ML14175A711
| ML14175A711 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1982 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14175A710 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204130015 | |
| Download: ML14175A711 (2) | |
Text
-o--tpA RECU,-1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION K'
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 65 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-23 CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261 Introduction By letter dated January 26, 1982 Carolina Power and Light Company (the licensee) requested that the abbreviations and definitions of certain frequency notations be changed to be identical to those used in the Standard Technical Specifications.
Evaluation The notations under consideration define the frequency for checking, calibrating, and testing instrument channels. The licensee prefers to use the standard frequenctes that are based on calendar periods rather than being based on fuel cycles.
As a result of discussions related to this request, the licensee agreed to further clarification of these terms by the inclusion of an additional "Remark" in Table 4.1.1.
These actions are considered to be administrative in nature and are acceptable.
Environmental Consideration We have determined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR §51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
8204130015 820311 PDR ADOCK 05000261 P
-2 Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date:
March 11, 1982 Principal Contributor:
W. J. Ross