ML14031A008
| ML14031A008 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/2014 |
| From: | Pickett D Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Irani A Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| References | |
| MF3369 | |
| Download: ML14031A008 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Pickett, Douglas Sent:
Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:34 PM To:
Irani, Ardesar (airani@entergy.com)
Cc:
Johnson, Andrew; Karwoski, Kenneth; Murphy, Emmett; Kulesa, Gloria; Beasley, Benjamin
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2 SG Alternate Repair Criteria (H*)
Mr. Irani -
By letter dated January 16, 2014, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 (TAC No. MF3369). The license amendment request would revise Technical Specification 5.5.7, Steam Generator (SG) Program, to exclude portions of the SG tube below the top of the SG tubesheet from periodic inspections and plugging by implementing the alternate repair criteria (H*).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
1050 Mail Envelope Properties (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20140130143400)
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2 SG Alternate Repair Criteria (H*)
Sent Date:
1/30/2014 2:34:23 PM Received Date:
1/30/2014 2:34:00 PM From:
Pickett, Douglas Created By:
Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Johnson, Andrew" <Andrew.Johnson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Karwoski, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Karwoski@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Murphy, Emmett" <Emmett.Murphy@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Kulesa, Gloria" <Gloria.Kulesa@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Irani, Ardesar (airani@entergy.com)" <airani@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2121 1/30/2014 2:34:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: