ML14181A942

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-261/97-201 on 970407-0523.No Violations Noted.Concern Re NPSH Requirements W/Si & RHR Pumps Noted
ML14181A942
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1997
From: Richards S
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Keenan J
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML14181A943 List:
References
50-261-97-201, NUDOCS 9708280095
Download: ML14181A942 (6)


See also: IR 05000261/1997201

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055-0001

August 14,

1997

Mr. J. S. Keenan, Vice President

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant,

Unit No. 2

3581 West Entrance Road

Hartsville, South Carolina 29550

SUBJECT:

DESIGN INSPECTION OF H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, NO. 2

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-261/97-201)

Dear Mr. Keenan:

From April 7 through May 23, 1997, the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), performed a design inspection of the H.B.

Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 (HBR) auxiliary feedwater (AFW) and safety injection

(SI) systems, including their support systems. The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate

the capability of the selected systems to perform safety functions required by their design

bases, the adherence of the systems to their design and licensing bases, and the consistency of

the as-built configuration with the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR).

. The inspection findings were discussed during a public exit meeting on June 12, 1997, and are

presented in the enclosed report. The team concluded that the systems could perform their

safety function, design documentation adhered in most cases to design and licensing bases,

and that the UFSAR generally reflected the current installed state of systems and how they

were maintained and operated. However, the team identified a number of issues that indicate

that additional management attention is warranted in the engineering area.

During the inspection the team identified a concern with the net positive suction head (NPSH)

requirements with the SI and residual heat removal (RHR) pumps. A hydraulic analysis was

performed subsequent to the inspection. You discovered a potential NPSH problem with SI

pump C and reported it to NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 on June 27, 1997.

Subsequently you identified actual NPSH problems with SI pumps B and C for a large break loss

of coolant accident (LBLOCA) as stated in LER 97-08. You have undertaken several immediate

corrective actions, including raising the refueling water storage tank (RWST) level. The

hydraulic analysis is still ongoing for the RHR pumps.

You discovered as the result of the team's inquiries that the redundant autostart cables for SI

pumps A and C were routed in the same raceway in violation of your electrical separation

criteria. You declared SI pump C inoperable, immediately placed the installed spare pump B in

service, and implemented a modification to provide correct separation subsequent to this

inspection. You advised the NRC of this discrepancy in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 on May

21, 1997.

.

9708280095 970814

PDR ADOCK 05000261

G

PDR

Mr. J. S. Keenan

-2

The team identified that you had not reported significant PCT changes as required by 10 CFR

50.46. Prior to the inspection you reported significant PCT changes for only the most limiting

transient for all the evaluation models, whereas you should report them for the limiting

transient of each evaluation model and its applications. The NRR technical staff is still

evaluating a potent ial unreviewed safety question (USQ) with regard to your commitments

about the transfer to cold leg recirculation following a LBLOCA.

The team found deficiencies with the improper slope of instrument sensing lines, the exclusion

of the seismic uncertainty term in calculations for safe shutdown and accident mitigation

instrumentation, and with verification of the closure capability of the accumulator isolation

valves if a LOCA occurred while filling the accumulators.

Weaknesses were also identified concerning updating and control of calculations,

nonconservative design inputs and assumptions, and incorporating design bases into

maintenance and test procedures. In addition, the team noted deficiencies and inconsistencies

in the USFAR, procedures, design basis documents, systems descriptions, calculations,

drawings, and other documents.

You have implemented appropriate measures to address the immediate concerns identified by

the team. For the other issues, you have initiated reviews and corrective actions including

further evaluations where deemed appropriate. The team concluded that, although a number of

problems were noted, the reviewed systems generally adhered to their design and licensing

bases, and their as-built configurations were generally consistent with the UFSAR.

In order for the NRC to coordinate follow-up actions, please provide within 60 days of receipt

of this letter a schedule for completion of your corrective actions for the open items listed in

Appendix A of the enclosed report. As with all NRC inspections, we expect that you will

evaluate the applicability of the results of this inspection and the specific findings to other

systems and components. Please advise us of your considerations in this regard.

Any enforcement action resulting from this inspection will be handled by the NRC Region II

office through separate correspondence.

Mr. J. S. Keenan

-3

In accordance with Section 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room. Should you have any questions concerning the attached

inspection report, please contact the project manager, Ms. B. L. Mozafari at (301) 415-2020, or

the inspection team leader, Mr. E. A. Kleeh at (301) 415-2975.

Sincerely,

Stuart A. Richards, Chief

Special Inspection Branch

Division of Inspection and Support Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket No. 50-261

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 50-261/97-201

cc: See next two pages

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2

cc:

Mr. William D. Johnson

Mr. Mel Fry, Acting Director

Vice President and Senior Counsel

N.C. Department of Environment,

Carolina Power & Light Company

Health and Natural Resources

Post Office Box 1551

Division of Radiation Protection Raleigh,

North Carolina 27602

3825 Barrett Dr.

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-7721

Ms. Karen E. Long

Assistant Attorney General

Mr. Robert P. Gruber

State of North Carolina

Executive Director

Post Office Box 629

Public Staff - NCUC

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Post Office Box 29520

Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0520

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Resident Inspector's Office

Mr. Max Batavia, Chief

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant

South Carolina Department of Health

2112 Old Camden Road

Bureau of Radiological Health

Hartsville, South Carolina 29550

and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Regional Administrator, Region 11

Columbia, South-Carolina 29201

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Atlanta Federal Center

61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23T85

Ms. D. B. Alexander

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Manager

Performance Evaluation and

Mr. J. W. Moyer

Regulatory Affairs

Plant General Manager

Carolina Power & Light Company

Carolina Power & Light Company

412 S. Wilmington Street

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant,

Raleigh, North Carolina 27601

Unit No. 2

3581 West Entrance Road

Hartsville, South Carolina. 29550

Mr. Milton Shymlock

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Public Service Commission

Atlanta Federal Center

State of South Carolina

61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85

Post Office Drawer 11649

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Columbia, South Carolina 29211

Mr. J. S. Keenan, Vice President

Carolina Power & Light Company

H. B. Robinson Steam ElectricRPlant,

Unit No. 2

3581 West Entrance Road

Hartsville, South Carolina 29550

MrM TH M Wilkerson

Manager - Regulatory Affairs

V

Mr. H.

K. Chernoff

Carolina Power & Light Company

Supervisor, Licensing/Regulatory Programs

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant,

Carolina Power & Light Company

Unit No. 2

H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant,

3581 West Entrance Road

Unit No. 2

Hartsville, South Carolina 29550-0790

3581 West Entrance Road

Hartsville, South Carolina 29550

Distribution:

NR(. and Local PDRs

Docket Files 50-261

PSIB R/F

SJCollins, NRR

BWSheron, NRR

FPGillespie, NRR

LAReyes, RII

SARichards, NRR

DPNorkin, NRR

CERossi, NRR

GEEdison, NRR

BABoger, NRR

BLMozafari, NRR

MBShymlock, RII

BBDesai, SRI

TTMartin, AEOD

Regional Division Directors

Inspection Team

PUBLIC

RES

ACRS

OGC (3)

IS Distribution

OPA

SPSB, NRR

Al*QO