ML15005A160
| ML15005A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/18/2014 |
| From: | Conn R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Bladey C K Division of Administrative Services |
| References | |
| NRC-2014-0223 | |
| Download: ML15005A160 (1) | |
Text
RULES ' CE Let Laguna Vote 1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA 92651 ZI 0C 2-9 P 15 December 18, 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
/Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
In response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's request for comment on Southern California Edison's decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, in the last 20 days we have gathered the signatures of 487 people, mostly residents of Laguna Beach, on a letter asking that the spent nuclear fuel on the site be moved to a secure location as soon as possible (see attached letters).
In addition we have collected 383 signatures on an online petition.
You can view the petition at www.LetLagunaVote.com The City of Laguna Beach, CA is located in the 20 mile dead zone of the San Onofre Nuclear Power plant. The Laguna Beach City Council passed a Resolution last night to address the gravity of any careless handling and storage of this deadly waste (see attached Resolution).
Laguna Beach city leaders and residents are concerned that an exposed site on an ocean bluff near an interstate highway, adjacent to the train tracks where there is the risk of an accident due to earthquakes, tsunamis, fire, and terrorism, is no place to store highly radioactive materials for an indefinite period of time. We urge you to do everything you can working the relevant agencies, to make sure this nuclear waste is moved to a safe interim repository rather than remaining in place until a permanent repository is identified.
Sincerely, Rita Conn Chairperson, Let Laguna Vote www.LetLagunaVote.com Ph 949-497-5148 RULKO-f KKX i" %-WTIVES M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Ne Sign U Email address KU Lx.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey .': Office of Administration, NRC ___ KC 9- 5 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RP- 7 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Emailk ef t.)s Email address U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey znlt : 29 Pu ,.5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFr-f!, /,R0 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, PL.4- -]t, (5 Print Name Sign Email address RULES Dr ; RyEC IVES 2 14OT~ 2D 9 F~ M,4: 5 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC rVPFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address Cr4'~ch)I 01U4 RU LL-', A'* t1 L -iRLCIVES 7Oq1A 2, R1, 155 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC'\E As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address RULES Nd\U I BIPANJCH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ?UI' n 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\, FlV As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, IA' J'd S Print Sign Emai address RU7 L LE 6`- i ,.,.! L,,7 S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 701 29 Pt'l 4: 55 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .VED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address RULES !-o.. 1i.,ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 10Dr 29 Pil 41: 55 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2F1\1-V\ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Emailaddress
,]
RULE5:.,..
liVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 00JJ flFC29 PI:l q: Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F 'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Narme--Sign Email address.
RULEL , C IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20Ui1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name-, Email address RULES ,A,. UElrUTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 0L! [1V0C 29 PH 4I: 55 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF C R ", F D\ /! D-- / D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Namea 61ail ddU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ULE 9 +CT iV E S d 'n 201 HC 2 9 Nr 5: 55 RFCEI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print lamn_Sign/ .f Email adff RULE ., -' 3h iES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC f 9 ?Vi 14:5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FI\/!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address RULES Ai C TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 EC 29 9 : 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F !\ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign.Email address RULES ,,!D b!FIICTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC "U1'4 GEC 22 t: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
'QF( -\!KD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Emaild Email address -
RUL i-l- /-S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
, As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign E iladdress RULES AIJ' ,CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC NA 2° p[j LI: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R-7!\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print e Si ld Email address HU ; L I_ ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 K C 2)? On' R: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Namess SigF Email address RULES F~UU~IVE~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC d, PC 2 9 V 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REOF,, F -, As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print 'me Si l I 4AJ~qa6ixý?AAbi1/ (o All Email address RULES -' .. ., i ; F1!- , TIVES-'H U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 LDEC 29? P' " 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC..I\/F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration.
activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Nam Sign Email address RULE, C! L.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC " 1LC2 , L: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FC:F\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ff S p i n t, e ' /
RULES /\N"L); ?CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 4,114 DEC 2-9 P 5 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Ra'CFI,/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address RULES /-)D-RIECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 9 0PI C F : 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
fj3 f- -'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Printý,m,/
Sign A Email address R U ,L , 1.1.0-nL , T 1t VEO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 07- 292 9 4: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R--.i-\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name Sign Email address RULES -7"CTE-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701 DIT 229 Pil f: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\/W-RP- N-ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Pri t Name Sign Email address .
