ML16116A356

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form Es 403-1
ML16116A356
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/23/2016
From: Bielby M
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML16116A356 (2)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: ~

,,. tN"-

Date of Exam::je¢t#1(, Exam Level: ROSRO D Item Description Initials a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~rr /;v ~

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and

~J documented

/;v MrJ?

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

/}v AA.cf?

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, riJJ_

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 61-M_~

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 411' N~

are justified ft---

ti.~

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of

{Jt--

~'t'17 questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader 1oO!fZ.'\\~'l..ICC2SatJ~~~

l/zr/eo1~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~

w1...b.,_., Lt-v--1.....,

~

5/ 29 f ZCJ JG,

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (*) M;.~... 1-t. o,.,,_L,,., t~J,;!f

~ f-/, L2*1, I L

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

gubu-\\ 3: Or\\.~~v.. f,}.:) i/J µ ld-,f

!,.Ol b

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: 7311u.r-Date of Exam: f2o/tt1'Exam Level:

RO D SRO ?

r Item Description Initials a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~~ /)L---

MM

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and 4~

documented

  • ~
3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

-1~

~

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 1L-

~<fl

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades rrJ

~~

are justified

/jl.-

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training 11 deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of

~ ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature ~~ Date

a. Grader

~13 t. a.r.Pc*~~.. r>

1-

~

~

~i-o.1" 7

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~a.titN LGY-,,.,~

3/zq ft.tJf~

c.

NRG Chief Examiner (*) l,f;dtri..t £. B:. lb ('tirt~

'it.

1/t /U>tl

d. NRG Supervisor (*)

~~h*~ ~ Or\\, \\tu*... ~L* L /lJ { ~L -

'{ l 1[ 2.b l{~

1V'

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: ~

,,. tN"-

Date of Exam::je¢t#1(, Exam Level: ROSRO D Item Description Initials a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~rr /;v ~

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and

~J documented

/;v MrJ?

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

/}v AA.cf?

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, riJJ_

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 61-M_~

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 411' N~

are justified ft---

ti.~

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of

{Jt--

~'t'17 questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader 1oO!fZ.'\\~'l..ICC2SatJ~~~

l/zr/eo1~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~

w1...b.,_., Lt-v--1.....,

~

5/ 29 f ZCJ JG,

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (*) M;.~... 1-t. o,.,,_L,,., t~J,;!f

~ f-/, L2*1, I L

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

gubu-\\ 3: Or\\.~~v.. f,}.:) i/J µ ld-,f

!,.Ol b

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: 7311u.r-Date of Exam: f2o/tt1'Exam Level:

RO D SRO ?

r Item Description Initials a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~~ /)L---

MM

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and 4~

documented

  • ~
3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

~

(reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

-1~

~

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80,

~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 1L-

~<fl

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades rrJ

~~

are justified

/jl.-

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training 11 deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of

~ ~

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature ~~ Date

a. Grader

~13 t. a.r.Pc*~~.. r>

1-

~

~

~i-o.1" 7

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~a.titN LGY-,,.,~

3/zq ft.tJf~

c.

NRG Chief Examiner (*) l,f;dtri..t £. B:. lb ('tirt~

'it.

1/t /U>tl

d. NRG Supervisor (*)

~~h*~ ~ Or\\, \\tu*... ~L* L /lJ { ~L -

'{ l 1[ 2.b l{~

1V'

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.