ML15239A103
| ML15239A103 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 10/19/1998 |
| From: | Casto C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Mccollum W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9811090216 | |
| Download: ML15239A103 (54) | |
Text
October 19, 1998 Duke Energy Corporation ATTN: Mr. W. R. McCollum Vice President.
Oconee Nuclear Station P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION
Dear Mr. McCollum:
This refers to the meeting conducted by mutual request at the Oconee Nuclear Station on September 29, 1998, to discuss the status of plant performance issues. Enclosed are a list of attendees and your presentation handout.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided the NRC staff with a better understanding of Oconee Nuclear Station performance and your ongoing initiatives.
In accordance with Section 2.790(a) of the NRC's "Rules of Practice." Part
- 2. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this meeting, please contact Mr. R. Carroll at (404) 562-4511.
Sincerely, (Original signed by)
Charles A. Casto Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Licensee Presentation Handout cc w/encls: (See page 2) 9811090216 981019 PDR ADOCK 05000269 P
0 DPC 2
cc contd:
cc cont'd:
J. E. Burchfield Manager. LIS Compliance NUS Corporation Duke Power Company 2
P. 0. Box 1439 25 comc rv P. 0 Box1439Clearwater.
FL 34619-1035 Seneca, SC 29679 L. A. Keller. Manager Paul R. Newton Nuclear Regulatory Licensing Legal Department (PB05E)
Duke Energy Corporation Duke Energy Corporation 520 S. Church Street 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28201-0006 Charlotte, NC 28242-0001 Karen E. Long Rick N. Edwards Assistant Attorney General Framatone Technologies N. C..Department of Justice 1700 Rockville Pike. Suite 525 P. 0. Box 629 Rockville. MD 20852 Raleigh, NC 27602 J. Michael McGarry. III, Esq.
Steven P. Shaver Winston and Strawn Senior Sales Engineer 1400 L Street,.NW Westinghouse Electric Company Washington, DC 20005 5929 Carnegie Blvd., Suite 500 Charlotte, NC 28209 Mel Fry, Acting Director Division of Radiation Protection Distribution w/encls:
N. C. Department of Environmental L. Plisco. Ru Commerce & Natural Resources D. LaBarge, NRR 3825 Barrett Drive H. Berkow, NRR Raleigh, NC 27609-7721 R. Carroll. Ru C. Casto. RII Virgil R. Autry. Director K. Landis, Rh Division of Radioactive Waste Mgmt.
C. Ogle. Ru S. C. Department of Health and NRC Resident Inspector Environmental Control PUBLIC 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, SC 29621 OFFI2E McIor k
RIDrDiP NuclearE ReuatrmLcnsn RME RrWlf:j coie______________
DATE
/9 57 9
10/
/98 10/
/98 10/
/98 10/
/98 10/
/98 YES O
.YF9 YE----
I~
Ms on YS ml ACO CDu DOkeIENT EegE:
GyCCorporati
LIST OF ATTENDEES
-Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
L. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Reigon'II (RII)
C. Casto, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII C. Ogle, Chief, Branch 1, DRP, RII K. Landis. Chief, Engineering Branch. Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII D. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate 11-2, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation M. Scott. Senior Resident Inspector - Oconee Nuclear Station, DRP, RII D. Billings, Resident Inspector - Oconee Nuclear Station, DRP, RII S. Freeman, Resident Inspector - Oconee Nuclear Station, DRP, RII R. Schin, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch, DRS. RII Duke Energy Corporation (DEC)
