ML14174B072
| ML14174B072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 03/24/1992 |
| From: | Reyes L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Watson R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9204010023 | |
| Download: ML14174B072 (83) | |
Text
Docket No. 50-261 License No. DPR-23 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN:
Mr. R. A. Watson Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- H. B. ROBINSON This refers to the meeting conducted at your request in the Region II Office on March 11, 1992.
The purpose of the meeting was for you to present a self assessment of the H. B. Robinson facility. A list of attendees and a copy of your handout are enclosed.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided a better understanding of your established goals, as well as the actions you have taken with respect to the weaknesses addressed in the last SALP report.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"- Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Jon R. Johnson/for Luis A. Reyes, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
.5v!!-- icybr
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Licensee Handout cc w/encls:
C. R. Dietz, Vice President Robinson Nuclear Project Department H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 (cc w/encls cont'd - See page 2) 9204010023 920324 PDR ADOCK 05000261 P
Carolina Power and Light Company 2
(cc w/encls cont'd)
R. H. Chambers, Plant General Manager H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health Dept. of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611-7687 McCuen Morrell, Chairman Darlington County Board of Supervisors County Courthouse Darlington, SC 29535 H. Ray Starling Manager -
Legal Department Carolina Power and Light Co.
P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 H. A. Cole Special Deputy Attorney General State of North Carolina P. 0. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Robert Gruber Executive Director Public Staff -
NCUC P. 0. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 J. D. Kloosterman, Director Regulatory Compliance H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 bcc w/encls:
(See page 3)
Carolina Power and Light Company 3
MAR 2 bcc w/encls:
J. Johnson, RII H. Christensen, RII R. Lo, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 5, Box 413 Hartsville, SC 29550 R II RI R
DPIVI rRP MGlasman:tj HCh istensen DVerrelli 03/)6/92 03/\\/92 03/ti/92 O
L-
ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES Carolina Power and Light C. R. Dietz, Vice President, Robinson Nuclear Project R. H. Chambers, Plant General Manager, Robinson J. M. Curley, Nuclear Engineering Department A. M. Lucas, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department R. L. Barnett, Manager, Outages and Modifications J. A. Dobbs, Section Manager, Nuclear Assessment Department R. W. Prunty, Jr., Manager, Nuclear Licensing, Robinson Nuclear Regulatory Commission L. A. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII J. R. Johnson, Deputy Director, DRP, RII J. P. Stohr, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, (DRSS) RI E. W. Merschoff, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety, (DRS) RH E. G. Adensam, Director, Project Directorate II-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
D. M. Verrelli, Chief, DRP, Branch 1, RII R. Lo, Project Manager, NRR H. 0. Christensen, Chief, DRP, Section 1A, RII F. Jape, Chief, Testing Programs Section, DRS, RH R. B. Shortridge, Senior Radiation Specialist, DRSS, RII G. R. Wiseman, Reactor Inspector, DRS, RII J. L. Shackelford, Reactor Engineer, DRS, RII R. P. Carrion, Radiation Specialist, DRSS, RII M. M. Glasman, Project Engineer, DRP, RII R. E. Carroll, Project Engineer, DRP, RII
ENCLOSURE 2 CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT NRC MANAGEMENT MEETING ATLANTA, GEORGIA MARCH 11, 1992
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES To Provide A Forum for Maximum Exchange of Information at Management Level Necessary to Effectively Assess and Monitor Activities of H. B. Robinson To Focus on Those Areas That Represent Most Significant Challenge to Successful Operation of H. B. Robinson To review the scope of RFO 14 activities and to share the conclusion of our risk assessment relative to the conduct of those activities To Review Recent Operational Performance at H. B.
Robinson, Objectively Assessing Contributive Factors That Have Promoted Success and Those That Have Impeded Progress 92-0621A(2)
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ II.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(3)
SECTION II MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ Personnel Issues Turnover Resource Availability & Application Morale Industrial Safety Equipment Performance Plant Aging Vendor Availability Deterministic Ability Work Process Issues Work Backlog Corrective Action Program Work Practices Resources 92-0621A(4)
