ML16061A372

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NFPA 805 Transition FAQ 14-0073 Revision 1
ML16061A372
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/29/2016
From:
Nuclear Energy Institute
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FAQ 14-0073
Download: ML16061A372 (5)


Text

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment Plant: Palisades Date: August 18, 2014February 29, 2016

Contact:

Tom Swiecicki Phone: (269) 764-2343 Email: tswieci@entergy.com Distribution: (NEI Internal Use) 805 TF FPWG RATF RIRWG BWROG PWROG Purpose of FAQ:

FAQ provides clarification on the acceptable use of fuel fired equipment relative to NRC NFPA 805 RAIs, NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4, and compliance with GDC 3.

Is this Interpretation of guidance? Yes / No Proposed new guidance not in NEI 04-02? Yes / No Details:

NEI 04-02 guidance needing interpretation (include section, paragraph, and line numbers as applicable):

NRC NFPA 805 RAIs at several transitioning plants have challenged the use of fuel fired equipment in general whereas NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 specifically prohibits fuel fired heaters only. There has also been reference to fuel fired equipment as not meeting GDC 3 whereas FAQ 07-0032 previously clarified that satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) will satisfy 10 CFR 50.48(a) and GDC 3.

If satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) by meeting NFPA 805 satisfies GDC 3 and NFPA 805 does not prohibit the use of fuel fire equipment other than fuel fired heaters, then the use of fuel fired equipment other than fuel fired heaters should not violate GDC 3.

There is a lack of clarity in interpreting the guidance documents and associated approved FAQs related to the use of fuel fired equipment and hence a difference of interpretation in implementing the regulatory requirements related to this type of equipment.

Circumstances requiring guidance interpretation or new guidance:

Clarification on the interpretation of the regulatory guidance documents, including approved FAQs, related to the use of fuel fired equipment is needed. The lack of clarity in interpreting the regulatory guidance documents has led to uncertainty in satisfying the

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment requirements as part of the NFPA 805 approval process and will continue to be an issue as part of future fire protection inspections.

NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 specifically prohibits fuel fired heaters but does not mention other fuel fired equipment. The NRC NFPA RAIs have gone beyond the prohibition of fuel fired heaters and made the issue more generic to fuel fired equipment. This appears to go beyond the intent of NFPA 805 and licensees are struggling with how to interpret the regulatory guidance documents, including approved FAQs, as currently written. For example: there are crane bays that periodically contain fuel fired vehicles, there are plants that have permanently installed fuel fired backup equipment which is part of the approved plant design, there are fuel fired man-lifts periodically utilized, etc.

The features mentioned above are a few examples of fuel fired equipment relied upon to support safe reliable nuclear plant operation and are examples that meet the literal requirements but do not meet the more generic interpretation prohibiting fuel fired equipment.

Detail contentious points if licensee and NRC have not reached consensus on the facts and circumstances:

None Potentially relevant existing FAQ numbers: FAQ 07-0032, Clarification of 10 CFR 50.48(c), 50.48(a), and GDC 3 Response Section:

Proposed resolution of FAQ and the basis for the proposal:

NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 already specifically prohibits the use of fuel fired heaters.

FAQ 07-0032 was previously approved as clarification that satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) will satisfy 10 CFR 50.48(a) and GDC 3. The existing approved regulatory guidance documents do not prohibit the use of all fuel fired equipment.

NFPA 805-2001, Section 3.3.1.3.2, Smoking and other possible sources of ignition shall be restricted to properly designated and supervised safe areas of the plant.

Section 3.3.1.3.2 is addressed within License Amendment Request Attachment A - NEI 04-02 Table B-1 Transition of Fundamental FP Program & Design Elements which is reviewed and approved. The approved fire protection program includes the compliance basis described within Table B-1 and the fire protection program controls identified in the compliance basis are generically applied. Typically licensees refer to procedures that control activities such as hot work, ignition sources, welding, burning, grinding, and smoking as the compliance basis to satisfy this requirement. A search of industry non-

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment pilot NFPA 805 Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) did not identify any RAIs associated with Section 3.3.1.3.2. Therefore this was not considered a point of confusion requiring clarification in the FAQ.

