Similar Documents at Byron |
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML23033A4602023-01-12012 January 2023
Comment (471) of Marguerite Winkel on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML15275A1572015-08-27027 August 2015
Comment (11) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Final Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15058A3882015-02-18018 February 2015
Comment (5) of Kay and Frederick Turk on License Renewal Application for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1102015-02-13013 February 2015
Comment (9) of Nancy L. Ranekon Behalf of Exelon Generation, LLC on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15058A1972015-02-12012 February 2015
Comment (4) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1092015-02-0303 February 2015
Comment (8) of Steven & Karen Herklotz on Behalf of Hoo Haven, Inc. on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1082015-02-0202 February 2015
Comment (7) of Unknown Individual on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Information Service on the Possible Closure of Byron
ML15027A3352015-01-21021 January 2015
Comment (00002) of David Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on License Renewal Application for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15016A1112015-01-0808 January 2015
Comment (1) by Cynthia Stacy, on Behalf of Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Supporting Proposed License Renewal for Byron Station, Units 1 & 2
ML13277A3062013-09-27027 September 2013
Comment (2) of David Kraft on Behalf of Neis Re Supplement to Nrc'S Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal for the Byron Nuclear Power Station
ML13263A2212013-09-16016 September 2013
Comment (1) of Kim P. Gouker on Behalf of Ogle County, Illinois Supporting the License Renewal Application of the Byron Power Generating Station
ML13247A0102013-08-27027 August 2013
Comment (2) of Kim P. Gouker on Behalf of Ogle County, Illinois, Supporting License Renewal Application of the Byron Power Generating Station
ML1002716862010-01-13013 January 2010
Comment (4) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1199, Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Reactors.
ML0934410862009-11-25025 November 2009
Comment (3) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, Draft Regulatory Guide DG-8039, Methods for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Exposure.
ML0929301482009-10-0101 October 2009
Comment (5) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222, Control of Preheat Temperature for Welding of Low-Alloy Steel.
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0531900672005-11-0808 November 2005
Comment (9) of Exelon Nuclear in Response to Questions Related to Specific Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Program Areas
2023-01-12
[Table view] |
Text
C-7 BYRON BULLET POINTS .-H Feb 2, 20:15 _ kC/r) 1.) FACTS:
!Byron has been slated by Exeton fior possible closure due to unprofitability.
- One way utilities use to regain profitability is to cut costs; at a plant like Byron, this could mean cutting staff, cutting O&M, or both
- Exelon's comments on unprofitability may indicate that it has already engaged in actions that have degraded the safety levels at the reactor site.
SCOMMENT/CONCERN:
o NRC needs to insure that Exelon cuts neither staff nor O&M spending, and that both are kept at levels to insure the safety of the public., the workers and the plant.
o NRC needs to publicly guarantee that any workers expressing safety concerns publicly do not experience any form of retribution, as has previously occurred (refer to Dreux Richards concerns) o Can a utility publicly stating it may have to close a reactor site be serious about continuing the costly relicensing process, and vice versa?
And be serious about meeting its requirements in full?
2.) FACTS:
- Byron has been slated by l1'xelon for possible closure due to unprofitability.
o Worker layoffs and other economic. disruption are guaranteed when Exelon makes the decision to close Byron, for whatever reason it chooses o COMMENTS/CONCERN:
- i. As part of the relicensing process, NRC needs to publicly affirm that sufficient funds are currently available in the decommissioning fund to meet NRC requirements for decommissioning, as outlined in current NRC decommissioning calculation lbrmulas.
it. A "just transition fund." needs to be established immediately, as a condition for community acceptance of relicensing, that financially prepares the workers and community for a loss of incomes and economic benefits. This needs to be negotiated among community leaders, workers and their union. leadership, and Exelon management; it can also be a part of negotiations with the Legislature, Exelon, and workers' unions.
p4.
N, .... ..
.......... '/ i SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03
..... ... * .,",, ~ ~Add= . -" --,' -/ /-',5
