ML15005A162
| ML15005A162 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/2014 |
| From: | Epstein R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Cindy Bladey Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 79FR61668 | |
| Download: ML15005A162 (184) | |
Text
RULEKS'.L'.:'}[ U iECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2t 1Q--
C 29 P1'1 4: 3 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R1,--_\\,/.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s nt fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely'/
Name Email
/
RULES.
TiV.S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29D ETr 29 PIN 4: 31 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history
. of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Name*/4 EmailC aa CO-hO
RULE i)
CTES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7 01 L1 E C 2 9 P11 4: 3 I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQP-\\/
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name __
Email w v/k,.A 1 w
, W i ", c)
RULE
,,-:*1,JN0 3C-TiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC "lIl UF_* 29.
LI: 3 I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF`F'
-/
)D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name_
Email C
- CkA, a(*_ O AY, or\\(
RULE A~I~~TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 014 0E-C 9 PR R: 3 I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF*
(
1\\/!-'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely.
Name Email 5co-,th... ep 1e,,1, (9 f
i.a' P1
RUL[S ANP-. V1 ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20]11 2 9 PMI: 3 I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
/
-C
_K As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerel Name AA I
OiA Email,
&1CU i.v,.
1k, L" t--
.RULE £L D:ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2BI'i n~c 29 Pil: 31 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R72 -\\-F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name______________________
Email KC iY k
QL 14
'o
RULES AI'DETVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
-70Iti 0-7 29 Pi i:31 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.7. IV
\\,/..D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Name Email
RULLS /.,i,,
DI' YCTtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0,
Office of Administration, NRC Z0H *.
2 /
PM tf: 3 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 r
Dear Commissioners,
R As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincere**,
RULES,*'ii L* (.ffiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey CO1/
2rr 29 PI
- 3M Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email V6lc*zk 5
7 z;(.cO'
RULES Ai D!C
'TIVE S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20I1 `-C 209 P4I Or 31 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQI"$*,
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel ods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
.O.L/A
( 61141lO(/ c
RULE.
E..
CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q [t--f-29. PM: 3 31 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email YN o-,
\\_,
--. J
,7h-,.
RULES I
S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey IC29P1 4: 3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
SincerelyA Name A)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201lI iWC 2 P1 L: 32 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F, F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as longr as the speutfuel rods remain there.
RULES "W.CTIVES b
tl-U**!"
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OEC 2 9 PH 4: 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CITR/r As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
RULES -' :dCT1VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
?014 OEC 2 PII 4: 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF.. -'. !-,.-.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident. there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain th Name___________
Sincerely, Email c.
RULES cARI f ~CT! yES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 261'i-,n. 29 P* L,:32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
'F.F..
.\\
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name__
('&
d._*
RULES J*.V`1.-",)
D!. :C-FIV S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
?61J Ec,-
Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R"0E'!V--"
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email i
it
\\t
RULE", A[-,1 C*...IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201'l 07 29
,q Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name____________________
RULES L-/
" i0-7EOT[VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20I'4 FEC 29 PR 4:32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -"-
\\--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, '
/
Name cV 17I-14
'/7"/
Email r***,//*J*
RULES i:WtW.ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PM LV 32 Office of Administration, NRC 9 P Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FR F2 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 4
,l Emal
RULES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey LOIF 29 P1 4: 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R C--- '/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentPel d remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
- S
RULES /-;",'b L'*- F IE, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
- Oi' G*C 29 P 2
Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
RUMSA.-' 173.CERVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOUI ~F 2 9 PM 4: 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F?-.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Email
RULES A.4 :..CTIVES.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey D011E DFC 29 P1 4: 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F1 -. '..\\/FV)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
'M m
& T', V [c Email _11 ro C(
o mk;i6o. co,hi
RULES%.IVE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201 29 '4 2
- 2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFt M-,
\\
)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name ta
&6 )x Email
RUI Fs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 *d 2? P* tP 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F,-...
