamm ete media wi structures an on Guideline ts will be r vels that repr iation techni iping, press Cost estima r

nto dollars, n or activi ual dose crit med througho standard t may not nece decommissio echnologies of the contam be subjected and historica tified to date re remediatio and compon he 639 foot e re expected cted to rema ration Buildi (G-3) are ex ore, no remed act and funct se through t aces above oning proces remain at LA will be cov uld not allow dose model t to as the B ma spectros ill be used to nd the corre e Level (DC remediated t resent the an iques that m ure washing ates for the 4-2 and the ac ty is below terion, then f out the decom o the comm ssarily be re oning of LA that will be minated med d to remed al survey dat

e.

on at LACBW nents to a d elevation. T d to remain.

ain after lice ing. None o xpected to b diation is pla tional for G-the site wil the 636 foot ss and dispos ACBWR fol vered by at w the remai that will be u Basement Fi copy and/or o calculate th sponding do CGL), the co to levels be nnual dose c may be used g, vacuumin ese techniqu ctual costs w the conce further reduc mmissioning mercial nuc equired, but ACBWR. T e employed dia requiring diation are c ta indicate th WR requires depth of at l Therefore, all

. The Clas ense termina of the buildin be radiologic anned and th

-3 power op ll also rema t elevation sed of as a w llowing the t least three ining structu used to calc ill Model (

r the analysi he remaining ose. Rather oncrete walls low radionu criterion for u for the bel ng, scabblin ues also inc to perform entrations o ction of resid g process an clear indust are listed as The appropr is dependen remediation concrete str that there is s the demoli least three f l Class 1 bas ss 2 and Cla ation are the ngs and stru cally impact hese structur erations. Th ain. All im in Class 1 b waste stream termination 3 feet of so ural surfaces culate and qu BFM). Sca is of volume g total residu than using a s and floors uclide-specif unrestricted ow grade st ng, chipping clude the a the remedi or activities dual radioac nd the techni try. All o s possible ac riate remedi nt on the phy

n. At LACB ructural surf minimal soi ition and rem feet below g sement struc ass 3 LACB e LACBWR uctures assoc ed such that res, includin he site and p mpacted sys buildings wi

m.

of the licens il and physi s, if excavate uantify the f an measurem etric sample(

ual activity i an adjusted of the rema fic adjusted release spec tructural sur g, and spong amount of w iation s that ctivity

iques, f the ctions iation ysical

BWR, faces.

il and moval grade.

ctures BWR-R Crib ciated t they ng the public

tems, ill be se are ically ed, to future

ments, (s) of in the gross aining total cified rfaces ge or water

La Cross License T Revision generated using ma have the 4.2.1.1.

The princ surfaces the high-a volume process t concrete accordan Referenc The scab to a seale

spindle, capture e methods roughing debris ge operation 4.2.1.2.

A secon pneumati enclosed media su surface.

transport of needle normal s and crevi 4.2.1.3.

Chipping vacuum-crevices.

4.2.1.4.

Sponge a abrasive blasting absorbs c from the se Boiling W Termination n 0 d and the co achines with ability to ex Scabb cipal remedi is scabbling

-velocity imp etric particul that uses pne surface to nce with NU ce Pressurize bbling piston ed vacuum a and perform enclosure si are deposite g and absolu enerated thr

n.

Needl d method o ic air-opera in housing.

urface. The m Typically, o t and dust co e guns for re cabbling ope ices. Needle Chipp g includes t assisted col This action Spong and abrasive compounds is less aggr contaminant e medium so Water Reactor Plan ost to proces h hydraulic-xchange scab bling and Sha iation metho g and shavin pact of a too late which c eumatically a nominal UREG/CR-58 ed Water Re ns (feet) are c and collector ms at similar milar to sca ed into a sea ute High Ef rough these le Guns of scabbling ated tool co The rods a media remov one to two m ontrol are acc emoval and c erations. Th e gunning te ping the use of lection devi n is also a for ge and Abras e blasting a such as sil ressive, inco ts. The med o the mediu r

ss, package a

-assisted, rem bbling, shear aving od expected t ng. Scabblin ol with the co can be remov operated air depth of 0.

884, Volum eactor Powe contained in r system. Sh r rates to sc abbling equi aled remova fficiency Pa remediation g is accomp ontaining a are connecte val depth is millimeters complished i chipping of hese include chniques can pneumatica ices. Chipp rm of scabbl sive Blasting are similar t lica sands, g orporating a dium is coll um may be r 4-3 and ship thi mote-operat r, chisel and to be used fo ng entails the oncrete surfa ved. One m r pistons wit

.125 inches me 2, Revised er Station (4 a close-capt having uses cabbling. Th ipment. Th able containe rticulate Air n processes plished usin series of tu ed to an air-a function o are removed in the same m media is usu

, but are not n also be app lly operated ping activiti ling.

g echniques th garnet, alum a foam med lected by va reused. Ab s waste. Co ted, articulat other tool he for removing e removal o face which tr method of sc th tungsten-at a nomin d Analyses 4), section G ture enclosu a series of d he wheels a he fractured er. The exh r (HEPA) f is collected ng needle g ungsten-carb

-driven pisto of the reside d per pass.

manner as o ually reserve t limited to, plied to pain d chisels an ies are usua hat use med minum oxide dia that, upo acuum and t brasive blast oncrete remo ting tools.

eads.

g contaminan of concrete f ransforms th cabbling is a

-carbide tips nal rate of a of Decomm G.3.1) or 12 ure that is co diamond cut are also con media and haust air pas filtration dev d and contr guns. The bide or hard on to abrade ence time of Generated d other scabblin ed for areas inside corne nted and oxid nd similar t ally reserved dia or mater e, and walnu on impact a the contamin ting is more oval may in These mac nts from con from a surfac he solid surfa a surface rem s that fractur about 130 ft missioning fo 2.08 m2 per onnected by h tting wheels ntained in a dusts from sses through vices. Dust rolled during needle gun dened steel e and fractur the rods ove debris collec ng methods.

not accessib ers, cracks, j dized surface tools couple d for cracks rials coated ut hulls. Sp and compres nants are wa e aggressive clude chines ncrete ce by ace to moval re the ft2 (in or the hour.

hoses s on a close both h both t and g the is a rods re the er the

ction,

. Use ble to joints es.

ed to s and with ponge

ssion, ashed than

La Cross License T Revision sponge b pressures 4.2.1.5.

Pressure that remo over-spra container 4.2.1.6.

Washing the cours contamin LACBW 25 mrem EnergySo Demoliti evaluatin 4.2.1.7.

Most con systems o to G3 Cr Chapter 5 situ reme surfaces high pres actual flo 20,000 p mole is a interior o surface o The was processin 4.2.1.8.

Another blasting.

directed blasting maintain disposal.

contamin se Boiling W Termination n 0 blasting but

s. Sponge an Pressu washing use oves superfi ay. A wet v rs for filtrati Wash g and wiping se of remedia nation. It WR to reduce m/yr dose cr olutions Tec on Limits (

ng the surfac High-ntaminated p or sections o rib House)

5. If radiolo ediation will is high pres ssure water p ow rate that si. A rotati attached to a of the pipe.

of the pipe, r ste water c ng as liquid r Grit B approach th Grit blasti through a n action remo s the section The fina nation.

Water Reactor Plan t less aggre nd abrasive b ure Washing es a nozzle o cial material vacuum sys on or proces ing and Wip g decontamin ation activiti is not antic e the residua riterion but chnical Supp (5) and, to e for accepta Pressure Wa piping will of pipe syste or be aband ogical condit l be perform ssure water pump capabl ranges from ng jet-mole a lance and h As the la removing the ontaining th radiological Blasting hat may be ing uses grit nozzle that oves the int ns being clea al system p r

essive than blasting are g

of intermedia ls from the s tem is used ssing.

ping nation techni ies for house cipated that al activity in rather, to port Docume ensure that able concent ater Blasting be removed ems that resi doned in pla tions inside med. One me blasting. A le of produci m 44 gallons tip is used high-pressur ance is adva e corrosive l he removed waste.

used to rem t media such is pulled th terior surfac aned under n pass is per 4-4 scabbling.

intended for ate water pre suspect surfa d to suction iques are act ekeeping and t this remed n structural comply wit ent (TSD) R loose surfa trations of re g

d and dispo ide below gr ace will be the pipe are ethod that m A typical Hig ing a water p per minute for 360 deg re hose. The anced, the h layer, interna d contamina mediate the s h as garnet hrough the c ce layer of negative pre rformed wit Both oper r the remova essure to dir face. A head the potentia tions that ar d to minimiz diation appr surfaces for th the open RS-TD-31319 face contami esidual activ sed of as ra rade that wil inspected an e in excess o may be used t gh-Pressure pressure of 1 at 10,000 ps gree coverag e lance is m high-pressur al debris and ation is the surfaces of or sand und closed pipin the piping.

essure and co th clean gr rations use al of surface rect a jet of p der may be u ally contami re typically p ze the spread roach will r the purpos n air demo 96-005, La ination is r vity.

adioactive w ll remain in nd surveyed of the releas to remediate Liquid-Jetti 10,000 psi to si to 23 gallo ge of pipe in manually adv e water abr d radiologica en collected pipe interio der intermed ng at a fixed A HEPA ollects the m rit to remo intermediat films and pa pressurized w used to mini inated water performed d d of loose su be employe se of meetin olition criter Crosse Ope removed pri waste. Any service (i.e.,

d as describ e criteria, th e the pipe int ing System o 20,000 psi ons per minu nteriors. Th anced thoug rades the int al contamina d and stored or surfaces i diate air pre d rate. The vacuum sy media for reu ove any res te air aints.

water imize r into during urface ed at ng the ria in en Air ior to pipe

, pipe ed in hen in terior has a at an ute at he jet-gh the terior ation.

d for s grit essure e grit ystem use or sidual

La Cross License T Revision 4.2.1.9.

