ML16161A848

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-269/87-27,50-270/87-27 & 50-287/87-27 on 870706-10.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review & Evaluation of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program
ML16161A848
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/23/1987
From: Decker T, Kreh J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML16161A849 List:
References
50-269-87-27, 50-270-87-27, 50-287-87-27, IEB-79-18, IEIN-85-080, IEIN-85-80, IEIN-86-097, IEIN-86-098, IEIN-86-97, IEIN-86-98, NUDOCS 8707300460
Download: ML16161A848 (6)


See also: IR 05000269/1987027

Text

63 REGO

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

JUL 2 3 1987

Report Nos.:

50-269/87-27, 50-270/87-27, and 50-287/87-27

Licensee:

Duke Power Company

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242

Docket Nos.:

50-269, 50-270 and 50-287

License Nos.:

DPR-38, DPR-47,

and DPR-55

Facility Name:

Oconee Nuclear Station

Inspection Condu ted:

July 6-10, 1987

Inspector:

1Yhtifzl-

L

. KrehDate

Sned

Approved by:

Q.us

(/

6

T. R. Decker, Chief

Date Signed

Emergency Preparedness Section

Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection involved review and evaluation of

the licensee's emergency preparedness program.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

  • 8707300460 870723

PDR

ADOCK 05000269

PDR

2

REPORT DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted

Licensee-Employees

  • M. S. Tuckman, Station Manager
  • R. L. Sweigart, Superintendent - Operations

C. L. Harlin, Compliance Engineer

  • C. C. Jennings, Station Emergency Planner
  • D. L. Davidson, Compliance Specialist
  • F. E. Owens, Shift Supervisor

D. L. Gordon, Shift Supervisor

T. E. Kelley, Safety Associate

T. N. Glenn, I&E Support Engineer

E. Merritt, Associate I&E Engineer

Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators,

and

office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspectors

  • J. C.

Bryant

P. H. Skinner

  • L. Wert
  • Attended exit interview

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 10, 1987, with

those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the

areas inspected and discussed the inspection findings.

The licensee did

not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by

the inspector during this inspection.

3. Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

This subject was not addressed in the inspection.

4.

Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures (82701)

Pursuant to

10 CFR 50.47(b)(16),

10 CFR 50.54(q), Appendix E to

10 CFR Part 50, and Section P of the licensee's Emergency Plan, this area

was inspected to determine whether significant changes were made in the

licensee's emergency

preparedness

program since the last routine

inspection (August 1985),

and to assess the impact of any such changes on

the overall state of emergency preparedness at the facility.

3

The inspector reviewed the licensee's program for making changes to the

Emergency Plan and the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EPIPs).

The inspector verified that the Station Manager approved all revisions to

the Emergency Plan and EPIPS,

and that all such changes were submitted to

the NRC within 30 days of the effective date, as required.

Current

controlled-copies of those documents were observed to be available in the

Control

Room,

with applicable EPIPs located in the Technical Support

Center (TSC) and Operational Support Center (OSC).

No violations or deviations were identified.

5. Emergency Facilities, Equipment, Instrumentation, and Supplies (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8) and (9),

Section IV.E of Appendix E to

10 CFR Part 50, and Section H of the licensee's Emergency Plan, this area

was inspected to determine whether the licensee's emergency response

facilities and other essential emergency equipment, instrumentation, and

supplies were maintained in a state of operational readiness.

The inspector toured the Control

Room,

TSC,

and OSC.

The licensee had

completed physical arrangements for an alternate OSC to be available in

Room A121 of the Administration Building; this change was- to be

  • appropriately

factored into the Emergency Plan and EPIPs during the next

revision cycle.

No other significant changes in emergency response

facilities were made since the last inspection, according to observations

by the inspector and statements by licensee representatives.

The OSC emergency supply cabinets, located in the Unit 3 Control Room

area,

were inspected and found to be complete and well organized.

Maintenance of emergency equipment and supplies was performed in

accordance with Procedure HP/O/B/1009/01.

The inspector reviewed the status of design and construction of the

permanent Crisis Management Center (CMC) for the Oconee Nuclear Station.

The licensee planned to construct the new CMC in Clemson, South Carolina,

approximately 10 miles from the station.

The CMC was designed as a

dedicated facility of about 10,000 square feet, and was expected to be

completed in mid-1988. Construction had not yet begun at the time of the

inspection.

No violations or deviations were identified.

6. Organization and Management Control (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and (16),

Section IV.A of Appendix E to

10 CFR Part 50, and Section B of the licensee's Emergency Plan, this area

was inspected to determine the effects of any changes in the licensee's

emergency organization and/or management control systems on the emergency

preparedness program, and to verify that any such changes were properly

factored into the Emergency Plan and EPIPs.

4

The organization and management of the emergency preparedness program were

reviewed. The inspection verified that there were no significant changes

in the organization or assignment of responsibility for the station and

corporate emergency planning staffs since the last inspection.

The

inspector's discussion with licensee personnel disclosed the appointment

of a new director of the South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division.

No other major changes in the organization and staffing of the offsite

support agencies had occurred since the last inspection.

Personnel changes in certain station management positions resulted in the

reassignment of several key positions involving primaries as well as

alternates in the emergency response organization.

Review of training

records of such personnel confirmed that training requirements for their

new positions in the emergency organization were completed prior to

assignment to those positions.

