ML16141B008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SE Granting 951204 Relief Request 95-05 from ASME Code Requirements for Preservice Insp of Two Welds Performed by Vendor During Fabrication of Replacement 1A High Pressure Injection Letdown Cooler
ML16141B008
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/23/1996
From: Shankman S
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Hampton J
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML16141B009 List:
References
TAC-M94198, NUDOCS 9602280029
Download: ML16141B008 (3)


Text

S February 23, 1996*

Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P.O. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - THIRD TEN-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 95-05 (TAC NO. M94198)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

By letter dated December 4, 1995, you submitted Relief Request No. 95-05 from ASME Code requirements for the preservice inspection of two welds performed by the vendor during the fabrication of the replacement 1A High Pressure Injection Letdown Cooler. The NRC staff has reviewed and evaluated your submittal and supporting information. The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.

The NRC staff has concluded that certain requirements of the Code are impractical.

The staff has determined that the extent of coverage obtained for the specific welds covered by this request provides reasonable assurance of the structural reliability and operational readiness of the High Pressure Injection Letdown Cooler welds. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i), relief is granted as requested for Request for Relief 95-05.

This relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest, giving due consideration to the burden that could result if the requirements were imposed on your facility.

Sincerely, Originl signed by:

Susan F. Shankman, Acting Director Project Directorate 1I-2 Division of Reactor Projects -

I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-269

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl:

See next page DISTRIBUTION:

SVarga Docket File JZwolinski PUBLIC OGC, 0-15 B18 PDII-2 Rdg.

GHill (2)

ACRS EMerschoff, RII GTracy, 0-17 G21 WRussell, 0-12 G18 RCrlenjak, RII FMiraglia, 0-12 Gl8 DOCUMENT NAME:

G:\\OCONEE\\RR9505 To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"C"

= Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE OFFICE LA:PD22:D I

E PM:PD22:D

(}

I GC*

BC:ECGB*

(A)D:PD RPE NAME LBERRY LWIENS:cn 0

NYOUNG

-GBAGCHI SSHANKMA DATE

/

/96 2,/

96 2/20/96 2/2/96 96/

/96 9602280029 960223 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY PDR ADOCK 05000269 I7?700 cr (..

P PDR

~J9ULL3u nfIL-V

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February 23, 1996 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P.O. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -

THIRD TEN-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 95-05 (TAC NO. M94198)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

By letter dated December 4, 1995, you submitted Relief Request No. 95-05 from ASME Code requirements for the preservice inspection of two welds performed by the vendor during the fabrication of the replacement 1A High Pressure Injection Letdown Cooler. The NRC staff has reviewed and evaluated your submittal and supporting information. The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.

The NRC staff has concluded that certain requirements of the Code are impractical.

The staff has determined that the extent of coverage obtained for the specific welds covered by this request provides reasonable assurance of the structural reliability and operational readiness of the High Pressure Injection Letdown Cooler welds. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i), relief is granted as requested for Request for Relief 95-05.

This relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest, giving due consideration to the burden that could result if the requirements were imposed on your facility.

Sincerely, usan F. S man cting Director Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects -

I/Il Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-269

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl:

See next page

Mr. J. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:

Mr. Paul R. Newton Mr. Ed Burchfield Duke Power Company, PB05E Complance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.

Ms. Karen E. Long Washington, DC 20005 Assistant Attorney General North Carolina Department of Mr. Robert B. Borsum Justice B&W Nuclear Technologies P. 0. Box 629 Suite 525 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 1700 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-1631 Mr. G. A. Copp Licensing -

ECO50 Manager, LIS Duke Power Company NUS Corporation 526 South Church Street 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Dayne H. Brown, Director Senior.Resident Inspector Division of Radiation Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission North Carolina Department of Route 2, Box 610 Environment, Health and Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Regional Administrator, Region II Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621