-I/.cr)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name ___1m Email
RULES ArVLDCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 26111 uC 29 PM 4:32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F P)
F- \\%/EF-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, //
Name Email
RULE. AL fD,
'ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7t}1 IEC 2Y P-I 1: 32 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCR I 'FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name co'-
/*r,/
i Email C__o 0H AJ-*
IO,,J
RULES / '} iCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20i14 OEC 29 P N " 32 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R7F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Name
/'?1A1,-
/
ye Email 6L e-*-/
C'L.[L"
RULES /...:" D.'
E U N U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201i1 DEC 229 PH
- 32 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
- F- -
1\\/.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name e
Email Y 7-
- (%.
Cl
RULES tiA!N I'TDI"VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 0[K 2"9 PM Lt-3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF'-(,
f\\/rr As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Sout ern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spe fuel rods remain there.
RULE:..
0K
. ; EVOLyVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 G i 41C 29 P1 IM 33 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F*
- \\V ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as tle spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Namem Email
- ,A*-
RULES A71;4) hHf(ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7
CEr1 2?9 P M 4:
Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF 71\\
[-E.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerel Name_
RULES.ii )
tES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7214 DEC 2 9 PH1
.1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerel Name (J-
-~---
Email ej'I/ do rc O4 1 W
y I.*
RULES-,*. *.3.,..,**E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Ztjf
'29 PM Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC'--F/ýD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 6K Name Email bzý n
r, J
RULES
- i. -
.. VH ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
'I r, 29 PM 4.: 33 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF E.,I\\/.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place, to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70l11 [ID
_29 P11 4: 33 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCR iJY!\\ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
RULES
..AECTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 1 0' 2?
PM t: 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F I\\F.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Name____________________
RULES ' Jt) ;CTI\\/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70tl IYT 29 P- [: 33 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF
- rJ' /FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 1,
Name Email 6bi.[,io* 3
,-/
1 J.
Ce)v, V
0
RULES A`,N, i.*:f*ECT1vES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 BE 29 P1 4-3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FQ r F I\\ EFrD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Namee_______
Email ow yY\\C)A. coq
RULES AI D!LCE TIVES 20N10F B1 229 PH 4: 33 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF r fl\\/Fr--
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name X0 ý Ag;ý
-1,2o64&,IAI 4V 17,2 I
RULES A',i i" r.i.
TVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7flj flC 29 P*i It: 3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rm,_
Dr-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
" (.J, Name Jgl-l Email
RULES :iI"D DI" LQ I
.VE, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 P11 L" 33 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F'
\\,F/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
,.-ie Email
RULESL K, I VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OEC 29 PHI 1": 33 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R *l l
I....
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
RULES A.-
-ECTVýES J. 1001.*P U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20,FC 29 PM 4: 33 Office of Administration, NRC 2
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC I\\!VFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
&by*
(O\\,AW.
Email b6-)'
(Q 4.*(
" *LY y*
(W'.
RUL --
'i ;
rVE3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC tL Lr 29 PM 41 33 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF** 1-I!\\!/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plantwas closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods rem.' there.
Sincerel,OoI6)
Name N._/*
.Email (j
0[
RULES P"I.
DIRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 EJEC 29 PH 4: 33 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC \\/Ft D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
////,eF I
w Iy.
RULES -:,;,.
L-"-,CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7M11 UEC 2 9 P14 4: 34 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
\\
-)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/
Name 1/4 r 3eC' Email k 6(
\\I/O\\i, A.
CA
,,,0
RULES ":'..
C-
- -VxlVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011-EF:.
29 PH 4: 3 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(CRV':-I\\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, I
/.
Name hl
( 'Y otteno
.Emai-(J
RULEIS A., D, EC;iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2O1't fEC2Y P'1 L:3I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC:7.\\/.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2)To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 4'
")
)4Lt U
I
RULES :-Al.l,13.l'IDcfVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Wil r!w 9 P
tp 3Lj Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RK QFK
.\\/FD.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted-on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Name7 (Avl* [
RULE)A
~
liE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20H DiEC 29 PM 4: 34 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF-/VED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email S0 dA(o VV
RULES AiO-E 4AR6STtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70NU HEC 29 PM 4: 3t4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQ, \\!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spejý fuel rods remain *ire.