Availability of off-shift personnel to staff the TSC following an

emergency declaration was tested and verified by means of quarterly

call-back drills in which the licensee's call-tree system was activated

and personnel were contacted by telephone or pager.

The inspector

reviewed documentation for drills conducted on March 23,

1987,

and

June 18, 1987.

Estimated TSC augmentation times met the commitments

specified in Figure B-5 of the Emergency Plan.

No violations or deviations were identified.

7. Training (82701)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and (15),

Section IV.F of Appendix E to

10 CFR Part 50, and Section 0 of the licensee's Emergency Plan, this area

was inspected to determine whether the licensee's key emergency response

personnel

were properly trained

and understood their emergency

responsibilities.

The inspector reviewed the Emergency Response Training Manual, approved by

the Station Manager on November 26, 1986.

This document specified that

training records were to be maintained by Production Training Services and

were to be fully audited annually by the Station Emergency Planner to

verify currency of training for all station personnel assigned to the

emergency response organization.

Records of training for selected members (both licensed and nonlicensed)

of the emergency organization were reviewed.

The training records

revealed that those personnel, including some designated as alternates in

the emergency organization, were provided with appropriate training, and

that the type, amount,

and frequency of training were consistent with

requirements.

The inspector conducted a walk-through with a Shift Supervisor on duty in

the Control Room. This individual was given various hypothetical sets of

emergency conditions and plant data and was asked in each case to talk

5

through the response he would provide as Emergency Coordinator if such an

emergency actually existed.

The individual exhibited considerable

familiarity with emergency procedures and equipment.

No problems were

observed in the areas of emergency classification, protective action

decision-making, and notification.

No violations or deviations were identified.

8. Independent Reviews/Audits (82701)

Pursuant to

10 CFR 50.47(b)(14)

and

10 CFR 50.54(t),

this area was

inspected to determine whether the licensee had performed an independent

review or audit of the emergency preparedness program, and whether the

licensee had a corrective action system for deficiencies and weaknesses

identified during exercises and drills.

Records of emergency preparedness program audits were reviewed.

The

records showed that an independent audit of the program was conducted by

the licensee's Quality Assurance Department from December 8, 1986, to

March 2, 1987, and was documented in Audit Report No. NP-86-23(CM). This

audit fulfilled the 12-month frequency requirement for such audits.

The

audit records showed that the State and local government interfaces were

evaluated, and that findings concerning the interfaces were made available

to State and local government authorities.

Audit findings and

recommendations were presented to station and corporate management.

Licensee documentation showed that required critiques were held following

periodic drills as well as the annual exercise. The records showed that

deficiencies were discussed in the critiques, and recommendations for

corrective action were made.

The licensee's program for follow-up action on audit, drill, and exercise

findings was. reviewed.

Inspection of licensee records indicated that

corrective action was taken on identified problems, as appropriate. The

licensee had established a tracking system called the Oconee Nuclear

Station Commitment Index as a management tool in following up on actions

taken in deficient areas.

No violations or deviations were identified.

9. Inspector Follow-up (92701)

(Closed)

Inspector Follow-up Item 50-269/86-12-01:

Training in health

physics practices and radiological contamination control for the Medical

Emergency Response Team (MERT). The licensee's corrective action for this

finding from the April 1986 exercise involved intensive retraining of MERT

personnel on all shifts.

During the period June-November 1986, eleven

medical drills were conducted.

All were documented in detail, including

objectives, scenario, and critique findings.

On January 20,

1987, two

persons were injured and slightly contaminated while working in the Unit 3

reactor vessel cavity during a refueling outage. The licensee declared a

6

Notification of Unusual Event and transported the personnel to Oconee

Memorial Hospital for treatment.

The critique of this event found the

response by health physics personnel and the MERT to be "very efficient

and effective."

10. NRC Bulletins (92702)

The inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the requirements

of Bulletin No. 79-18, "Audibility Problems Encountered on Evacuation of

Personnel from High-Noise Areas."

In response to this Bulletin, the

licensee completed a Nuclear Station Modification (NSM-1407)

on April 25,

1980. Licensee records showed that 16 site assembly drills were conducted

since June 1984, with no indication of recurring problems related to

audibility of evacuation alarms in any area of the station.

11.

NRC Information Notices (92717)

The following Information Notices (INs)

were discussed with licensee

representatives to ensure that receipt, management review, and appropriate

corrective action had occurred.

a. IN 85-80 (Timely Declaration of an Emergency Class, Implementation of

an Emergency Plan,

and Emergency Notifications):

The licensee

determined that no action was necessary,

since all Operations

personnel received appropriate training on notification procedures.

Consequently,

a trained communicator,

knowledgeable of station

operations, was always available to assist the Shift Supervisor.

b.

IN 86-97 (Emergency

Communications System):

The Health Physics

Network (recently made available at the TSC and the interim CMC)

and

Emergency Notification System telephones were tested monthly by the

licensee.

c. IN 86-98 (Offsite Medical Services):

The inspector reviewed an

internal memo dated March 24,

1987,

from the licensee's System

Emergency Planner in which he stated that he had discussed this IN

with North Carolina and South Carolina officials and learned that

both states were pursuing changes in their emergency plans and

procedures to bring them into conformance with revised Federal

guidance regarding arrangements for offsite medical services.

The

licensee planned to conduct training and drills with two area

hospitals with which Oconee Memorial Hospital maintained mutual-aid

agreements.