RULES RIECTIIES NOI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 9P.'R 14: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-__\, --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Print Name I Sign d'Email address RUL/,; ;t U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey .9 ."'l 56 Office of Administration, NRC r 7 9 r 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
\F. 'F \/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to 'climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1"-. aa- 60rc-(:ý &Name Street Address City 5 State RULES/,N LE DRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC C 29 Y f 1 L-: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F IVF-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer ly, Name CiStreet Address RULES i 'ECTIVES*YANF-i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 'C 9 P' LI: 56 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R1F2 IVF\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Str dres City State RULES ii,, Q)iKC-TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Kit5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 4: 56 Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R\ n As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City State RULL E L, .L'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7: Office of Administration, NRC ..... 5 ' " 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F, -,1 ,'!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sir , Street Address r City ctt4 RULES £;,3 L),RLlVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey rlrc- 29 114 q4: 56 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
rmF.. v\!--n As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 9 Street Address City-'3 State RULES ) /,-ýJ DBECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201Q 5 C 29 PIN 14: 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F-. IV.. .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name U Street Addres, 5 RULES /,',;:J V mTjE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey T4,: 57 Office of Administration, NRC 14 29 F 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City 'State RULES ,-, -VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey r 2 ; Li-57 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RN 2.. \/!=D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address~4-Cw, 'kCCccý CA City S State RULE; i 1 K2OTLVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201'i 0Z1 29 FM V-: 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFO; t\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address Cit9-J State RULLP). bKH7CHVE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 9. N 5 7 Office of Administration, NRC Lu. L-: 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF- C-....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 9( 2-- tALD6P 11V Street Address City State RUL1 A.. L...I CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 _ 29 PH LI: 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFO -\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 5l Street Addr,-LdL~ v~f~t City State RIJULES -. CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Z_01 F' 2 9 P. N .- 5 7 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
rF-,-!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name.ý K VýJ-ob' m nn v I Street Address Cit V City State vk HU~lS ~+CTI E 2014 FTýE 29 R1 V: 57 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.2. F-\!FD©As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as lonWas the spent fuel rods remain there.Street Address City CSA- te 124e5 State RULS K) L) ýECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111 OFT, 29 P1 4I: 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R [ F\/.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A Y- -Name Street Address city 1ý'State RULES , TIV., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 V 9 el q: 5 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-i'i\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Street Address Stv 91Q 3 0 CA qZto1 City State RULES 011 ,,ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20tl11 [EC 29 RI : 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F F(7,..\..
..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name IZ (ý o C- lkv Street Address 5 '-) & 1~City State RULES i u.L R U L E , v. s.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70LI.V 9 pj L: S7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name L 71D C I co Street Address City State 61--ýCity State RULES .. T.- /U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 219 Nil L1 57 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RiF--, /ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S ee City State HUIL; i( SlvE 2014 OrC9 0 Pl~ 57 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC~F~1N I T As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~4~eA4c4 Name QJ " Street Address City IState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FRULL5! _ CToE oO'~v: 2p ~ 57 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,ýghzcol R el Srme Street Addres4b Cit IState RULES fi i) I-.,TI' VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20lN BEC 29 PH 4: 5 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R[FC NVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address(City') State FIU..:- .,,7 .L i :-i:TiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20t14 D 2 V : 57 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, it Address City State ULB) Ah. L;:ETJIVES RULS .L ' 11 57 201Iq RI ,"C 2 9 5i Li7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC7R/~D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, MCPVMX \kcýName S\!WQe ~Street Address City cA C Zos State RULES /%.:`D L /- S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Mt[Lj P'- 9,) L-, 57 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FOrF1 D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City State RULE.'i- DF,"CTIVES.C2 9 P M, 57 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D E E I HI. \ .r As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 6R 6im 10- --- ý16( mhjýýIName~i y Street Address city tt Ao'd (0ýtate 7 0i 13K D 2 E ~ C1 F 4: 5 7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F-- r.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,-1.A P A Name .I City CA 5Z(6 T I State FU L L, L) I) I 1Q, E CF71 E S 20flU7C 29 F,% LI: 57 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RrFCF,-t\,'W As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, f-11,01:11 T44tý'e--
-' '770 t() A 5SrtAddress ity State RU -.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
., -. 57 Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1 cA Name Street Address Cit Sat City State RULES i", li-.ECIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70N DEC 29 PH 4: 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REOF', /FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, , C Name I-`S-6 0 Street Address City State H ULE7 E ,N LTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC lit4 ri F9 r; Li: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF FC E/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Nam4 Street Address)City "t St-cA city ' State RULES PV..ii" -U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey " Office of Administration, NRC 2014 29 1: Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F FQIV )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street AddressýýwvjC-A City S State RULES /\AiD LW::!ECIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70,1l1 KEC 29 PM 1-: 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FCF.I\!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincereK;), 6y/