NFPA 805-2001, 3.3 Prevention, A fire prevention program with the goal of preventing a fire from starting shall be established, documented, and implemented as part of the fire protection program. The two basic components of the fire prevention program shall consist of both of the following:

(1) Prevention of fires and fire spread by controls on operational activities (2) Design controls that restrict the use of combustible materials The design control requirements listed in the remainder of this section shall be provided as described.

Section 3.3 is addressed within License Amendment Request Attachment A - NEI 04-02 Table B-1 Transition of Fundamental FP Program & Design Elements which is reviewed and approved. The approved fire protection program includes the compliance basis described within Table B-1 and the fire protection program controls identified in the compliance basis are generically applied. Typically licensees refer to procedures that control hot work, combustibles materials, and impacts to the fire protection program. A search of industry non-pilot NFPA 805 Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) did not identify any RAIs associated with Section 3.3. Therefore this was not considered a point of confusion requiring clarification in the FAQ.

NFPA 805-2001, Section 1.5.1, Nuclear Safety Performance Criteria, Fire protection features shall be capable of providing reasonable assurance that, in the event of a fire, the plant is not placed in an unrecoverable condition. To demonstrate this, the following performance criteria shall be met. The performance criteria are: Reactivity Control, Inventory and Pressure Control, Decay Heat Removal, Vital Auxiliaries, and Process Monitoring.

NFPA 805 Chapter 1 is the introduction and it is the other chapters, particularly Chapter 3 - Fundamental Fire Protection Program and Design Elements that provides guidance on how to satisfy the requirements.

Relative to NFPA 805 Section 2.4.3 and how fuel fire equipment is addressed in the fire probabilistic risk assessment (Fire PRA). The Fire PRA evaluates transient combustibles considering worst case locations and assumes the transient combustibles ignite irrespective of whether or not a fixed ignition source is present. The worst case locations are essentially locations that would result in the challenging fires from a plant risk perspective. The fire protection program controls, including any additional insights from the Fire PRA that may have warranted additional controls, provide the guidance to

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment address fire risk from a day-to-day plant operation standpoint. Fuel fired equipment that is installed plant equipment would have required explicit consideration in both the deterministic fire protection aspects and Fire PRA to account for both the combustible load and potential ignition source. Infrequently used equipment during normal operation that could initiate a fire is included in the initiating event frequencies used in the Fire PRA.

The staffs questions and observations include the statement but following an emergency unknowns regarding human performance may be difficult to quantify. It is during the emergency situations when plant personnel would need to respond to the unknown that flexibility is needed and the shift manager maintains the authority to implement 10CFR50.54X to accomplish required actions. In some cases the use of fuel fired equipment may be the only reasonable alternative remaining or it may be an easier more efficient approach to implement with reasonable assurance of success to simplify the emergency response rather than introducing complexity. Fuel fired equipment is designed to contain fuel and although there may be some likelihood of this causing a fire, an additional failure must take place for a fire to occur. As this fire is not directly caused by the initiating fire event, it would be considered a concurrent independent fire.

Concurrent independent fires are not postulated for other ignition sources in the Fire PRA given that the likelihood is substantially small. As noted in NUREG/CR-6850 on page 11-12, [T]he analysis is limited to considering a single fire occurring at any given time. The analysis does not consider the possibility of multiple, concurrent fires.

The FAQ was generically written and not intended to be plant specific. Adding specifics for all plants would be excessively cumbersome. Instead, a few examples have been mentioned with reference to the approved guidance contained within NFPA 805-2001, and FAQ 07-0032 which provide the basis for the fire protection programs documented in the approved Safety Evaluations.

Installed plant equipment would have been evaluated in the NFPA 805 analysis for deterministic fire protection aspects and the Fire PRA to account for both the combustible load and potential ignition source. Temporary equipment (e.g. lifts or trucks in the plant area) would fall under the controls of the approved fire protection program as documented in the approved Safety Evaluations.

Proposed resolution is to follow the previously approved and accepted regulatory guidance documents allowing plants to utilize the most appropriate prudent approach to plant operation within the constraints of those guidance documents. This includes control of combustibles, hot work, and ignition sources which areis intended to provide a level of defense to prevent fires and the impact of a fire and not prohibit the use of all combustiblesfuel fire equipment.

