SBK-L-16016, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report

Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report

ML16061A129
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/25/2016
From:	Ossing M NextEra Energy Seabrook
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
SBK-L-16016
Download: ML16061A129 (8)

Text

ENERGY £

~SEABROOK February 25, 2016 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L- 16016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D C 20555- 0001 Seabrook Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.7 17(e) and 10 CFR 26.203(e), enclosed is the NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report and Annual Fatigue Results for 2015. The Fitness-For-Duty Performance Data will also be provided electronically.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact me at (603) 773-75 12.

Sincerely, LLC Licensing Manager cc: D. Dorman, NRC Region I Administrator J. Lamb, NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate I-2 P. Cataldo, NRC Senior Resident Inspector NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874

ENCLOSURE to SBK-L-16016 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy 2015 Company Annual Reporting Period Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAC)

X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Average number with Unescorted Access 532 615 Total: 1147 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Follow-Up 2 0 82 3 For Cause -

Observed Behavior 2 1 2 1 For Cause -

Post Event 0 0 3 0 Pre-Access 18 0 1442 25 Random 292 1 321 2 Total 314 2 1850 31 During the reporting period of 2015, NextEra EnergylSeabrook Station conducted 2164 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:

Reporting Period POOLS 2015 Seabrook Station 54.2%

Page 1 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report Annul Ftnes fo Dut ReortSY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS

• ... Amphe- Phency- Refusal:

Site Location MarijUana Cocaine OpiateS tamineS clidine - Alcohol to Test Licensee Employees 1 1 0 0_ 0 0 0 Contractors 18 3 I 0 I 0 0 I 3 5 Total* ] 19 ] 4 [ 0 0 0 3 [ 5 ]3

• Does not include 2 subversion attempts.

Management Actions For the reporting period of 2015, thirty three (33) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, twenty five (25) pre-access tests were positive, three (3) random tests were positive, three (3) follow-up tests were positive and two (2) for-cause for observed behavior were positive.

Pre-Access Positive Tests Eleven (11) initial contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) initial contractor employee substituted his specimen. Three (3) initial contractor employees tested positive for cocaine. Three (3) initial contractor employees refused to test. Three (3) update contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) update contractor employee tested positive for alcohol. One (1) update contractor employee substituted his specimen. One (1) reinstatement contractor tested positive for alcohol. One (1) reinstatement contractor tested positive for marijuana. These individuals were denied access.

Random Positive Tests One (1) licensee supervisor tested positive for marijuana after trying to subvert the process. One (1) contractor employee refused to test. One (1) contractor employee tested positive for alcohol and was denied. These individuals were denied access.

For Cause - Observed Behavior Tests One (1) licensee employee tested positive for cocaine. One (1) contractor employee refused to test. The contractor employee was permanently denied access.

Follow-Up Tests Three (3) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. All were denied access with one individual being permanently denied per the FPL/NextEra program.

Page 2 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report SY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010

Additional Comments

1. There were nine (9) subversion attempts / refusals during the 2015 reporting period.

Three (3) contractor employee tests were considered subverted when their first specimen's temp was out of range. Of those three tests, one person refused the second collection, and one tested positive for cocaine.

One (I) contractor employee provided a specimen with no temperature, and while re-hydrating admitted to bringing in someone else's urine, he lifted his pant leg to show the vial he had used.

One (1) person refused to provide the initial specimen.

One (1) contractor employee didn't report for random after being notified.

One (1) licensee supervisor didn't report when scheduled for random, collection completed 6.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> later and tested positive for marijuana.

One (1) individual refused to provide a second specimen under direct observation after he gave less than 15 ml.

One (1) individual was unable to provide a required observed sample, shy bladder process invoked, which the MRO declared there was no evidence of shy bladder and it became a refusal to test.

All individuals were permanently denied access.

2. For the 2015 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to Seabrook Station's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

3. One call-in test was conducted during the 2015 reporting period, for alcohol only, with negative results.

4. Communicated Access/FED related Operating Experience bulletins with the appropriate personnel. The communications were completed face to face, through fleet bulletins and in leadership meetings.

Reportable Events Seabrook Station had one reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period.

