ML16196A061

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to Disagreement with Adversary Characteristics, Attributes, or Tactics Employed or Prepared as Part of an NRC-Evaluated FOF Exercise - Disputed Item 05000528, 529, 530/2016-01
ML16196A061
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/2016
From: Joseph Willis
NRC/NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB
To: Cosenza M
Arizona Public Service Co
Josh Berry 287.3647
References
IR 2016001
Download: ML16196A061 (2)


See also: IR 05000528/2016001

Text

July 15, 2016

Mr. Michael J. Cosenza

Department Leader, Nuclear Security Programs

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

5801 S. Wintersburg Road, MS 7002

Tonopah, AZ 85354-7529

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO A DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS,

ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN

NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM

05000528,529,530/2016-01

Dear Mr. Cosenza:

Thank you for the discussion in the teleconference on July 14, 2016, with the Division of

Security Operations (DSO), Security Performance Evaluation Branch regarding your

disagreement with adversary characteristics, attributes, or tactics employed or prepared in

accordance with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspection Procedure 71130.03,

Contingency Response - Force-on-Force Testing, as part of an NRC-evaluated force-on-force

(FOF) exercise.

In this teleconference you disputed a tactic, technique, or procedure (TTP) within Scenario 1

developed by an NRC FOF inspection team.

The NRC has carefully reviewed your escalation and concluded that the disputed TTP is

approved for use within the NRC-evaluated exercise scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is

within the design basis threat; (2) it is supported by available data; (3) it is within your program

requirements to provide defense-in-depth; (4) it can be safely performed and controlled; and (5)

it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy.

If you would like to appeal this decision, provide a written response within 3 days from the date

of this letter with the basis of your appeal to the Director, DSO.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Joseph Willis, Branch Chief (Acting)

Security Performance Evaluation Branch

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

ML16196A061

OFFICE

NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB

NAME

J. Berry

J. Willis

DATE

7/ 14 /2016

7/ 15 /2016