)
/I Email JAA/d,/
/--1
_-0-7
/
/
RULE..
`0 TiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC J.-I
- £ 79 P11 4: 3£4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R C !\\/E D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 1/2 U'rl,49t 'y Email
/C T-A)LY/-ý-,yc
ýi C* c0
-U
~.,'UJ JSCTfVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 DEC 29 P-I t: 34 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
I-o
\\,!7 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods re ain there.
Sincerely,A Name__
RIBQ,
, I IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 9rr L
Office of Administration, NRC ZoLI OrC 2 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R --
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email oCr
RULE, i-,!1 TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 2 9 PM 4: 34 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC L/F.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
'1 A
RULES i
",i:
- DRCIv-S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC L014 1 C 29 PIN 4: 3 4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REF-
\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name I
)1 6
-A,'LA_,"* e
_).
(
L';
Ti; VES:
RU '
,.S
- L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2GIt w-o9 p:.
1: 34 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Fr7
-i\\!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 4A U.
Name Email v)"-CoJ1'A
RULES A W:i*];<]TiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 07C 2 9 PR l 4: 3 4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOFI\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
/
Email co)_,
(
VC-
/C\\C
EULIO
-i.. /ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20IN CF 29 PHI t* 34 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R k
._...i:.I/--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Email /*/*
RULES L -+ECIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 IDEC 29 PM 4: 314 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R VCIF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email rydALt?1'jCL DqeA7-6ý2-c&Wr-A
RULES;, - ' -E', -t
-1;0t,'*
I-lf-,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201N OD.C 29 PN 4:.34 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE CE.
VFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,.
Name Email
/41/,
)j_(-C11'7
RULES /
uSChE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 01f'l C 29 P M 4: 3 4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF-
\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerej"-f,
/
Nami Email
RULES i9",.PRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0
0JC 29 PI L:35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -C..
/--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincere)
()
Na e Email
RULE!S: A1/2!L ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2Lu1I NTC 29 P*t 4: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D E
F D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,,Q Name Email
HULES A, 'E;i7JTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111 r}c 2/
P*j
- 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name A
- f)1 Email
- A4 4FJ-ErCAC EhI
. i p-
RULES /\\",;,:;
Hr-"-'-,'- I....
1 L. A 2CIE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011* L 29 Q 1 i4: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R
.'\\/F'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email__________________
RULE./',:,.",)
JOr+/-C]-iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC
?D LC 2 9 Pd-LI: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-FO V/'
--)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Namemail Y
--c
\\=tA4C,,(
)t'-
~
.,d/(cgt
RULES i",:,!
V)5,ECTIVES, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 01
_ 2 9 PiN 4: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF CFIVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely._
Name "' 1t2)
Email VD cOk
!E
RULES A` DFC, T I,- E S D.:
, t, j
0
!i-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 IFIC 2?9 Puel
- "35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R
.C
.. VF)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerem l
Name w9:1.
J**'
Email*4.*),
A k A'* a 6*
1 g
RULES Aý'` L",-V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 291A DEC, 29 P
- 35,1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF'\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
(
Name
- xlF.-*'3 x!*
Email I-*-t wc*
u-lcu1#
COM
RULES...
C. T-
,- -'s U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey n-35 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REP-:C
\\E D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel, rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email f-t-n-*..
~
S
-,e--
HULL,
i
-,:-CTIVES HWE-i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7l1l Di 2 P L: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-.H\\ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/
Name Email 0
- /,/"J) o/*(6Y, fl'
RULES ",.LCTtIVE S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201 L I Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F*(7 I\\/F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
RUL
ý,;
D, t
E TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ZON 07r 29 PM 41: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC Fl\\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,/q Name Ci6m'u Email CU*tl o
o4 t 4
(A.