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS PERSONNEL ISSUES TURNOVER Improvement RESOURCE AVAILABILITY & APPLICATION CP&L Permanent Staff o
Selective Additions Contractor Support o
Increasing Trend Overtime 0
CP&L Staff MORALE Subjective Assessment...Very High o
Community Support o
Confidence to Support Outage Conservatively Optimistic o
Reduction in Force Concerns 0
More Demand.....Less Discretionary Time 0
Benefits of Strategic Planning are Recognized Industrial Safety Good Performance 92-0621A(5)
PERSONNEL TURNOVER LOSS OF KEY PERSONNEL LOSSES UNIT KEY POSITIONS INTERNAL EXTERNAL Plant Section General Manager 0
1 Emergency Senior Specialist 0
1 Preparedness Tech Support Senior Engineers 1
0 Project Engineer 1
0 E&RC RC Technicians 0
2 Operations Reactor Operators 3
3 Maintenance I&C Technicians 2
0 Planner 0
1 TURNOVER RATE (External) 7%
6%
4%
3%
2%
1%
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
RNPD AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL INVENTORY 500 400 300 -
Tr
..1 200 71T 100 0
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
=IDEPT MGMT EZZ OUT & MODS ROB PLT C&A RNPD SECTIONS
RNPD TECHNICAL CONTRACTORS 60--
55 50 45--
40 35 30 25 20-15 10 5
MAMJ JAS ND J FMAMJ JAS N D J
1990 1991 1992
RNPD CRAFT & CLERICAL CONTRACTORS 1000 900 800 700 600 4
0 0 -
- 200, 100 -_-
MAM J J ASOND J FMAM J J ASOND J F 501990 1991 1992
1991 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (BY SECTION) 600 500 400 300 200 100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec M
MOD PROJECTS 17] GEN. MANAGER 11 cONTROL & ADMIN 9
TOTAL
RNPD OVERTIME AS% OF REGULAR PAID TIME 35 30 25 20 15 1
0 5
O JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1991 GOAL ACTUAL BOD:
4.2
RNPD INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE Accident Rate 0.852
(# Lout Time Accidents x 200,000)/# Manhoure Worked 0.639 0.426 0.213-0 1st QTR 2nd QTR 3rd QTR 4th QTR 1991 GOAL ACTUAL Over 1 Million Safe Manhours Worked Since Last Lost Time Accident (2/91)
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE PLANT AGING Continuing Issue o
Condensate Pump Failure o
Through Wall Corrosion Failure VENDOR AVAILABILITY Continued Service o
Security Computer System Responsiveness o
SI Pump Casings DETERMINISTIC ABILITY Diagnostics o
MOV Program o
Performance Monitoring 92-0621A(6)
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS WORK PROCESS ISSUES WORK BACKLOG Maintenance Tech Support Operations CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM Measures of Effectiveness o
Self-Identified vs. Identified by Others o
Significant vs. Non-Significant o
Corrective Actions Completed WORK PRACTICES ACR Distribution o
Equipment o
Human Performance Adherence to Management Standards o
Acceptance of Current Performance Levels o
Receptivity to External Self Assessments RESOURCES Financial o
Support Equipment/Process Challenges Personnel o
Adequacy to Address Backlogs and Expectations o
Effectiveness of Management Development o
Effectiveness of Skills Training 92-0621A(7)
MAINTENANCE BACKLOG 3500 3000---
2500 2000 1500 500 0
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN 1991 1992 W OUTAGE ITRNONOUTAGE Backlog Consists of WRa (All Priorities) Awaiting Action 6
WORK BACKLOG TECH. SUPPORT BACKLOG ITEMS BACKLOG ITEMS*
250 200 F 150 100 LA 0 1 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY 1
st 92 JANUARY Any work (priority 4 or les)
L2TOTAL that permanent staff Is unable to schedule OPERATIONS BIENNIAL PROCEDURE REVIEW PROGRAM BACKLOG ITEMS*
140 1 1
120 100-80 401 JUNE 1991 SEPTEMBER1991 DECEMBER 1991 JANUARY
- Number of reviewed procedures TOTAL with comments which have not been Incorporated
_990 91 C. A. P. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 1 990 i 1991_
1992 5EP DCT N7--DEC WAN FEB AR 1APR-NA-UN JUL FAU]GsEP CT 01EC AN TEB RtC1A R1 1Y TTO AUG CORPOFATE NGEM DEVELOPED DESCRIBIG CAP REV 5 OF PLP -026 (RNPD CAP IMPLEMENTED OLLOWING NGGM I I
I CAPG-001 THR)UGH CAPG-005 PREATED DESCRIBING AC EVALU ION R. UIREMENTS I
CREATE ACR T ACKING SYSTEM ON GSA MA1NTENANE SUBPROGRAM I PLEMEN TED -
MM-Oil CORPORATE MA AGEMEN REVIE) OF CA.
MOD-IMPLEMENTATION SUBPROGRAM IMPLEMENTED
- MIP 004 1
MPLEME T TRACKING OF ACR CORECTIV ACTIONS ON WTS.
C PG-008 I
E MATER AL RECEIPT IN PECTIO SUBPROGRAM IUPLEMENTED
-PMC--012 I
I WORK REQUEST CAUSAL FACTOR TRENDS SUBPRO(RAM IMPLEJENTED i TSG-1 8 EGRC 3UBPROGIAMS IMPLEMENT D -
AP-018, E IC-013.
- HPP-0 )5 R V I OF CAPG-0 5, ENHINCEMEN{
OF IN TRUCTIIN FOR
- P RFORMI G NON-ICA EVA UATION:
R 6 OF PLP-02 IMPLEMENTED.
ENHANC MENT To THE A R PROC ESSING NSTRUC ION BA$ED ON USTOME1 F EDBACK I
SECURITY/EMER ENCY PREPARED ESS CORRECTIV ACTION SUBPRO RAM IM LEMENT D -
EP 001 INPO ASSESSMENT IDENTIFIES NO ROLEMS NTH CAP IMPL ENTED CAP MEA EFFEC IVENESI.
CAP ifMONTH Y ASSEISMENT EPORTII REV 6 OF PLP-026. R4V i OF CAPG-O I THROUGH
- CAPG-404.
EN$ANCEMEIfT TO TfE ACR EVALUATON INSTIV,&NI TREND AALYSIS PROGRA4 TO BE IMPLEM NTED CAP PROCES TO BE INTEGI TED INTO SWTS ELIMIN TING SOM PAPER ORK &
TREAM NINGPOCESS EP CT OV EC JAN
~EB AR PR AY lUN JUL.
