Text

2016 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
	ML16116A062
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	03/23/2016
From:	Bielby M; Operations Branch III
To:	; Exelon Generation Co
References
	Download: ML16116A062 (1)
	v • d • e

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

lndependent NRC reviewer initial tems in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required

Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.

Note:

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (.)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor e LÉu-r *:

C tt/¿ltt il/qt/Ç l>ln Date tt/z/zotf Nam nt9

á¿-

K

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO).

ifr0 4

w

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

fii4 tL t,(

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

M4

¿t¿-

$l

c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

i\\\\t9

$t

\\4(

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

4.

G E

N E

R A

L w\\60 y'c q0 Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

a t\\aE y't-

{*

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days, hq.tl

úc

(,rr

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES'301'1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations 3.

W A

L K

T H

R o

U G

H

ü Ih iu

.üt

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2\\ task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'audit test(s){

(4\\ the number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on the fom (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

h 4"r To the e)dent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.

c.

nfg

áu i

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

2.

S I

M U

L A

T o

R hço lt-f,l

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major trânsients.

lrrø

éc A+

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KA statements are appropriate.

rwt t4¿

'fr

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

mf

/tL

û

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.

1.

W R

I T

T E

N nt4

,9t-

'tl a, Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

c#

b.

a Item lnitials Task Description

/Rc zal o/

Facility:

Exam ination:

Date of 5)*w,n{'tuiad qurc\\

gawrs ø) e^ Pr"eP4 ei-e ltl?t