~
~
o
RULES Ai:!') DiRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC C 29 PMI 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F. F-rV F/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 0mi -AAAL ý -d c
o,V, C.r Email
BULE,,
D'-
FTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011' DEC 20, Pr1 4: 35 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC IV\\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Email
BRL'l E~TNVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2n Office of Administration, NRC u14 3 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF*F*-
D*-
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Namem 14-e Email J,0/n' 6-oum'/*
1/ 6*
e'lt*@
RULE,,,L, L.IIHLCTIbES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q P C 2O PM' 4: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFI\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 13g f
D2 Email
/a r/'6t'"m D t lo,*-
/4s
- BULL' \\LJ~E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Li G?= 29
- L: 35 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE F '*\\....
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,.
Q4
/
Name/
RULE,
.. J-iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2
O 29 FI4 35 Office of Administration, NRC 2:
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RV D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
- 7.
Name Email__'-- I t-4-'s--* '-
RULES
- ' U
, I iPLSb U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZON FJU* 29 PM 4: 36 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFF F I\\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 2
Name Email
",V2,7
RULES' O,
,:-;i£ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 4 t3,'El _C 2 9 PH 4-36 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFE-!--
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
-/-
',L/ U-Email
/_ ____
RULES i%,.!!Lj 0 i,_CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 29 M 4: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC I
-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely/f Name
'¢.
r¢A '[
Email LIC C~L/~
cc -
J
HUL". ' -',
L l 'H-.,T I V ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7011 OFYY 29 Pi11 4: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the sient fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
(
ý\\,
_ q-NC CA
RULU_,.
I D:,)
,-E-,.TI VES.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC
-- 29 R1 41: -36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
PFOFIVLD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email wo Le4 "Vt
RULES/,i,,!:, D'RECT-IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 21114 C 29 PR 4-: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFI\\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
/3 Email
RULES i,,i[ DIPE CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 1 fIC 29 P-I: 36 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RF7rFI\\VF'D
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on siterestoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 0'
RULES.... " 1" CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20i4 OF, 29 PM 4: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF,7I\\/F, D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
~ t L J
RULES i;,D LIIECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 1'1C 29 PM L: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R C I--.
\\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/7
? */,/'/"I Name
.V.-'""
Emi /4
RULE-,
_CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC HIM pC 29 N, Li: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF-\\,.-
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sinmcerely',
Na m
.Email__________________
RULES AI'
-CTI!\\/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 701t1i DEC 29 P11 01: 3'6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF(\\/IT As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remano here.
pUL
,S
,,*I
-ýF TI\\/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20IJ*LI.T 29 PM 4: 36 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-- F k.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
- p.
(
Name___________
c__
.Email tvc~~
C~-
-a'( Q.
Q+(
RULES I,: D,*- CIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission m,-
29 'i 4:
Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (I) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name__
Email r
A
.nh
RULES A "IR.'
DiICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2
29 PH 4: 36 Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE R\\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent I rods rem ýn there.
Sincerely Name______________________
Email (L
Vuoqm o
fra
- u.
WV
RULE,:i 'CIIHEOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 DEC 29 PMi 4: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFE I\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
,7cjA-F4-T-PýOc Email C
X
&0A iT
RULES',k,..
i' VrES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q DEC 29 P0I 4: 36 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REC F
I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
\\4\\-
RU
,t H*O.,Ji_.,,
IVES A I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 DET 29 P11 4:36 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
__(-
._.,IV-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 1.
Name Email
RULEL AD1,}
U
}KCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2
L C 29 PN 14 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F'NC fR IVFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, A
[-,,-
Name LUd(fQ (9
(
RULS,..,) L)UiECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2O1q PEC 29 Pi"i 14: 37 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,--4'/
i 7
Name m
'6_-l-Z...
Email 4"*'d,*'i/t '(O,Ž 3"-"*9..J746-&/. 6-d)z-l
~(J
BULEL' 2-!_ý'
DIk'EC]IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0,2 4
Office of Administration, NRC 20111 FFT 99 P*1 L:37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF"
- \\IVFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
(
v,./kJ Email
c.A, 1 -......
RULE S......... FL..-
TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111 1,31T 2? P LI: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF
"-F'\\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Email
RiULEr",, :. IECTIVES HU -i!.',;.