Page 3 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report SY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010_

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results

.Facility Name

• Renort Period 1 CFR 10 F Part at2,SbatIAna 26, Subpart I -Annual Fatigue aiu Results eut Seabmok [V 2015 V Summarv of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e)(1)(i-iit Number of Waivers Issued Performing maintenance or onsite Operating or on-site directing of the operations of systems as described in Performing health physics or chemistry Performing duties of a fire brigade directing of maintenance, as described in Performing security duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3)* duties as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1 ) 26.4(a)(4) Outage Work Hour Controls Operating (after day Total 60)

Outage (after !POutage (after ( Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Operating day 60) Operating i4 ~ day 60) day 60) Operating day 60)

Daily Work Hours Operating 26.205(d)(1)

Rest Breaks 26.205(d)(2)

______I ____ ____________I

___________ 1211 1111 1121 Minimum Days Off Per Shift Cycle 26.205(d)(3)

Days Off for Outage 1l4~~

Activities (during first ~ I4*~ 74y~~

60 days of 225~4 outage) 26.205(d)(4) Lsw d~f e uQsl and .c d y m n 28205(dd)7

,oTOTAL 00 0 0 0 0l 0

• N'OTE: For individuals performing fire brigade duties and other duties, please count them only under the fire brigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

• T _

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results FaciiyName Reoort Perio Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1 )(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)

Analy. i f..Waiv.. r.A.s..ssm.nt...ata.

No waivers were required in 2015.

Operating or on- Performing Perrforming site directing of health physics Performing Performing the operations or chemistry duties of a fire onseiteidirecting security duties Number of Waivers of systems, as duties as brigade member as described in assdescribed in as described in described in described in 26.4(a)(5) 226 4(a)(5) 26 .4(a)( 1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(3)"

Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:

Eight fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015. 1) A "self-declaration" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working online hours. The worker was determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off. 2) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working online hours. The worker was determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off. 3) A 'for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Operations worker working online hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 4) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Chemistry worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 5) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a noncovered worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 6) A "post-event" fatigue assessment for a covered maintenance worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue.

7) A "post-event" fatigue assessment for a covered maintenance worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 8) A "follow-up" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatige.

0

Conclusions:

No waivers were required in 2015. Eight fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015. Three assessments were conducted while the plant was online and five conducted during the refueling outage. Of the eight fatigue assessments, only two workers were determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off.

• Nt:For irodualsI rot doab/e count these iodividuaa/s performing the 5r0brigade duteies, please coant them ane/undertirebrigade iobumeo. ni Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

No corrective actions are required based on the review of waivers and fatigue assessments.

ENERGY £

~SEABROOK February 25, 2016 Docket No. 50-443 SBK-L- 16016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D C 20555- 0001 Seabrook Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.7 17(e) and 10 CFR 26.203(e), enclosed is the NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Data Report and Annual Fatigue Results for 2015. The Fitness-For-Duty Performance Data will also be provided electronically.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed report, please contact me at (603) 773-75 12.

Sincerely, LLC Licensing Manager cc: D. Dorman, NRC Region I Administrator J. Lamb, NRC Project Manager, Project Directorate I-2 P. Cataldo, NRC Senior Resident Inspector NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874

ENCLOSURE to SBK-L-16016 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy 2015 Company Annual Reporting Period Seabrook Station Location Stella M. Dumais (603) 773-7040 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAC)

X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Average number with Unescorted Access 532 615 Total: 1147 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Follow-Up 2 0 82 3 For Cause -

Observed Behavior 2 1 2 1 For Cause -

Post Event 0 0 3 0 Pre-Access 18 0 1442 25 Random 292 1 321 2 Total 314 2 1850 31 During the reporting period of 2015, NextEra EnergylSeabrook Station conducted 2164 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:

Reporting Period POOLS 2015 Seabrook Station 54.2%

Page 1 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report Annul Ftnes fo Dut ReortSY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS

• ... Amphe- Phency- Refusal:

Site Location MarijUana Cocaine OpiateS tamineS clidine - Alcohol to Test Licensee Employees 1 1 0 0_ 0 0 0 Contractors 18 3 I 0 I 0 0 I 3 5 Total* ] 19 ] 4 [ 0 0 0 3 [ 5 ]3

• Does not include 2 subversion attempts.

Management Actions For the reporting period of 2015, thirty three (33) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, twenty five (25) pre-access tests were positive, three (3) random tests were positive, three (3) follow-up tests were positive and two (2) for-cause for observed behavior were positive.

Pre-Access Positive Tests Eleven (11) initial contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) initial contractor employee substituted his specimen. Three (3) initial contractor employees tested positive for cocaine. Three (3) initial contractor employees refused to test. Three (3) update contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) update contractor employee tested positive for alcohol. One (1) update contractor employee substituted his specimen. One (1) reinstatement contractor tested positive for alcohol. One (1) reinstatement contractor tested positive for marijuana. These individuals were denied access.