(AU G SEP 0CT NOV lDEC JAN EB AR APR E AY lJUN lJUL AUG 1990 1991-1992 Barchart Drawing System 7: 44 am 9-MAR-92 Page 1 of 1
ADVERSE CONDITION REPORTS
- INITIATED 100 80--
60 40 20 AUG (98)
SEP (97)
OCT (89)
NOV (96)
DEC (100)
JAN (96) 1991 1992
- SELF IDENT (SI)
- NON-SELF IDENT
% SI - ROLLING AVG
() INDICATES % SELF IDENTIFIED
ACRs INITIATED SIGNIFICANT, NONSIGNIFICANT
% OF INITIATED
- SIGNIFICANT 100 100 90 80 80 70 60 60 50 40 40 K'
30 20 20 AUG (41)
DEC (19)
JAN (27)
VALUE IN () 18 TOTAL # OF ACRe INITIATED
% SIGNIFICANT E
% NONSIGNIFICANT
- SIGNIFICANT (TRND)
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED BY DUE DATE/WITHOUT EXTENSION C/As COMPLETED 70 60 50 40 30
~*
20____
10 AUG '91 SEP '91 OCT '91 NOV '91 DEC '91 JAN '92 (63)
(48)
(63)
(76)
(70)
(71)
E BY ORIG DUE DATE E
AFTER ORIG DUE DATE
% BY DUE DATE (Rolling Avg) 0 Indicates % by Original Due Date/No Extensions 1a
EQUIPMENT VS. HUMAN PERFORMANCE ALL ACR'S ENTERED THRU 01/31/92 EQUIPMENT: 139 37%
Z//
HUMAN PERFORMANCE: 236 63%
TOT CAUSES
- 375, WHICH 94 ARE APP CAUSE ACRe ENTERED
- 276 ACR BACKLOG
- 0
HUMAN PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS vs. CAUSE TOTAL ACR CAUSES TO DATE 01/31/92 Verbal -F2 2Z Written -
22 7
- 2 MMI-[
Environ E0 Wrk sch - 2 Wr k pr ac --
X7ZZX22/2722222 22
>2 2
Wrk org - 272222 Sup mth -22 Trn/Qual - I222]
Chg mgt - 122 Resorce mgt
[EZ Mgt mth P27)
External -El 0
20 40 60 80 100
['.'I' TOTAL TOTAL HUMAN
- 236, APPARENT CAUSE
- 56 ACR ENTERED
- 276, ACR BACKLOG a 0 MMI - MAN/MACHINE INTERFACE
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ II.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(8)
SECTION III OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETI' RFO 14 STATUS RFO 15 SCOPE OUTAGE RISK MANAGEMENT 92-0621A(9)
REFUELING OUTAGE 14 INITIATIVES/LESSONS LEARNED PERMANENT OUTAGE ORGANIZATION o
SHIFT OUTAGE MANAGERS (SRO QUALIFIED) o TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL MODIFICATION RELEASE DATES o
70% APPROVED 6 MONTHS PRIOR TO OUTAGE o
ORIGINAL MODS IN DETAIL SCHEDULE IN DECEMBER SCOPE CONTROL o
SYSTEM ENGINEER OUTAGE PLAN o
MANAGEMENT APPROVAL OF SCOPE ADDITIONS MATERIAL CONTROL ORGANIZATION o
SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT o
APPROXIMATELY 80 PARTS WITH DELIVERY DATES PAST OUTAGE START DATE SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT o
DETAILED SCHEDULE ISSUED IN NOVEMBER o
REVISION 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT o
EACH MAJOR PROJECT HAS PROJECT MANAGER o
MAJOR PROJECT HAS DEDICATED OPERATORS CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 92-0621A(10)
REFUELING OUTAGE 14 (Continued)
SCHEDULE 70 DAYS MODIFICATIONS RHR MINI-FLOW RECIRCULATION o
ELIMINATES OPERATOR ACTION SERVICE WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT o
REPLACES NON ALX6N PIPING AUXILIARY FEEDWATER FLOW CONTROL VALVE o
REGAINS AFW MARGIN CONTROL ROOM ANNUNCIATOR UPGRADE o
CORRECTS HUMAN FACTORS DEFICIENCIES PRESSURIZER SURGE LINE TEMPERATURE INSTRUMENTATION o
VALIDATES CALCULATIONS ON THERMAL STRATIFICATION PROJECTS CONTAINMENT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST/INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST SERVICE WATER PIPE INSPECTION CHECK VALVE INSPECTIONS o
69 CHECK VALVES S/G GIRTH WELD INSPECTIONS CCW VALVE REPAIRS 92-0621A(11)
REFUELING OUTAGE 15 SCOPE SERVICE WATER PENETRATION REPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT OF "B" BATTERY CONTROL ROOM UPGRADE 92-0621A(12)
OUTAGE RISK MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT Developed Outage Risk Management Scheduling Guidelines (N + 1 Criteria)
Electrical Power Fuel Cooling RCS Makeup Capability RCS Pressure Control Containment Vessel Integrity Reactor Core And Spent Fuel Pit Reactivity Control Schedule Reviews Initiatives System Window Document o
Reasons for Each System Window Operator Training Plant Status Forms o
Indicates What Systems Cannot Be Worked Special Procedures o
Temporary Spent Fuel Pit Cooling o
Battery Charger Power o
Emergency Diesel Cooling Independent Reviews o
Operators o
Harris/Brunswick/Corporate Team 92-0621A(13)
OUTAGE RISK MANAGEMENT (Continued)
DEVELOPMENT Future Contingency Planning Shutdown Procedures Outage Schedule Changes CONCLUSIONS CP&L Has Been Proactive In Outage Risk Management 92-0621A(14)
H. B. ROBINSON SHUTDOWN SAFETY FUNCTION STATUS CURRENT PLANT CONDITIONS RCS TEMP:
RCS PRESS:
PZR LVL:
RX VESSEL UNIT STATUS:
DATE:
LVL:
TIME:
PROTECTED TRAIN =
PROTECTED TRAIN EXCEPTIONS WNPA MAKEUPOLJ~I~
COoUNG MAKP S
CURRENT REQUIRED.
RCS BORON LINEUP OR FLOWPATH REQ'D ACTUAL NI'S IN SERVICE SFP BORON ALTERNATE LINEUP OR FLOWPATH AVAILABLE REQ'D (CONTINGENCY)
ACTUAL UPCOMING MAJOR WORK ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HRS 92-0621A (15)
H. B. ROBINSON SAFETY SYSTEMS SHUTDOWN FUNCTION STATUS CURRENT PLANT CONDITIONS DATE:
TIME:
UNIT STATUS:
PROTECTED TRAIN PROTECTED TRAIN EXCEPTIONS RCS TEMP:
RCS PRESS:
PZR LVL:
RX VESSEL LVL:
SAFETY SYSTEM AVAIL.
ELECTRICAL DIST. STATUS CORE STATUS CONTAINMENT STATUS RCS COOLING RCS MAKEUP FLOW PATH SFP COOLING SFP MAKEUP FLOW PATH REACTIVITY CONTROL BORATION FLOW PATH RCS BORON SFP BORON NI'S IN SERVICE UPCOMING MAJOR WORK ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS 92-0621A(16)
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ ii.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(17)
SECTION IV NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS OWNERSHIP QUALITY STAFFING TRAINING
SUMMARY
CONTINUING PROGRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM FUTURE FOCUS 92-0621A(18)
NED SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS During the past year, NED has initiated or reinforced the following actions as a result of self identified problems and NRC concerns:
Ownership Mod engineer owns the design from cradle to grave Ouality Design verification procedure was strengthened Qualification of personnel Section manager review of modifications Department goals to reduce the number of comments and field revisions generated per modification Expectation assigned to each first line supervisor to assess review comments and coach employees to reduce errors Field revisions being assessed and trended Quality supersedes schedule or budget requirements 92-0621A(19)
NED SELF ASSESSMENTIMPROVEMENTS (Continued)
Staffing Long term goal to decrease reliance on contractors
- a.
