ML14314A423
| ML14314A423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson, Harris  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1992 |
| From: | Le N Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TAC-M836287, TAC-M83668, NUDOCS 9210270149 | |
| Download: ML14314A423 (7) | |
Text
oE t
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 15, 1992 Docket Nos. 50-261 and 50-400 LICENSEE:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY FACILITIES:
H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1992, MEETING REGARDING IPEEE SCHEDULES (TAC NOS. M83668 AND 83627)
This refers to the September 10, 1992, meeting conducted at the request of Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L or the licensee) in Rockville, Maryland.
The purpose of the meeting was for the licensee to discuss their planned activities related to the IPEEE evaluations and the impacts that may prevent their improving their IPEEE submittal dates to meet the NRC-requested submittal date of June 1994. The licensee's response, dated December 19, 1991, to Generic Letter 80-20, Supplement 4, indicated submittal dates of June 1995 for the Robinson IPEEE and June 1997 for the Brunswick IPEEE. The staff found the submittal dates scheduled by the licensee for their IPEEE evaluations to be unacceptable; and, by letter dated June 26, 1992, the staff requested the licensee to reassess their activities and revise their submittal dates. A list of attendees and a copy of CP&L handouts used during the meeting are enclosed (Enclosures 1 and 2).
Among the problems discussed were site specific refueling outage activities, individual plant A-46 walkdowns, and limited manpower assigned to the task.
These plant specific activities will force the licensee to stagger their IPEEE evaluations. The licensee indicated that staff comments regarding the A-46 walkdowns and synergism between site evaluation activities discussed during the meeting will be considered during implementation of their planned IPEEE activities. The licensee committed to submit an updated A-46 response by September 18, 1992, as previously scheduled, and to respond to the NRC's June 26, 1992, letter regarding the improvement of their IPEEE submittal dates by September 30, 1992.
220005 9210270149 921015 PDR ADOCK 05000261 PDR October 15, 1992 On September 28, 1992, in a phone call, the licensee changed their submittal date regarding IPEEE activities to October 15, 1992, to integrate the scheduling dates for all three CP&L plants.
Original signed by:
Ngoc B. Le, Project Manager Project Directorate II-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
Enclosures:
- 1. Attendees List
- 2. CP&L Handouts cc w/
Enclosures:
See next page OFFICE LA; PM:PD21:DRPE 1RPE D:D1:DRPE NAME PAM4 sn NBLe:tms____
ozafari EAdeksam Date
/o /
/92 16 / 5 /92
/I /15/92
./
/92 Document Name:
91092.MTS
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File NRC PDR PD #21 Reading TMurley/FMiraglia JPartlow SVarga GLainas EAdensam PAnderson NBLe BMozafari OGC EJordan RRothman GBagchi JMitchell RHernan CAder JTChen LPlisco, EDO ACRS (10)
EMerschoff, RH cc:
Licensee & Service List
ENCLOSURE 1 IPEEE MEETING CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 September 10, 1992 Name Organization Title R. W. Prunty, Jr.
CP&L Mngr., SHNPP Licensing F. A. Emerson CP&L Mngr., Generic Licensing N. B. Le NRC/DRPE Project Manager/NRR Robert Rothman NRR/DET Section Chief Goutam Bagchi NRR/DET Branch Chief Jocelyn Mitchell RES/SALB Section Leader Ron Hernan NRR/PDI-IV Lead Project Manager/IPE Charles Ader RES/SAIB Branch Chief John T. Chen RES/SAIB Project Manager Eleanor G. Adensam NRR/DRPE Project Director Brenda Mozafari NRR/DRPE Project Manager/NRR
ENCLOSURE 2 IPEEE SCHEDULES FOR HARRIS AND ROBINSON PLANTS SIGNIFICANT POINTS o
SEISMIC IS CONTROLLING FACTOR IN IPEEE SCHEDULES o
CP&L MUST PERFORM 3 A-46 AND 4 IPEEE EVALUATIONS IN 3.5 YEARS UNDER THE ACTIVE LEADERSHIP OF ONE INDIVIDUAL o
WALKDOWN DATES WHICH START EVALUATIONS ARE LARGELY DRIVEN BY REFUELING OUTAGE SCHEDULES o
CP&L INVOLVEMENT IS ALREADY AT LOW LEVEL UNDER EXISTING SCHEDULE o
SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN CONTRACTOR RESOURCES TO IMPROVE SCHEDULE ARE NOT LIKELY TO PRODUCE DESIRED RESULT; REDUCED CP&L CONTROL WILL LIKELY RESULT IN REWORK AND DELAYS o
SIX MONTHS IS MAXIMUM SCHEDULE IMPROVEMENT FOR HARRIS AND ROBINSON WHICH MAINTAINS EFFECTIVE CP&L INVOLVEMENT AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT. RESULT IS 12 MONTH SCHEDULES FOR ALL 4 PLANTS o
OTHER EXTERNAL EVENT EVALUATION SCHEDULES CAN BE IMPROVED TO MATCH SEISMIC EVALUATION SCHEDULES
CURRENT SEISMIC IPEEE SCHEDULE 1993 1994 1995 19%
997 PMeH 09MM) lirl 8 22 C
BNPI W.73100 C: 125 C 12 5 BNpZ U: 1.2 U: 12 (273 lW0 C: 12,5 C: 12A5 HNP U: 1.2 U: 12 C: 3.6 C 7.2
- 2.
tkft am mos U
- 2.
.40 U: 2.4 TOTAL MAN MONTC:
C: 7.2
%TuLrIYPARTCIPAITON 17.9%
9.2%
8.8%
13.7%
62.5%
FUTllMEUVALEfI 2.2 4.3 4.6 2.9 1.6
REVISED SEISMIC IPEEE SCHEDULE 1993 1994 1995 19%
1997 RNP Stiity 4.8 09MM) contractor: 34.2 BNPI U: 2.4 U: 1.2 27.5 MIO
- 12.5 C: 125:
BNP2 C27.3 MMC 1
.5 Hp U 1.2 U
4MM).4 Unks: Mm nonthea C: 34.2 U: 2.4 TOTAL MAN MONTHS C:2 C: 8.4
% UTILITY PARTICIPATION 12.3%
16.1%
8.8%
10.3%
41.7%
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT 3.25 2.5 4.5 3.9 2.4 (FTE)II