ML14181A124
| ML14181A124 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1993 |
| From: | Merschoff E NRC/IE, NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | Dietz C Carolina Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9307220149 | |
| Download: ML14181A124 (39) | |
Text
JUN 22 1993 Docket No.: 50-261 License No.: DPR-23 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN:
Mr. C. R. Dietz Vice President H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550-0790 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- ROBINSON UNIT 2 This letter refers to the management meeting conducted at your request in the NRC Region II Office in Atlanta, Georgia on June 18, 1993. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Nuclear Assessment, Maintenance, and Technical Support at your H. B. Robinson facility. It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided a better understanding of the initiatives you have taken and/or planned to enhance performance in these areas. A list of attendees and a copy of your slides are enclosed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulation, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Jon R. Johnson/for Ellis W. Merschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Licensee Slides cc w/encls:
Mr. W. S. Orser Executive Vice President Nuclear Generation Carolina Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 Mail Code - CPB 12 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc w/encls cont'd - See page 2) 9307220149 930622 PDR ADOCK 05000261 p
Carolina Power and Light Company 2
JUN 22 (cc w/encls cont'd)
Mr. H. W. Habermeyer, Jr.
Vice President Nuclear Services Department Carolina Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 - Mail OHS7 Raleigh, NC 27602 W. J. Flanagan Acting Plant General Manager H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health Dept. of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611-7687 McCuen Morrell, Chairman Darlington County Board of Supervisor County Courthouse Darlington, SC 29535 H. Ray Starling Vice President - Legal Department Carolina Power and Light Co.
P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 H. A. Cole Special Deputy Attorney General State of North Carolina P. 0. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc w/encls cont'd -
See page 3)
JUN 2 2193 Carolina Power and Light Company 3
(cc w/encls cont'd)
Robert Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC P. 0. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 J. L. Harrison, Manager Regulatory Compliance H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 Ms. Gayle B. Nichols Staff Counsel SC Public Service Commission P. 0. Box 11649 Columbia, SC 29211 bcc w/encls:
H. Christensen, RH B. Mozafari, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 5, Box 413 Hartsville, SC 29550 RI I
- tj r enen DVerr li JJolson 06/-Z/93 06/
93 06/
93 06/11193
ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES Carolina Power & Light Company C. R. Dietz, Vice President, Robinson Nuclear Project B. H. Clark, Manager, Maintenance T. P. Clearly, Manager, Technical Support D. B. Waters, Manager, Regulatory Affairs C. S. Olexik, Manager, Plant Assessment D. T. Gudger, Licensing Engineer Nuclear Requlatory Commission L. A. Reyes, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region II (RH)
J. R. Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RH J. P. Jaudon, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety, RH S. S. Bajwa, Acting Director, Project Directorate II-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
D. M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1, DRP, RH H. 0. Christensen, Chief, Reactor Projects Section lA, DRP, RH W. T. Orders, Senior Resident Inspector - Robinson, DRP, RII B. F. Mozafari, Project Manager, NRR R. E. Carroll, Project Engineer, DRP, RII
ENCLOSURE 2 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY H. B. ROBINSON UNIT NO. 2 NRC Management Meeting Atlanta, Georgia June 18, 1993
Agenda Introduction C. R. Dietz Nuclear Assessment Overview C. S. Olexik, Jr.
Maintenance Overview B. H. Clark Technical Support Overview T. P. Cleary 1
Table of Contents Introduction 1
Nuclear Assessment Overview...............................
2 M ission 3
M ethods 3
Assessment Results 4
Follow-Up 8
Summary......................................
9 Maintenance Overview...............................
10 Challenges 11 Backlog...
12 Maintenance Procedures..........................
16 Previous Issues.................................
16 Work Control/Planning 16 Staffing Levels..........................
17 Work Practice Issues.......................
17 Summary.............................
20 Technical Support Overview..................................
21 Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program Upgrade...............
23 Engineering Support of Operations and Maintenance..........
24 Challenges........*
26 Conclusion.............
28 n
Introduction Objectives To provide a forum for maximum exchange of information at management level necessary to effectively assess and monitor activities of H. B.
Robinson.
To focus on those areas that represent the most significant challenges to successful operation of H. B. Robinson in the Nuclear Assessment, Maintenance, and Technical Support areas.
To review the recent operational performance at H. B. Robinson; objectively assessing contributive factors that have promoted success and those that have impeded progress.
1
Nuclear Assessment Overview C. S. Olexik, Jr.
2
Nuclear Assessment Overview June 1992 - June 1993 Mission Contribute to the continued performance improvements at Robinson by identifying issues preventing world class performance to both Robinson Line Management and to Senior Management.
Serve as Senior Management's staff for the objective oversight of safe, high quality, and reliable nuclear operations at Robinson.
