ML14234A223
| ML14234A223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Aerotest |
| Issue date: | 08/22/2014 |
| From: | Amitava Ghosh NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-228-LT, ASLBP 14-931-01-LT-BD01, RAS 26357 | |
| Download: ML14234A223 (8) | |
Text
August 22, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
AEROTEST OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-228-LT
)
(Aerotest Radiography and )
Research Reactor) )
JOINT PROPOSED TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS As directed by the Presiding Officer at the August 12, 2014, evidentiary hearing,1 Aerotest Operations, Inc., and Nuclear Labyrinth, LLC, (collectively the Companies), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (Staff), jointly submit proposed corrections to the transcript of the evidentiary hearing. The NRC Staffs proposed transcript corrections are identified in Attachment 1. The Companies proposed transcript corrections are identified in . The parties have consulted and neither party objects to the proposed transcript corrections contained in these attachments. The parties respectfully request that the transcript be revised to incorporate these corrections.
Respectfully submitted,
/Signed (electronically) by/
Anita Ghosh Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: (301) 415-4113 E-mail: Anita.Ghosh@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day of August, 2014 1
Hearing Transcript (August 12, 2014), at 221-22.
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 59 12 initial rebuttal, statements of position initial and rebuttal statements of position Ms. Ghosh 60 15 or security risk. or security risk. Ms. Ghosh 60 18 license transfer application. license transfer application. Ms. Ghosh 63 15 Companies Companies Ms. Ghosh 63 17 denial; that denial and that Ms. Ghosh 64 1 denial. They're noted denial, were noted Ms. Ghosh 64 1 form formed Ms. Ghosh 65 14 liability, no funds liability and no funds Ms. Ghosh 70 10 substantial substantive Ms. Ghosh 75 10 (No audible response). Correct. Mr. Anderson 89 5 The Companies question that The Companies question the Judge Hawkens 123 14 questions direction of questions directed to Judge Hawkens 125 19-20 Not business, not Aerotest, Not for a business like Aerotest, Ms. Lian 126 19 custom behavior analysis customer behavior analysis Ms. Lian 126 20 comparative competitor Ms. Lian 129 23 wasnt was Ms. Lian 130 3 issues issue is Ms. Lian 130 3 has to be had to be Ms. Lian 130 4 shut down two years at a time shut down for two years at the time Ms. Lian 131 2 to run the operator to run and operate the Ms. Lian 132 22 the closing of the projection, the closing of the transaction, Ms. Lian 133 2 believes believed Ms. Lian 133 3 believe believed Ms. Lian 133 4 funding after funding until after Ms. Lian 134 1 companys Companies Ms. Lian
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing 134 4 funding. That will funding that will Ms. Lian 134 23 underlying assumption the underlying assumption is the Ms. Lian 134 24 return, the fact return. The fact Ms. Lian 135 3 inspires ??? Judge Hawkens 139 3 include included Ms. Lian 139 17 research revenue Ms. Lian 139 22 theres some the sum Ms. Lian 142 8 put projected Ms. Lian 143 3 position it not an position that it is not an Judge Hawkens 144 20 a change or changing Ms. Lian 145 5 provide anything your decision provide anything in your decision Judge Hawkens 146 9 comparative competitive Ms. Lian 149 2 custom cost and Ms. Simmons 151 11 opt-in customers top-ten customers Judge Hawkens 154 1 alternatives alternative Ms. Simmons 159 22 operating has operating and has Ms. Lian 160 21 condition has used Commission has used Judge Hawkens 162 1 they can throw upon they can bestow upon Judge Hawkens 165 10 but why is not but why is it not Judge Hawkens 170 18 core down, core, down, Mr. Adams 176 6 application, you have drafted application, could you have drafted Judge Hawkens 177 3 on the good plate on the grid plate Mr. Adams 183 12 fail? fail. Mr. Adams 187 2 giving given Mr. Adams 195 21 stated their version to stated their aversion to Judge Hawkens 2
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing 197 2 warn, standby warm standby Dr. Slaughter 197 22 wouldnt be considerably less would be considerably less Dr. Slaughter 201 19 that we could have determined a time that we could have determined at that time Ms. Lian 202 11 founding agreement funding agreement Ms. Lian 209 14 final qualification requirements financial qualification requirements Ms. Ghosh 212 19 reasonable unreasonable Ms. Ghosh 214 23 casking companies casting companies Ms. Harshaw 215 1 I have worked with sandy NRAY in the I have worked with Sandy and Ray Ms. Harshaw 3
ATTACHMENT 2 AEROTEST OPERATIONS, INC. AND NUCLEAR LABYRINTH, LLC HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing List of Proposed Revisions Page No. Line Original Text Revised Text Nos.
40 21 enback by reference enback in block by reference 44 1 have been providing have has been providing 45 20 reactor has gone reactor has gone begun 46 6 information the Companies should information the Companies submitted should 46 18 and their reviewed and their they reviewed 46 22 The submitted The They submitted 47 5 on revenue for customers on revenue for from customers 48 3 cannot reasonable predict cannot reasonable reasonably predict 48 12 the Companies projects the Companies projects projections 49 20 it cannot it they cannot 50 6 the NRC requests the NRC requests requested 57 10 but we did suggest providing but we did suggest providing provide 73 23 each witnesses each witnesses 76 10 2003-2000 timeframe 2003-2010 2000 timeframe 81 24 their the 84 22 We entered this transaction We did not entered this transaction 404731039v1
89 20 those particular issue those particular issue services 89 21-20 type of fundamentally these types of issues are fundamentally 90 8 providing service providing a service 90 15-16 service area test services area and testing 92 8 closure closing 92 22 license licensed 93 1 critical criticality 93 16 are selected that are selected 94 10-11 be satisfied with their obligations satisfy their obligations 95 1 critical criticality 104 13 licenses licensees 107 4 directly a proportion of directly a in proportion of to 107 12 amount services amount of services 108 17 you indicate you they indicate 110 23 from for 111 5 independent if they independent of if they 112 16 familiar on familiarity on with 116 24 provided by provided by to 117 10 on the 2013 inspection on the 2013 2012 inspection 118 13 No additional No additional scrutiny 118 17 seeding seating 124 22 seriously lodged with seriously lodged at odds with 131 24 percent recurring percent recurring returning 194 24 sold at sold aimed at 2
404731039v1
195 1 sold, but sold old radiography, but 197 3 operate operating 220 9 the existed the it existed 3
404731039v1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
AEROTEST OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-228-LT
)
(Aerotest Radiography and Research )
Reactor) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing JOINT PROPOSED TRANSCRIPT CORRECTIONS, dated August 22, 2014, have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange, in the above-captioned proceeding, this 22nd day of August, 2014.
/Signed (electronically) by/
Anita Ghosh Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: (301) 415-4113 E-mail: Anita.Ghosh@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day of August, 2014