As previo If the con primary demolitio excavato reduced t In situati removal interchan flame cut container collected HEPA sy be remov 4.2.1.10.

Mechani surfaces the remo 4.2.2.

The soil 10 CFR 2 Table 5-4 Site Inves of elevat elevated level for (AF) to remediat However remediat design an greater th The site LACBW minimal surveys w during th sampling Soil rem excavato practical, se Boiling W Termination n 0 Remo ously stated ncrete struct method tha on using hy rs. Concret to rubble, th ions where a may be acco ngeable tooli tting equipm rs for later d d and as nec ystems or co ved as intact Addit cal abrasive of embedde val of certai Soil l DCGLw th 20, Subpart 4 of Chapter stigation Ma ted radioacti areas. This this compa account for ion approac r, soil conce ion with su nd assessme han the DCG characteriza WR. Charac residual rad will be perf he remediati g and survey ediation equ rs. Other e

, when the r Water Reactor Plan oval of Activ

, the princip ture is desig t will be us ydraulic-oper e structures he embedded a more surgi omplished u ing heads. A ment. The co disposal in b cessary, con ontrolled wat sections afte ional Remed equipment, d/buried pip n contamina hat will be E for the u r 5. Section anual (MAR ivity. A sim is referred t arison is the r the small ch will be entrations at ch areas dem ent. Any r GLEMC will b ation process terization su dioactivity in formed to en on actions i methods.

uipment will quipment in emediation d r

vated/Contam pal means of gnated for co sed to comp rated crushin will be frac d rebar will b ical removal using a mach As concrete i oncrete rubb both techniq ntrolled usin ter misting s er sawing w dial Actions such as hon ping. Chemi ants.

used to de unrestricted n 2.5.1.1 of RSSIM) (6) a mple compar to as the Elev

DCGLEMC, area of the used which t levels betw marcated an radiological be removed a s has establis urvey result n soil and gr nsure that an s adequately l include, bu ncluding soil depth approa 4-5 minated Con f remediating omplete rem pletely remo ng shears an tured and cr be exposed a l is required hine mounte is fractured le and expos ques. Dusts, g temporary systems. Bu ith blades, w nes, may be ical removal emonstrate release of o NUREG-15 addresses the rison is used vated Measu which is th elevated ra h entails re ween the DC nd accounted contaminati and disposed shed the loc ts and histo roundwater i ny changing y identified ut not be lim l dredges an aches the so ncrete g concrete s moval, such a ove the con nd jack-ham rushed by th and segregat

, activated a d, remote-op and rebar ex sed rebar is c

, fumes and y enclosures ulk concrete wires or othe used to rem l means may compliance open land s 575, Multi-A e concern fo d to assess urement Com he DCGLw adioactivity.

emoval of s CGLw and D d for during ion in soils d of as radioa cation and ex orical survey identified to g soil radiol and address mited to, shov nd vacuum tr oil interface r surfaces is sc as interior co ncrete is thr mmers fitted hese tools. A ted from the and/or conta perated artic xposed, the m collected an generated d s coupled w such as floo er cutting me move contam y be used, as with the d survey units Agency Radia or the presen the dose im mparison (EM modified by In genera soil exceedi DCGLEMC m g Final Stat identified i active waste xtent of soil y data indic date. As n logical conta sed. Chapter vels, back h rucks may a region betw cabbling/sha oncrete wall rough large to large tra As the concr e concrete ru minated con culating arm metal is cut u nd transferred debris are lo with close-ca ors and walls ethods.

mination from s appropriat dose criterio s are provid ation Survey nce of small mpact of pote MC). The a y an Area F l, a conserv ing the DC may remain tus Survey (

in concentra

e.

contaminati cate that the needed, addit amination pr r 5 discusse hoe and track also be used ween unaccep aving.

s, the scale acked rete is ubble.

ncrete m with using d into ocally apture s may m the e, for on in ded in y and areas ential action Factor vative CGLw.

after (FSS) ations ion at ere is tional rofile s soil k hoe

d. As ptable

La Cross License T Revision and accep be used.

lower soi Remedia control p and soil include a sediment 4.3.

R The Radi regulator subseque activities decontam The curre federal a radiologi single un public fro exposure engineeri procedur and radio process.

accommo The spre by washi loose sur impregna items, ov reducing For inter

washing, and drain Small to contamin contamin contamin appropria The Rad place dur systems a se Boiling W Termination n 0 ptable conta This simple il layers as w ation of soils procedures.

control proc additional c t, and air em Remediation iation Protec ry approved ent SAFSTO s during de minated in or ent approved and state re ical hazards nit commerc om radiolog e to radioacti ing controls ral requirem ological haz Conseque odate each re ad of loose ing and wip rface contam ated media verhead spa low levels o rmediate lev

, high-pressu n lines can b ools, hoses nation levels nation from d nation embe ate.

diation Prote ring comme and compon Water Reactor Plan amination, a e methodolo would occur s will be per Operational cedures. In onstraints a mission contro n Activities I ction Progra program tha OR period.

commission rder to perfo d Radiation gulatory req encountered cial reactor f ical hazards ive material and hazard ments allow r zard mitigat ently, the n emediation t surface cont ing. Water mination ov is an effect aces and sm of surface co vels of surfa ure water bla be cleaned a and cables

s. A paint c drying out a dded in con ction Progra ercial power nents were de r

squared edg ogy minimiz with a tooth rformed usin constraints addition, wo and mitigatio ols during so Impact on t am approved at was imple During th ning, contam rm maintena Protection P quirements d or expected facility. In and ensures s is, and rem mitigation t radiation pr tion measure necessary ra technology a tamination is washing wi er large sur ive techniqu mall hand to ontamination ace contami asting and gr and hot spot can also coating may and becomin ncrete, scabb am approved operation.

econtaminat 4-6 ge excavator zes the mixin hed excavato ng establish and dust con ork package on or contro oil remediati the Radiatio d for decomm emented dur hese periods minated stru ance or repai Program at L for the prot d to be encou addition, th s occupation mains ALAR echniques ar otection per es directly i adiological c as appropriat s mitigated b ith a deterge rface areas.

ue to reduce ools. These n on structur ination, mor rit blasting m ts removed u be pressure be applied a ng airborne.

bling or oth d for decom During pow ed in order t r bucket des ng of contam or bucket.

hed excavatio ntrol will be instructions ol methods ion.

on Protectio missioning a ring commer s, in a man uctures, syst air actions.

LACBWR is tection of o untered duri he program e nal, effluent a RA. To ens re employed rsonnel to in into the wo controls are te.

by the routin ent is effecti Wiping w e loose surf e same tech ral surfaces.

re aggressiv may be more using these t e washed in after surface To mitigate her surface mmissioning wer operatio to perform m ign or simila minated soils on safety an e addressed i s for remedi to ensure a on Program at LACBWR rcial power o nner similar tems and c s adequate to occupational ing the decom ensures the and environm ure that ade d, work cont ntegrate rad ork planning e correctly ne remediati ive in reduci with detergen face contam hniques are ve methods e appropriate techniques a n a contain e cleaning to e high levels removal tec is similar to ons, contami maintenance ar technique s with accep nd environm in site excav ation of soil adequate ero m

R is similar t operation an r to remedi omponents o comply wi l personnel mmissioning protection o mental dose equate and p trol program diation prote g and sched implemente ion of work ing low leve nt soaked or mination on also effectiv such as pre

e. Pipes, sur and technolo nment to re o prevent su s of fixed su chniques ma o the progra inated struct or repair act e may ptable mental vation l may

osion, to the nd the iation were ith all from g of a of the from proper ms and ection duling ed to areas els of r oil-small ve in essure rfaces ogies.

educe urface urface ay be am in

tures, tions.

La Cross License T Revision These tec for the d prevent t Protectio Decomm above tho and slud personne remediat The deco technique Radiation The activ during op approved 4.4.

