ML14192A515

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Periodic Evaluation of SALP for Facilities.No Major Weaknesses Identified.W/O Ee Utley 840907 Response to SALP Board Assessment
ML14192A515
Person / Time
Site: Harris, Brunswick, Robinson, 05000000
Issue date: 10/05/1984
From: O'Reilly J
NRC/IE, NRC/RGN-II
To: Utley E
Carolina Power & Light Co
References
NUDOCS 8411010616
Download: ML14192A515 (2)


Text

OCT 0 5 1984 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN:

Mr. E. E. Utley Executive Vice President Power Supply and Engineering 1iQ FIE c and Construction 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has completed its periodic evaluation of the performance of your reactor facilities.

As you are aware, this evaluation, program, the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP),

involved an assessment of facility performance by the NRC staff; the issuance of the staff's findings in the form of a final report, the SALP Board Assessment; your response to the SALP Board Assessment (enclosed); and the review of your comments and characterization of the overall safety performance of your facilities.

It is our view that Carolina Power and Light Company's conduct of nuclear activities showed a proper concern for nuclear safety. It is noteworthy that no major weaknesses were identified by the SALP Board at any of your facilities.

The overall performance of your Robinson facility indicated that resources were adequate such that satisfactory performance with-respect to operational safety was achieved. Major strengths were identified in the areas of Surveillance, Fire Protection, Emergency Preparedness, and Refueling.

No major weaknesses were identified.

With regard to your Brunswick facility, management attention and involvement were evident and were concerned with nuclear safety.

Major strengths were identified in the areas of Radiological Controls, Emergency Preparedness, Security and Safeguards, and Refueling. No major weaknesses were identified.

The performance of your Harris facility was fully satisfactory. Resources were effectively utilized and proper management attention was evident.

Major strengths were identified in the areas of Soils and Foundations, Containment and Other Safety Related Structures, and Support Systems.

No major weaknesses were identified.

No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions concerning these matters, I will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, 8411010616 841005 PDR ADOCK 05000261.

8 4 11 85 J a m e s P. O ' R e i l l y Regional Administrator Enclosure (See page 2)

0 OCT 0 5 1984 Carolina Power and Light Company 4

Enclosure:

Letter from E. E. Utley, Carolina Power and Light Company, to James P. O'Reilly, NRC, dated September 7, 1984 cc w/encl:

R. A. Watson, Vice President Harris Nuclear Project R. M. Parsons, Project General Manager G. P. Beatty, Jr., Manager Robinson Nuclear Project Department R. E. Morgan, Plant General Manager P. W. Howe, Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Project C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager bcc w/encl:

NRC Resident Inspectors, Brunswick, Robinson and Harris Document Control Desk State of North Carolina State of South Carolina R. C. DeYoung, IE R. W. Starostecki, RI C. E. Norelius, RIII R. P. Denise, RIV T. W. Bishop, RV D. S. Price, RH B. C. Buckley, NRR G. Requa, NRR M. Grotenhuis, NRR Records Center, INPO Distribution Lists C and D RII RH RII RIH RII Price P

1 DVerrelli JP cAett 9/k/84 9/ZUj84 9/ele/84 9/47/84 9/ (/84 RIr RI R.

JS hr J01shinski

-Lewis 9/h /84 0/,/84

/5/84