ML13330B172
| ML13330B172 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/16/1987 |
| From: | Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13330B171 | List: |
| References | |
| SCE-1-A-A-09, SCE-1-A-A-9, NUDOCS 8703240042 | |
| Download: ML13330B172 (6) | |
Text
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT SCE-1-A CHANGE NOTICE Change Notice Number:
20 Affected Amendment:
9 Affected Pages:
17.1-39a, 17.1-40, 17.1-41, 17.2-47, 17.2-48 Description of Change:
(1) The corrective action system controlled by the SCE Quality Assurance organization uses different forms to identify problems and obtain resolution (2) Corrective action systems may exist that are controlled by SCE Station and Engineering organizations which provide equivalent controls for corrective action as the system controlled by the SCE Quality Assurance Organization Reason for Change (including basis for concluding that the change satisfies the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and the quality assurance program commitments previously accepted by the NRC):
The Topical Report is being revised to reflect the use of multiple corrective action systems. The systems are equivalent but are controlled by different organizations within'SCE. The systems comply with 10CFR50, Appendix B Criterion XVI Change ___ does X does not reduce commitments previously accepted by the NRC.
Approvals:
'Manager of Quality Assurance Vice President Date Submitted to NRC: March 16, 1987 8703240042 870316 PDR ADOCK 05000206 P
17.1.15.2 (continued) inspection records and forwarded to the responsible design 7
organization for review and assessment.
The SCE Project Engineer reviews and approves these dispositions for SCE I
procured items or onsite supplier activities.
Conditions adverse to quality discovered by SCE personnel at a jobsite, contractor's manufacturing facility or design office, supplier's manufacturing facility, or SCE internal organizations are processed as described in Subsection 17.1.16.
19 CN#20 17.1-39a Amendment 9 CN#20
17.1.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 17.1.16.1 Scope This subsection describes the measures utilized by SCE to assure that corrective action is promptly identified and implemented when conditions adverse to quality are determined to exist.
17.1.16.2 Corrective Action As described in Subsection 17.1.15, nonconformance and corrective action associated with material, parts, or components are controlled at a jobsite by the nonconformance reporting system. Additionally, a system for initiating corrective action associated with conditions adverse to quality is controlled by the SCE Quality Assurance Organization by means of written procedures. This system implements corrective 19 CN#20 action system forms to document conditions adverse to quality I
discovered by SCE personnel at the SCE General Office or I
jobsite, at A-E's design offices, and at NSSS Suppliers and I
other suppliers' facilities. This corrective action docu-l mentation is also used for hardware problems discovered at l
NSSS Supplier or other suppliers' facilities. Procurement specifications may specify the requirement for SCE approval of nonconforming hardware disposition if discovered by SCE at a supplier's facility.
The corrective action documentation provides for item or system identification, description qf the adverse condition, cause of the-condition, corrective action to resolve problem, and the corrective action to prevent recurrence as appropriate to l
the problems identified.
Corrective action documentation is promptly initiated with a request for corrective action directed to the responsible I
organization as a result of review, inspection, audit or I
surveillance activities.
The responsible organization to which corrective action docu mentation is directed-determines the cause of the adverse condition, the action taken to resolve the problem, and the 19 CN#20 action to be taken to prevent recurrence as appropriate to the problems identified. They also provide dates for imple-I mentation of the corrective action where appropriate. The I
corrective action documentation is returned to the responsible I
SCE Quality Assurance Organization Supervisor for review and I
concurrence. Revised corrective action documentation is I
requested if corrective action proposed is unacceptable.
I Follow-up reviews, inspections, audits, or surveillance are performed by SCE personnel to verify corrective action implementation.
Trending studies may be performed on corrective action data by the SCE Quality Assurance Organization as directed by the Vice I
President, Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing, or the I
Manager, Quality Assurance. Results of trending studies are
(
17.1-40 Amendment 9 CN#20
17.1.16.2 (continued) documented and retained on file in the CDM Center. The Vice 17CN#7 President, Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing, issues I
directives for corrective action resulting from trending studies, as necessary, and assures appropriate management involvement in correcting significant conditions adverse to quality.