L;D tE-J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70i1l [.ZC 29 Pr L: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2.1Y/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name___________
RULES-,J i11-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201'I 0EC 29 PN 4: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFrP -'--/IFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerelyt Name____
Email iý Cer ? 1 f;i-.l
RULFS \\'
"'C'TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201Li IW 29 PM 4: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQRVFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
.Email(Cc1
ULK. i DCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 0' rC2 2/
,11H 4: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
tC !\\/FVD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name eTr&-(
Cae."
]m oý V)I C W -(* r.j)1,i,,
(,-)i,1
BULLS2 D
0iH:ETIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 99 R
- 37 Office of Administration, NRC L1 U2>
/
il :
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCJF-\\!EED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name____
,'¶.
3
RULES -Lk L
.TJIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
?flU4 0CT 29 RN q4: 37 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQF!\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
/
Sincerely,
./
Name
/ '
/
RULES !I.,il) DiHECTIVES N,H U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 701q DFC 29 PH1 4: 37 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFrC -FIV D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 2 ~A)A
HULEK.. '
IVE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
-014 "ruC 29 P* 4: 37 Office of Administration, NRC L
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCj,__/!.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
.5 (C(C,'7)
Email 2d
)IIQ
/",',L4l
/(l 4
//I-,
~~~J....-
HULES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 ! DEC 2_9 1 1: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F-7L/7D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
BULLS \\'I' L)F-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 1', 2?
Pu
'4 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF\\._D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely I
Name V-I Email
RULES h L) Lw,*
1LUJIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 nc 29 LA 4: 37 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC !\\
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name_________
/Ema/
HULE
! ý 1 REC.TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 CIE 2/9 P14 14:37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC"I-\\i/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincere Name Emai i~(2 og
RULES *, j L
TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014
-FC 29 PM 4: 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFR.
I"V-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name e_
Email ii
/
c-
BULE'i LFCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 ]
2"i PI 14 37 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REQ As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name -
.* CL,
(,4y\\ k-z"v)-'c
.Email EmailýA % Z CPO
-P&9 fcI QVv L.1Q/S ( Z)rV-J
BULES i ::L H UCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2O1 q GEC 29 P" 14: 38 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RCF I-- /
I! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2)~~n To thosp-Stet fuelifodsrnia Eines*_.*
'/*
(2) To hol(Suthern California Edisoresponsible for safety and security at SONGS as Sincerel *b Email G3 VIAk(,-~.,-
RULES A,.
L)*-
"iES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7011 DEC 29 P11 4: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCI'\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 6,
RULE"'r Yi T1~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC
- 29 9
' L" 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
\\-- -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam.generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California/dison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spedt fuel rods remi there.
Sincerely,
/
Name
/
Email__
RULE"..
D TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 702 1T" 29 PI 4I, 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF*2*F. '\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email O I lW i.)
RULE /-. L, I'C*-VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC
?oii UEc. 29 Pjj L: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE._\\.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 2
/
RULES,'
r\\-nCTV ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70t, 0,r 29 F-1 4: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CFI\\/W As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/
Name Email L,4'p *-*.vv(
i x
- C.V3
RULDE 2,,*
- CT-IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 701q 99 R1 4' 38 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
inere ly, Name Q___
RULE-'0 E C TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2F1 29 Fli 4: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email/qj.*
4ýe
RULES
%L)1 1-iES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 i
Office of Administration, NRC 2
U 29 PN L: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(7 J\\./'/.-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, AI*,'?rnV Name
,/V '/
/--
/ L r
2
RULES,..*
- LvTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011.U 2 10 L38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF,. \\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to afinal deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
7Y A?
RULES ;!,,`D DIRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201411
-EC 29 Pi'I 4: 38 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R (7"
i\\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel ods Frem there.
Sincerely, Name Email
// 14 1 (6 6tO/ 6'-'1
- \\1Jj DfRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn
- Cindy Bladey DO Office of Administration, NRC L 29 PM Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFO_.,...
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, A
Name 1l O\\
A C. C Email
RULES Ai,*;)L)IR'EC-T-V E-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 C C 2 9 P1 M,: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
CH /ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name A.