A Guidance Volume 2 and Det methods concentra Section N have unr facility is of waste not have approach of soils a For the s determin effects to dollars) f accidents the actua reduction ALARA section 4 The ALA The ALA When rem meet the demolitio se Boiling W Termination n 0 chniques are decommissio the spread of on Program p missioning d ose encount dges from p el to focus o ion techniqu ommissionin es on contam n Protection vities expect perations, as d Radiation P ALARA Eva e for condu 2, Revision ermination for determ ations below N.1.5 of NU restricted rel s unlikely to disposal. T e to be eva h and applica as low-level r subsurface s ne whether fu o the undesir following th s, worker an al costs to p n achieved b evaluation 4.4.2.

ARA criterio ARA analys mediation is e ALARA re on criteria sp Water Reactor Plan e the same o oning to red f contaminat provides ade oes not pre ered during plant system on each area ue.

ng organizati minated sys Program is ted during d s described Protection Pr aluation ucting ALA 1, Consolid of Radiolog mining when w the levels n UREG-1757 lease, generi o be cost effe Therefore sh luated for u able to LACB radioactive w tructures tha urther concre red costs. B he removal o nd public do perform the by further r n for concr on specified sis is a plan s performed, equirement.

pecified in R r

or similar to duce personn tion from est equate contro esent any ne recent main ms. Decom a of the site ion is experi stems, struct adequate to decommissio above. The rogram is no ARA analyse dated Decom gical Criter n further r necessary to states that ic analyses s ective for un ipping soil t unrestricted BWR, a sim waste is prov at will rema ete remediat Benefits are of radioactiv se associate remediation remediation rete remedia in 10 CFR 2 nning tool to there is no For examp Reference 5 4-7 the radiolog nel exposure tablished co ols for these ew challeng ntenance acti mmissioning and plan ea ienced in an tures or com o safely cont oning are th erefore, the ot requested es is provid mmissioning ria, Final R reduction of satisfy the 2 For residua show that sh nrestricted re to a low-lev d release.

mple ALARA vided in sect ain at license tion is neces the averted ity. The co d with reme

n. If the c is not ALA ation in be 20.1402 is no o justify tha need to anal ple, the rem 5, including gical control e to radiatio ontaminated actions.

ge to the Ra ivities, such g planning ach activity nd capable o mponents du trol the radio he same or s approval of in this LTP.

ded in App g Guidance Report (7),

f residual r 25 mrem/yr d al radioacti hipping soil elease, large vel waste dis To illustra A analysis fo tion 4.4.1.

e terminatio ssary by com collective ra sts of remed edial action osts exceed ARA. The elow grade ot met by so at further re lyze whethe mediation re cleaning loo ls implemen on and conta areas. The c adiation Pro h as the remo allows radi well before of applying t uring decomm ological aspe similar to th f any change pendix N o

- Characte which desc radioactivity dose criterio ivity in soil to a low-lev ely because sposal facilit ate that this or the excava on, the ALA mparing the d adiation dos diation inclu (converted i d the benefit methods an structures olely perform emediation i er the action equired to m ose surface nted at LACB amination an current Radi otection Pro oval of the r iation prote execution o these remedi missioning.

ects of this w hose encoun es to the exi f NUREG-erization, Su cribes accep y is require on.

at sites that vel waste disp of the high ty generally is a reason ation and dis ARA analysis desired bene e (converted ude transport into dollars) ts, then the nd results o is provide ming remedia is not neces was necessa meet the ope contaminati BWR nd to iation ogram resins ection of the iation The work.

ntered isting

1757, urvey, ptable ed to t may posal costs does nable sposal s will eficial d into tation

), and dose of the ed in ation.

ssary.

ary to en air on to

La Cross License T Revision concentra 2 mR/h e evaluatio 4.4.1.

The soil are provi data indi course of and char accessibl concentra excavate In order beneficia from rem should b considere Based up is the mo averted d 4.4.1.1.

The bene future co value. In The pres accordan se Boiling W Termination n 0 ations below exposure ra on.

ALARA DCGLw that ided in Tabl icate that the f the decom racterize soil le by the rem ations great

, package an to determine al effects (be medial action be performed ed to be not pon a simple onetary value dose is based Calcu efit from col ollective ave n accordance

wh BA

$2 PW sent worth nce with the f Water Reactor Plan w 1,000 dpm te criteria, w Analysis of t will be use le 5-4 of Ch ere is minim mmissioning ls as they a moval of stru ter than the nd dispose of e if addition enefits) and t n will be gr

d. Howeve ALARA and e ALARA an e of the colle d upon the i ulation of Ben llective avert erted dose a e with Appen

$2,000 here:

AD

=

2,000

=

W(ADCollective of future c following eq r

m/100cm2 an will be perf f Soil Remed ed to demons hapter 5. C mal residual and through are exposed uctures or co e DCGLEMC f the soil as L al remedial the undesirab reater than th er, if the co d should not nalysis, the o ective averte industrial us nefits ted dose (BA and multiply ndix N of NU 0

=

benefit US doll

=

value in e)

=

collective a quation; 4-8 nd the remed formed rega diation strate compl Characterizat radioactivity h to site clos by excavati omponents.

C in surface Low-Level R action is wa ble effects (c he costs, the sts exceed t t be perform only benefit ed dose to fu e scenario.

AD) is calcula ying by a fa UREG-1757 from an av

lars, n dollars of a present wor averted dose diation of co ardless of th liance with th tion survey y in soil at sure, LACB ion during b If residual r e or subsur Radioactive arranted by A costs) must en the reme the benefit, ed.

of reducing uture occupa ated by dete actor to conv 7, the equatio verted dose a person-rem rth of a futur e PW(ADCol oncrete surf he outcome he 25 mrem results and LACBWR.

BWR will co building dem radioactivity rface soils, Waste (LLR ALARA ana be calculate edial action then the re g residual rad ants of the si ermining the vert the dos on is as follo for a remed m averted an re collective llective) is th faces to mee of the AL m/yr dose crit historical su Throughou ontinue to su molition or m y is discover LACBWR RW).

alysis, the de ed. If the ben is warranted emedial acti dioactivity in ite. For soil present wor se to a mon ows; Equatio diation actio nd, averted dos hen expresse et the LARA terion urvey ut the urvey made red at R will esired nefits d and ion is n soil ls, the rth of netary n 4-1 on, in

e.

ed in

La Cross License T Revision 4.4.1.2.

In accord paramete Do Ana Pop ind Sup Nuc Mo (No NU equ the soil se Boiling W Termination n 0

wh PD A

0.

F Co DC r

N ALAR dance with ers for use in llars per per alysis Guide pulation den dustrial reuse pport of Rule clear Facilit onetary disco ote; This var UREG-1757.

uation throug r variable h ls as well as Water Reactor Plan

here:

D

=

=

025

=

=

onc

=

CGLw

=

=

=

=

RA Analysis Table N.2 o n performing son-Rem - $

elines of the sity (PD) for e scenario (p emaking on R ties, Volume ount rate (r) riable was es The monet gh Federal R has been cons basements.)

r

=

populat people/

=

area be

=

annual DCGLw

=

effectiv remove

=

average being e

=

derived concen dose of

=

moneta

=

radiolo year an

=

number calcula s Parameters of Appendix g ALARA an

$2,000.00/pe U.S. Nuclear r the critical er NUREG-Radiologica e 2 (9), Appe

- 0.00 yr-1 fo stablished at tary discount Register Noti servatively s

)

4-9 0.025 tion density

/m2, ing evaluate dose to an A w concentrat veness, or ed by the rem e concentrat evaluated in u d

concentr tration of re f 25 mrem/yr ary discount gical decay nd, r of years o ted.

s x N of NUR nalysis are as erson-rem (p r Regulatory group (perso 1496, Gener al Criteria fo endix B, Tab or soil 0.03 yr-1 for t for the ALA ice 72 FR 46 set at 0.00 yr

y for the ed in square AMCG from tion in rem/y fraction of mediation ac tion of resid units of activ ration equ esidual radi r to the AMC rate in units constant for over which REG-1757, s follows; per NUREG/

y Commissio ons/m2) - 0.0 ric Environm or License Te ble A.1) r soil in Tab ARA analys 6102 - Augu r-1 for soil, i.

1

critical gro meters (m2) m residual ra yr, f the residu

ction, dual radioact vity per unit uivalent to ioactivity th CG (pCi/g),

s per year (yr r the radionu the collecti the accepta

/BR-0058, R on (8))

01 person/m mental Impa ermination o le N.2 of Ap sis was remo ust 16, 2007.

.e. no monet Equatio

oup scenari adioactivity a ual radioac tivity in the t volume (pC o

the av hat would g r-1),

uclide in unit ive dose wi able and rel Regulatory m2 for land in ct Statement of NRC-Lice ppendix N of oved from th Consequen tary discount n 4-2 io in at the ctivity e area Ci/g),

erage ive a ts per ill be evant n

t in nsed f

e

ntly, t for

La Cross License T Revision Num NU Are that 4.4.1.3.

The total be evalua 4.4.1.4.

