ML15040A718

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Concerning Cyber Security Implementation Plan Milestone 8 Completion Date (TAC No. MF5557) (L-14-421)
ML15040A718
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/13/2015
From: Ellen Brown
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Harkness E
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Eva brown, NRR/DORL
References
L-14-421, TAC MF5557
Download: ML15040A718 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

"ebruary 13, 2015 Mr. Ernest J. Harkness Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mail Stop A-PY-A290 P.O. Box 97, 10 Center Road Perry, OH 44081-0097

SUBJECT:

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MILESTONE 8 COMPLETION DATE (TAC NO. MF5557)(L-14-421)

Dear Mr. Harkness:

By application dated January 9, 2015 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15009A264), FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP), Unit No. 1. The proposed amendment requests revision of the operating license to extend the completion date for full implementation of PNPP Cyber Security Plan from the beginning of July 2015 to the end of December 2017. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.

This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

E. Harkness If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315.

Sincerely,

/RAJ Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing 111-2 and Planning and Analysis Branch Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-440 cc: Distribution via Listserv

ML15040A478 NRR-106 OFFICE LPLll-2/PM LPLI 11-2/LA LPLlll-2/BC NAME EBrown SRohrer TTate DATE 2/10/15 2/10/15 2/13/15