M. Tuckman, Executive Vice President, Nuclear Generation, DEC W. McCollum, Vice President, Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS)
J. Forbes, Station Manager, ONS W. Foster, Safety Assurance Manager, ONS M. Nazar, Engineering Manager, ONS E. Burchfield, Regulatory Compliance Manager, ONS T. Hartis. Business Manager. ONS D. Stewart, Community Relations, ONS L. Azzarello, Mechanical Systems Engineering Supervisor, ONS J. Fisicaro. Nuclear Assessments/Issues Department Manager, DEC J. Smith, Regulatory Compliance, ONS P. Byron, Contractor, Regulatory Compliance, ONS
Oconee Nuclear Station Bi-Monthly Performance Meeting ee Nude September 29, 1998
EPurpose of Meeting
- Plant Status
- Overview of Recent Performance
- Recovery Plan Status
- Closing Remarks 2
Plant Status Me Pude~
Unit 1
-Online 169 days leading up to forced outage
-21 day forced outage to replace RCP Seals
-Currently online 3.2 days Unit 2
-Online 110 days leading up to forced outage
-5 day forced outage to repair feedwater leaks on the steam generators
Plant Status
- Unit 3
-Online 351 days
-Began Planned Coastdown 8/24/98
-47 Day Refueling Outage Begins 10/9/98
-Successful Focus on Pre-Outage Planning 4
Efte Unit 1 Power History - 1998 1998 Oconee Unit I Power History 120 Stopped power at 65% for NI caland iB MFDWP tripped for ICS testing Forced Outage due to RCP Oil Leak investigate Thermal Power Best swings 100 80 60 Shutdown to Repair OTSG 40 20 0
5
C) 00 1/1/98 1/97/98 1125/98 120198 2/0/98 2/18198 212619 3/14/98 M/22/98 3/30/98.
4/198 4/15/98 4/23/98M 00 0_
0 5/9/98 C
5/17198 5/25M9 00 7/50198 7/283/98 8/211980 819198 Q
9J/98 9/14198 922198
____________0
Unit 3 Power History - 1998 1998 Oconee Unit 3 Power History 12 0 100 80 40 20 0
7
Efto
_E Improved Plant Safety
- Significant Backlog Reduction
- Improved Quality of Job Observations
- Measurable Increase in the Quantity &
Quality of Pre & Post Job Briefs
- Marked Improvement in Self Reporting Ratio
- Mispositionings Significantly Reduced 8
ER Improved Plant Safety
- Sustained Increase in System Reliability Index
- Increasing Equipment Reliability (2 MRWFs in August out of 1018 total functions/73 in last 12 months)
- 117 Days Event Free Operation 9
Eft~
Improved Performance
- Unit 3 Continuous Run
- Model Control Room Environment
- Structured Processes In Place
- Aggresssively Conducting Detailed System Reviews
- Meeting or Exceeding Design Basis Milestones
- Pre-Outage Planning 10
Eft Near Term Challenges
- Emergency Response - Drill Performance
- RP Work Practices
- Unit 3 Outage Execution
- Keowee Emergency Power Test
- Materiel Condition
Eft Other Issues M4Z
- Union Election
- INPO Evaluation & Assessment
- Non-Ops Accreditation Renewal
- Fuel Trans-shipment
- Budget 12
August Recovery Plan Annunciator Panel Operational Quality and Safety Financial of Operations Production Mana gem ent PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT BASIS SYSTEM OPERATIONAL iMCO:u.