For the a CostR, Co anticipate provided benefit, t 4.4.1.4.1 The cost NUREG-se Boiling W Termination n 0 mber of year UREG-1496, ea (A) used t t was evalua Calcu l cost, (Cost ated accordin

wh Co Co Co Co Co Co Calcu analysis of s ostACC, Cost ed unlikely d in NUREG then the rem Transp t of waste

-1757, Appe Water Reactor Plan rs (N) over w Appendix B to calculate t ated) ulation of Co tT) which is ng to Equati

here:

ostR

=

ostWD

=

ostACC

=

ostTF

=

ostWDose

=

ostPDose

=

ulation of Tot oil excavatio WDose and Co impact on

-1757 which ediation cos port and Dis transport a endix N whic r

which the co B, Table A.1 the populatio sts balanced ag ion N-3 of N

=

moneta mobiliz

=

moneta generat

=

moneta action;

=

moneta the was

=

moneta the was

=

moneta transpo tal Cost for on and dispo ostPDose were the total co h states that i t is shown to sposal of the and disposal ch is express 4-10 ollective aver

)

on density (m gainst the be NUREG-1757

ary cost o zation costs) ary cost for ted by the ac ary cost of w ary cost of t ste; ary cost of t ste; ary cost of ort and dispo Soil Remedi osal as low-l e not calcula ost (CostT).

if one or two o be unneces e Waste (Cos l (CostWD) sed as follow rted dose is m2) - 7,500 m enefits; has s 7, Appendix

of the rem

);

r transport ction; worker accid traffic fatali traffic fatali dose to th osal of the wa iation by Ex level radioa ated for this This is c o of the cost ssary withou stWD) was calcula ws:

calculated -

m2 (size of r several comp x N below:

mediation ac and dispos dents during ities during ities during he public f aste; xcavation and ctive waste, s evaluation consistent w ts can be sho ut calculating ated using 1,000 yrs (p reference are ponents and Equatio

ction (inclu sal of the w g the remedi transportatio transportatio from excava d Disposal the variable based upon with the guid own to excee g all of the c Equation N-per ea d may n 4-3 uding waste iation on of on of

ation, es for their dance ed the costs.

-4 of

La Cross License T Revision Disposal This ave compone highway disposal considere The volu (A) is rem 1,500 m3 4.4.1.4.2 The cost using Eq For this e overland In accord Ft.

The Cliv (2,169 km of the rou se Boiling W Termination n 0

wh VA Co costs for ge erage cost i ent of this av hauling fro facility). Th ed proprietar ume of waste mediated to 3, which prod Transp of traffic fa uation N-6 o

wh

$3 VA VS FT DT evaluation, t truck shipm dance with N ve, Utah ro m). The dis ute rail shipm Water Reactor Plan

here:

A

=

ostV

=

enerated wa ncludes pac verage cost i om the LAC he details of ry values def e produced b a depth of duces a valu portation Ri atalities incu of NUREG-1

$3,0 here:

3,000,000 =

A

=

SHIP

=

T

=

T

=

the waste vo ment per NUR NUREG-149 ound trip di stance for ra ments must r

=

volume

=

cost o transpo aste were ba ckaging, tran is based on t CBWR site f the average fined by neg by remediati 0.15 meters ue for CostWD sks (CostTF) urred during 1757, Appen 00,000

=

moneta rem (N Person

=

volume

=

volume

=

fatality fatalitie

=

distanc olume (VA) is REG-1757 i 96, Appendi istance from il shipments follow, how 4-11 e of waste pr of waste d ortation cost, ased on an a nsportation the average to Clive, U total dispos gotiated cont ion (VA) assu

s. This resu D of $2,812,5

)

g the transpo ndix N which

ary value of NUREG-153

-Rem Conve e of waste pr e of a truck s rate per es/truck-km; e traveled in s assumed to s assumed to ix B, Table A m the LAC s is further t wever the diff roduced, rem disposal pe

, in units of $

average total and disposa transportatio Utah (Energy sal cost (Cos tract.

umes that th ults in a valu 500.00.

ortation of w h is expresse f a fatality e 30 Reassess ersion Facto roduced in u shipment in m truck-kilom n km.

o be 1,125 m o be 13.6 m3 A.1, a value CBWR site than that for fference as it mediated in u er unit vo

$/m3.

l disposal co al fees. Th on cost of us ySolutions r stV) of $2,500 he reference ue for waste waste (CostTF ed as follow equivalent to sment of NR or Policy (10 units of m3; m3; meter travel m3 and the h 3 (VSHIP).

e of 3.8 E-08 by highway r highway sh t pertains to Equatio units of m3; lume, inclu ost of $2,50 he transport sing either r radioactive w 0/m3 of wast area of 7,50 e volume (V F) was calcu ws:

Equatio o $2,000/pe RCs Dollar 0))

led in unit haul volume 8/hr was use y is 1,348 m hipments bec the calculati n 4-4 uding 0/m3.

tation rail or waste te are 00 m2 VA) of ulated n 4-5 erson-r per ts of of an ed for miles cause ion is

La Cross License T Revision insignific CostTF. F 4.4.1.4.3 The total 4.4.1.5.

Determin benefit e set equal follows; Assumin the a va rem a so the ratio averted i Assumin Class 3 calculate

resulting averted d se Boiling W Termination n 0 cant. The hi For this eval Total l cost, (CostT Residu nation of res quals or exc l to the dos

ng the follow parameter v alue of one f moved during oil DCGLw o

of the conc s 17.35.

ng a concent area), the p d as follows

in a value dose (BAD) is

Water Reactor Plan ighway ship luation, the v Cost (CostT)

T) assumed f ual Radioact sidual radioa ceeds the cos se averted,

$2 wing values f values from s for remediat g the excava of 57.9 pCi/g

$2 centration to tration set a present wor s;

0.0 for PW(AD s then calcula

$2,000 r

pment distan value for the

)

for this evalu tivity in Soil activity in s sts of remov the ratio of

2,000 for the remai section 4.4.1 tion effective

ation, gm for Cs-13 2,0000.01 o the DCGL at 50% of th rth of future 017,500 DCollective) of ated as follo 0 40.81 4-12 nce of 2,169 e CostTF varia uation is $2,8 ls that are A oils that are al and waste f the concen

0.025 ining variabl 1.2, eness (F), as 37 from Tab

$2,832,953 10.0251 Lw when the he DCGLw e collective 0.0251 f 40.81 pers ws;

$81,628.79 km (DT) wa able is $20,4 832,953.99.

ALARA e ALARA is e disposal. W ntration to t

1 les; ssuming all r ble 5-4 of Ch

.990.00 7,5001 e total cost (based on t e averted do 28.95 57.9 1 son rems.

9 as used for t 453.99.

s the concen When the tot the DCGLw residual radi hapter 5, 0.693 30.17 1.

(CostT) is e the investig ose PW(AD

0.00 0 3

The benefit the calculati ntration at w tal cost (Cos is calculate Equatio oactivity is Equatio equal to the gation level DCollective) ca Equatio 0.693 30.17

t from colle Equatio on of which stT) is ed as n 4-6 n 4-7 dose for a an be n 4-8 ective n 4-9

La Cross License T Revision This sim disposing removing criterion.

soils with 4.4.2.

With the be disass commod open air designati rates tha based up The obje E

A E

pr M

si T

E te eq As expla those bas Based up following Les Les All struc Confirma prior to d criteria.

source te be perfor structura be demol se Boiling W Termination n 0 mple analysis g excavated g and dispo

. Since the h residual ra ALARA exception o sembled, rem ity removal demolition c ions used to at will safely on re-suspen ctives of the Ensure groun ALARA and Ensure demo rocessed and Minimize the ignificant ef Termination.

Ensure open echniques w quipment or ained in Ref sed only on m pon the calc g open air de ss than 2 mR ss than 1,000 ctural surface atory survey demolition t It is expect erms to level rmed to mee l surfaces an lished, reduc Water Reactor Plan s confirms th soil as low osing of soil cost is great adioactivity c Analysis for of some buri moved, pack is complete criteria spec characterize y allow stru nsion factors e open air de nd level airb within regul olition liqui d released us e spread on ffect on grou air demolit with minim r personnel c ference 5, th member of th culations, co emolition lim R/hr beta-gam 0 dpm/100cm es will be re ys will be pe to ensure tha ed that reme below that c et the 25 mr nd non-load-ced in size, p r

he statemen w-level radio l with resid ter than the b concentration r Remediati ied piping, a kaged and sh

, structural s cified in RS-e the accept uctures to be s and ground emolition lim orne radioac latory limits id concentra sing plant wa contaminati undwater or tion activitie al radiolog contaminatio hese objectiv he public do omparisons, mits will be i mma total co m2 beta-gam emediated to erformed usi at contamina ediation to o correspondin rem/yr dose

-bearing inte packaged and 4-13 nt in section oactive wast dual radioact benefit, it is ns below the ion of Basem all contamin hipped off-si surfaces will

-TD-313196-able remova e demolishe d level releas mits are the fo ctivity levels ations rema ater treatmen on within th r the scope o es can be co ical restrict on controls).

ves result in oses at the sit and conclu implemented ontamination mma loose su o the open a ing approve ation levels open air dem ng to 25 mre limit. Onc erior concret d shipped of N.1.5 of NU te is clearly tivity conce s not ALARA e DCGLw.

