ML16116A062

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML16116A062
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/23/2016
From: Bielby M
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML16116A062 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: /Rc zal Date of Exam ination: o/

lnitials Item Task Description a b. c#

1.

W a, Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. 'tl ,9t- nt4 R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled. û /tL mf T

E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 'fr t4¿ rwt N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KA statements are appropriate. A+ éc lrrø
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major trânsients.

f,l lt- hço S

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the i áu nfg T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

o c. To the e)dent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D. 4"r $.- h

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form W

A (2\ task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form .üt iu L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'audit test(s){ Ih ü K (4\ the number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on the fom (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES'301'1:

o (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (,rr U (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified úc hq.tl G

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

{* y't- t\aE applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days,

4. a Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the q0 y'c w\60 appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. \4( $t i\\t9 N

E

c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. $l ¿t¿- M4 R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. t,( tL fii4 A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. w 4 ifr0

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO). K á¿- nt9 Nam Date
a. Author tt/z/zotf
b. Facility Reviewer (.) e LÉu-r *: tt/¿ltt
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) C il/qt/Ç
d. NRC Supervisor l>ln Note: # lndependent NRC reviewer initial tems in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required
  • Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.

5)*w,n{'tuiad qurc\ gawrs ø) e^ Pr"eP4 ei- e ltl?t

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: /Rc zal Date of Exam ination: o/

lnitials Item Task Description a b. c#

1.

W a, Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. 'tl ,9t- nt4 R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled. û /tL mf T

E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 'fr t4¿ rwt N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KA statements are appropriate. A+ éc lrrø
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major trânsients.

f,l lt- hço S

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the i áu nfg T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

o c. To the e)dent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D. 4"r $.- h

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form W

A (2\ task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form .üt iu L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'audit test(s){ Ih ü K (4\ the number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on the fom (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES'301'1:

o (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (,rr U (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified úc hq.tl G

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

{* y't- t\aE applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days,

4. a Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the q0 y'c w\60 appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. \4( $t i\\t9 N

E

c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. $l ¿t¿- M4 R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. t,( tL fii4 A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. w 4 ifr0

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO). K á¿- nt9 Nam Date
a. Author tt/z/zotf
b. Facility Reviewer (.) e LÉu-r *: tt/¿ltt
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) C il/qt/Ç
d. NRC Supervisor l>ln Note: # lndependent NRC reviewer initial tems in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required
  • Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.

5)*w,n{'tuiad qurc\ gawrs ø) e^ Pr"eP4 ei- e ltl?t