MANC ASESM NT B
31 J EQUIPMENT FOCUS McCOLLUM FOSTER NAZARAZARRELIABILITY FORBES PIP Acti vity Progress on
.Rework 8 a c It_1_______Its
_Level
_Design
_Index R ' 8 M at e so n kt o o d 20 D H u b i B Is da t at v s 0 0 %
L J A aza ran on d e x operation Procedure C hanges 0Davenport 28 id e
-Problem Preventlon Housekeeping Pa Leco 10%Index L J Axcarello 20%
J R Nunnicult 12.6%
Equipment Number of Deficiency Workable Index CRIPs LL JA A sartello i %
ITD C urtle 26 Root Cause Quality R T Bond 20%
Los Generation Days d ue to WAPRs Equipment Fallures L J Aazarello 28%
T D Curtis it.g%
agD I
tl 1.96o INT OUARTIAt VALLOW 2.4*2.6SPOINTS STATUSYTD Allif 3.y-3.0 POINTS WNITAC
- AON CRR N T
(Unteported)
STATUS 13
- ea January Recovery Plan Annunciator Panel Operational Quality and Safety Financial of Operations Production Management PIP Activity outage Backlog Performance
(> 6 months old)
R 8 Matheson 26%
R M Weatherford 60%
Pre-Jobi PIP Post-Job Briefs Quality TR Mcuarr 30%
R T Bond 25%
in L e Problem IndexPrevention NGD masur 10%Index NrT0L J Azarf*
20%
Self Identified Enhance 8RO h
ia u
lt Problems S*If Assessment TehIca Queaity Processes oOedrtin RtT Bond 30%
RtT Bond 25%
PrCdu res 0
KUSystem R
la bility U
1Performan RED otePOINTs L J A zzarelf Ide 10%
YELLOW 2.0*-2.609POINTS OREaN 2.7 -3.0 POIN00TB WHITE 0 POINTS QUARTERLY IQ 30 STATUS v g
g CURRENT (MEASURE)
STATUS (5~a 14T
__ aEOperational Focus Initiatives Nude
- Work Control Process
- Tech Spec Surveillance Program
- Outage Readiness
- OAC System Project Closeout
- Housekeeping and Materiel Condition Program
- Control Board Monitoring-Control Room Improvement
- Technical Quality of Operating Procedures
- Maintenance Tech Support 15
Work Order Backlog Reduction Nmuclt WEEK#
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3
COUNT 569 558 539 490 481 436 391 370 342 34 4
28 4 2 75 2 50 264 267 GOAL 598T 5381 S6S 548 532 515 499 482 46 49433 416 400 400 400 40 700 0
500 0 a400 LL 300 0
w 200 S
100 z
0 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 WEEK RECOVERY PLAN GOAL = 400 16
Work Order Backlog Reduction WEEK#
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 COUNT 109U L97 93 88 84 84 68 65 59 48 36 34 25 28 28 30 GOAL 108 101 94 87 80
- 74.
67 60 53-46 39 32 25 25 25 25 130
-~
120 110 t
100 m
90 0 E 80 0
x 70 o
60 Sso o
40 w
30 w
S 20 z
10 0
23 24 25 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 WEEK RECOVERY PLAN GOAL =25 17
o 1
CRIP Reduction WEK 3 2 5
2 7
2 9
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 COUNT 36 36 34 34 26 22 13 15 12 13 10 15 21 18 12 11 GOAL 21.4 20.9 20.
198 1.
1.7 82 1.7 71 16.6 16.1 15.5 15 15 15 415 40 35 W
30 25 0
2 3
24 2
6 2
8 2
0 31 3
3 3
5 3
7 3
U.
0 2
15 w
18
Eft Unit 3 Pre-Outage Milestones 1996 1997
-1998 Year To Date 55 48 30 Milestones Planned 35 18 28 Milestones Met 19
~ER C e
Unit 3 Outage Goals 0
U31f98-11/23/98
[IN TART
[VIAX (Wage [ration (Days) 49 47 45 Incrementd O&M cost
$23.M 7M 12-.6 Iriues 4
2 0
FRcation Dose (persorVrem) 175 160 45 LERs 0
Sdid Fiamste (chic feet) 71U 65U 590 Note: Min & Max refer to potential goal points received 20
Ui 3
Unit 3 Outage Scope Unit 3 Outage Scope
-Fuel Handling Equipment Upgrade
-Implementing Service Water Mod
-Replacing LPSW Pump Impellars
-3B 1 RCP Replacement and Inspection of 3A1 & 3A2
-Electrical Generator Stator Bar Replacement
-Keowee Emergency Power Test
-500 Valves: 200 MOVs, 100 AOVs, 200 Manual Valves 21
Eft Operations Procedure Quality Measure: Number of Outstanding Procedure Enhancement Requests (all priorities)
Outstanding Operations Procedure Enhancement Requests Month Actual Target January 1470 1470 1800..........