Infrastructure positions
- b.
Hiring new college graduates All Engineering Support Section Managers are former plant employees NED has joined ten system teams For Refueling Outage 14, NED Engineers routinely meet with system teams to discuss modification designs.
Training Summary Robinson basic systems being taught in Corporate office Real Time Training held quarterly to review topics of current interest In 1991, twice the number of manhours spent on training as compared to 1990 92-0621A(20)
NED SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)
CONTINUING PROGRESS All committed design basis documents issued Design basis document validations will be complete this year Steady progress continues to be made in the electrical calculation area Additional design guides in development NRC given early notification of potentially undesirable IPE results. Through appropriate actions, results have been improved.
Procurement Engineering Section established NED Onsite Unit is maturing and providing day-to-day support NED support of plant's Technical Support Unit continues through RET process Frequent visits to site by Corporate NED personnel Support for refueling outage 14 while preparing designs for refueling outage 15 92-0621A(21)
NED SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The NED Corrective Action Program identified that 64%
of all adverse conditions were due to work practices, design or procedures.
Solution A Project Quality Team has been established to recommend measures to improve the effectiveness of NED procedures.
Addressing corrective actions to preclude recurrence on non-significant Adverse Condition Reports was identified as a good practice.
92-0621A(22)
ADVERSE CONDITION REPORTS 1991 NED MONTHLY 16 N
u 14 m
12 10 rV A
4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec E
iassued Closed Significant Issued Significant Closed CUMMULATIVE 120 N
u 100 m
e 80 r
o 60
.A f
40.
A C
R 20 -..
a Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Issued Total Closed 96% of ACRs Were Self-identified
ACR CAUSAL FACTORS 1991 NED Work Practices Design Procedure Management 7/ 7 Equipment Communications Training External Planning Change Maintenance Supervisory 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Total ACRs - 100
NED SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)
FUTURE FOCUS Continue to improve modification quality Increase personnel rotations between the plant and Corporate office Continue providing system training for engineers Continue to improve communications between NED and Technical Support Increase communications with Operations and Maintenance for modification activities 92-0621A(23)
CONTINUAL NED IMPROVEMENTS 1988/1989 1990 1991 1992 Management
- CDO-Engineer of
- More Formal
- Instill Ownership of
- Reinforce Ownership of Initiatives Record Walkdowns Vendor Products Vendor Designs
- CDO-150 FTE's
- Established
- Mod Review Checklists
- Emphasis on Dedicated to Guideline on
- Began Assessing Field Qualification of RNP Durations for Revisions personnel
- CDO Specialized Mod Design
- Mod Overviews Initiated
- Support RF014 While Support
- NED/Fuels Interface Developing Mods for
- Fuels Plant Document RF015 Parameters
- Meetings With System
- Assessment of Comments Document Teams to Review Mods
- Emphasis on Rotation
- NED Onsite Unit
- NED Membership on 10 of Personnel System Teams
- Improve Communications between NED and Plant Tools
- 6 DBD's Written
- 5 DBD's Written
- 3 DBD's Written
'2 DBD Validations plus (4 Validated)
(4 Validated)
(4 Validated)
Closeouts
- CAD Capability
- ECCS Single
- EDG Electrical
- DC Electrical
- Started PRA Failure Calculations Calculations Analysis
- 480V Voltage Drop
- EDG Dynamic Analysis
- 9 Design Guides Calcs.
- 10 Design Guides
'Submit PRA Issued
- Issue 10 Design Guides
- Surrogate Video Tour oFast Transfer Analysis
- 2DBDValidatonuCompleted Skills eNCSU Inhouse
'Professional
- Added 30 Infrastructure
- Systems Training Civil Engineer Push Slots
@Add 30 Additional Training
@Started Real
'33,000 Hours in Infrastructure Time Training Training Slots
'16,000 Hours in Training 92-flA21A(?4)'
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ II.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(25)
SECTION V NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT MISSION ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIP OPERATING ISSUES AND CONCERNS REFUELING OUTAGE OVERSIGHT PLANS DEVELOPMENT PLANS NEAR TERM ASSESSMENTS 92-0621A(26)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT MISSION:
CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS AT ROBINSON BY IDENTIFYING ISSUES PREVENTING PREMIER PERFORMANCE TO BOTH ROBINSON LINE MANAGEMENT AND TO SENIOR NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT.
SERVE AS SENIOR NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT'S STAFF FOR THE OBJECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF SAFE, HIGH QUALITY, AND RELIABLE NUCLEAR OPERATIONS AT ROBINSON.
92-0621A(27)
Nuclear Assessment Robinson Nuclear Project Organizational Relationship Chairman Sherwood Smith Executive V. P.
Lynn Eury J
Nuclear Generation Group Senior VP Al Watson Harris cBrunswick Nuclear Assessment Robinson Project Department Manager Vice-President Leonard LofNin Charlie ietz Harris Brunswick Robinson Project Robinson Plant Assessment Manager jGeneral Manager J. Anthony Dobbs Ray Chambers Assessment Operating Organization Organization 3/9/92 92-0621A (28)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING ISSUES AND CONCERNS TEAM ASSESSMENTS:
SITEWIDE ASSESSMENT -
AUGUST 91 NINE ISSUES IDENTIFIED EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIONS TAKEN AND WRITTEN RESPONSES ARE BEING INCLUDED IN FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENTS.
FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT BY ON-SITE NAD PERSONNEL NOTED SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN SPENT FUEL SHIPPING ACTIVITIES. (FEBRUARY 92) 92-0621A(29)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT RoBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING ISSUES AND CONCERNS TEAM ASSESSMENTS:
ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIATION CONTROL ASSESSMENT -
JANUARY 92 FOUR ISSUES IDENTIFIED
- 1.