Methods 13 Nuclear Professionals 19 Years Nuclear Experience Average 7 Former Line Supervisors 6 Degreed Engineers 4 SROs Observations Random Focused Assessments Commitments Discretionary Event-Driven (HBR or Others) 3
Assessment Results OPS MA E&TS Support Issues 7
4 12 12 Strengths 4
0 4
11 Operations Issues (7)
Work Practices Training Procedures Corrective Action Program Strengths (4)
Training Fire Protection Personnel Maintenance Issues (4)
Work Practices Procedures Corrective Action Program 4
Assessment Results (Continued)
Engineering & Technical Support Issues (12)
Training Work Practices Corrective Action Program Configuration Control Equipment Deficiency Procedures Strengths (4)
Training NPRDS Ownership Self-Assessment Support Issues (12)
Outage Planning Work Practices Management Prioritization Process Self-Assessment Corrective Action Program 5
Ue S
Assessment Results (Continued)
Support (Continued)
Strengths (11)
Management Self-Assessment Spent Fuel Shipping Radiological Control Document Control Key Issues Corrective Action Program Work Practices Outage Planning Emergency Preparedness Program Event Avoidance Methods Assessments Recent Service Water Pre-RFO 15 Security Ongoing Fire Protection Charging Pump NOUE Training and Qualification Procurement Engineering Near-Term Procedures Maintenance Technical Specifications 6
Assessment Results (Continued)
RFO Assessment Focus Shutdown Risk Management Previous Issues Switchyard Work Selected Mods Selected Activities 7
Follow-Up Plant Issue Response to Senior Management Within 30 Days Identify Cause and Effect Corrective Actions With Dates Performance Indicators NAD Issues Weaknesses 8
Summary Right People Right Things Positive Results We Are Making a Difference 9
Maintenance Overview B. H. Clark 10
0 0
Challenges Backlog Maintenance Procedures Previous Issues Work Control/Planning Staffing Levels Work Practice Issues 11
U Safety Significance of Backlog "Focus" System 1 4 0 Outstanding WRs 120 100 80 60 40 120........................................................................
20 1-3 4
5 6
7 8
90 Prior ity WrkRqts
Top Contributors to Core Damage (Relative to Safety Significance) 35 30 25 20 9
15 8
10 55 0~1
-3 Priority S
A C
E D
L D
F A
H C
R H
W F
C D
S 0
C P
C H
V H
V W
W G
D 0
S C
R A
G P
I S
C J Priority 1-3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Priority 6 0
Priority 7 Priority 8 Priority 9
BACKLOG CATEGORIZATION Power Block Work Non-Power Block Work Corrective Planned/
Corrective Planned/
Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Maintenance Priority 1-4 27/320 46/655 3/56 16/200 Priority 5-9 124/1452 518/14041 5/68 79/4971 715/16475 103/5295 Notes: No. Jobs/Man hours
Non 0uaeBako (Number of Tickets) 1400 WRx 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0l JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC WRs Goal
Challenges (Continued)
Backlog Goal By December 1994, Reduce Backlog From Current Level of 13 Weeks to 7 Weeks Maintenance Procedures Content and Quality of Maintenance Procedures Established Procedures Group Developed Formal Program Writer's Guide Procedure Request Assess Quality of Product Targeted 150 PM Procedures For Development This Year Previous Issues Work Control/Planning Moving Towards Implementation Of:
Work Management Center - August 1993 Work Control Center - December 1993 Remove Burden Of "Control Of Maintenance" From The Control Room Work Package Concept Systematic Approach To Scheduling Activities 13 Week Rolling Schedule 16
Challenges (Continued)
Staffing Levels Permanent Staff Additions Being Evaluated Procedure Writers Calibration Lab Technicians Sub-Unit Managers Electrical/I&C Mechanical I&C Technicians Mechanical Technicians Temporary Staff Additions Mechanical Craft Technicians (8)
I&C Craft Technicians (8)
Security I&C Craft Technicians (2)
Work Practice Issues Long Term Trend Is Down Problem Is Not Solved Corrective Action Program Trends Recent INPO Evaluation 17
Maintenance Work Practices May 31, 1993
- OF INAPP ACTS 26 20 15 10 6X IJ A
S920 N
D J
F M3 A
M 92 93 Legend Month Trend By Date ACR Identified CalHO1BILL1WPMNT02
Challenges (Continued)
Work Practices Since January 1992 20 Adverse Condition Reports Related To Maintenance 15 Involved "Inattention To Detail" Strategy For Improvement Create Awareness Of Work Standards, Practices, Problems Imbue Personnel With Understanding Of Management Expectations How:
Continue To Take Message Direct Maintenance Performance Expectations Handbook INPO Assist Visit - Human Performance Focus On Past Successful Activities Utilization Of CAP Site Program Unit Sub-Program Self Assessment On-The-Job Observations Training Nuclear Assessment Department 19
0 Summary Procedure Processes Performance People 20
Technical Support Overview T. P. Cleary 21
0 Technical Support Overview Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program Upgrade Engineering Support Of Operations And Maintenance Challenges 22
Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program Upgrade Plant Coordinator Position Established As Dedicated Position Increase Corporate Oversight/Involvement Corporate Governing Procedures And Plant Implementing Procedures Written Large Bore Piping Walkdowns Small Bore (<2") Walkdowns Piping Isometrics Developed System Susceptibility Analysis Checmate Model Updated Program Components Selected And Outage Plan Written Previous Inspections Reviewed To Ensure Plant Safety Plant Representation Established In Industry Group EPRI Assessment Of Program - Very Good RFO 15 Inspections
-300 Components Selected For Inspections Small-Bore (<2") Added To Inspection List
-25 Inspections Performed Pre-Outage
-60 Components Have Been Tagged For Forced Outage Work 23
0 Engineering Support of Operations And Maintenance System Engineers Provide Technical Expertise And Leadership On The Design And Operation Of Their Assigned Systems And Related Components 29 System Engineers All Major Systems Covered System Engineer Certification Process which requires the System Engineer to demonstrate mastering of all aspects of the system to his customers, peers and management. He must also possess strong communication and project management skills.