February 1527 1527 1600 March 1577 1577 1400 1200 April 1675 1675 looo Actual May 1401 1400 o
8001.
Target June 1202 1100 2
600T July 847 900 400 August.
782 800 200 September.
753 550 0
October 425 M
2 E
E E
C 2
2 EE November 300 40 o
- 25) z o
250 Month 1988 22
Design Basis Initiatives Safety System Reviews
- HPI/LPI
- Emergency Power
- OSRDC
- SQUG Outlier Resolution
- Improved Tech Specs
- Service Water Project
- UFSAR Project Review Generic Letter 96-06 Emergency Power
-rn23
-Configuration Management
Efta Design Basis Overview OCONEE DESIGN BASIS OVERVIEW CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT dul-g Scheduled
=Actual GENERIC LETTER 96-06 UFSAR ACCURACY REVIEW OCONEE SERVICE WATER PROJECT IMPROVED TECH SPECS IMPLEMENTATION SQUG PROJECT OSRDC PROJECT SAFETY SYSTEM REVIEWS I
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% COMPLETE - KNOWN SCOPE 24
Design Basis Initiative - OSRDC OSRDC PROJECT -MAJOR MILESTONE STATUS 8/31/98 MILESTONE DUE DATE STATUS I
PIP OPEN ITEMS 711/97 COMPLETED 6/30/97 2
REVISE EVENT MITIGATION CALCS 12/1/97 COMPLETED 12/1/97 3
QA-1 CHECKLIST 12/16/97 COMPLETED 12/16/97 4
EVENT MITIGATION CALCULATIONS 12/31/97 COMPLETED 12/31/97 5
FUNDING REQUEST 2/17/98 COMPLETED 2/17/98 PACKAGE 6
COMPONENT DATABASE 3/20/98 COMPLETED 3/19/98 INSTRUCTIONS 7
DBE WHITE PAPER 4/20/98 COMPLETED 4/20/98 8
EVENT SCOPE FOR QA-5 5/15/98 COMPLETED 5/14/98 9
QA-5 SCREENING 6/18/98 COMPLETED 6/18/98 CRITERIA 10 COMPLETE SGTR CALC 7/17/98 COMPLETED 7/16/98 11 QA-5 PROGRAM 8/3/98 COMPLETED 8/13/98 DEFINITION 12 QA-5 IMPLEMENTATION 12/10/98 5 %
1 13 COMPLETE COMPONENT 12/16/98 90%
DATABASE 14 START QA5 IMPLEMENTATION 1/99 0%
25
ER C0 Design Basis Initiatives - Emergency Power System Emergency Power System NRC Open Items 10 9
g O e Bars below curve represent better 7
than expected progress 6
5 4
3 2
0 O2I 26
Design Basis Initiatives - HPI/LPI HPilLPISITA PIP INITIALLY IDENTIFIED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REMAINING 90--
85 Actual 80 wSched 80 75 70
.BARS BELOW THE CURVE REPRESENT 70 65 BETTER THAN PROJECTED PROGRESS 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
- 15.
10 5
0 Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 Dec-98 27
Design Basis Initiatives - OSW Oconee Service Water Implementation Parts Remaining 100 90 80 ACTUAL PARTS REMANING 70
.PROJECTED PARTS REMANNG 60 so.
BARS BELOW THE CURVE REPRESENT BETTER THAN EXPECTED PROGRESS 40
- 30.
20 10 0
PROJECT U3EOC16 INNAGE UiEOC17 INNAGE 2EOC16 INAGE 3EOC17 INAGE UEOC18 START RFO 64 RFO 65 RFO 66 RFO 67 RFO 28
Design Basis Initiatives - SQUG 850 O-utliers to Be Resolved Scheduled Outiers. to be Resolved 800 750 I
700 1000 600 400 200.
