ML16148B088
| ML16148B088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1992 |
| From: | Wiens L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hampton J DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| GL-88-14, TAC-M71689, TAC-M71690, TAC-M71691, NUDOCS 9201150210 | |
| Download: ML16148B088 (4) | |
Text
0 January 10, 1992 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 DISTRIBUTION Mr. J. W. Hampton SEE NEXT PAGE Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0.
Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679
Dear Mr. Hampton:
SUBJECT:
GENERIC LETTER 88-14, INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM PROBLEMS AFFECTING SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT OCONEE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 (TAC NOS. M71689, M71690, AND M71691)
Your letters dated May 8 and July 21, 1989, September 20, 1990, January 15, April 15, August 12, and November 26, 1991, responded to Generic Letter (GL) 88-14 for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. Your responses indicated that activities required to address the issues discussed in the generic letter either have been performed or are scheduled to be implemented. A detailed technical review of your response has not been performed and, therefore, approval of your response is neither intended nor implied. However, based on a review of your responses, we conclude that you have addressed all of the issues in the generic letter. Accordingly, your responses provide an adequate basis for closure of the NRR licensing action on this matter.
Further NRC review, if any, will be by the inspection or audit process.
Since your response to GL 88-14 was not completed until the submittal of the letter dated November 26, 1991, we request that the document retention period addressed by the generic letter be extended until 2 years from that date to support any future audit by the NRC staff.
Also, pursuant to GL 88-14, when all requirements of the generic letter have been implemented, a written notification should be provided to that effect.
Sincerely,
/s/
Leonard A. Wiens, Project Manager doubh
~Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next age OFC
- LA/P&
PN PDII-3
- D/PDII-3:
NAME
- LBERAY
- LWIENS:rt : DLANG DATE
- 01/)o /92
- 01//&/92 : 01/(b/92 9201150210 920110 PDR ADOCK 05000269 0
P PDR
LETTER DATED:
January 10, 1992 DISTRIBUTION EKET FILE NRC/Local PRDs PDII-3 Reading Oconee Reading DLange LWiens LBerry SVarga GLainas OGC ACRS (10)
LAReyes, RII
tpjk REGI UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 lanuary 10, 1992 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679
Dear Mr. Hampton:
SUBJECT:
GENERIC LETTER 88-14, INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM PROBLEMS AFFECTING SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT OCONEE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 (TAC NOS. M71689, M71690, AND M71691)
Your letters dated May 8 and July 21, 1989, September 20, 1990, January 15, April 15, August 12, and November 26, 1991, responded to Generic Letter (GL) 88-14 for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. Your responses indicated that activities required to address the issues discussed in the generic letter either have been performed or are scheduled to be implemented. A detailed technical review of your response has not been performed and, therefore, approval of your response is neither intended nor implied. However, based on a review of your responses, we conclude that you have addressed all of the issues in the generic letter. Accordingly, your responses provide an adequate basis for closure of the NRR licensing action on this matter.
Further NRC review, if any, will be by the inspection or audit process.
Since your response to GL 88-14 was not completed until the submittal of the letter dated November 26, 1991, we request that the document retention period addressed by the generic letter be extended until 2 years from that date to support any future audit by the NRC staff.
Also, pursuant to GL 88-14, when all requirements of the generic letter have been implemented, a written notification should be provided to that effect.
Sincerely, Leonard A. Wiens, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
Mr. J. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. A. V. Carr, Esq.
Mr. M1. E. Patrick Duke Power Company Compliance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P.O. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Winston and Strawn Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief 1400 L Street, NW.
Project Branch #3 Washington, DC 20005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission IC1 Marietta Street, NW., Suite 2900 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Division Vs. Karen E. Long Suite 525 Assistant Attorney General 1700 Rockville Pike N. C. Uepbrtment of Justice Euckville, farylard 20852 P.O. Box 629 raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Varager, LIS UUS Corporation Mr. R. L. Gill, Jr.
2650 McCormick Drive, 3 Floor Licensing Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1007 Senior Resident Inspector Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormission Route 2, Box 610 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1I flavietta Street, 11., Suite 29CC ttlarta, Georgia 30323 Mir.
HeywarG G. SI;eAly, Chief Bureau of r; iological Health SuLth Car olia Departmaent of Health
&uo Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Office of Intergovernmental Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621