ML14234A480
| ML14234A480 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Aerotest |
| Issue date: | 08/22/2014 |
| From: | Harshaw K, Siberg J Aerotest, Nuclear Labyrinth LLC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-228-LT, ASLBP 14-931-01-LT-BD01, RAS 26359 | |
| Download: ML14234A480 (4) | |
Text
August 22, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
Aerotest Operations, Inc. ) Docket No. 50-228-LT
)
Aerotest Radiography and )
Research Reactor ) ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPT FROM AUGUST 12, 2014 HEARING On August 12, 2014, a hearing was held in the above-captioned matter and a hearing transcript was issued for review on August 13, 2014.1 As directed by the Presiding Officer, Aerotest Operations, Inc. and Nuclear Labyrinth, LLC (the Companies) reviewed the transcripts and with the NRC Staff jointly submitted proposed transcript corrections.2 During review of the transcript, Mr. Michael Anderson identified that he provided an incorrect answer to a question posed by Judge Hawkins because he misunderstood the question posed. The Companies hereby move to correct the transcript. This motion is supported by Mr. Andersons Affidavit included as Attachment 1.
The particular question and response are provided in the transcript at page 75, lines 11-15:
JUDGE HAWKENS: And at the time of the denial it was still uncertain when the reactor could return to service, in part because of the damaged fuel. Is that correct?
MR. ANDERSON: I believe thats correct.
1 Aerotest Operations, Inc. (Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor) Official Transcript of Proceedings (August 12, 2014).
2 Aerotest Operations, Inc. (Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor) Joint Proposed Transcript Corrections (August 22, 2014).
404735038v1
Mr. Anderson understood the question to be related to the Staff position on the return to service date. Based on that understanding, Mr. Andersons answer at page 75, line 15 should have been:
I believe that is a correct statement of the Staffs position. The Companies respectfully request that this response be corrected as provided herein.
I hereby certify that I have consulted with the NRC Staff on this transcript correction and the NRC Staff stated that they object to this change and requested that a motion be submitted allowing them to respond on the record.
Respectfully Submitted
/signed electronically by/
Jay E. Silberg Kimberly A. Harshaw Counsel for Aerotest Operations, Inc. and Nuclear Labyrinth, LLC 2
404735038v1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )
) Docket No. 50-228-LT Aerotest Operations, Inc. ) License No. R-98
)
(Aerotest Radiography and )
Research Reactor) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion to Correct Transcript from August 12, 2014 Hearing has been served through the E-Filing system on the participants in the above-captioned proceeding this 22nd day of August 2014.
/Signed electronically by/
Kimberly A. Harshaw 3
404735038v1
ATTACHMENT 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
Aerotest Operations, Inc. ) Docket No. 50-228-LT
)
Aerotest Radiography and )
Research Reactor ) ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL S. ANDERSON
- 1. I, Michael S. Anderson, state that in my review of the August 12, 2014 hearing transcript, I realized that I had misunderstood a question posed by Judge Hawkins and therefore provided an incorrect answer.
- 2. The particular question and response are provided at page 75, lines 11-15:
JUDGE HAWKENS: And at the time of the denial it was still uncertain when the reactor could return to service, in part because of the damaged fuel. Is that correct?
MR. ANDERSON: I believe thats correct.
- 3. During the hearing, I understood the question to be related to the Staffs position on the return to service date. Thus, my answer should have been: I believe that is a correct statement of the Staffs position.
- 4. I request that the record be corrected to reflect the correct answer to the question asked as I understood it.
I, Michael S. Anderson, declare under penalty of perjury that my statements in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executed in Accordance with 10 C.F.R. 2.304(d)
Michael S. Anderson 1320 Pacific Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48326 (248) 475-0442 Mike.anderson@autoliv.com Executed this 22nd day of August, 2014.
404734991v1