ment Struct nated and no ite as a was l be remedia

-005. These able contami ed without c se and disper following:

s and off-sit ain at level nt systems a he site boun of soil reme onducted us tions or co n lower ope te boundary usions docu d:

n on contact urface contam air demolitio ed procedure are at or be molition crite em/yr. If no ce remediati te walls belo ff-site to a lic UREG-1757 y greater tha entrations le A to excava tures on-contamina te stream co ated as nece e conditions ination and containment.

rsion model te dose cons ls which ca and discharg ndary such th ediation requ sing convent ontrols (e.g en air demol umented in R with structu mination.

on limits pri es following elow the ope eria will red ot, additional on is compl ow the 636 fo censed dispo 7 that the co an the bene ss than the ate and dispo ated systems ommodity.

ssary to mee or indicator contact exp

. The limit

s.

sequences re an be colle e points.

hat there is uired for Lic tional demo g., without lition limits Reference 5 ural concrete ior to demol remediation en are demo duce the stru l remediation lete, above g oot elevation osal facility.

ost of fit of dose ose of s will Once et the rs are osure ts are emain

ected, not a cense olition

area, than 5, the

e.

lition.

n and lition ucture n will grade n will

La Cross License T Revision The belo Building located b Ventilati Foundati remainin Structure All concr to demol Reactor contamin excess of and Rem after dem contamin below th 25 mrem An ALA Building of charac structure located in WTB is e ALARA comprise is used as 4.4.2.1.

The ALA section 4 as oppos To be co in units o same ma the result is chang represent Concent address b The calc multiple normaliz distributi se Boiling W Termination n 0 w grade imp (WTB), Wa below the 6 on Tunnel, ion, the 1C ng structures es.

rete inside th lition. This Building b nation on the f the open ai maining Stru molition wil nation in the he open air m/yr dose lim ARA analys

, WTB, WG cterization s s after the o n the WTB.

expected to r analysis of ed of the sma s an example ALAR ARA analy 4.4.1.5 with a ed to DCGL onsistent with of mCi per anner in the ting mCi val ed to activ ts total ac tration/DCG basement stru culation of d radionuclide zed to accou ion. The equ Water Reactor Plan pacted end s aste Gas Tan 636 foot ele Reactor/Ge Turbine su s have been he steel liner includes all basement re e exposed li ir demolition ctures prior ll be low l e WGTV an r demolition mit in the BFM is was perf GTV and Rem urveys indic open air dem Therefore, result in the f the WTB b allest surfac e in the ALA RA Analysis ses for the a slight mod Lw. The BFM h the NURE mrem/yr wh equation. W lue is called vity to be ctivity as GLw in Equ uctures.

dose averted es. The den unt for the uation from N r

state structur nk Vault (W evation. Th enerator Pla ump and the n combined r will be rem l activated a emaining a iner surfaces n criteria wil to demoliti evels of su nd Remainin n criteria a M (see Chap formed for maining Stru cate that the molition crite

, the remedi greatest rela bounds the A e area which ARA calcula s Equation remediation dification of M DFs are e EG-1757 AL hich are ana When the BF the Baseme consistent w opposed to uation 4-6 i d in Equatio ominator mu multiple r NUREG-175 4-14 res consist o WGTV) and t hese remain ant, the on e Turbine p d into one moved from t and contami after demoli

s. It is also ll be remove ion. The re urface conta ng Structure and below pter 6 for a d each of the uctures) and e majority o eria is met a iation of the ative benefit ALARA ana h minimizes ation method n of basem terms to add expressed in LARA equat alogous units FM DFs are ent Inventory with the def o concentr s replaced on 4-10 is m ust be summ radionuclides 57 therefore f the Reacto the remainde ning structu ne foot thic pit. For the survey unit the interior o inated concr ition will o assumed th ed from the i emaining sou amination.

es at levels t contaminati detailed desc e four base is summariz f residual ra and after all concrete in

t. In addition alyses for o s remediation ds discussed ment structur dress the use n units of mr tion, the BFM s to the DC inverted an y Level (BIL finition of m ration. In by Activit modified to med and the i s that are becomes:

or Building, er of the bas ures include ck portion o e purposes o t designated of the React rete. The so be low le hat contamin interiors of th urce term in There is cu that are exp on levels c cription of th ement survey zed in Table adioactivity concrete is n the 630 an n to contami other baseme n costs. The below.

res uses Eq e of BFM D rem/yr per m M DFs are i CGLw and ca nd multiplied L). The term mCi in the n summary ty/BIL in E account for individual d present in Waste Treat sement struc the Piping of the Chim of the BFM d as Rema tor Building ource term i evels of su nated concre he WTB, W n these buil urrently min pected to be correspondin he BFM).

y units (Re e 4-4. The re remaining i removed w d 635 foot o ination level ents because erefore, the W quation 4-6 Dose Factors mCi total act inverted resu an be used i d by 25 mre m concentra BFM DF w y, the ratio Equation 4-1 r the presen dose contribu the radionu tment ctures g and mney M, the aining prior in the urface ete in WGTV dings nimal e well ng to eactor esults in the will be of the ls, the e it is WTB from (DF) tivity.

ulting in the m/yr, ation which o of 10 to ce of utions uclide

La Cross License T Revision The tota determin that no fu ALARA.

remediat 4.4.2.2.

The only concrete With the all struct and disp Building if any, r contamin floors of As discu open air will likel remainin action wi The ALA concrete TSD RS-is anticip first 1/2-in assumed guidance 0.125 inc are listed Surface A se Boiling W Termination n 0

wh fi DO al cost for nes the cost e further remed

. Values les e to achieve Reme y structures walls and f exception o ures above t osed of as a and LACBW residual con nation to rem the WTB.

ussed above, demolition ly be concre ng structural ill not be eva ARA analys surfaces.

-TD-313196 pated that the nch of conc that 100%

e in section ches (0.635 c d in EnergyS Areas, Volum Water Reactor Plan

here:

=

OSEAMCG =

the remedia effectiveness diation is ne ss than one p ALARA.

dial Action that will re floors from t of some secti the 636 foot a waste stre WR Crib Ho ntamination.

main after re prior to bu limits speci ete scabbling surfaces for aluated for A is assumes t Based on 6-001, Radio e majority of crete. For of the cont G.3.1 of NU cm) of conc Solutions TS mes, and Voi r

$2,000

=

the mix Concer

=

averted al action wh s of the rem ecessary bey provide the f Costs emain as po the Reactor ions of burie elevation w eam. There ouse will rem As discu emoval of co uilding demo ified in Refe g or shaving r acceptable ALARA.

that the rem LACBWR nuclides of C f the radionu the purpose tamination r UREG/CR-5 crete. The b D RS-TD-3 id Spaces (1 4-15

xture fractio rn (ROC) no d dose to the hen divided medial action yond that req fraction of th otential cand Building, W ed pipe, all i will be remov are two ex main in plac ssed above, ontainment c olition all st erence 5. T

g. As these concentratio mediation of concrete co Concern Du uclide source es of the A esides in th 5884, one p basement flo 13196-002, L 2).

on for each rmalized to AMCG (Re d by the to

n. Values gr quired to me he dose crite didate surfa WTB, WGTV impacted sys ved during t xceptions; th ce but are ex

, it is antic concrete wil tructures wil The remediat efforts will ons of resid basement st ore data de uring LACBW e inventory i ALARA eva he first 1/2 in pass of scab oor surface a La Crosse E

1 h individual one.

em).

otal benefit reater than u eet the dose erion where aces for rem V and Rema stems, comp the decomm he LACBWR xpected to co cipated that ll be in the 6 ll be remedi tion approac occur prior dual activity, tructures is escribed in WR Decomm in the floor r aluation, it i nch. In acco bbling is ass areas used i End State Ba Equation Radionuclid of averted unity demon criterion an it is necessa mediation ar aining Struct ponents as w issioning pr R Administr ontain neglig the majori 630 and 635 iated to mee ch for this a to evaluatin

, this remedi by scabblin EnergySolu missioning (1 resides withi is conservat ordance wit sumed to rem in the calcul asement Con n 4-10 de of dose strate nd are ary to re the tures.

well as ocess ration

gible, ty of 5 foot et the action ng the iation ng the utions 11), it in the tively th the move lation ncrete

La Cross License T Revision 4.4.2.2.1 The rem experienc similar a developin In accord or shavin Radiation labor rate and $55.

$236.74.

Using th shaving a nominal assumes Consequ surface a inch per p Also in a typical e preparati were incr contingen 20.29 ma the labor 4.4.2.2.2 Using th commerc such as c per work week. Th will be p

$685.00 p

$950.00 p a nomina every 80 Addition drums fo approxim approxim approxim associate se Boiling W Termination n 0 Reme mediation ac ce, from pub activities. Cu ng these rate dance with N ng activities n Protection es for these

.59 per hour he guidance activity will removal rat that 100%

ently, using area of 36.87 pass, equate accordance w eight-hour sh ion, donning reased by a f ncy of 25%

an-hours for r cost for this Equip he guidance cially availa cutting bits, k week, the his evaluatio procured, the per week an per week. T al rate of $1 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of o nal costs inc or the collec mately $100 mately 16.53 mately 3 drum ed with pro Water Reactor Plan diation Acti tivity rates blished liter urrent projec es.