650 0
QUARTERS 600 MAR.
APR.
MAY.
JUN.
JUL 1998 1998 1998 1998 1998 1998 8
Month
EMRC Ip Design Basis Initiatives - UFSAR UFSAR Review Items Remaining 7000 The curve will be updated as chapters are split 6000 Into discrete review items.
BARS BELOW THE CURVE REPRESENT BETTER THAN EXPECTED PROGRESS 5000 g Actual 4000 Est..
4000 3000 2000 1000 0
- 0)
- 0)
- 0)
- 0)
M)
- 0) 0
)0 C
IL CP9 a)4
'U-~
~
,U_
<)
co 0
z 30
Design Basis Summary
- Meeting or Exceeding Commitments
- Design Review Board looking into the future
- Established a Risk Informed Process for Systematic Review of Key Systems
- Recent Org Changes to Support Continued Focus
- Established a Self Improvement Culture That Resulted in Lower Thresholds for Identification and Resolution of Issues 31
System/Equipment Reliability NudC->
Overview OCONEE SYS/EQUIP RELIABILITY OVERVIEW PIPING RELIABILITY
- Scheduled c tu a STEAM GENERATOR RELIABILITY ctual SECONDARY SYSIEQUIP RELIABILITY EQUIPMENT AGING PROGRAM TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY PROJECT FOLLOW--
SYSTEM TEAMS MEPR PROCESS (MEPR MILESTONES)
CONTROL ROD DRIVE MECHANISMS ICS REPLACEMENT PROJECT OAC REPLACEMENT PROJECT Original scope Is complete; 0
10 20 30 40 so 60 70 80 90 100 assessment identified
% COMPLETE -KNOWN SCOPE additional scope 32
.1.ER1 System/Equipment Reliability Measures Equipm ent Failures T 14%
g Eg Eq u ip ment 0 13%
Failures Y -T-D
~12%
c 11%
E 10%
Equipment I
9%
NFailures Annual 7%
Target 6%
o4 5%
Eq uipment 3%
Failures.12 Month u-2%
RoIling Avg IK 1%
2 0%
110 EFPD a Lost Due to Equipment Fallures AgY-D SOO 10 30 (y2M nt ig 20 7 0
..6 R e l e T a g e 10 10.EFP
's ostDue to qui m en Fa lur s
U iteve
. (p r nt)D 10 303 so 20 10 20 33
ER1 System/Equipment Reliability Measures 1998 MEPR Milestones Remaining 25 MEPR Milestones Remaining - Actual I
MEPR Milestones Remaining - Scheduled BARS BELOW THE CURVE REPRESENT BETTER 20 THAN EXPECTED PROGRESS 15 10
- 5.
0 12/31/97 Inn 65 U2 EOC16 Inn 66 U3 EOC17 Inn 67 34
/ 1 System/Equipment Reliability Nudp Measures NSMs Implemented vs. Planned 1998-99 Objective Is complete >=90% Pri 1&2 NSMs 60 Cancellation of Pri 1&2 NSs willlnot decrease the number of these planned 50.
