L-14-156, Response to Request for Additional Information for Proposed Extension Request Regarding the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report
| ML14115A156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 04/24/2014 |
| From: | Emily Larson FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-14-156, TAC MF3589, TAC MF3590 | |
| Download: ML14115A156 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ffiloc'" \\ F r r st E ne E y Nuc/ear Openff tlng Cprnpany Seayer Va{tey Power Sfalfarr F. O. Eax 4 $firppingport, FA l 5A77 Eric A. Larson Sife Vice Presrrjanf 724-682-5234 Fax 724-643-8069 April 24, 2414 L-14-156 ATTN; Document Contral Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatsry CCImmission 1 1555 Rockville Fike Rockville, MD 20852 r 0 cFR 50.54(f)
SUBJECT:
Beaver Vafley Power $tation, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Docket No. 5S-412, License No. NPF-73 Eee$qflge_to Fgggest k Additional Informatior.r fqr ProEpsed Extens"iqn Request Fegardinq thg f{gaf:ferfn l-qsk Fofce Regommendaticn 2,l-Elegd Lkugtrd Rglivaf*atiqq Repqrt ilAC Nog. MF35B9 and MF3590) On March t 2,2A12, the Nucfear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a letter titled, "Request far fnformation Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code af Federal Regu/afi'sns 50.54(f) Regarding Recornmendations 2.1,2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of lnsights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction perrnits in active or deferred status. Enctasure 2 of the 10 CFR 50.54{f} letter addresses NTTF Recommendation 2.1 for flooding. One of the required respon$es is for licensees to submit a Hazard Reevaluation Report (HRR) in accordance with the NRC's prioritization plan. By letter dated May 11, 2012, the NRC placed the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 {BVPS}, in Category 2 requiring a response by March 12,2A14. By letter dated December 17,2013, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company {FENOC} requested NRC assistance to obtain information needed tc complete the flood hazard reevaluation for BVPS frsm the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {USACE}. By letter dated March 11, ?014, FENOC requested an extension fcrthe completion and submission of the flood HRR based on the schedule to receive input informatfon from the USACE. By electronic mail sent on March 26, 2014, the NRC staff requested additional information to-complete its review of the extension request. The rspon$e to this request for additional information is attached.
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 L-r4-156 Page 2 There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter. lf there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Thomas A. Lentz, Manager
- Fleet Licensing, at 330-315-6810.
I declarq under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correcJ. Executed on April l1f,2014,. Sincerely, {d /'"-* Eric A. Larson
Attachment:
Response
to Request for Additional Information cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) NRC Region I Administrator NRC Resident lnspector NRR Project Manager Director BRPIDEP Site BRP/DEP Representative
Attachment L-14-156 Response to Request for Additional Information Page 1 of 5 By letter dated March 11, 2014, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) requested an extension for the completion and submission of the flood hazard reevaluation report (HRR) based on the schedule to receive input information from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). By electronic mail sent on March 26,2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff requested additional information to complete its review of the extension request. The response to this request for additional information (RAl) is provided below. The NRC request is provided in bold type, followed by the FENOC response.
RAI 1
The NRC staff requests that FENOC provide a more detailed breakdown of the activities and analyses that remain to be conducted, as well as the associated schedule for those activities and analyses. The NRC staff suggests that a Gantt chart or similar format would be an effective means of communicating the schedule information.
Response
A more detailed breakdown of the activities and analyses that remain to be conducted is provided in the following schedules. The first schedule provides the activities to be completed after receipt of USACE dam information. The second schedule provides the remaining activities to complete the flood HRR, excluding the USACE dam information. The schedules indicate target dates and task durations, which may warrant adjustment as activities progress.
Y-lo E(ob EPC\\ niF
I o I o c{ oy oo fit a, t!o c! lq s r I Lo I C\\l o o o g= tr IJ.] J-o F] QV) F A I!(J rrl&zo F lr< 1 o rl] C) a\\ Fa A riotru 1Ho .Joz q oo L.C o Lo. E oso= b Y o F+.= o G J o @3 .9oo !o 6l o ol oE (U o-o o o o ) o ( o r N N r r r o o o l f r o ^l s ' s s o , o ' o o o . o o g ) t o { N ( \\ F Fo o o tl o 6 E o = O E = d:r .Y oE ctf y. c b : E E E ge E 8 o ' E E. O lt o'E a) t l o X s g b > ( ! o E Z 'c at (L II H_ l.O E(ob EP.n $iF
F r f ) E(o-o ^EPs niF
o$ (\\l o o o
- i ^
F S ct F O s f : 5 r F S d clr F O E:) aH 9 2-r ? 6 Z I E q EP O Ifri ul E u l rrl t'Es tz gEfiH o o sf l{) c ! N 6 5 - E E
- ,Bu oro
(! o sf I (E Io, o o ai(E o lE .Joo $rO lO s I o I N o {Joo C:' tr o c! o oo C\\ o o o Fg H s, Q f f i f t = P r i Z I E q 6e C ) xfri 5 g IU 0 r t u l u E E., fU A 6 r r i 5F gft 9 o f t 6 =]- rt < o o O F N N 5 6 r f l l c c -a -) o \\ d O N $ s f t l c c f J - - t d d O N I$ \\ t* ) o = c 6 d (\\ (f) tlJ O z t-{L llJ c) (J r J 4 L ' AfrE t, , t o - r T ( ) : l t o E g m - L
- f 1-2 B LI TU ia l,lJ t
frB u J z E, TIJ ( L l ! o o c{ (o c! ol 6 5 [ i l z F g. z f r I O a D 7 J U X ll.1 I Y I U a tJ. z z rr.l o 6 F o = O E: -:r
- o=
o) .v, c b : E = E?e E $ o ' t r t. o K I K IW I E I .e o) a l.g5 h G c = ' c o (L [ll tll Ito t(E +.o o z ooE ofe o. s g, o +a vo F aito G J oo= .9oo G F r o E(ob EP, $iF}}