NUREG/CR s is three fu Technician positions of r for a RPT found in N l remove app te is approxi

% of the r the WTB a 7 m2, scabbl s to approxim with NURE hift is 5.33 g and remov factor of 33%

was added the WTB, w s evaluation pment Costs found in N able scabblin vacuum filt 20.29 man-on assumes t e Pentek Squ nd a Pentek M The compres 115.00 per w operation, fo clude filter r cted debris.

.00 per drum 3 ft3 (0.47 m ms at a tota curing this r

vity Rates that were rature, or fro ct labor cost R-5884, an as ull-time labo (RPT), also f $66.78 per T, the hourly NUREG/CR-proximately imately 130 radioactive as an examp ling at a nom mately 12.2 EG/CR-5884 hours. To ving protect

% which equ to the manp which is mul of $4,804.59 NUREG/CR-ng equipmen ters and was

-hours in the that two diff uirrel Scabb Moose Scabb ssor required week. The c or an equiva replacement A 55-gallon

m. As it is m3) of conc al cost of $3 equipment 4-16 used for th om groups o ts and past o ssumed crew orers, a sup o at a 1/4-time hour for a l y unit rate

-5884 it is a 0.125 inche ft2 or 12.08 contaminati ple, removin minal rate o 1 man-hours it is assum account for tive clothing uates to an a power hours ltiplied times

9.

-5884 equip nt, a compr ste drums fo e WTB exa ferent comm ler & Vacuu bler & Vacu d for pneuma cutting bits f alent cost o ts at about n drum hold s assumed t crete waste, 300.00. The would be his evaluatio or vendors c operational e w size for pe ervisor at a e involvemen laborer, $90 that will be assumed tha es of concre 8 m2 per hou ion resides ng 1/2 inch o of 12.08 m2 p s of work.

med that the r non-remed g and work additional 4.

s. This equ s the hourly pment costs ressor, a vac or containing ample equate mercially ava um System w uum System atic equipme for the units of about $1

$2.50 per h ds approxim that the sca this will e mobilizati approximat on were ba currently per experience w erforming co a 1/4-time inv nt. Using th 0.00 per hour e used for t at the concr ete per pass ur. The AL within the of concrete o per hour to actual reme diation work breaks, the 03 man-hou uates to a to unit rate of are based cuum unit a g waste deb es to approx ailable concr with a nomi with a nom ent operation s are assume 3.00 per ho hour of oper mately 7 ft3 o abbing activ require the ion and dem tely $2,200.

ased on prev rforming the were also us oncrete scab volvement a he current pr r for a super the evaluati rete scabblin and the effe LARA evalu e first 1/2 over an assu a depth of 0 ediation time k hours for total man-h urs. In additi otal man-hou f $236.74 to on the rent and consum bris. At 40-h ximately 1 w ete removal inal rental ra inal rental ra n can be rent ed to be rep our of opera ration and w of waste and vity will gen procuremen mobilization 00 per piec vious ese or sed in bbling and a roject rvisor on is ng or ective uation inch.

umed 0.125 e in a work hours ion, a urs of equal tal of mables hours work-units ate of ate of ted at placed ation.

waste d cost nerate nt of costs ce of

La Cross License T Revision equipmen evaluatio 4.4.2.2.3 For the e labor cos cost (Cos 4.4.2.3.

As previo expressed Disposal This ave compone highway disposal

$1,170.5 4.4.2.4.

The cost of NURE In accord FW. For (20.29 m calculate 4.4.2.5.

As previ transport se Boiling W Termination n 0 nt for a tota on is approxi Total evaluation o st of $4,804.

stR) for this a Transp ously descri d as follows

costs for ge erage cost i ent of this av hauling fro facility). B 2 is calculat Non-R of non-radi EG-1757, Ap

wh

$3 FW TA dance with N TA, in accor man-hours) w d for the Co Transp iously descr tation of was Water Reactor Plan al of approxi imately $9,2 Remediation f the remed 59 plus the activity of $

port and Dis bed in sectio

enerated wa ncludes pac verage cost i om Genoa, Based upon a ed for the Co Radiological iological wo ppendix N w

$3,0 here:

3,000,000 =

W

=

A

=

NUREG-149 dance with N was used fo ostACC variab portation Ri ribed in sect ste (CostTF) i r

imately $6,6 70.00.

n Action Co iation activi equipment c 14,074.59 fo sposal of the on 4.4.1.4.1, aste were ba ckaging, tran is based on t Wisconsin an assumed ostWD variab l Risks (Cost orkplace acc which is expr 000,000.00

=

moneta rem (N

=

workpl

=

worker hours.

96, Appendi NUREG-175 or worker a le.

sks (CostTF) tion 4.4.1.4.

is expressed 4-17 600.00. The st (CostR) ity of concre cost of $9,27 or the WTB.

e Waste (Cos

, the cost of ased on an a nsportation the average to Clive, U waste volum ble.

tACC) idents (Cost ressed as foll

ary value of UREG-1530 ace fatality r time requir x B, Table A 57 the same accident cos

)

2, the cost as follows:

e total equip ete scabbling 70.00 results stWD) f waste transp average total and disposa transportatio Utah (Energy me of 0.47 tACC) was ca lows:

f a fatality

0) rate in fatalit red for rem A.1, a value hours that w st. Subsequ of traffic f pment costs g or shaving s in a total re port and dis l disposal co al fees. Th on cost of us ySolutions r m3 for the W alculated usi equivalent t ties/hour wo mediation in e of 4.2 E-08 was determin uently, a va fatalities inc assumed fo g, the sum o emediation a posal (CostW Equation ost of $2,50 he transport sing either r radioactive w WTB, a valu ing Equation Equation to $2000/pe orked; units of wo 8/hr was use ned for labor alue of $2.5 curred durin r this of the action WD) is n 4-11 0/m3.

tation rail or waste ue of n N-5 n 4-12 erson-orker-ed for r cost 56 is g the

La Cross License T Revision For this e overland In accord was used The Cliv (2,169 km of the rou insignific CostTF. F 4.4.2.6.

The cost 1757, Ap Costs ass exposure majority shaving a this activ

$121.77.

4.4.2.7.

The cost 1757, Ap se Boiling W Termination n 0

evaluation, t truck shipm dance with d for FT.

ve, Utah ro m). The dis ute rail shipm cant. The hi For this eval Work of remediat ppendix N w

wh DR T

sociated with e for the task of the sourc activity. Th vity (T) was Mone of remediat ppendix N w Water Reactor Plan

$3,0 the waste vo ment per NUR NUREG-14 ound trip d stance for ra ments must ighway ship luation, the v er Dose Esti tion worker d which is expr here:

R

=

=

h worker do

k. A value o ce inventory he time work 20.29 man-h tary Cost of tion worker which is expr r

00,000.00 olume (VA) i REG-1757 i 96, Volume distance from il shipments follow, how pment distan value for the imates (Cost dose (CostWD essed as foll

$2,000.00

=

total ef worker

=

time w person-se are a func of 3 mrem p y will be rem ked to reme hours. For th f Dose to the dose (CostPD essed as foll 4-18

is assumed t s assumed to e 2, Append m Genoa, W s is further t wever the diff nce of 2,169 e CostTF varia tWDose)

WDose) was cal lows:

ffective dose s in units of worked (site

-hour.

ction of the per man-hou moved prior diate the are his evaluatio Public (Cos Dose) was cal lows:

to be 0.47 m o be 13.6 m3 dix B, Table Wisconsin than that for fference as it km (DT) wa able is $8.51 lculated usin e equivalent f Rem/hr; labor) to re hours worke ur was used to performi ea in units o on, the value stPDose) lculated usin m3 and the ha 3 (VSHIP).

A.1, a valu by highway r highway sh t pertains to as used for t

1.

ng Equation (TEDE) rat emediate the ed and the w for DR. Th ing the conc of person-ho e for the Cos ng Equation Equation aul volume ue of 3.8 E-y is 1,348 m hipments bec the calculati the calculati N-7 of NUR Equation te to remedi e area in un workers radi is assumes t crete scabblin our calculate stWDose variab N-7 of NUR n 4-13 of an

-08/hr miles cause ion is on of REG-n 4-14 iation its of iation that a ng or ed for ble is REG-

La Cross License T Revision For this e shipment the packa exposure Genoa, W CostPDose 4.4.2.8.

The total 4.4.2.9.

The follo from NU Pop ind Fra des Are and spr Mo Num (pe se Boiling W Termination n 0

wh DR T

equation, a t is classifie age meets an e time (T) us Wisconsin to e variable is Total l cost, (CostT Residu owing param UREG-1757 a pulation den dustrial use s action of resi sired concret ea (A) used t d BFM Exca ead over a 1 onetary disco mber of year r Table N.2 Water Reactor Plan

$2 here:

R

=

=

worst-case d as Low Sp n administra sed for this c o the dispo

$22.00.