POOR RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES
- 2.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM WEAKNESSES
- 3.
POOR CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM UTILIZATION
- 4.
HIGH STANDARDS ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED FOR SOME ACTIVITIES.
SIMILAR FOLLOW-UP ON ACTIONS TAKEN AND WRITTEN RESPONSES PLANNED FOR LATER THIS YEAR.
92-0621A(30)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NuCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING ISSUES AND CONCERNS ON-SITE NAD ASSESSMENTS:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT -
JANUARY 92 PURPOSE -
WHY DO WE FAIL TO EFFECTIVELY CORRECT DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED IN EP, PRODUCING INCONSISTENT EXERCISE PERFORMANCES?
NAD'S ASSESSMENT PARALLELED SELF-ASSESSMENT BY THE LINE ORGANIZATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH NSD.
Two ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED, IN SIGNIFICANT DETAIL:
- 1.
INADEQUATE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND DIRECTION AND USE OF AN INADEQUATE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.
- 2.
INADEQUATE DRILL CRITIQUE PROCESS.
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ALL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN OR PLANNED -
COMPLETE; RESULTS PROVIDED TO ROBINSON.
92-0621A(31)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING ISSUES AND CONCERNS ON-SITE NAD ASSESSMENTS:
MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT -
MARCH 92 PURPOSE -
DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ROBINSON M&TE PROGRAM TO CALIBRATE AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ACCURACY AND TRACEABILITY.
Two ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED:
- 1.
ROBINSON HAS A NON-SITEWIDE M&TE CONTROL PROGRAM LACKING IN GUIDANCE FOR SOME USERS AND FAILING TO CONTROL ALL TEST EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
- 2.
EVALUATIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS PERFORMED ON IMPACTED PLANT EQUIPMENT FOLLOWING DISCOVERY OF OUT-OF-TOLERANCE TEST EQUIPMENT.
POOR SELF-ASSESSMENT PRACTICES WERE NOTED IN M&TE.
92-0621A(32)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NuCLEAR PROJECT REFUELING OUTAGE OVERSIGHT PLANS DETAILED ASSESSMENT PLANS ARE CURRENTLY BEING PREPARED COVERING THREE GENERAL OUTAGE FUNCTIONAL AREAS:
- 1. PLANT MANIPULATION AND FUEL SHUFFLE ACTIVITIES
- 2. OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS
- 3. SPECIAL TESTING ACTIVITIES MULTI-DISCIPLINED TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED UPON APPROVAL, PLANS WILL BE SHARED WITH ROBINSON EXTERNAL TECHNICAL EXPERTISE IS PLANNED TO ASSIST HIGH STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE WILL BE EXAMINED ISSUES AND WEAKNESSES WILL BE DEBRIEFED TO SITE MANAGEMENT UPON DISCOVERY.
PERFORMANCE POTENTIALLY AFFECTING SAFETY, QUALITY, OR RELIABILITY AND PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES WILL BE SCRUTINIZED.
92-0621A(33)
Nuclear Assessment Robinson Nuclear Project Refueling Outage Oversight Plans Functional Area Example: 2. Outage Modifications M1087 - RHR Mini-Flow Recirc Line Operations Maintenance Outage Mgmt Eng/Tech Support E&RC Clearance(s)
WO Prep/Planning Scheduling Planning ALARA Planning
- Prep/planning Mock-ups/Practice Planning Problems Practice involvement
- Draining Pre-Job briefings Pre-Fab Tracking
- Responsiveness Dose projections
- Implementation Turnover knowledge Parts
- Conservative RWPs
- Maintenance Procedures Oversight
- Technical Accuracy
- Accurate
- Removal
- Utilization Progress tracking of solutions
- Current
- Refill
- Accuracy Communications
- Pro-active
- Understood Procedure Revisions
- Understanding Problems Field Revisions
- Properly revised Operator Training
- Use Expectations
- Identification
- Quantity Pre-Briefings
- Mod knowledge Contingencies
- Resource Utilization
- Reasons Dosimetry
- Simulator training
- Planning
- Solutions
- Review adequacy Contamination Turnover knowledge
- Practice
- Lessons Learned Documents
- decon Testing Safety Priorities
- Timely Revised
- control spread Coaching
- Safety, Quality, Reliability - Accurate Work Practices Self-Critical Training input
- Knowledge.
- Enforcement 3/9/92 92-0621A (34)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS CONTINUE TO INDEPENDENTLY ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF ROBINSON TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE, FOCUSING ON SAFETY, QUALITY, AND RELIABILITY.
BRING FORWARD SUBSTANTIVE AND IMPACTIVE PERFORMANCE ISSUES NOT LIMITED BY CURRENT OR PERCEIVED CONSTRAINTS.
FOSTER A POSITIVE CHANGE ENVIRONMENT SUCH THAT RE-ENGINEERING OF OUR BUSINESS PROCESSES OCCUR AT ALL LEVELS OF THE NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION.
CONTINUE STAFFING ROTATIONS, BRINGING RECENT LINE EXPERIENCE INTO ASSESSMENT, AND STRENGTHENING THE SELF-ASSESSMENT AND SELF-CRITICAL PRACTICES OF THE ROBINSON ORGANIZATION.
INCORPORATE THE ROBINSON IPE RESULTS INTO THE FUNDAMENTALS OF ASSESSMENT SUCH THAT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PERFORMANCE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IS KNOWN TO ALL.
CONTINUE TO SCRUTINIZE THE ABILITY OF ROBINSON TO EFFECTIVELY TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO SOLVE IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS.
92-0621A(35)
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT ROBINSON NuCLEAR PROJECT SOME NEAR-TERM ASSESSMENTS:
CORRECTIVE ACTION DETERMINE THE ABILITY OF ROBINSON TO (APRIL)
IDENTIFY AND CORRECT CONDITIONS ADVERSE TO QUALITY.
PRIORITIZATION DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE (APRIL & AUGUST)
ROBINSON PRIORITIZATION SYSTEM TO ACCOMPLISH IT'S OBJECTIVES.