In addition to the corrective action system controlled by the I
SCE Quality Assurance Organization, other corrective action systems may exist within other SCE organizations which provide a l9 CN#20 means for identification of the deficiency; documentation of l
corrective action to resolve the issue and corrective action to I
preclude recurrence; a means to track the status of the defi ciency; and a means to assure followup and closeout of the I
corrective action. When these optional systems exist, they shall be defined by written and approved procedures which con-l tain program elements and administrative controls which are com-I patible with the SCE Quality Assurance Program. These systems I
are periodically audited by the SCE Quality Assurance organi zation to determine effectiveness of implementation.
A-E's, NSSS Suppliers, and other suppliers are required by contract or procurement specification to implement a corrective action system equivalent to that described herein for their scope of work, including appropriate management involvement in the review and assessment of significant conditions adverse to quality.
17.1-41 Amendment 9 CN#20
'17.2.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 17.2.16.1 Scope This subsection describes the measures utilized by SCE to assure that corrective action is promptly identified and implemented when conditions adverse to quality are determined to exist.
17.1.16.2 Corrective Action As described in Subsection 17.1.15, nonconformance and corrective action associated with material, parts, or components are controlled at a jobsite by the nonconformance reporting system. Additionally, a system for initiating corrective action associated with conditions adverse to quality is controlled by the SCE Quality Assurance Organization by means of written procedures. This system implements corrective 19 CN#20 action system forms to document conditions adverse to quality I
discovered by SCE personnel at the SCE General Office or jobsite, at A-E's design offices, and at NSSS Suppliers and I
other suppliers' facilities. This corrective action docu mentation is also used for hardware problems discovered at NSSS Supplier or other suppliers' facilities. Procurement specifications may specify the requirement for SCE approval of nonconforming hardware disposition if discovered by SCE at a supplier's facility.
The corrective action documentation provides for item or system I identification, description of the adverse condition, cause of I
the condition, corrective action to resolve problem, and the I
corrective action to prevent recurrence as appropriate to I
the problems identified.
Corrective action documentation is promptly initiated with a request for corrective action directed to the responsible l
organization as a result of review, inspection, audit or surveillance activities.
The responsible organization to which corrective action docu mentation is directed determines the cause of the adverse condition, the action taken to resolve the problem, and the 19 CN#20 action to be taken to prevent recurrence as appropriate to I
the problems identified. They also provide dates for imple-I mentation of the corrective action where appropriate. The I
corrective action documentation is returned to the responsible I
SCE Quality Assurance Organization Supervisor for review and I
concurrence. Revised corrective action documentation is I
requested if corrective action proposed is unacceptable.
I Follow-up reviews, inspections, audits, or surveillance are performed by SCE personnel to verify corrective action implementation. Significant conditions adverse to quality, I
the cause of the conditions, and the corrective action taken I
are reported to cognizant levels of both "offsite" and "onsite" I management for review and assessment.
17.2-47 Amendment 9 CN#20
17.2.16.2 (continued)
Trending studies may be performed on corrective action data 19rCN#20 by the SCE Quality Assurance Organization as directed by the Vice President, Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing, or I
the Manager, Quality Assurance. Results of trending studies I
are documented and retained on file in the CDM Center. The 17 Vice President, Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing, I
issues directives for corrective action resulting from trend-l ing studies, as necessary and assures appropriate management involvement in correcting significant conditions adverse to I
quality.
In addition to the corrective action system controlled by the I
SCE Quality Assurance Organization, other corrective action systems may exist within other SCE organizations which provide a 19 CN#20 means for identification of the deficiency; documentation of I
corrective action to resolve the issue and corrective action to I preclude recurrence; a means to track the status of the defi-I ciency; and a means to assure followup and closeout of the I
corrective action. When these optional systems exist, they I
shall be defined by written and approved procedures which con tain program elements and administrative controls which are com-I patible with the SCE Quality Assurance Program. These systems l
are periodically audited by the SCE Quality Assurance l
organization to determine effectiveness of implementation.
I A-E's, NSSS Suppliers, and other suppliers are required by con-tract or procurement specification to implement a corrective action system equivalent to that described herein for their scope of work, including appropriate management involvement in the review and assessment of significant conditions adverse to quality.
17.2-48 Amendment 9 CN#20