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment If appropriate, provide proposed rewording of guidance for inclusion in the next Revision:

None

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment Plant: Palisades Date: August 18, 2014February 29, 2016

Contact:

Tom Swiecicki Phone: (269) 764-2343 Email: tswieci@entergy.com Distribution: (NEI Internal Use) 805 TF FPWG RATF RIRWG BWROG PWROG Purpose of FAQ:

FAQ provides clarification on the acceptable use of fuel fired equipment relative to NRC NFPA 805 RAIs, NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4, and compliance with GDC 3.

Is this Interpretation of guidance? Yes / No Proposed new guidance not in NEI 04-02? Yes / No Details:

NEI 04-02 guidance needing interpretation (include section, paragraph, and line numbers as applicable):

NRC NFPA 805 RAIs at several transitioning plants have challenged the use of fuel fired equipment in general whereas NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 specifically prohibits fuel fired heaters only. There has also been reference to fuel fired equipment as not meeting GDC 3 whereas FAQ 07-0032 previously clarified that satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) will satisfy 10 CFR 50.48(a) and GDC 3.

If satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) by meeting NFPA 805 satisfies GDC 3 and NFPA 805 does not prohibit the use of fuel fire equipment other than fuel fired heaters, then the use of fuel fired equipment other than fuel fired heaters should not violate GDC 3.

There is a lack of clarity in interpreting the guidance documents and associated approved FAQs related to the use of fuel fired equipment and hence a difference of interpretation in implementing the regulatory requirements related to this type of equipment.

Circumstances requiring guidance interpretation or new guidance:

Clarification on the interpretation of the regulatory guidance documents, including approved FAQs, related to the use of fuel fired equipment is needed. The lack of clarity in interpreting the regulatory guidance documents has led to uncertainty in satisfying the

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment requirements as part of the NFPA 805 approval process and will continue to be an issue as part of future fire protection inspections.

NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 specifically prohibits fuel fired heaters but does not mention other fuel fired equipment. The NRC NFPA RAIs have gone beyond the prohibition of fuel fired heaters and made the issue more generic to fuel fired equipment. This appears to go beyond the intent of NFPA 805 and licensees are struggling with how to interpret the regulatory guidance documents, including approved FAQs, as currently written. For example: there are crane bays that periodically contain fuel fired vehicles, there are plants that have permanently installed fuel fired backup equipment which is part of the approved plant design, there are fuel fired man-lifts periodically utilized, etc.

The features mentioned above are a few examples of fuel fired equipment relied upon to support safe reliable nuclear plant operation and are examples that meet the literal requirements but do not meet the more generic interpretation prohibiting fuel fired equipment.

Detail contentious points if licensee and NRC have not reached consensus on the facts and circumstances:

None Potentially relevant existing FAQ numbers: FAQ 07-0032, Clarification of 10 CFR 50.48(c), 50.48(a), and GDC 3 Response Section:

Proposed resolution of FAQ and the basis for the proposal:

NFPA 805 Section 3.3.1.3.4 already specifically prohibits the use of fuel fired heaters.

FAQ 07-0032 was previously approved as clarification that satisfying 10 CFR 50.48(c) will satisfy 10 CFR 50.48(a) and GDC 3. The existing approved regulatory guidance documents do not prohibit the use of all fuel fired equipment.

NFPA 805-2001, Section 3.3.1.3.2, Smoking and other possible sources of ignition shall be restricted to properly designated and supervised safe areas of the plant.

Section 3.3.1.3.2 is addressed within License Amendment Request Attachment A - NEI 04-02 Table B-1 Transition of Fundamental FP Program & Design Elements which is reviewed and approved. The approved fire protection program includes the compliance basis described within Table B-1 and the fire protection program controls identified in the compliance basis are generically applied. Typically licensees refer to procedures that control activities such as hot work, ignition sources, welding, burning, grinding, and smoking as the compliance basis to satisfy this requirement. A search of industry non-

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment pilot NFPA 805 Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) did not identify any RAIs associated with Section 3.3.1.3.2. Therefore this was not considered a point of confusion requiring clarification in the FAQ.

NFPA 805-2001, 3.3 Prevention, A fire prevention program with the goal of preventing a fire from starting shall be established, documented, and implemented as part of the fire protection program. The two basic components of the fire prevention program shall consist of both of the following:

(1) Prevention of fires and fire spread by controls on operational activities (2) Design controls that restrict the use of combustible materials The design control requirements listed in the remainder of this section shall be provided as described.