RULE N' CI S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC DC 29 P*i L: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVQC
\\---D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, o
Name Email C
A.A-,
/(041
RULES "' L, >-iTV ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201i K*C 29 PHj L: 38 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.-C-1,.-/-"
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name________________________
Email 1
t JI'*. C,90Y2
RULE` A)
NU I-'DVE(TiVEES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C
Office of Administration, NRC 20tL
- -¶ 29 ?1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.RVC--
\\F D/
1 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, N
a..me,--i Email
____c______o ____
Co M
RULES £'. -EL OCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0rr 29 Pi*
1: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R Q LH /D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name _
Email _ ___ _______________________
RULES ANibL!);tR1flTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 BEF 29 PM 4: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rod Sincerely A't7 Name Email
- C,
ýL
'C.*
- )
,! e:
HULES JI'
- I
'...... T. VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q DEC 29 PM 4: 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF C I'\\!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern C liohftia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s ent fuel Iods rem in there.
Sincereal Email-r Z
RULES.,9 f 'ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2O1'1 29 4:39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC F \\/V As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email i
.A-nff/
4'A*"
4
.f
RULES. ",t TI/FS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7fW4 u. 29 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF+.E7 D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Namem AA Ij U/.
Email 'm*
UL.E.S ut PITiES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2K1N0 E-C 29 PM q: 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-CFIV.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and
-7 (2) To hold Southern California.Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the se lt fuel -
s-rem-Kthere.
Sincere Name
/"
RULESAL LA, 7CT1VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Cuiq p.
29 P* 1: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC 7'\\IE--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, e
.I bro*
ff Name
_- i f
)0V ý t "AAA
RULES Ai-) R TL CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201/1 D-EC 29 PK1 4: 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2F!\\'m As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Nam e_____
Email 0 ýJ 04\\-
RULE,)
L "
Ti"
- 3R,'\\L*L VH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2GIL 0 C2 P2 FM
- 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REF I\\'ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Email
RULLS ID,!L CT 1IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q ofC ?9 PH 4: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.F.!,
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,___
Name
,*1,,-
' b Email N6-31-lWPNi
\\ L1C-V
RULESL 11D CI"VES
- r \\
,'I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC LL 29 PM q: 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R (.F K'FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email Z-L-. /
- e.
6
RULE ES EW, DHRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2q 0 9
39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R IFC C IF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email iYa AV,.,
Pu-
RUILIEo, 4".' L)IRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 204 BD C 2 9 Pr1 4: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REV As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email J'u.g)
(*
t
BULES AI.
i-,VCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC L
- 29 PI 'l 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
pFO,\\,_-
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 0 5"r'r.
Name
,R, f¢ S 0 'S 0
ý2-9 Z ý Z)
/,J Q (7-/-' ^ %
I- - C QJrJ
RULES A L-:;
L)-UTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:'Cindy Bladey 2 qEC 2
,TI.: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF CFi\\!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name___________
\\*
- M V
RULESB,
,ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 BE 29 Pl q: 39 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R L
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
.Email c1ac (3--
Cr:Ckk ý
RULE E6 L..
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2
29 q: 39 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R[7`,
!.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison respon bor safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel r ds re ain there.
Sincerely, I
Name Email
BULLS i,
'-IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 NECf' 29 PMI 4: 40 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IV\\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email cv~\\
7
RULES :'V,) QEOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC HIM P' 29 Pl 4: 140 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(. FIVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods rejTain there.
Sincerely, Name Email Sd0 E/(d 1
- cc
HULES/,;,Ji D;1H-ECTIVES
-~'~[
)]t F
- (.I "
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C 2_,2 P M 4: 4 0 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCD I\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email k
RULES
" ?'i--CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 l EC 2 9 P H 4:40 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC7.....
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email A l g o/t1 PC 4 C
hA,
7
RULES L6LEOI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 71OIEi l C 29 PRN L
0I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
I IJ\\/I D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accidentthere, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fue rods remain there.
- Sincerel,
/4 Name Email
(, 4) ý3, 14ý,
RULE r
,,,', IV" S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey,4 Office of Administration, NRC MEVq C
£ 29 P?'1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF...
