ML16116A356

2016 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form Es 403-1

ML16116A356
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	03/23/2016
From:	Bielby M Operations Branch III
To:	Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML16116A356 (2)

Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~, ,,.tN"- Date of Exam::je¢t#1(, Exam Level: RO,¢ SRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~rr /;v ~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented ~J /;v MrJ?

~

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) /}v AA.cf?

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail riJJ_ 61- M_~

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 411' ft--- N~

ti.~

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants $ {Jt-- ~'t'17 Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader 1oO!fZ.'\~'l..ICC2SatJ~~~ l/zr/eo1~

b. Facility Reviewer(*) w1...b.,_., Lt-v--1.....,

~ ~ 5/29 fZCJ JG, M;.~... 1-t. o,.,,_ L,,., t~J,;!f ~ f-/, L2*1, I L*

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*) gubu-\ 3: Or\.~~v..f,}.:) i/Jµ ld-,f!,.Ol b

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: 7311u.r-r Date of Exam: f2o/tt1'Exam Level: RO D SRO  ?

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~~ /)L---

MM

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 4~ ~

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

~

-1~ ~

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~ 1L- ~<fl

~~

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 6.

are justified rrJ /jl.-

11 Performance on missed questions checked for training

~

deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature ~~ Date

a. Grader ~13 t. a.r.Pc*~~ ..r> 1- ~- ~ ~i-o.1" 7

b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~a.titN LGY-,,.,~ 3/zq ft.tJf~

c. NRG Chief Examiner (*) l,f;dtri..t £. B:. lb ('tirt~ 'it. 1/t /U>tl

d. NRG Supervisor (*) ~~h*~ ~ Or\, \tu*...~L* 'L/lJ 1V'{ ~L - '{ l1[2.bl{~

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: ~, ,,.tN"- Date of Exam::je¢t#1(, Exam Level: RO,¢ SRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~rr /;v ~

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented ~J /;v MrJ?

~

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) /}v AA.cf?

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail riJJ_ 61- M_~

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 411' ft--- N~

ti.~

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants $ {Jt-- ~'t'17 Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader 1oO!fZ.'\~'l..ICC2SatJ~~~ l/zr/eo1~

b. Facility Reviewer(*) w1...b.,_., Lt-v--1.....,

~ ~ 5/29 fZCJ JG, M;.~... 1-t. o,.,,_ L,,., t~J,;!f ~ f-/, L2*1, I L*

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*) gubu-\ 3: Or\.~~v..f,}.:) i/Jµ ld-,f!,.Ol b

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: 7311u.r-r Date of Exam: f2o/tt1'Exam Level: RO D SRO  ?

Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~~ /)L---

MM

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 4~ ~

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

~

-1~ ~

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

~ 1L- ~<fl

~~

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 6.

are justified rrJ /jl.-

11 Performance on missed questions checked for training

~

deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature ~~ Date

a. Grader ~13 t. a.r.Pc*~~ ..r> 1- ~- ~ ~i-o.1" 7

b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~a.titN LGY-,,.,~ 3/zq ft.tJf~

c. NRG Chief Examiner (*) l,f;dtri..t £. B:. lb ('tirt~ 'it. 1/t /U>tl

d. NRG Supervisor (*) ~~h*~ ~ Or\, \tu*...~L* 'L/lJ 1V'{ ~L - '{ l1[2.bl{~

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.