OPERATIONS TEAM DETERMINE THE ABILITY, DESIRE, AND (APRIL)
PRACTICE TO OPERATE ROBINSON CONSERVATIVELY IN A HIGH QUALITY, SAFE, AND RELIABLE MANNER.
SELF-AsSESSMENT DETERMINE THE ABILITY OF ROBINSON TO (MAY)
SELF-IDENTIFY AND CORRECT PERFORMANCE WEAKNESSES.
WORK PRACTICES DETERMINE THE ABILITY OF ROBINSON TO (MAY)
CORRECT THE IDENTIFIED WORK PRACTICE ISSUE, VIA THE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.
NAD SELF-ASSESSMENT DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NAD TO (SEPTEMBER)
ACCOMPLISH IT'S MISSION AND REALIZE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS AT ROBINSON.
92-0621A(36)
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ II.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(37)
SECTION VI MANAGEMENT ACTIONS C. R. DIETZ MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES R. H. CHAMBERS
- PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES
- PERSONNEL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
- FACILITIES
- PLANNING
- PROGRAM INITIATIVES 92-0621A(38)
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES
- CORPORATE INCENTIVE PROGRAM SUCCESSFUL IN 8 OF 10 CATEGORIES
- QUALITY ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS EIGHT NOMINATIONS FROM RNP (26 EMPLOYEES)
- TOTAL QUALITY PROGRAM 39 ACTIVE TEAMS IN 1991 0
27 SYSTEM TEAMS o
12 QUALITY TEAMS INCENTIVE GOAL 0
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INCREASE
- GREAT IDEAS AT WORK 53 IDEAS SUBMITTED IN 1991
$6.8M ESTIMATED SAVINGS 92-0621A(39)
CP&L clog
,.chieve at least a cumulative 5% annual increase in earmngs per share. (To be EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE GOALS calculated on a normalized 1988 base of S3.93 per share which for the year 1991 is DECEMBER 1991 (Year-end) 4 per share.)
Status Year-cnd.............................................
5.1%
DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT NUCLEAR PRODUCTION POSSIL PRODUCION Goal Goal Gal Add 4,500 high-efficiency heat pumps and Achieve a nuclear capacity factor of at least Fossil system equivalent forced outage rate 11.100 Safeshine lights.
70%.
will be no more than 5.75% from fossil generating units.
Status Budret Actual Status Heat pumps 4,500 7,299 Year-end..............................
....... 70%
status Safeshine lights 11.100 14,435 Year-end...........--
........ 3.61%
NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SATISFACION CONTNUITY OF SERVICE GodW Goal GoalV Achieve a nuclear performance index of at Increase the Company's overall favorability Customers have service available at least least 80 from nuclear generating units.
score to at least 82.
99.982% of the time on average.
status status Status Year-end..
... 93 Year-end...............................................
81.20 Average availability......................... 99.988%
TOTAL QUALITY EMPLOYEE SAFETY TOTAL MENDTIJRES Goal Goal Go A. Achieve a minimum of a five point A Achieve safety performance frequency Total expenditures (construction and O&M increase in the corporate internal rates of no more than 3.40 vehicle including fuel) will not exceed 3.9e/KWH customer satisfaction index. (Half credit) accidents per million miles driven and system energy input (excludes depreciation B. All departments will have completed the 5.5S injuries per million hours worked and interest).
Effective Performance Management wiih disaoiing injurics 4cing nu more training for exempt employees and at least than.80. (Half credit) stats 40% of the non-exempt employees will B. No employee fatalities. (Half credit)
Year-end have completed the training. (Half credit)
Part A must be achieved to receive Status credit for part B.
A. 5 point increase B. Exempt - 100%
Status Goal Actual Non-exempt - 69%
A. Vehicle Accidents......
3.40 2.89 Total Injuries............
5.55 4.76 Disabling Injuries.....0.80 0.89 B. Employee Fatalities 0
.De seek to become the best...Sherwood H. Smith, Jr.
PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH YOUR EMPLOYEES 92-0621A (40)
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS (CONTINUED)
PERSONNEL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
- PERFORMANCE TRAINING EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT o
ALL EMPLOYEES TRAINED EXCEPT NEW HIRES o
IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS RNP MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING o
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND VISION o
SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES AND EXPECTATIONS o
ORGANIZATION ANALYSIS o
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 0
PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES NGG SUPERVISORY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM o
DEVELOPMENT COMPLETED IN 1991 0
FIRST CLASS SCHEDULED IN MAY, 1992 TECHNICAL AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT TRAINING 0
NUMEROUS INTERNAL TECHNICAL TRAINING PROGRAMS ITEMS OF INTEREST/CURRENT ISSUES o
TECH SUPPORT TRAINING INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS COMPLETED OVER 8000 INSTRUCTIONAL HOURS IN 1991 0
OTHER MAJOR TRAINING INITIATIVES OBSERVATION TRAINING ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TRAINING 92-0621A(41)
NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP SUPERVISORY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EAR ION "UP Management and Professional Development Carolina Power & Light Company
NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP SUPERVISORY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM POPULATION:
ALL SUPERVISORS BELOW UNIT MANAGER
==
Introduction:==
Employee EEO Supervising in the Relations Workshop NGG (1/2 Day)
(1-1/2 Days)
(2 Days)
Industrial Interpersonal Leadership Safety Supervisory and Skills Teambuilding (1 Day)
(3 Days)
(2 Days)
Problem Solving Stress Assertiveness and Management Skills Decision Making (3 Days)
(1 Day)
(1/2 Day)
Effective Meeting and Management Performance Presentation Principles Management Skills (2-1/2 Days)
(2 Days)
(3 Days)
Written Communications (2
Days)
Eleven (11) Courses (24 Days) 92-0621A(42)
NUCLEAR GENERATION GROUP SUPERVISORY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CURRICULUM WEEK HONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY
)
THURSDAY FRIDAY 1
==
Introduction:==
Supiervising in Employee Relations EEO Workshop EE0 Uorkshop Induastrial Safety May 11-15 the NGG (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 prm.)
(8:00 a.m. -Noon)EvinSeio Employee ReLations (5:30 p.m.-7:00 p...)