HULLS) .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2Oi- Fi"- 29 I'I : 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Dl,(" \ Q \1 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer y, Name Street Address t -State/
Ru .F -. '.f , 11-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2OVT DEC 29 PHi 4: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FCF- -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address LA676ro& PCH CA 2s City State U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20YH F-P" 1 i: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
'i9 .\ D-:-, , ....! V , 1 ... )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, trlee A q ty State RULLS iD UF.U:ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC L2 -"K '7; ,U i: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ..H\V'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Andrs Cityi State RULE" L., CTNES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC %O!4 L 29 4u: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVC>H ,_.,D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Naii t-Street Address-Ci
,, v--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70f4 D_ C 2 (1) PN 4: 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
...i'!./V'.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely Stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincere Name Street Address City State RULES ,S J 'F.j-E.fIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 C 29 P0 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REQ FC..E./ )D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SON S as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si 6ce y, ree dres ty State RULESYi,, Di:iCTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC u Z9 L: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2V'c \/1 FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ame Street Address City I State RULE 2T1 2 Pl !': 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FlZQ) FE A IVF.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, D6I ell71~~5-)< I/o Name Street Address CiLt "3a C Stat CitJ State RULES -I L I .tVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 2,1, 2 9 4 -: 58 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F --IVFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted n-site-restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison si le for safety and security at SONGS as long as ths spt fuel rods re ee.Name/ ." Street Address City RULES e.-,;.. J ; -,-! TV S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C,> 1 0, IN Ll Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name tret Address City State HU L- A -, -C-,-, S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 79iq TT 2 1? PM 4: 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .'.\/ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name Address Cty State" C.-City State
.( ' .-, ' r ,i r RULE ,) L.1,;-ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey t HC 22 i~I : 58 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F I F I\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,*ame Street Address \ IC-city :7'State RULE 1Ji,, ii.'. CT1/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 PU L: 58 Office of Administration, NRC [C P 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF Fr--- 1V- )D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; a (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SON long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinc r y, 4ame q2j(), (j,0,0V6W VA Street Address .City State RULES E DiTnVt -U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Fil LIP. 5 Office of Administration, NRC -i,' 79 Pu L.: 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
,Fr' \11D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Stre Street Address city/ State" RULK S~LRCIE 2011, IEC 219 10d 4: 591 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(.f'!V!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name et ddress City Stt State LULESý I\ I CVIES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 701"G' DEC 9_9 P'i 4: 59 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Stree 7 Adre j Street Address Keg ( M- 190(Q3 City State
%UL , ,.`mCT1 ES RULES i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 PH Office of Administration, NRC 2 O 21 F 41: 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC "\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people Of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for.safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,-?-- -- --0 ="&4 --.1 Street Address State HULE ,L .\Lb U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Q9-:5 Office of Administration, NRC 29 P0 4: 5/Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF 1V\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as. soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City State hULW id u E IJECTIVES,.',/ , -.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ?9 NO LV 59 Office of Administration, NRC LIt _: Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
r F .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name J Street Address City State RULE'U'f!(ii U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701A C 29 PO 4, 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namer-Street Address Ci Stae HULEL , 'VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 'E'"C 9 R-1 4j: 59 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address C642tS7 city State RULES ." 'LC""-iE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 270q DEC 2 9 Pti 4: 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCrFI\/!-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address L,1 2.4 City State U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RULES piUTI\!ES 254 F 29 Pjl 4: 59 REOH ,F ý V/F.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 6/ 1 fM41?A1 Name Street Addressý_,q 1 U OA K;74 City State U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 99 t. 59 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its, spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated ina recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City J State RULE ' b-U ICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7011L L 2I, Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF -i....\/ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street dress ity State R!,- J JNE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 Y ?- / P9 ', 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F7 E--!\V)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address city XState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC '/Jlf 5¶Nl 29 Pi1 L_: 59 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F. -D,!, _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If.there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.
Name.)Sleet Address City State U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2_Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
_-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Street Address City State RULES ;~ TVIES'7 0 4 0 D2'2 29 P H LI: 591 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RVCFV/W
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, CA/Name Street Ad ss i4ty TP hA J-,1 ýý <N State '
BULEi5 "&T.. ".. ..S R L _ ,_ ,t % , ý ' [ -' 'L. I , C ý_.U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey R, Q- 55 Office of Administration, NRC -2 ? ; : 55 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF""I\/Fi)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, (iIe~hfl mq'12ýe,&Sign Elail address