Section 3.3 is addressed within License Amendment Request Attachment A - NEI 04-02 Table B-1 Transition of Fundamental FP Program & Design Elements which is reviewed and approved. The approved fire protection program includes the compliance basis described within Table B-1 and the fire protection program controls identified in the compliance basis are generically applied. Typically licensees refer to procedures that control hot work, combustibles materials, and impacts to the fire protection program. A search of industry non-pilot NFPA 805 Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) did not identify any RAIs associated with Section 3.3. Therefore this was not considered a point of confusion requiring clarification in the FAQ.

NFPA 805-2001, Section 1.5.1, Nuclear Safety Performance Criteria, Fire protection features shall be capable of providing reasonable assurance that, in the event of a fire, the plant is not placed in an unrecoverable condition. To demonstrate this, the following performance criteria shall be met. The performance criteria are: Reactivity Control, Inventory and Pressure Control, Decay Heat Removal, Vital Auxiliaries, and Process Monitoring.

NFPA 805 Chapter 1 is the introduction and it is the other chapters, particularly Chapter 3 - Fundamental Fire Protection Program and Design Elements that provides guidance on how to satisfy the requirements.

Relative to NFPA 805 Section 2.4.3 and how fuel fire equipment is addressed in the fire probabilistic risk assessment (Fire PRA). The Fire PRA evaluates transient combustibles considering worst case locations and assumes the transient combustibles ignite irrespective of whether or not a fixed ignition source is present. The worst case locations are essentially locations that would result in the challenging fires from a plant risk perspective. The fire protection program controls, including any additional insights from the Fire PRA that may have warranted additional controls, provide the guidance to

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment address fire risk from a day-to-day plant operation standpoint. Fuel fired equipment that is installed plant equipment would have required explicit consideration in both the deterministic fire protection aspects and Fire PRA to account for both the combustible load and potential ignition source. Infrequently used equipment during normal operation that could initiate a fire is included in the initiating event frequencies used in the Fire PRA.

The staffs questions and observations include the statement but following an emergency unknowns regarding human performance may be difficult to quantify. It is during the emergency situations when plant personnel would need to respond to the unknown that flexibility is needed and the shift manager maintains the authority to implement 10CFR50.54X to accomplish required actions. In some cases the use of fuel fired equipment may be the only reasonable alternative remaining or it may be an easier more efficient approach to implement with reasonable assurance of success to simplify the emergency response rather than introducing complexity. Fuel fired equipment is designed to contain fuel and although there may be some likelihood of this causing a fire, an additional failure must take place for a fire to occur. As this fire is not directly caused by the initiating fire event, it would be considered a concurrent independent fire.

Concurrent independent fires are not postulated for other ignition sources in the Fire PRA given that the likelihood is substantially small. As noted in NUREG/CR-6850 on page 11-12, [T]he analysis is limited to considering a single fire occurring at any given time. The analysis does not consider the possibility of multiple, concurrent fires.

The FAQ was generically written and not intended to be plant specific. Adding specifics for all plants would be excessively cumbersome. Instead, a few examples have been mentioned with reference to the approved guidance contained within NFPA 805-2001, and FAQ 07-0032 which provide the basis for the fire protection programs documented in the approved Safety Evaluations.

Installed plant equipment would have been evaluated in the NFPA 805 analysis for deterministic fire protection aspects and the Fire PRA to account for both the combustible load and potential ignition source. Temporary equipment (e.g. lifts or trucks in the plant area) would fall under the controls of the approved fire protection program as documented in the approved Safety Evaluations.

Proposed resolution is to follow the previously approved and accepted regulatory guidance documents allowing plants to utilize the most appropriate prudent approach to plant operation within the constraints of those guidance documents. This includes control of combustibles, hot work, and ignition sources which areis intended to provide a level of defense to prevent fires and the impact of a fire and not prohibit the use of all combustiblesfuel fire equipment.

FAQ Number 14-0073 FAQ Revision 1DRAFT FAQ Title Acceptable Uses of Fuel Fired Equipment If appropriate, provide proposed rewording of guidance for inclusion in the next Revision:

None