(1:00 p...-5:00 p-rn.)
11 12 13 14 15 2
InterpersonaL Interpersonal Supervisory Interpersonal supervisory Leadership and Tea Leadership and May 18-22 Supervisory Skills Skills Skills Building Team Building (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a..-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a...-5:DO p.m.)
(8:00 a..-5:00 p.m.)
Evening Session (5:30 p.m.-7:00 p-rm.)
___________18 19 20 21 22 ThREE (3 IEEK BREAK 3Problem Solving & Decision Problem Solving & Decision Problem Solving & Decision Stress Management Assertiveness Skilt June 15-19 Making Making Making (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-Noon)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p-rm.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)__________
Evening Session Course Adiniistrati on/
(5:30 p.mn.-7:00 p.m.)
Application (1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.)
___________15 16 17 18 19 4
Effective Performance Effective Performance Effective Performnce Meeting & Presentation Meeting & Presentation Junie 22-June 26 Management Management Management Skills Skills (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-Noon)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-Noon)
Meeting & Presentation Skills Evening Session Course Admuinistration/
(1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(5:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m.)
Application (1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.)
______22________
23 24 25 26
______________________OIE (1) MEEK BREAK 5
Management Principles Management Principles Management Principles Written Cannunaications uritten Commuications July 6-10 (8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-S:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
(8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.)
Evening Session Conmnencement (5:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m.)
6 7
8 9
10 92-0621A(43)
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS (CONTINUED)
FACILITIES
- O&M BUILDING FINAL BID PACKAGE RELEASED 0
CONSTRUCTION START APRIL, 1992 0
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE NOVEMBER, 1992 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING o
SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION START IN 1993 (NOT CURRENTLY APPROVED IN CURRENT BUDGET CYCLE) 92-0621A(44)
1~
"Am
)
l l j ll j j j I, pl.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS (CONTINUED)
PLANNING
- STRATEGIC PLANNING IsSUES AND DIRECTIVES o
RECOVERY OF DESIGN MARGIN o
PLANT AGING STRATEGY o
OPERATOR ACTION ASSESSMENT
- LONG RANGE PLANNING FIVE YEAR PLAN o
EVOLVING TO A WORKING DOCUMENT 0
LACKS IDENTIFICATION OF LONG RANGE PROJECTS
- WORK MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS LAN INSTALLATION "COMPLETE" o
STARTING TO DERIVE BENEFITS o
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN PROGRESS WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS o
SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND PROCESS COMPLETE o
LOADING CURRENT COMMITMENTS o
SIGNIFICANT IN FUTURE RESOURCE DECISIONS 92-0621A(45)
MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES R. H. CHAMBERS PROGRAM INITIATIVES OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE TECHNICAL SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTAL & RADIATION CONTROL PLANT SUPPORT CONTROL & ADMINISTRATION 92-0621A(46)
OPERATIONS -
PROGRAM INITIATIVES SELF-ASSESSMENTS CONTROL RooM OBSERVATIONS SIMULATOR OBSERVATIONS OPERATIONS MANAGER'S WEEKLY FIELD OBSERVATION MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS ISSUED ANNUALLY PERFORMANCE BASED ON ROUTINE DUTIES DESIRE FOR CONSISTENCY BETWEEN SHIFTS LABELING PROGRAM PROCEDURE DEVELOPED CREW ON SITE AND EQUIPMENT SETUP ANNUNCIATOR WINDOWS FOR OUTAGE -
FIRST USE PROCEDURE UPGRADE SECOND BI-ANNUAL REVIEW INTEGRATION 391 -
PROCEDURES APPROVED IN 1991 33 PROCEDURES APPROVED IN 1992 (YTD)
ALL ANNUNCIATOR PANEL PROCEDURES UPGRADED (44) IN 1991 PER INPO COMMITMENT ALL ISI RELATED PROCEDURES (54) WILL BE UPGRADED IN FIRST QUARTER 1992 TO REFLECT THE THIRD 10 YEAR ISI INTERVAL (ASME SECTION X 1-1986) 170 PROCEDURE CHANGES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT RO 14 MODS 92-0621A(47)
MAINTENANCE - PROGRAM INITIATIVES 0
MAINTENANCE MINOR ADVERSE CONDITION REPORTING SYSTEM SUPPORTS PLANT CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM (LOWER TIER REPORTING)
IMPROVES SELF IDENTIFICATION MONTHLY PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROGRAM UPGRADED WITH GRAPHS BEING PLACED ONTO THE PERFORMANCE INDICATION MONITORING SYSTEM (PIMS)
STATUS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MORE VISIBLE TO PLANT PERSONNEL MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (SELF ASSESSMENT)
PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT BY SUPERVISORS STANDARDS OF EXCELLENCE IN MAINTENANCE DEVELOPED CLEARLY DEFINES ExPECTATIONS PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM 104 PROCEDURES UPGRADED IN 1991 66 PROCEDURES UPGRADED IN 1992 (YTD)
BEHIND IN INITIAL GOAL -
104 (210)
ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL ADDED 92-0621A(48)
TECHNICAL SUPPORT - PROGRAM INITIATIVES PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE SYSTEM AND COMPONENT ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT 0
THREE SYSTEM ENGINEERS QUALIFIED IN 1991 o
ONE COMPONENT ENGINEER QUALIFIED IN 1991 o
25 ACTIVE SYSTEM TEAMS AT END OF 1991 SELF ASSESSMENT INITIATED TO MEASURE PROGRESS o
Two (2) SURVEYS CONDUCTED o
ISSUES:
BACKLOG, TRAINING, TIMELINESS, COMMUNICATIONS CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS DOCUMENT FOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
