ML14175B442
| ML14175B442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1986 |
| From: | Verrelli D NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14175B441 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-86-26, NUDOCS 8611110378 | |
| Download: ML14175B442 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket No. 50-261 H. B. Robinson Unit 2 License No. DPR-23 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 11 October 10, 1986, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved failures to follow procedures. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Section 6 of the CP&L Corporate QA Manual, requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings.
10 CFR 50.59 (b) requires the licensee to furnish to the NRC a summary of the licensee's safety evaluation of licensee changes accomplished pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.
Licensee procedure AP-030 requires the submittal of an annual report in July describing changes, tests and experiments conducted in the previous year without prior NRC approval.
Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with AP-030, in that the licensee failed to submit to the Region II office a brief description of the 1985 facility changes, tests and experiments, and a summary of the safety evaluation of each.
This is a Severity Level V violation. (Supplement 1)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, H. B. Robinson is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the Letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8611110378 861031 NVD M. VF"'!
PDR ADOCK 05000261 PP0 David M. Verrelli, Chief
)PRReactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 31 day of October 1986