ML14183A083
| ML14183A083 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1986 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14183A082 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701090684 | |
| Download: ML14183A083 (2) | |
Text
o1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 110 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO, DPR-23 CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY H. R. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50461 INTRODUCTION By letter dated September 3, 1986, Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested a revision to their operating license. The revision would revise Technical Specification (TS) Section 6.2.3 to reflect the dual role of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO). The SRO could also be used in the role of Shift Technical Advisor (STA). The licensee states that this revision is based on the NRC Policy Statement on Engineering Expertise on Shift (Generic Letter 86-04).
EVALUATION We have reviewed the licensee's proposed revision, compared it with our Policy Statement on engineering expertise on shift contained in Generic Letter 86-04, and find that the change meets our policy statement. Based on this comparison, we find the licensee's requested revision acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no sionificant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, 81701090684 861230 PDR ADOCK 05000261
___-PDR
-2 and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated: December 30, 1986 Principal Contributor:
G. Requa