20 GUIDELINES WRITTEN TO SUPPORT ACTIVITIES RANGING FROM PROCEDURE REVIEWS TO PLANT WALKDOWNS PROCEDURE UPGRADE o
40 OF 151 PROCEDURES UPGRADED 0
23 GUIDELINES UPGRADED/DEVELOPED 92-0621A(49)
TECHNICAL SUPPORT - PROGRAM INITIATIVES (CONTINUED)
EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE REPETITIVE FAILURE PROGRAM 0
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED IN 1991 o
116 REPETITIVE FAILURES IDENTIFIED IN 1991 (14 ACR's)
MANAGED VALVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 0
CHECK VALVE DESIGN REVIEWS COMPLETED POST-MAINTENANCE TESTING PROGRAM 0
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED IN 1991 0
DEVELOPED PER INPO GOOD PRACTICE PERFORMANCE MONITORING/PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM o
8 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS DEVELOPED DURING 1991 0
3 SYSTEMS HAVE PERFORMANCE GRAPHS ON THE LOCAL AREA NETWORK (LAN) COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR SYSTEM TEAM USE THERMOGRAPHY PROGRAM o
EQUIPMENT PURCHASED AND PERSONNEL TRAINED IN 1991 0
BASELINE DATA IS BEING OBTAINED ON PLANT COMPONENTS 92-0621A(50)
ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIATION CONTROL PROGRAM INITIATIVES USE OF VIDEO CAMERAS To REDUCE DOSE DURING INSPECTIONS To ASSIST WITH FIRE/SECURITY WATCHES IN HIGH RAD AREAS USE OF REMOTE DETECTORS FOR MONITORING HI RAD FILTERS SURROGATE VIDEO TOUR STATIONS (4)
MAINTENANCE PLANNERS:
JOB PLANNING RCA ENTRANCE:
PRE-JOB BRIEFINGS ALARA OFFICE:
DOSE PROJECTIONS AND ALARA INITIATIVES CORPORATE NED:
MOD PLANNING MODIFIED LI CHEMISTRY PROGRAM TO REDUCE CORROSION SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM INITIATED FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF JOB PERFORMANCE BY TECHNICIANS AND SUPERVISION 92-0621A(51)
PLANT SUPPORT PROGRAM INITIATIVES PLANT PROGRAM FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF TRANSIENT WORKER QUALIFICATION IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANT PROGRAM FOR CONDUCT OF AEQUENTLY PERFORMED TESTS 92-0621A(52)
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ II.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII.
CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(53)
SECTION VII PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. Chambers NUCLEAR SAFETY PRODUCTION RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 92-0621A(54)
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
NUCLEAR SAFETY Total Safety System Availability o
Achieved 1991 Goal (96%) With Actual 98.41%
Unplanned Scrams While Critical o
Achieved 1991 Goal (2) With Actual 1 (Equipment Related) o Last Personnel Caused Scram - 11/17/90 Unplanned Safety System Actuations o
Achieved 1991 Goal (1) With Actual 0 o
Last Event - 2/26/89 PRODUCTION Equivalent Availability o
1991 Actual 76.6 Was Below Goal (85%) Due to RFO-13 Extension Forced Outage Rate o
1991 Actual 1.27% (RFO-13 Extension Not Considered Forced Outage Per EEI Definition)
Thermal Performance o
Achieved 1991 Goal (11,000 BTU/nKWH)
With Actual 10,926 NKWH RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL Total Site Exposure o
Achieved 1991 Goal (250 Mrem) With Actual 194 Mrem o
Lowest In Site History Radwaste Shipped o
Achieved 1991 Goal (3000 cu. ft.) With Actual 2289 cu. ft.)
o Second Lowest Year of Record Contaminated Area (Outside CV) o Achieved 1991 Goal (2000 sq ft.) With Actual Annual Average 1340 sq. ft. (<2% RCA) o Lowest on Record 92-0621A(55)
RNPD PERFORMANCE NUCLEAR SAFETY
% AVAILABILITY EVENTS 100 12 80 -10
-8 60
-6 40
-4 20 2
0 0
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1/31/92 SAF. SYS. AVAIL.
F SCRAMS
-771 SAF. SYS. ACTUATIONS
RNPD PERFORMANCE PRODUCTION PERCENT BTU/nKWH (THOUSANDS) 120 12 110 100-P71 90 -,
80 8
70 60 6
50
/
40
/
30 20 -2x 10 1
0
?<
0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1/31/92 SEQUIVALENT AVAIL.
L.FORCED OUTAGE RATE STHERMAL PERFORMANCEI
RNPD PERFORMANCE RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL MANREM Thousands 600-25 500 -
2
-20 400 15 300 10 200 100 0
0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1/31/92 E
EXPOSURE RADWASTE VOL. CU.FT.
CONTAM. AREA SQ.FT
CONDENSER AIR INLEAKAGE STD CUBIC FT PER MIN 10
I 8
6<K 1986198 19819919019 8
Y LY AV G 6.
\\ \\.
\\
\\ \\.
4.......
2~~
~~~
"V 40 19861987198819891990199 L
RN VJ
H. B. ROBINSON FUEL INTEGRITY 1-131 ACTIVITY (uCi/gm) 0.0 1 0.008...........................................
0.007.........
0.006...
0.005
/..........
0.0 0 4 7/
0 003..
0.002
/
77 0 0 0 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 CYCLE NUMBER
RCS LEAKAGE AVERAGE PER YEAR
- 0. 1 4 - -
Values are from OST-061 0.12
/777 G
00 pA M
0.06
/
- 0. 027 O
1989 1990 1991 1992 1992 DATA REFLECTS AN INCREASE IN FEB. DUE TO CHARGING PUMP PACKING LEAKAGE WHICH HAS SINCE BEEN REPAIRED.
AGENDA I.
INTRODUCTION C. R. DIETZ ii.
MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS C. R. DIETZ III.
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE R. L. BARNETT IV.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J. M. CURLEY SELF ASSESSMENT/IMPROVEMENTS V.
NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT J. A. DOBBS ROBINSON NUCLEAR PROJECT VI.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES C. R. DIETZ R. H. CHAMBERS VII.
PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
R. H. CHAMBERS VIII. CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(56)
SECTION VIII CONCLUSION C. R. DIETZ 92-0621A(57)
CONCLUSION ROBINSON NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT IS GOOD, GETTING BETTER BY:
Being 100 % Responsible for Auditable Results Practicing Self-Assessment O
0 Sustaining Our Commitment to Improved Performance 92-0621A(58)