ML15245A814
| ML15245A814 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/2015 |
| From: | Steve Wyman Japan Lessons-Learned Division |
| To: | Guill P Duke Energy Corp |
| References | |
| Download: ML15245A814 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Wyman, Stephen Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:41 PM To:
Paul.Guill@duke-energy.com Cc:
Devlin-Gill, Stephanie; DiFrancesco, Nicholas
Subject:
McGuire ESEP Clarification Question Mr. Guill, In follow-up to the message I left today, as part of the NRC review of the McGuire ESEP report, the staff would appreciate clarification on the following technical item:
The following clarification questions are raised in the context of the NRC evaluation of the ESEP submittals only and licensees responses will be reviewed by NRC staff only to the extent the use of this information affects the elements and outcomes of the ESEP evaluation. As many licensees have used information from their ongoing SPRA analyses, the current review will not evaluate methods or results as they pertain to the SPRA. They will be reviewed later at the time of SPRA review.
- 1. The reviewers have identified some differences between the components identified as requiring modifications between the two units after the ESEP was performed. When comparing Tables 6-1 and 6-2, the issues identified are not common between units 1 and 2 (e.g. Unit 1 ESEL ID 23 & Unit 2 ESEL ID 18). Given that both units have the same layout, the licensee is requested to provide further information that explains and/or justifies the differences in required modifications between both units.
An email response will likely be sufficient to support the ESEP report review, however, please be aware that your email response will be made publicly available in ADAMS. A response around July 7, if practicable, would be greatly appreciated to support the planned review schedule.
Please let me or Nick DiFrancesco (at 301-415-1115) know if you would like to schedule a clarification call or have any questions and concerns.
- Thanks, Steve Stephen M. Wyman USNRC/NRR/JLD/HMB Office: O-13G9 MS: O-13C5 301-415-3041 (Voice) 301-415-8333 (Fax)
Stephen.Wyman@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
2359 Mail Envelope Properties (26e4d015bca74764bc0bde4e287ed929)
Subject:
McGuire ESEP Clarification Question Sent Date:
6/23/2015 3:41:04 PM Received Date:
6/23/2015 3:41:04 PM From:
Wyman, Stephen Created By:
Stephen.Wyman@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Devlin-Gill, Stephanie" <Stephanie.Devlin-Gill@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "DiFrancesco, Nicholas" <Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Paul.Guill@duke-energy.com" <Paul.Guill@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1825 6/23/2015 3:41:04 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
Yes Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: