ML15239A321
| ML15239A321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1995 |
| From: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hampton J DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15239A322 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M91052, TAC-M91053, NUDOCS 9502080299 | |
| Download: ML15239A321 (3) | |
Text
January 19, 1995 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 - SECOND TEN-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 93-07 (TAC NOS. M91052 AND M91053)
Dear Mr. Hampton:
By letter dated November 10, 1993, Duke Power Company submitted Request for Relief No. 93-07 from certain ASME Code requirements that you determined to be a hardship or unusually difficult to perform at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 and 2, during the second 10-year interval inservice inspection. By letter dated August 9, 1994, you submitted Revision 1 to Relief Request 93-07, which superseded the original request in its entirety, and limited the application to Unit 2. You requested approval to use ASME Code Case N-416-1 in lieu of performing a system hydrostatic pressure test after making weld repairs on the Core Flood Tank (CFT) system pressure boundary.
The NRC staff has reviewed and evaluated your August 9, 1994, request and has determined that performance of the Code-required testing would impose an undue hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The staff has concluded that the use of Code Case N-416-1 is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii). The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Herbert N. Berkow, Director Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270 DISTRIBUTION:
JZwolinski CDocket File-LWiens
Enclosure:
PUBLIC LBerry Safety Evaluation PDII-3 R/F OGC, 0-15 B18 SVarga ACRS (4),
TWF cc w/enclosure:
HBerkow EMerschoff, RII See next page RSpessard, 0-9 A2 JLieberman, 0-7 H5 EJordan, T-4 D18 GHill (2), T-5 C23 OC/LFDCB T-9 E10 GTracy, 0-17.G21 To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = Ug copy XO,
kPVbq OFFICE LA:PD23:DRPE E
PM:PD23:DRPE E D:PD23:D E E
OGC Al EMCB NAME LBerry LWiens HBerk J8trosnide DATE
/(k/95
/1/95 1 / 1/95
/1
/95
- 795 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\OCONEE\\RR9307.LTR 9502080299 950119 F E CT COPY PDR ADOCK 05000270 P
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 19, 1995 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 - SECOND TEN-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 93-07 (TAC NOS. M91052 AND M91053)
Dear Mr. Hampton:
By letter dated November 10, 1993, Duke Power Company submitted Request for Relief No. 93-07 from certain ASME Code requirements that you determined to be a hardship or unusually difficult to perform at Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 and 2, during the second 10-year interval inservice inspection. By letter dated August 9, 1994, you submitted Revision 1 to Relief Request 93-07, which superseded the original request in its entirety, and limited the applications to Unit 2. You requested approval to use ASME Code Case N-416-1 in lieu of performing a system hydrostatic pressure test after making weld repairs on the Core Flood Tank (CFT) system pressure boundary.
The NRC staff has reviewed and evaluated your August 9, 1994, request and has determined that performance of the Code-required testing would impose an undue hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. The staff has concluded that the use of Code Case N-416-1 is authorized pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii).
The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed Safety Evaluation.
Sincerely, H rbert N. Berkow, Director roject Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page
Mr. J. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:
A. V. Carr, Esquire Mr. Ed Burchfield Duke Power Company Compliance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.
Ms. Karen E. Long Washington, DC 20005 Assistant Attorney General North Carolina Department of Mr. Robert B. Borsum Justice Babcock & Wilcox P.0. Box 629 Nuclear Power Division Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike Mr. G. A. Copp Rockville, Maryland 20852 Licensing -
ECO50 Duke Power Company Manager, LIS 526 South Church Street NUS Corporation Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection Senior Resident Inspector North Carolina Department of U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment, Health and Route 2, Box 610 Natural Resources Seneca, South Carolina 29678 P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621