i Pr 1&2 NSMs Implemented (cumulative) aggggPri 3 NSMs Implemented (cumulative)
Prl 1&2 NSMs Planned 40
-. 4v Pr 3 NSMs Planned 30 20 10 Inn 65 U2EOC16 Inn 66 U3O1 n
7 U1EOC18 Inn 68 U2EOC17 Inn 69 35
/
1, System/Equipment Reliability Measures TOTAL TSM's OUTSTANDING -- PROJECTED vs ACTUAL (Sept Projected 35: Sept Actual= 30) 80 0
Projected 70
.. 4s Actual 60 GO D
50 P
40 30 20 10 0
(Chart Reflects All TSM Open As Of April 1, 1998 & Any New TSM With Expected Removal Date to Exceed 90 Days) 36
System/Equipment Reliability Measures Success In Restoring Maintenance Rule Al Systems to A2 Status 1.00 Actual Y-T-D Success%
0.90 Goal - Success %
0.80 0.70 BARS ABOVE THE LINE REPRESENT BETTER 0.70 THAN EXPECTED RESULTS 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 Dec-98 37
System/Equipment Reliability Measures Oconee Emergency Power System Reliability/Availability Assessment 35 30 25 a
20 E
gOpen Items 15 g Closed Items 10 5
0 INN66 INN67 INN68 INN69 Total Items 38
System/Equipment Reliability Measures 0.08 ONS HPI System Unavailability Rolling 12 month average 0.07 Unit1I Unit 2 0.06 --
Unit3 0.05 -------------
x Goal 0.04 0.03 0.02.
Good 0.01 x
x x
x x
x x
0 0.0
- ONS AC Power Unavailability Rolling-12irnoth -ave rage 0.025
-- KH1
.KH2 00 Goal 0.015 0.005 0
Good 0II 7+/-
09~
39 11~
-~M
Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar Apr May Jun-98 d
Jul Aug-98..
Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 I
- I I
Dec-98
- 1*
I II System/Equipment Reliability Summary
- Spending More Time in Prevention and Detection Activities
- Focused on Preventing Failures and Reducing Down Time Due to Equipment Failures
- Completing Major Modification Projects ICS, OAC, OSW 41
ER Corrective Action Initiatives
- PIP Backlog
- Problem Evaluations
- Root Cause Analysis Quality 42
Corrective Action Measures NUMBER OF PIPS GENERATED 7000 6000.1 5000-4000 4676 NUMBER OF PIPS GENERATED ACTUAL 3000 284-NUMBER OF PIPS 2000-.
GENERATED PROPOSED 73 1000-.
9 0
CN cf)
LO C
- 0) a
)
0)0)0 000)
)
D
- 0)
- 0) 004 43
-Corrective Action Measures Flu Problem Evaluation >30 days old YTDACRAL YTD TARGET 300-200-100 JAN FEB MR AFR MY JLE JLLY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 44
Eftg Corrective Action Measures Corrective Actions > 6 months old aYTD ACTUAL 500.----
YTD TAROET 500 400 300-200.
100 0
AUG SEPr OCT NOV D3C JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 45
ERt Corrective Action Measures Root Cause Quality 100.0%
80.0%
Quality Checklist 0%
a 60.0%
YTD Quality 40.0%
Checklist Avg %
200..
Quality Checklist 20.0%
Goal %
0.0%
1st 2nd 3rd 4th Quarter 46
ER e
'i Corrective Action Program Summary
- Focus On Backlog Continues
- Root Cause Quality Improvement Plan In Progress
- Assessment Activities Remain On Target 47
Human Performance Measures Culture Index Combined score of all areas In the Self Improvement Culture Survey.
This survey looks at 5 key areas of self-improvement culture focus; strength of mission and goals, knowledge and skill level, lateral Integration (communication), simplicity of procedures and processes; and self-improvement culture programs (problem Identification and resolution).
Culture Index PB LeCroy 10%
GREEN:
> 14.50 YELLOW:
> 13.5 RED:
< 13.5 GOAL:
System Avg > 15.0 by 12/31/98 ONS Culture Index =
13.81 CNS Culture Index =
14.31 MNS Culture Index =
14.03 SYSTEM AVERAGE =
14.05 48
Human, Performance Measures
- 1. Field InvolvementlJob Observation. WEIGHTED 20016 EXPECTATION: Each DivislonRroup it~ conduct record and monitor Supervisoes Field Involvement and Job Observations on&&h Job Obsenvation Form.
PeAim once, expectatlons are established based on en average of 12 forms per supervdsorper month.