Detailed Qualification Card Oral Board Exam Certified System Engineer - Site "Expert" On System Certified System Engineers Reactor Protection System Emergency Diesel Generator Turbine And Auxiliaries Containment DC And Batteries Reactor Vessel And Internals 24
Engineering Support of Operations And Maintenance (Continued)
System Teams 38 Teams In Place 15 Met In First Quarter Of 1993 Ad Hoc Teams Used For:
RCP Seal Flow SI Line Foreign Material FW Oscillation ILRT/SIT Component Engineer Provides Technical Expertise On The Design And Operations Of Assigned Components Subunit Formed Engineers Identified:
SOV MOV Check Valves Motors Pumps 25
Challenges BSEP Lessons Learned Engineering Work Management Work Control Group Established Outage Planning Coordination And Management Day-To-Day /Routine Work Coordination Workload Studies Completed Standards For Work Items Developed Site Work Tracking System Items Prioritized Items Manhour Loaded Inadequate/Incomplete Technical Reviews Causes Of Lack Attention To Detail Lack of Knowledge Reliance on Other Reviewers Corrective Actions Enhanced Guidance On Performing Reviews Increased Training Technical Tools Stressed Individual Accountability For Reviews 26
Challenges (Continued)
Configuration Control Issues EDBS Walkdowns Finding Discrepancies Mods/EEs Not Updating All Effected Documents Plant Changes Made Without A Modification Package Causes Past Work Practices Inadequate/Incomplete Technical Reviews Failure To Follow Procedure Corrective Actions Working To Strengthen Technical Reviews Corporate Team Reviewing MOD Process 27
Conclusion C. R. Dietz 28
Robinson Nuclear Plant 1993 Achievements Generation Capacity Factor/Availability Factor Forced Outage Rate Frcent recent 120 50 100 40
.80-60 30 40 20 20M7 0
10 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 YTD 0
M CAFACITY Wi AVAILABILITY 0
1 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 YTD
Robinson Nuclear Plant 1993 Achievements Generation Unplanned Automatic Scrams Safety System Availability While Critical Percent 3
80 2
60 2
10 1
0o 20 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 YTD 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 YTE
PERCENT POWER vs TIME ON LINE LET'S KEEP IT IN THE BLUE I
POWER PRODUCTION POWER REDUCHON 1
2 3
4 5
6 100 OUTAGE DESCRIPTION
- 1) Turbine Valve Test
- 6) Thermal Discharge Limits, 3C Duration: 7hrs. 45 mins.
"C" Feed Reg. Valve Air Losses: 745 MWHs Leak, and Turbine Valve Test z
75
- 2) Turbine Valve Test Duration: 7 days, 10hrs.
Duration: 8hrs. 28 mins.
36 mins.
wi Losses: 849 MWHs Losses: 47,580 MWHs CL
- 3) Turbine Valve Test and 50 OT Delta T Test Duration: 22hrs. 25 mins.
Losses: 2075 MWHs
- 4)
Turbine Valve Test Duration: 16hrs. 23 mins.
25 Losses: 1330 MWHs
- 5) Turbine Valve Test Duration: 13hrs.
32 mins.
Losses: 1348 MWHs 193 FEB 14AR-1PR 14AY
-UN WUL RAUG ISEP IOCT NOV DEC ARIM am
~~~~~~~~Management Graphis35pm7JN9paeIOf,-
0 0
Conclusion Robinson Nuclear Department Is Good, Getting Better By:
Being 100% Responsible For Auditable Results Practicing Self-Assessment Sustaining Our Commitment To Improved Performance 32