Cost (CostT)

T) assumed f ual Radioact meters were u and presente sity (PD) for cenario (per idual radioac te volume is to calculate t avation scena meter lift.

ount rate (r) rs (N) over w of Appendix r

2,000.00

=

total ef units of

=

time sp person-value of 0 pecific Activ ative limit o calculation i sal site in C

)

for this evalu tivity in Bas used for per ed in section r the critical r NUREG-14 ctivity remov assumed 10 the populatio ario - the vol

- 0.00 yr-1 fo which the co x N of NUR 4-19 ffective dos f Rem/hr; pent near wa

-hour.

.5 mrem/hr vity (LSA) i f 0.5 mrem/

s based upon Clive Utah.

uation is $15 sement Struc rforming the n 4.4.2.1:

group (perso 496, Append ved by the re 00% effective on density (m lume of conc or soils.

ollective aver EG-1757).

se equivalen aste shipmen was used fo in accordanc

/hr on the ex n a transit ti For this e 5,399.95 ctures that ar e ALARA ca ons/m2) - 0.0 dix B, Table emedial acti e).

m2) - BFM I crete for eac rted dose is nt (TEDE) r nts in parkin or DR. This ce with 49 C xterior of th ime of 22 ho evaluation, t re ALARA alculation us 01 person/m A.1).

on (F) - 1 (R Insitu scenar ch basement calculated (y Equation rate to publ ng lots in un assumes tha CFR 173.427 e shipment.

ours driving the value fo sing the equ m2 for soil in Removal of rios - 7,500 m from Table yr) - 1,000 y n 4-15 lic in nits of at the 7 and The from or the uation m2 4-1 yrs

La Cross License T Revision (a) 4.4.2.9.1 The ALA decay co in TSD R The ALA BFM Ins Excavati because Table 5-7 results in T

(

(

complian BFM Ins only to th As seen i is at the mixture Therefor to derive the AMC basement se Boiling W Termination n 0 Tab EnergySolutio Radio ARA analysi onstants () a RS-TD-3131 ARA calcula situ scenario on scenario.

the BIL for

7) is based n a maximum Table 4-2 Radionuclid Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 (a) Dose signif (b) Normalized TSD RS-TD nce BIL that situ dose app he basement in Table 4-3 maximum fraction wa e, for the BF e the fi variab CG (DOSEAM t in units of Water Reactor Plan ble 4-1 V

Basem React WTB WGT Rema ons TSD RS-TD onuclides Co is was cond and the radio 96-001 are p ation was per o (groundwa

. Two dose the Source on the sum m

Radionuc de (a) ficant ROC for d radionuclide m D-313196-001.

t is driven pr plies to the

-specific are 3 (from Refe compliance as included FM Insitu sc ble in Equat MCG) variabl Rem.

r Volume of C ment tor Building B

TV aining Structu D-313196-004 onsidered for ducted for ea onuclide mix presented in rformed in tw ater and dril e values wer Term Surv of the BFM clide Half-L Half-Life (yrs) 5.27 E 00 2.91 E+01 3.00 E+01 the WTB in ac mixture for do rimarily by t full 7500 m ea of concret erence 13), th level is le in the calcu cenario, the d tion 4-10 for le is the sum 4-20 Concrete in Con ures 4 (13), LACBW r ALARA A ach basemen xture fractio Table 4-2.

wo parts for lling spoils) re required ey (STS) co M Insitu and ife(s), Decay

(

1.3 2.3 2.3 ccordance with se significant R the BFM Ex m2 site area w te on the gro he dose from ss than 25 m ulations of dose values r each ROC m of the dos Basement S ncrete Volum (m3) 538.63 40.72 121.91 242.92 WR Soil DCGL Analysis nt. The valu ons for conta r each basem

) and the se to accuratel ompliance d d BFM Exc ay Constant(

(yr-1) 31 E-01 38 E-02 31 E-02 h TSD RS-TD-ROC for the W xcavation sc while the BF ound surface m the BFM I mrem/yr. I the dose va for each RO C in each bas se for each R Structuresa me L and Concrete ues for half-aminated co ment, the first econd repres ly calculate determination cavation Dos (s) and Dose Radionu Mixtur 1.40%

1.00%

97.60

-313196-001.

WTB from enario dose.

FM Excavat after excava Insitu scenar In addition, alues report OC from Tab sement. The ROC from T BFM Dose Fa

-life, radiolo oncrete devel t representin senting the the averted n (see Chap se Factors.

e Factors uclide re(b) 0%

. In addition tion dose ap ation.

rio when the the radionu ted in Table ble 4-3 were e averted do Table 4-3 in actors.

ogical loped ng the BFM dose pter 5, This n, the pplies e BIL uclide e 4-3.

e used ose to each

La Cross License T Revision For the B the DOSE the radio divided b for each values in The aver provide t justify r radioactiv T

Radionu Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 Total Do 4.4.2.9.2 The ALA activities at 1.02.

residual r 4.4.2.10.

Concrete terminati buried pl benefit a complian se Boiling W Termination n 0 BFM Excava EAMCG. The onuclide mi by the comp basement w n Table 4-3.

rted cost fro the ratio for remediation vity is ALAR able 4-3 uclide ose (mrem/yr ALAR ARA calcula s are presente The ratio f radioactivity Concl e structural ion. The site lant structure analysis show nce with the Water Reactor Plan ation scenari e fi variable i ixture for c pliance BILs when the BI om the BFM activity/BIL whereas a RA.

BFM Insit Rea Buil (mrem 3.44 2.05E 8.11E r) 1.05E RA Calculati ations perfor ed in Table 4 for the WTB y at license te lusion surfaces be e dose contr es will be ac ws that furth 25 mrem/yr r

io, 0.025 (i.e in Equation contaminated s from Chap IL is at the M Insitu and L. A result a result gre tu Dose usin actor lding m/yr)

E-01 E+00 E+00 E+01 ion rmed to eva 4-4. The low B basement ermination, low the 636 ribution from ccounted for her remediat dose criterio 4-21 e., 25 mrem/

4-10 for the d concrete pter 5, Table compliance d BFM Exca for the activ eater than ng Complian WTB (mrem/yr) 8.39E-02 1.48E-01 1.55E+00 1.78E+00 luate the co west activity t, which is e was 1.29.

6 foot eleva m remaining r by the BFM ion of concr on is not jus

/yr) was use e Excavation developed e 5-7. The a e level woul avation scen vity/BIL rati one would nce BIL wit W

)

(mr 1.4 1.5 2.64 2.94 oncrete scabb y/BIL ratio w expected to ation will re residual rad M. The AL rete beyond stified.

ed as a conse n scenario is in TSD RS actual BFM ld be 25 mr narios were o that is less d demonstra th Mixture WGTV rem/yr) 41E-01 54E-01 4E+00 4E+00 bling or sha was calculate contain the emain in pl dioactivity re LARA analy that require ervative valu s calculated u S-TD-313196 Excavation rem/yr minu then summ s than one w ate that res Fractions Remaini Structur (mrem/y 6.07E-0 3.78E-0 1.09E+0 1.53E+0 aving remedi ed for the W e majority o ace after lic emaining in sis based on ed to demon ue for using 6-001 dose us the med to would sidual ing res yr) 02 01 00 00 iation WGTV of the cense these n cost strate

L L

R W

I A

Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 E

A Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 C

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Waste Treatme Insitu Calculation A = 7,500 m2, r =

A Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Excavation Calcu A = 40.72 m2, r =

A Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Cost (in dollars) of ng Water React ation Plan Table 4-4 ent Building (b n

= 0.00 yr-1, N = 1 Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E ulation

= 0.00 yr-1, N = 1 Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E f remedial action (C or ALARA A ounding scenar 1,000 yr, PD = 0.

n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 1,000 yr, PD = 0.

n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 (A re CostT) = $15,399.95 nalysis for Vol rio) 01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 esult < 1 would justify r 5

4-22 umetrically Co Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum remediation whereas a r ontaminated Su action of Activity Column I Col

]

In-situ Dose (C

I 8.39E-02 4.

1.48E-01 8.

1.55E+00 8.

m 1.78E+00 1.0 action of Activity Column I Col

]

Activity Fraction 1.40%

1.

1.00%

8.2 97.60%

5.

m 100%

result > 1 would demon ubsurface Struc y removed by rem lumn J Column fi Column I/Sum)

Cost Benef

.71E-02

$95.70

.31E-02

$932.2

.70E-01

$10,064 00E+00

$11,092 y removed by rem lumn J Column BIL (Columns 15E+00 1.22E-0 25E+00 1.21E-0 16E+00 1.89E-0 Sum 2.02E-0 nstrate that residual radi ctures medial action (F) =

K t

fit 0

21 4.94 2.85 (CostB) medial action (F) =

K Column L s I/J) fi Column K divided by sum 02 6.01E-02 03 5.99E-03 01 9.34E-01 01 1.00E+00 oactivity is ALARA)

= 1

= 1 Column M Cost Benefit

$9.30

$5.12

$823.17

$837.59 (Co 1.29 Activ BIL ostB) vity/

L L

R R

I A

Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 E

A Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 C

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Ta Reactor Buildin Insitu Calculation A = 7,500 m2, r =

A Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Excavation Calcu A = 538.63 m2, r A

Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Cost (in dollars) of ng Water React ation Plan ble 4-4 (continu ng n

= 0.00 yr-1, N = 1 Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E ulation r = 0.00 yr-1, N =

Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E f remedial action (C or ued)

ALA 1,000 yr, PD = 0.

n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 1,000 yr, PD = 0 n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 (A re CostT) = $80,964.12 ARA Analysis 01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 0.01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 esult < 1 would justify r 2

4-23 for Volumetric Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum remediation whereas a r cally Contamin action of Activity Column I Col

]

In-situ Dose (C

I 3.44E-01 3.

