ML15008A062
| ML15008A062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/2015 |
| From: | Peter Presby Operations Branch I |
| To: | Cote M Dominion Nuclear |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14043A009 | List: |
| References | |
| U01891 | |
| Download: ML15008A062 (6) | |
Text
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
-~
~-- - - - - - - - -
-~
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only 1
F N
s 2
F N
E Modified stem to delete irrelevant information. Changed distractor wording to align with the modified stem.
3 F
B E
Minor stem changes for clarity.
4 H
B E
Used on 2009 MS2 exam. Moved repeated information from all choices into the stem. Changed initial conditions to address a technical issue.
5 H
B s
6 H
N E
Changed Choice B to eliminate possibility of 2"d correct answer. Minor wording changes to Choices A, C, and D to maintain symmetry.
7 H
N Modified choices to eliminate possibility of a 2"d correct answer, to E
eliminate overlap with 0#66 and to adjust LOD. Added specific step reference to step.
8 H
B E
Added power level to the stem to make KA match more explicit.
9 H
B s
10 H
B s
11 H
M s
12 F
N E
Minor nomenclature changes.
I 13 H
B s
14 H
N E
Modified stem to provide more realistic indications for the plant conditions.
I 15 H
M E
Changed components referenced in two distractors to reflect equipment normally in operation for the given conditions.
I 16 F
N E
Modified initial conditions to at-power operation.
17 H
B s
L__
L_
L__- L__
Page 1
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
-~
---~ ----
--~ --**--
-~
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-Q=
SRO 8/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 18 H
N s
19 H
N E
Minor modification to stem conditions to change cause from operator error to circuit malfunction.
20 H
N s
21 H
N E
Modified a stem parameter to ensure desired plant response.
22 H
B s
23 H
N E
Minor change to stem conditions. Minor wording changes to dis tractors.
24 F
B u
Q overlaps with op-test JPM. Replaced the Q.
25 F
N E
Minor formatting changes.
26 H
N E
Minor stem nomenclature correction.
27 H
B u
This bank Q is no longer valid as written because of plant procedure and operating philosophy changes. Replaced with another bank Q.
28 H
N E
Modified Q stem to enhance clarity.
29 H
B E
Minor wording change 30 H
B E
Minor format, wording changes.
31 F
N s
32 F
N E
Reworded stem to provide more clarity as to plant conditions and equipment functionality.
33 F
N s
34 H
M s
35 H
B u
Replaced with a bank Q testing the same KIA.
36 F
N E
Minor wording changes to choices to reduce choice length. ---
Page 2
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD 0#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-0= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 37 H
B E
Minor modifications to improve clarity and ensure given conditions are representative of SG pressure.
38 H
B u
Bank 0 is technically obsolete due to plant design changes.
Replaced with a different bank 0.
39 F
M s
40 H
N E
Minor modification to stem conditions to ensure components can be manually operated.
41 F
B s
42 H
N E
Corrected nomenclature error in stem.
43 H
N E
Minor wording changes in stem and choices. Corrected typo on key.
44 F
B u
Replaced 0#44 because it overlapped with 0#1 0.
45 F
B E
Minor formatting changes.
46 H
B s
Used on 2011 MS2 exam. Changed cognitive level designation to higher order.
47 F
N s
48 H
B E
Changed stem conditions to align with a plant design modification.
Minor wording change in one choice.
49 H
N E
Modified key answer wording to ensure technically accurate.
50 F
B E
Minor stem changes.
51 F
B E
Replaced the 0 because of oversampling of the system.
52 F
N s
Minor wording changes to some choices for improved symmetry.
Changed trend direction in one distractor to fix the distractor.
53 F
X N
E Replaced another distractor and swapped answer choice order for symmetry. Changed stem conditions and choices to clarify question and move repetitive text from choices to stem.
54 F
B s
Page 3
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N UIE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 55 F
N E
Corrected typo in Choice B. Labeled Q source on justification page.
56 H
M E
Added information to stem to reduce complexity of Q. Changed a distractor to eliminate confusion due to low initial power level.
57 H
B s
Used on 2009 MS2 exam.
58 F
B E
Corrected minor typos.
59 F
B s
60 F
B s
61 H
N E
Minor wording change in stem to clarify intent of Q.
62 H
B E
Minor wording change in stem to clarify conditions and intent of Q.
63 F
B s
64 F
B s
65 H
N E
Replaced the Q because of oversampling of the system.
66 H
B u
Replaced Q based on overlap with 07 Corrected categorization, new not modified. Minor wording changes 67 F
N E
to stem and distractors to eliminate confusion over how/when the testing is performed.
68 F
B u
Not testing RO knowledge. Replaced the Q.
69 F
N E
Minor stem wording improvements.
70 F
N E
Added to choices to eliminate possibility of subset answers.
71 F
B E
Corrected justification statements.
72 F
N E
Added information to stem related to extent of damage and condition of assembly to better match intended initial conditions.
73 H
B s
Used on 2009 MS2 exam.
Page4
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 74 H
B E
Corrected operator position designators consistent with facility convention. Minor modification to one distractor.
75 F
N s
76 H
N E
Changed parameter in stem to one that is instrumented.
77 F
B E
Modified one distractor to avoid subset problem.
78 H
B E
Used on 2009 MS2 exam. This question reworded to match the as-administered version on the 2009 NRC exam.
79 H
N E
Modified choices to enhance symmetry.
H Changed affected component in stem to align with initial conditions.
80 M
E Minor stem and choice wording and format changes to improve clarity.
Minor modification to a condition in the stem to ensure no confusion 81 H
N E
over the time at which the component was lost. Added information to eliminate any possible misunderstanding about equipment status.
82 H
B E
Modified operator titles consistent with new station convention.
Clarified condition in the stem.
83 H
N u
Replaced Q because of overlap with an op-test JPM.
84 H
B E
Minor wording changes.
85 H
X N
u Replaced with a bank Q that matched the KA.
86 H
N E
Modified some stem conditions such that all could exist concurrently, to ensure operational validity.
87 H
N E
Changed makeup from auto to manual in stem, consistent with normal plant operation. Changed wording in choices.
88 H
B s
89 H
B s
Used on 2009 MS2 exam.
90 H
N s
~-
Page 5
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia
- I Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 91 H
B E
Modified Q conditions.
92 H
M s
93 F
N u
Q not technically correct. Replaced with another new Q.
94 F
N s
95 H
B u
Q not technically correct. Replaced with another new Q.
96 H
N E
Changed one choice to make technically correct for all conditions.
97 H
M s
I 98 H
B s
I 99 F
N s
100 F
N u
Not operationally valid. Replaced with a new Q.
I
~-....____ -
Page 6