DivisionlGroup feasure a Numnb.- of Forms subm ftted i month CRITERIA:
Number of Supervisors GREEN:
>12 YELLOW: >4to -c12 RED:
4 WIITE CmeTntIy unireported Group ENGINEERING OP RA1OES MAINTENANCE Y9+/-ow CHEITRY t
WOqcOONmRoL WV1n
-REEN No-moI then I,
FNslonl:
u:1 z1;Vq~~YELO
>2u Z3on/rop 35 AtGre0en f1 1
1 Z
RED
>2A 49eoeimp 1
Yellow 44~~~~WIT C2wre171-ntV 1.;
z 4lyimed7 All 741 52 t Ia 14.1 l g -
r 74 9
Eft Human Performance Measures
- 2. Pre-JoblPost Job Brief. WEIGHTED 20%.
EXPECTATION: Each Dvisionroup (I conduct recon and monibrair Pre-Jobst Job Biefs on a Bdoing Fan.
Perknence expeciftons are eshb#ishedb&sed on an average ofl onns per suponsorper month.
DMalara/Group Measure = Number of Forms submifttd per month CRITERIA:
Number of Supervisors GREEN:
> 8 YELLOW:
>2 to < 8 RED:
< 2 WHITE-Currently unreported Group ENGINEERIN OPS MAINTENANCE CHEMISTRY RP WORKCONTROL 4%N
-33 23 ~
-r 1
1 -
34 4T 84-52 1T T-94 7
Ii 1-h 32 4Ul 4W toT 56 7N 8.0 122 7T3 1T 7 T FW 17.43 MAH 29 571 Z37 42 W-
- 10.
47r -rr-r
--r-v
-Wi- ---
38 31 --
n 2 3 I
--Z-7 F 36 4-e 54 I6 1 W
.-a Z7 Tl -~WT1 -
.1F7' 43 7-ioW-48 6 5.w 7 1
-i--i--l-ti 14r 29 uu u
-- 4r 9~ ag-IF
.50 -
of m
8.14
~JUL ?
23 0.94 z1W 2
7A5 449 27 T IF r
-w-IF - W r U AU 2
-TW 1W I7-W-
-M-29 9.1
--r-a 41 e
56 1 NUV CRITERIA FOR SITE MEASURE:
GREEN:
No more than I DWsionlGroup < Green YELLOW:
> 2 Didsiona/Groups < Green RED:
- 2 DiAsions/Groups < Yellow WHITE:
Currently unreported r
URRENT STATUS GREEN 50
II lfi Human Performance. Measures Mudct£*dke Redio of the number of PPs genetuted by the culpable group to the number generaed by aft groups.
DlviedotV Group ENGINEERING OPS MAINTENAN4CE CHEMISTRY RtP SBURTqY YearEndTaluet YearEndTarget YearEndTaigot YearEndTarget YearEndTarget YearEndTargot
_A~r 0.33 APRIL 0910.12 9V
-.1 CRITERA FOR SITE MEASU)RE:
GREEN:
I 149ison/Group < Grown YELLOW:
2 IZE4sone/Groups -c Grown CUIRRENT STATUS: GREEN RE:
> 2 DIkIonsGroups < Green 51
Human Performance Summary fuc
- 11% of PIPs are Human Performance Related (matches the industry average)
- Improved Significant Event Rate (better than the industry average)
- Marked Improvement in Self Reporting by Operations and Engineering 52
Human Performance Summary
- Quality of Job Observations Improving More Good Catches Documented & Fixed
- Measureable Increase In Use of 6 Tools by Station Divisions
- Early SuccessWith Real Time Behavior Based Monitoring - Increased Focus on Peer Coaching in Chemistry 53
Summary
- Working The Plan and Producing Results
- Recovery Plan On Track For 12/31/98 Completion
- 1999 Planning - Transitioning To Operational Plan
- Operational Planning Focused On Sustaining Progress and Continuing To Raise Standards 54