2.05E+00 1.

8.11E+00 7.

m 1.05E+01 1.0 action of Activity Column I Col

]

Activity Fraction 1.40%

1.

1.00%

4.9 97.60%

4.5 m

100%

result > 1 would demon nated Subsurfac y removed by rem lumn J Column fi Column I/Sum)

Cost Benef

.27E-02

$392.4

.95E-01

$12,912

.72E-01

$52,662 00E+00

$65,967 y removed by rem lumn J Column BIL (Columns 16E+01 1.20E-0 97E+00 2.01E-0 59E+02 2.13E-0 Sum 2.45E-0 nstrate that residual radi ce Structures medial action (F) =

K t

fit 40 2.34 2.34 7.07 (CostB) medial action (F) =

K Column L s I/J) fi Column K divided by sum 03 4.91E-02 03 8.22E-02 02 8.69E-01 02 1.00E+00 oactivity is ALARA)

= 1

= 1 Column M Cost Benefit

$100.60

$929.57

$10,127.65

$11,157.82 (Co 1.05 Activ BIL ostB) vity/

L L

R W

I A

Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 E

A Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 C

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Ta Waste Gas Tan Insitu Calculation A = 7,500 m2, r =

A Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Excavation Calcu A = 121.91 m2, r A

Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Cost (in dollars) of ng Water React ation Plan ble 4-4 (continu nk Vault n

= 0.00 yr-1, N = 1 Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E ulation r = 0.00 yr-1, N =

Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E f remedial action (C or ued)

ALA 1,000 yr, PD = 0.

n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 1,000 yr, PD = 0 n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 (A re CostT) = $21,297.55 ARA Analysis 01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 0.01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 esult < 1 would justify r 5

4-24 for Volumetric Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum remediation whereas a r cally Contamin action of Activity Column I Col

]

In-situ Dose (C

I 1.41E-01 4.

1.54E-01 5.

2.64E+00 8.

m 2.94E+00 1.0 action of Activity Column I Col

]

Activity Fraction 1.40%

3.3 1.00%

2.2 97.60%

1.4 m

100%

result > 1 would demon nated Subsurfac y removed by rem lumn J Column fi Column I/Sum)

Cost Benef

.80E-02

$160.8

.25E-02

$970.0

.99E-01

$17,142 00E+00

$18,273 y removed by rem lumn J Column BIL (Columns 31E+00 4.23E-0 26E+01 4.43E-0 47E+01 6.63E-0 Sum 7.10E-0 nstrate that residual radi ce Structures medial action (F) =

K t

fit 84 00 2.86 3.69 (CostB) medial action (F) =

K Column L s I/J) fi Column K divided by sum 03 5.96E-02 04 6.23E-03 02 9.34E-01 02 1.00E+00 oactivity is ALARA)

= 1

= 1 Column M Cost Benefit

$27.62

$15.96

$2,465.08

$2,508.66 (Co 1.02 Activ BIL ostB) vity/

L L

R R

I A

Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 E

A Column A Nuclide Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 C

La Crosse Boilin License Termin Revision 0 Remaining Stru Insitu Calculation A = 7,500 m2, r =

A Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Excavation Calcu A = 242.92 m2, r A

Column B C

e Half-Life (yrs)a 5.27E+00 2.91E+01 3.00E+01 Cost (in dollars) of ng Water React ation Plan uctures n

= 0.00 yr-1, N = 1 Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E ulation r = 0.00 yr-1, N =

Column C Column (yr-1)a (r+

1.31E-01 1.31E 2.38E-02 2.38E 2.31E-02 2.31E f remedial action (C or 1,000 yr, PD = 0.

n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 1,000 yr, PD = 0 n D Column E

)

(r+)N E-01 1.31E+02 E-02 2.38E+01 E-02 2.31E+01 (A re CostT) = $74,110.73 01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 0.01 person/m2 Column F Colu e-(r+)N 1-e 7.77E-58 1.00 4.54E-11 1.00 9.29E-11 1.00 esult < 1 would justify r 3

4-25 Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum Fra umn G Column H

-(r+)N

[1-e-(r+)N]

/(r+)

0E+00 7.60E+00 0E+00 4.20E+01 0E+00 4.33E+01 Check Sum remediation whereas a r action of Activity Column I Col

]

In-situ Dose (C

I 6.07E-02 3.

3.78E-01 2.

1.09E+00 7.

m 1.53E+00 1.0 action of Activity Column I Col

]

Activity Fraction 1.40%

6.9 1.00%

1.9 97.60%

3.

m 100%

result > 1 would demon y removed by rem lumn J Column fi Column I/Sum)

Cost Benef

.97E-02

$69.24

.47E-01

$2,380.

.13E-01

$7,077.

00E+00

$9,528.

y removed by rem lumn J Column BIL (Columns 98E+00 2.00E-0 96E+01 5.10E-0 15E+01 3.10E-0 Sum 3.35E-0 nstrate that residual radi medial action (F) =

K t

fit 4

.91

.92

.07 (CostB) medial action (F) =

K Column L s I/J) fi Column K divided by sum 03 5.98E-02 04 1.52E-02 02 9.25E-01 02 1.00E+00 oactivity is ALARA)

= 1

= 1 Column M Cost Benefit

$55.21

$77.54

$4,863.76

$4,996.52 (Co 5.10 Activ BIL ostB) vity/

La Cross License T Revision 4.5.

R

1.

U Im

2.

U C

2

3.

D D

4.

U o

N

5.

E D

6.

U R

7.

U C

o

8.

U A

9.

U Im T

10.

U P

11.

E C

12.

E B

13.

E D

se Boiling W Termination n 0 References U.S. Nuclear mplementati U.S. Nuclear Content of Li 011.

Dairyland Po Decommissio U.S. Nuclear f Decommis November 19 EnergySoluti Demolition L U.S. Nuclear Radiation Sur U.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologic U.S. Nuclear Analysis Guid U.S. Nuclear mpact Statem Termination o U.S. Nuclear erson-Rem C EnergySoluti Concern Duri EnergySoluti Basement Co EnergySoluti DCGL and C Water Reactor Plan Regulatory ion of 10 CF Regulatory icense Termi wer Coopera oning Activit Regulatory ssioning for t 995.

ons Technic Limits.

Regulatory rvey and Site Regulatory Decommiss cal Criteria, F Regulatory delines of th Regulatory ment in Supp of NRC-Lice Regulatory Conversion ons Technic ing LACBW ons Technic oncrete Surfa ons Technic oncrete BFM r

Commission FR 50.59 Cha Commission ination Plan ative, LACB ties Report (

Commission the Referenc cal Support D Commission e Investigati Commission sioning Guid Final Report Commission he U.S. Nucl Commission port of Rulem ensed Nucle Commission Factor Polic cal Support D WR Decomm cal Suppor D ace Areas, V cal Support D M Dose Fact 4-26 n Regulatory anges, Tests n, Regulator s for Nuclea BWR Decom (D-Plan/PSD n, NUREG/C ce Pressurize Document R n, NUREG-1 ion Manual (

n, NUREG-1 dance - Char t - Septembe n, NUREG/B ear Regulato n, NUREG-1 making on R ear Facilities n, NUREG-1 cy - Decemb Document R missioning.

Document RS Volumes, and Document R tors.

y Guide 1.18 s and Experim ry Guide 1.1 ar Power Rea mmissioning DAR), Revis CR-5884, Vo ed Water Re RS-TD-31319 1575, Revisi (MARSSIM 1757, Volum racterization er 2006.

BR-0058, Re ory Commis 1496, Volum Radiological

- July 1997 1530, Reasse ber 1995.

RS-TD-31319 S-TD-31319 d Void Space RS-TD-31319 87, Guidance ments - Nov 79, Standard actors, Revis Plan and Po sion - March olume 2, Re eactor Power 96-005, La C ion 1, Multi-M), August 20 me 2, Revisio

, Survey, an evision 4, Re ssion - Septe me 2, Generi Criteria for

7.

essment of N 96-001, Rad 96-002, La C es.96-004, LAC e for vember 2000 d Format and sion 1 - June ost Shutdown h 2014.

evised Analy r Station -

Crosse Open

-Agency 000.

on 1, nd Determina egulatory ember 2004.

ic Environm License NRCs Dolla dionuclides o Crosse End S CBWR Soil

0.

d e

n yses n Air ation mental ar per of State