Random Positive Tests One (1) licensee supervisor tested positive for marijuana after trying to subvert the process. One (1) contractor employee refused to test. One (1) contractor employee tested positive for alcohol and was denied. These individuals were denied access.

For Cause - Observed Behavior Tests One (1) licensee employee tested positive for cocaine. One (1) contractor employee refused to test. The contractor employee was permanently denied access.

Follow-Up Tests Three (3) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. All were denied access with one individual being permanently denied per the FPL/NextEra program.

Page 2 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report SY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010

Additional Comments

1. There were nine (9) subversion attempts / refusals during the 2015 reporting period.

Three (3) contractor employee tests were considered subverted when their first specimen's temp was out of range. Of those three tests, one person refused the second collection, and one tested positive for cocaine.

One (I) contractor employee provided a specimen with no temperature, and while re-hydrating admitted to bringing in someone else's urine, he lifted his pant leg to show the vial he had used.

One (1) person refused to provide the initial specimen.

One (1) contractor employee didn't report for random after being notified.

One (1) licensee supervisor didn't report when scheduled for random, collection completed 6.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> later and tested positive for marijuana.

One (1) individual refused to provide a second specimen under direct observation after he gave less than 15 ml.

One (1) individual was unable to provide a required observed sample, shy bladder process invoked, which the MRO declared there was no evidence of shy bladder and it became a refusal to test.

All individuals were permanently denied access.

2. For the 2015 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to Seabrook Station's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

3. One call-in test was conducted during the 2015 reporting period, for alcohol only, with negative results.

4. Communicated Access/FED related Operating Experience bulletins with the appropriate personnel. The communications were completed face to face, through fleet bulletins and in leadership meetings.

Reportable Events Seabrook Station had one reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period.

Page 3 of 3 Annual Fitness for Duty Report SY-AA-100-1006-F01 Rev 0 10/2010_

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results

.Facility Name

• Renort Period 1 CFR 10 F Part at2,SbatIAna 26, Subpart I -Annual Fatigue aiu Results eut Seabmok [V 2015 V Summarv of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e)(1)(i-iit Number of Waivers Issued Performing maintenance or onsite Operating or on-site directing of the operations of systems as described in Performing health physics or chemistry Performing duties of a fire brigade directing of maintenance, as described in Performing security duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3)* duties as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1 ) 26.4(a)(4) Outage Work Hour Controls Operating (after day Total 60)

Outage (after !POutage (after ( Outage (after Outage (after Outage (after Operating day 60) Operating i4 ~ day 60) day 60) Operating day 60)

Daily Work Hours Operating 26.205(d)(1)

Rest Breaks 26.205(d)(2)

______I ____ ____________I

___________ 1211 1111 1121 Minimum Days Off Per Shift Cycle 26.205(d)(3)

Days Off for Outage 1l4~~

Activities (during first ~ I4*~ 74y~~

60 days of 225~4 outage) 26.205(d)(4) Lsw d~f e uQsl and .c d y m n 28205(dd)7

,oTOTAL 00 0 0 0 0l 0

• N'OTE: For individuals performing fire brigade duties and other duties, please count them only under the fire brigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

• T _

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results FaciiyName Reoort Perio Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1 )(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2)

Analy. i f..Waiv.. r.A.s..ssm.nt...ata.

No waivers were required in 2015.

Operating or on- Performing Perrforming site directing of health physics Performing Performing the operations or chemistry duties of a fire onseiteidirecting security duties Number of Waivers of systems, as duties as brigade member as described in assdescribed in as described in described in described in 26.4(a)(5) 226 4(a)(5) 26 .4(a)( 1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(3)"

Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:

Eight fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015. 1) A "self-declaration" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working online hours. The worker was determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off. 2) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working online hours. The worker was determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off. 3) A 'for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Operations worker working online hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 4) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a covered Chemistry worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 5) A "for cause" fatigue assessment for a noncovered worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 6) A "post-event" fatigue assessment for a covered maintenance worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue.

7) A "post-event" fatigue assessment for a covered maintenance worker working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatigue. 8) A "follow-up" fatigue assessment for a covered Security officer working outage hours. The worker was found not to be impaired due to fatige.

0

Conclusions:

No waivers were required in 2015. Eight fatigue assessments were conducted in 2015. Three assessments were conducted while the plant was online and five conducted during the refueling outage. Of the eight fatigue assessments, only two workers were determined to be impaired and given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off.

• Nt:For irodualsI rot doab/e count these iodividuaa/s performing the 5r0brigade duteies, please coant them ane/undertirebrigade iobumeo. ni Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

No corrective actions are required based on the review of waivers and fatigue assessments.