ML15238A294
| ML15238A294 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 09/06/1996 |
| From: | Newberry S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Hampton J DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9609120241 | |
| Download: ML15238A294 (3) | |
Text
Mr. J.W. Hampton 0
Site Vice President Duke Power Company P.O. Box 1439 September 6, 1996 Seneca, SC 29679
SUBJECT:
NRC STAFF REVIEW OF SUBMITTAL NO. 1 OF OLRP-1001
Dear Mr. Hampton:
By letter dated July 31, 1996, the Duke Power Company submitted "License Renewal - Technical Information, Topical Report, OLRP-1001, Submittal No. 1" for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The staff understands that Duke will be submitting additional portions of OLRP-1001 throughout the upcoming year and that Duke desires NRC staff safety evaluations for all portions to be completed by January 1998.
Based on our preliminary assessment of the submittal, the staff concludes that it does not contain adequate information for the staff to begin its review.
The information provided in areas such as evaluation boundary, aging effects, and aging management demonstration are far short of that needed to support the findings required by 10 CFR Part 54.
For example, in several areas of Chapter 3.3, various elements of NEI Guideline 95-10, Section 4.2, are not provided. Further, an assertion that NEI 95-10 is followed is not sufficient by itself without providing the technical information that forms the basis for the statement.
The staff believes that it would be beneficial to initiate discussions between the Duke Power Company and the staff on the necessary format and content before revising Submittal No. 1 or before submittal of additional reports for review.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or John Moulton of my staff at 415-1106.
Sincerely, Oxiial inewoBy: PTKuo for Scott F. New e ry, 1irector License Renewal Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.:
50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 cc:
See service list R.L. Gill, 'Duke Power Distribution:
Docket Files;.
PUBLIC PDLR R/F TMartin, NRR BGrimes, NRR SNewberry,.NRR FHebdon, NRR DLaBarge, NRR SFlanders, NRR BSheron, NRR GBagchi, NRR JStrosnider, NRR DOCUMENT NAME: A:DUKE.N01 (JMoulton/LLM Disk)
To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE LA:PDLR517 p PM:PDLR 1 C-PD:PDLR,/
NAME LLuther:bs:llm I
JMoulton,
I SNewbe ry I
DATE 9/ /96 9/ /96 19/6 /96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-6 9609120241 960906 PDR ADOCK 05000269 P
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 6, 1996 Mr. J.W. Hampton Site Vice President Duke Power Company P.O. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679
SUBJECT:
NRC STAFF REVIEW OF SUBMITTAL NO. 1 OF OLRP-1001
Dear Mr. Hampton:
By letter dated July 31, 1996, the Duke Power Company submitted "License Renewal - Technical Information, Topical Report, OLRP-1001, Submittal No. 1" for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The staff understands that Duke will be submitting additional portions of OLRP-1001 throughout the upcoming year and that Duke desires NRC staff safety evaluations for all portions to be completed by January 1998.
Based on our preliminary assessment of the submittal, the staff concludes that it does not contain adequate information for the staff to begin its review.
The information provided in areas such as evaluation boundary, aging effects, and aging management demonstration are far short of that needed to support the findings required by 10 CFR Part 54.
For example, in several areas of Chapter 3.3, various elements of NEI Guideline 95-10, Section 4.2, are not provided. Further, an assertion that NEI 95-10 is followed is not sufficient by itself without providing the technical information that forms the basis for the statement.
The staff believes that it would be beneficial to initiate discussions between the Duke Power Company and the staff on the necessary format and content before revising Submittal No. 1 or before submittal of additional reports for review.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or John Moulton of my staff at 415-1106.
Sincerely, cott F. Ne berry, Direct icense Renewal Project D rectorate ivision of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.:
50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 cc:
See service list R.L. Gill, Duke Power
Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. Ed Burchfield Mr. Paul R. Newton Duke Power Company, PB05E Comp 422 South Church Street Oconee Nuclear Site Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Winston and Strawn Ms. Karen E. Long 1400 L Street, NW.
Washington,DCt 200 Assistant Attorney General
,Wasingon, C 2005North Carolina Department of Justice Mr. Robert B. Borsum P. 0. Box 629 Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Division Suite 525 Mr. G. A. Copp 1700 Rockville Pike Licensing -
EC050 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Duke Power Company 526 South Church Street Manager, LIS Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 NUS Corporation 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Dayne H. Brown, Director Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Division of Radiation Protection North Carolina Department of Senior Resident Inspector Environment, Health and U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Natural Resources Route 2, Box 610 P. 0. Box 27687 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Regional Administrator, Region II Mr. J. W. Hampton U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Vice President, Oconee Site 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Duke Power Company Atlanta, Georgia 30323 P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 27679 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621