ML14178A342
| ML14178A342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14178A341 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-93-07, 50-261-93-7, NUDOCS 9305180277 | |
| Download: ML14178A342 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket No.:
50-261 H. B. Robinson Unit 2 License No.:
DPR-23 During the NRC inspection conducted on March 20 - April 16, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure For NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1993), the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification (TS) 6.5.1.1.1.c requires written procedures be established for surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment. TS 4.6.1.1 requires monthly that the emergency diesel generators (EDG) assume loads up to the nameplate rating. The nameplate rating was 2500 KW at 0.8 power factor (3125 KVA).
Written procedures OST-401 and 409 were established to implement TS 4.6.1.1 test requirements.
Contrary to the above, OST-401 and 409 were not adequately established, in that, the test procedures tested the EDGs at a load less restrictive than the nameplate rating. The monthly tests were performed at 2500 KW with a power factor approaching 1.0.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 6th day of May 1993 9305180277 930506 PDR ADOCK 05000261 a