ML13330B550
| ML13330B550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/1991 |
| From: | Morgan H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9108270151 | |
| Download: ML13330B550 (5) | |
Text
Southern California Edison Company P. 0.
BOX 28 SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672 H. E. MORGAN TELEPHONE VICE PRESIDENT AND SITE MANAGER 714-368-9470 SAN ONOFRE August 20, 1991 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness For Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period January 1, 1991 to June 30, 1991.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Attachments:
10CFR26 Performance Data cc:
C. W. Caldwell (USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 1, 2 and 3)
J. B. Martin (Regional Administrator, USNRC Region V)
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)Unit 1, 2 and 3 9108270151 910820 PDR ADOCK 05000206 R
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern California Edison January 1 to June 30, 1991 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location T.M. Calloway, Mqr., Access Authorization (714) 368-9554 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50 /
10 Barbiturates 300 / 300 Cocaine 300 /
150 Benzodiazepine 300 / 300 Opiates 300 /
300 Methadone 300 / 300 Amphetamines 1000 /
500 Propoxyphene 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Phencyclidine 25 /
25 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 2266 1294 Test Types
- Tests
- Positive
- Tests
- Positive Pre-Badging 265 2
810 20 For Cause 1
1 1
1 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 1087 2
684 9
Follow-Up 133 1
27 0
Other 43 1
31 0
Total 1529 7
1553 30 Number of Employees.Referred To Mandatory Treatment 2
Number of Personnel With Access Restored SCE 5
Contract 2
Total Number of PERSONNEL Tested One or More Times SCE 1065 Contract 659 Total Number of Random Tests 1771 Random Testing Rate 50%
Random Testing Program Results ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2
of 2
Individuals Tested 1989 1990 11991 11992 11993
- Failed N/A 1
18 12 1
Tested N/A 302*
2422 1842 11771 1
% Failed N/A
.3%
.7%
.6%
.6%
Graph of
.9
%Failed
.8
.7
- 6-
.5-
.4-
.3-
.2-
- Represents only two months of testing.
All Confirmed Positive Samples (Excludes Appeals) for Specific Substances Includes Multiple Submittals
[SUBSTANCES 1989 1990 1 1991 11992 1993 Marijuana 100/15 N/A N/A**
24 11 15 Marijuana 50/10 N/A 2
32 13 32/27 Cocaine N/A 0
11 5
5/5 Opiates N/A 0
20 28 18/0 Amphetamines N/A 0
13 18 11/11 Phencyclidine N/A 0
0 0
0/0 Alcohol N/A 0
4 1
4/4 Barbiturates N/A 0
15 15 14/0 Benzodiazepine N/A 0
22 17 17/0 Methadone N/A 0
0 0
1/0 Propoxyphene N/A 0
4 1
9/0 Not performed during this period.
NOTE:
The first number in column 5 represents the confirmed positive samples as reported by the testing laboratory.
The second number represents the number of positive specimens that were determined by the MRO to be associated with test failures.
This figure illustrates the differences between specimens that are reported positive but were not considered test failures due to prescription drug use, etc.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND REPORTABLE EVENTS FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM (January 1991 -
June 1991 period)
- 1.
A total of fifteen (15) individuals (contract workers and employees) had unescorted protected area access withdrawn following substance test failures.
- 2.
Five (5) employees were placed on investigatory suspension.
- 3.
Two (2) disciplinary suspensions from employment were enforced during this period.
- 4.
Employment was terminated for three (3) employees.
- 5.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) during this time frame as a result of failed substance tests.
- 6.
Two (2) employees were required to enroll in a treatment program.
- 7.
Five (5) employees and two (2) contract personnel were granted unescorted access after having previously failed a drug or alcohol test at San Onofre or elsewhere.
- 8.
There were no modifications to the Fitness For Duty program as a result of management actions during the current reporting period.
- 9.
There were no controlled substances found in the Protected Area at San Onofre during the reporting period.
- 10.
Two events were reported to the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 26 during the period January 1 to June 30, 1991:
A.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.73(a)(2)(ii), a twenty-four hour non emergency notification was made on January 22, 1991.
It was determined that an employee, who was a licensed reactor operator assigned to Units 2/3, had tested positive on a drug screen urinalysis test. The employee's protected and vital area unescorted access authorization was terminated within ten minutes.
The employee, who has been employed by SCE since July 2, 1984, had not previously failed a substance screen test. The employee's unescorted access was restored on April 13, 1991, after the individual successfully met the Company's criteria for reinstatement. The drug screen urinalysis test was administered as part of the random testing program on January 12, 1991.
Unit 1 was in a refueling outage, and Units 2 and 3 were operating at 100% power.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2 B.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26, Appendix A, Section 2.8(e), a submittal was made on June 17, 1991 summarizing SCE's investigation concerning unsatisfactory blind drug performance test results.
Two blind samples were reported negative by the NIDA-certified testing laboratory used by SCE on May 19, 1991 and May 24, 1991.
These specimens should have been reported positive. Although SCE submitted these samples in accordance with the supplier specified shelf life, the specimens had degraded to below the SCE established cut-off level, thus resulting in the negative laboratory report. Additional testing by the specimen supplier later confirmed the sample degradation to below the cut-off level.
SCE has discontinued processing blind performance samples provided by this supplier and has technically qualified two separate blind performance specimen providers.