\\\\/7-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 4-AA*-.-
A AA Email
{
j
RULES i L
T'VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey T
P Office of Administration, NRC
- 29 Pl 1: q4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R C',.VD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain her Sincerely, Name
.Email--
[)
.--p'AZ'-/'R I*
{A I
I
RULEO
), i j,2(OTiV%
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70111 LIT 29
?MI 4: 140 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REO. t\\.-FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to'a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
>0 1, J
RULES
.. iIU IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C9 M 4: 40 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R _C F* '
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely',
"5 f/o._.
Name K
[ 4./
RULE,,(,,
!-S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC PC 29 P11 0
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVO K!_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/
Name
/
RULE,)L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC t
__ 7-PtI L*: 140 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RH2H\\./5.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
SNmcrely, -
-L. -
o::)
L Email
RUL 1
L,.L I TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2'E L _7 Pu 14: Lt 0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2,*
Fr As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 1/
Name VAPIt Email iF "A
C
',CO
HULLO' Ai4*L L;JT1I'; VEI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20NI tArC 29 PIN I:0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF C 1-E-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Li.7(--fl Name 2L' A (11-1 1
A EV Email
RULES i.K LKAL&TivES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 E[TC 2
PIel 4: Q0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R.r-
/E-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name_________________________
RUL ES' fl",i)
IECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC
?OU DFC 9-9 114 40 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-
'-I\\/VD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name ___t_ _ ___
_1______
.Email_____ _
RULES,' v L lIVEO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2(!il DE' 29 P 1: 40 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF, d-\\/ Fd As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
`
K Email
RULES' I
A D
ECTIVES RULES
}-*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20N PC 29 Pil 4: 4 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -- RVFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name 2\\A*.
Eml Email6-L4 I&06
IULE'. iA!0) U-; iVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 011 2U O? [:
291 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
RULES I,", TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q 0C 29 1 1: 4 1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Namemail Email C
q
~,*
,(-O"N,,,,
RULES M j i{(T ES KbrLtCH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2
8 29 Pj t*: 14!
Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(,.\\-/ --
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
RULES /\\",!D ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7
-iq CF 2
P 11 4' 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-. 7-(, \\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
._/
Name Email
RULES A 'L, CiTL--VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C 29F Office of Administration, NRC
}
2 c)
L:,
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-HV VJ D_
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
\\
N Sincerely.
t--.
/...
Name L,
RULES i'
(}T!VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2
C 29 P
- 14 I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name a
/-
/*
/
RULES J";!-) ICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 CF_1 2 9 P H_
14: " I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE-C" 'I!
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name
_ W --
Emnail IC;____________,
Y)-)
RULE" J
`
L TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC bL UF C 2 <1 LV L I Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-7.
-_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email
RULIES A l"')
T'"-"--";
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 HC 29 2
P41 1-1:
LHI Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -- r.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely'i" Name V,"1U -
2;'
.J
-5/
RULES ;* U,:'EWTiVES UH..
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 29 VI T 4 1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC ',\\
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Name Email a *
, J CL( [ Ci.)w
R
-ULES,"
.,. -" ' c,"TVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 0 -C 2?
PN HI: L, I Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FO I\\/'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, Namem' Aai
'r,
',JC..3,(
RULLr: AK
§- i§FIRCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ZOIL 017C 29 Pi F4 LI4 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF_.i-\\!F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/
Name
/V Email
RULES i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey F0!
EC 24
'R 4: L41 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RS cE -\\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,'M__..<
Name V
/."
\\ c -A Email
BULE S u J L)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 D*. 2 9 HU L: 4 1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely Name' Email l*
O 0i'1
- RULE, SA 0.) DLFE-CTIVES
ýF_'
- NCH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn
- Cindy Bladey C 2 9 P 11 LI: 4I1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF---lJ
/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Smncerel%-/.,,
J..
Name f/'
- t. <4" Email
RULES Ai 1011 1 ECTIVES
',)
ra. 4'.*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey
?I1 C 29 fj'4:140 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-(_'- V ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely, 1
/
,"7ecr Name__
Email Me r O-, _
0/0