ML15160A218

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NYS000517 - Salas, Pedro, Regulatory Affairs Director, Areva, Letter to USNRC Regarding Potential Non-Conservatism in NRC Branch Technical Position 5-3 (January 30, 2014) (ML14038A265)
ML15160A218
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 27910, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15160A218 (2)


Text

A AREVA January 30, 2014 NRC:14:004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Potential Non-Conservatism in NRC Branch Technical Position 5-3 Ref. 1: Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 2, "Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials," May, 1988.

Ref. 2: NUREG 0800, Revision 2, Standard Review Plan, Branch Technical Position 5-3, "Fracture Toughness Requirements," March 2007.

Ref. 3: "NRC Review of the Technical Basis for Use of the Master Curve in Evaluation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity," pp. 411-437 of NUREG/CP-0172, "Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting," May 2001.

During evaluation of adjusted reference temperatures (Reference 1) for reactor vessel extended beltline materials, AREVA Inc. (AREVA) considered invoking Paragraph 1.1(4) of Branch Technical Position 5-3 (Reference 2) to estimate the initial RTNDT(reference temperature for nil ductility transition) for these materials. In this assessment, AREVA determined that this position is not bounding of AREVA's measured initial RTNDT database, as Reference 3 implies. Attachment A to this letter discusses the potential non-conservatism in Reference 2.

AREVA has not used this Branch Technical Position in its existing calculations for operating plants. The purpose of this letter is to bring this observation to the NRC Staffs attention for the Staff to assess its potential significance and the need to determine extent of condition.

If you have any questions related to this submittal, please contact Ms. Gayle F. Elliott, Product Licensing Manager at 434-832-3347 or by e-mail at Gayle.Elliott@areva.com.

Sincerel-P dro Salas, Director Regulatory Affairs AREVA Inc.

cc:

J.

G. Rowley M. T. Ericksonkirk Project 728

Attachment:

D Discussion of Potential Non-Conservatism in NRC Branch Technical Position 5-3 t.D AREVA INC.

3315 Old Forest Road, Lynchburg. VA 24501 Tel.: 434 832 3000 - www.areva.com NYS000517 Submitted: June 9, 2015

Document Control Desk NRC:14:004 January 30, 2014 Page A-i Attachment A Discussion of Potential Non-Conservatism in NRC Branch Technical Position 5-3 NUREG-0800, Branch Technical Position 5-3 (Reference 2, previously identified as MTEB-5.2) presents various options for estimating initial RTNDT when there is not sufficient data to make a direct measurement.

Paragraph 1.1 (4) of Reference 2 reads as follows:

"If limited Charpy V-notch tests were performed at a single temperature to confirm that at least 41 J (30 ft-lbs) was obtained, that temperature may be used as an estimate of the RTNDT provided that at least 61 J (45 ft-lbs) was obtained if the specimens were longitudinally oriented. If the minimum value obtained was less than 61 J (45 ft-lbs), the RTNDT may be estimated as 11 °C (20 *F) above the test temperature."

The limited Charpy V-notch tests for B&W procured forgings were typically tested at +100 F. Based on the above, one could estimate the RTNDT is either 10 *F or 30 *F, depending on the Charpy test results. Per page 421 of Reference 3, the Branch Technical Position is intended to produce a bounding estimate of RTNDT. The following is stated on Page 422 of Reference 3:

"... the sum {RTNDT(U) + 2oj} represents a bounding value of RTNDT before irradiation. When RTNDT is determined according to ASME NB-2331 or MTEB-5.21, these protocols produce a bounding estimate, so a, can be zero."

RTNDT values from B&W procured RPV forgings were determined according to ASME NB-2331 and estimated per Paragraph 1.1(4) of Reference 2. The below comparison shows that use of RTNDT as estimated according to Paragraph 1.1(4) of Reference 2, with oa = 0, does not result in a bounding estimate of RTNDT before irradiation, as stated in Reference 3 above.

>45 1 I <45 ft-b '

ft-lb I

I

-ASME NB-2331 a 8TP 5-3, Pos. 1.1(4)

II I

I I

I I

I

-25

-5 15 35 55 75 RTNDT,-F 1 MTEB-5.2 is a previous identifier for the guidance contained in Reference 1.