L-2015-050, Annual Fitness-For-Duty-Program Report for the Period of January 1 Through December 31, 2014

Annual Fitness-For-Duty-Program Report for the Period of January 1 Through December 31, 2014

ML15070A005
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	02/24/2015
From:	Katzman E Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2015-050
Download: ML15070A005 (6)

Text

February 24, 2015 a I PL L-2015-050 10 CFR 26 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Fitness-For-Duty Program Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717, letter forwards the fitness-for-duty program performance data for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2014.

Enclosed are the following attachments: Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (via EIE General Submission Portal) and 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I- Annual Fatigue Results.

Please contact us should you have any questions regarding this submittal.

Sincerely, 5 ,V YY Eric S. Katzman Licensing Manager St. Lucie Plant ESK/tlt Attachments AO?/

Florida Power & Ught Company 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2015-050 Attachments Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data (2 pages) 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results (2 pages)

Estimated burden per response to comply with this collection request is 114 hours0.00132 days <br />0.0317 hours <br />1.884921e-4 weeks <br />4.3377e-5 months <br />. This form is a voluntary means of reporting the information required under 10 CFR 26.717. The information is required by NRC to obtain on an annual basis site specific ftness-for-duty (FFD) program performance data on drug and alcohol programs from licensees and other entities. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collection Branch (T5-F53), U.S. Nudear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to InfiacoltetsResouros0NRC aov and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-1020, (3150-0146), Office of Management and Budget, Washington DC 20503. If a means used to impose information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

1) All fields rnquhud unlto marked optilonar

2) Use of Adobe Reader S or lear is required E Submission

]Update

3) Mouse over fields for additionalInfornnaion Select Facility St. Lucie [50-335; 50-389]

I I 2014 Period of Report I

Tests Conductedin the CalendarYear Rs F" Total Number of Tests Conducted Total Number of Positive, Adulterated, ReaonFoTstng Licensee Employees Contractors/Vendors Substituted, and Refusal to Test Results Random 5I3]I2 40]5I1 3]

Post-Event / t jo0 IiI1 [ 0 Folwp42] 541 JI, Total (Calculated)

FFDProgram Random Testing Population and Rate 7541 F~-II151 1,7501 1 Average number of Average number of Total size of the random testing pool Annual random testing percentage licensee employees F 975 I'5 I contractors/vendors 80075 Iq throughout the period (Calculated)

,Ft [

achieved for the testing pool 1 52.81 2 Laboratory Testing Does your program use a N Licensee Testing Facility?

(Yes / No)

Identify your HHS-Certified Laboratory(ies) IQuest Diagnostics, Inc. in Tucker, GA Identify your Blind Performance Test Sample supplier(s) IElSohly Laboratories in Oxford, MS Substances Tested Did your program only test for NRC-required substances Does your program conduct LOD testing AND at the NRC-specified minimum cutoff levels? (Yes / No) permitted in 26.163(a)(2)? (Yes / No)

Special Analyses Testing Results Total Number of "Dilute" 1 Total Number o° "Dilute" Specimens [

Specimen Test Results 48 (Special Analyses Testing Conducted) 48 (Optional)

Use Only NRC Cutoff Initial Confirmatory LOD Testing? Comment Substance Levels? (Yes I No) Cutoff Cutoff (Yes I No) (Optional)

Alcohol Yes,_,NotAppli ale Cocaine Yes Yes LOD testing on dilute specimens only Majuana Yes Yes LOD testing on dilute specimens only Amphetamines Yeo LOD testing on dilute specimens only Opiates Yes LOD testing on dilute specimens only PCP Yes LOD testing on dilute specimens only

- Page 1 of 2 NRC Form 891 (12/2014)

Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014)

Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December19, 2014) - Page 1 ot2 NRC Form 891 (12/2014)

Substances Tested- continued Summary of Management Actions - 26.717(b)(8)

Summarize actions implemented to improve FFD program performance. As applicable, reference in the topic description audit reports, 30-day reports, and/or corrective action reports. If reporting information on more than three topics, select "Others" for Topic 3 to report any additional topics.

Topic 1 Topic 1 Description Program and System Management For the reporting period of 2014, fifteen (15) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, one (1) follow-up test was positive, two (2) for cause - observed behavior tests were positive, nine (9) pre-access tests were positive, and three (3) random tests were positive.

Follow-Up Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. The individual was denied access.

For Cause - Observed Behavior Positive Test One (1) licensee employee tested positive for alcohol. The individual was denied access. One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. The individual was denied access.

Topic 2 Topic 2 Description Certified Laboratories For the 2014 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to St Lucie nuclear plant's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

One (1) specimen was lost in transit by the DHHS certified laboratory. The individual was retested with negative results.

0 Add an additional Topic Topic 3 Topic 3 Description Policies and Procedures Three (3) individuals appealed their positive drug test results. In each case the appeal test supported the original drug test result.

Person(s)Responsible for InformationProvided Person 1 (required):

Robert Boskey ]Access/FFD Supervisor Robert.L-Boskey@fpl.com First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address Person 2 (optional):

First Name Last Name Position Title Company Email Address FinalStep (Requirso)- NRC will consider this form authentic in accordance with 26.11 only when the "Validate & Lock" button has been selected and all errors (i.e., those highlighted in red) have been corrected. The "Validate & Lock" button will change to "Locked" after the data validation process has been successfully completed and the form is ready for submission.

Form Locked On: Feb 16, 2015 at 1:47:13 PM s f Annual Report Form (version 1.6.0 - December 19, 2014) - Page 2 of 2 - NRC Form 891 (12/2014)

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Facility Name Report Period F"."t~de TV 2014 7 Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1)(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2) I NumberofEmolovees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

Number of Fmaloveas ued Waivers; There were a total of nine (9) employees issued waivers in 2014. Of these nine employees, there were 14 instances in which a work hour limit was waived. Thirteen of the waivers were related to an emergent down power to support a recovery of foreign material in the Unit 2 B Operating or on- Performing Performing steam generator bowl. The waivered individuals performed activities to support SIG nozzle dam removal, installation of SG manways and Performing site directing of health physics maintenance or Performing tube plugging evaluations to enable exiting RCS midloop conditions. One additional waiver was necessary for a valve repair by a duties of a fire Furmanite Technician with unique qualifications. The waivers were associated with work hour controls greater than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> the operations or chemistry onsite directing security duties Number of Waivers brigade member period, greater than 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> in a 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> period, greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in a 7 day period, and less than a day off for 7 day period.

of systems, as duties as of maintenance as described in as described in described in described in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(3)

• 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(4)

Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:

Eight online fatigue assessments were conducted in 2014:1) Five workers were assessed "For-Cause," two (2) Security Officers, two (2)

Contractor workers, and one(1) Maintenance worker. The Security Officers were determined to be impaired, given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off and advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or combating fatigue. The Maintenance worker was determined to be impaired and was given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off and advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or combating fatigue, the two (2) Contractors were determined not to be impaired and continued to work, 2) Three Security Officers were assessed for "Self-Declaration" fatigue assessments. Two of the Officers were determined to be impaired, given 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> off and advised of strategies for obtaining adequate rest or countering fatigue and one Officer was determined not to be impaired and continued to work.

___________ 14 ______

of 0 0 0 9 0

Conclusions:

There were a total of fourteen waivers issued in 2014. The waivers were required to address circumstances that could not have been reasonably controlled and to ensure the industrial or radiological safety of the public and plant personnel.

B 0 0 j 1 0 onlyunder tot brigaed columnt, Do tot dotubt count thoemIndhodoots ate Forimdhoda performingthe firebfiade duties, pleseouotentthemt~

Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

There were no corrective actions taken in response to the use of waivers and the conduct of fatigue assessments in 2014.

Facllt[t Name 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results IStLu wjft12d14 N Summary of Waiver Issuance - 26.203(e1i l-ii -

or chemistry Performiog dutiesof a tire brigade Performingsecurity Performinghealthphyorco Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one of the cells in this table should have a non-negative value)

I n I r Operating or on-site directing of the Perforrning health physics or chemistry Performing duties of a fire brigade Performing maintenance or onsite Performing security operations of systems as described in directing of maintenance, as described in duties as described in 26.4(a)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3) duties as described in 26.4(a)(5) Outage 4uag afe 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(4) Operating Work Hour Controls (after day Total so)

Dutage(after Outage(fr Operaing

ýOutae (offer0 Operating day 60) Operating Ouae day60 Operaing u" Iday 60) 0 0 Daily Work Hours 26.205(d)(1) 0 0 0 0 Rest Breaks 26.205(d)(2) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 - 0 Minimum 0 0 Days Off Per Shift Cycle 26.205(d)(3) 0 0 0 0 Minimum Days Off for Outage Activities 26.205(d)(4) and 26.205(d)(5)

Alternate to Minumum Days Off 26.205(d)(7) rage i TOTALI yt them envueder rho fir brioudo volume 0 01 0 01 01 14 1 01 0 0

• U I *" *Or IROlVI*U*

rurinuiviuuais

• NO*IRO jiur-in TIr* Dno*o8 ittauri a-DUIIH*anQ OTn*r OUEJ*

u-burjuvi-juu-Dle*H *U*

tva-wuntthemonl under the fire brinade column - I- ..u... - 11U.... 1....

--.