ML13326A165
| ML13326A165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1995 |
| From: | Marsh W SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9502010116 | |
| Download: ML13326A165 (6) | |
Text
Southem California Edison Company 23 PARKER STREET IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92718 WALTER C. MARSH January 24, 1995 TELEPHONE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY AFFAIRS (714) 454-4403 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness for Duty program performance data for the period July 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994 (Attachment 1). Attachment 2 is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Attachments: 10CFR26 Performance Data cc:
L. J. Callan, Administrator, NRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV M. K. Webb, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2&3 9 5 02010116 950124 PDR ADOCK 050002206 P
January 13, 1995 Mr. G. T. GIBSON
SUBJECT:
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Attached is the Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data for the most recent reporting period (July through December 1994). This data is provided for your report to the NRC which is due to the Commission within 60 days of the end of the reporting period.
The data is arranged as follows: provides the required six month data and includes all pertinent program statistics. is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you have any questions, please contact Sharon Blue on 82482.
Jack Wallace Manager, Access Authorization cc:
H.W. Newton J. E. Wallace S. L. Blue SAPA Files JAN IT 1995 ONSITE NUCLEAR LICENSING
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison July 1 -
December 31, 1994 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Administrator, Fitness For Duty (714) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total Average Number with Unescorted Access 2171 720 2892 Test Types
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Badging 132 0
425 10 For Cause 0
0 4
2 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 519 1
182 0
Follow-Up 41 0
13 0
Other 38 0
12 0
Total 730 1
636 12 Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 0
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees _
Contract 1 Number of Random Tests _11_
Random Testing Rate 24.2%
Annual Random Testing Rate(January 1 -
December 31, 1994)
Total Number of Random Tests 1,697 Random Testing Rate 57.7%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS See Attachment 3, Figure 1 Individuals Tested-1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
- Failed 18 12 11 14 4
4 10 15 2
1
- Tested 2422 1842 1771 2604 1986 1890 1947 2148 996 701
% Failed
.7%
.6%
.6%
.5%
.2%
.2%
.5%_
7%
.2%
.1%
Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittals/substances detected.
Mari'uana COC OPI AMP ETOH BARB BENZO PROP 100/15a 50/10b Licensee Employees 0
1 0
9 0
0 3
7 1
Contract Workers 2
5 3
0 7
0 1
2 3
TOTAL Totals 2
6 3
9 7
0 4
9_4_42
- OnSite Presumptive N/A 4
3 a -
NRC Levels b
SCE Levels I
c - 6 samples were reported positive by the HHS lab,
- certified Lab N/A 6C 3
of those, 2 prescreened negative and were reported Confirmation Ratio N/A 67 10 positive at or near cutoff levels.
67%__
_%1 d
If marijuana had been tested at 50/15, results for this reporting period would have been; on-site presumptive 4, total confirmed 4 for a confirmation ratio of 100%.
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES MARIJUANA Cocaine METHAMPHETAMINE ALCOHOL Licensee Employees 1
0 0
0 Contract Workers 3
1 6
2 Total Total 4
1 6
2 13
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2 confirmed the positive results.
- 10.
There were no events reported to the Commission during this reporting period.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2 (July 1 - December 31,1994)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
One (1) temporary employee failed a random test, unescorted access was withdrawn and employment was terminated. Ten (10) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure. Two (2) contract workers were permanently denied unescorted protected area access after failing a For Cause test.
- 3.
As a result of a random test failure one (1) disciplinary suspension from employment was exercised during the reporting period.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
There were no enrollments in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
One (1) employee was granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of thirteen (13) appeal results for one (1) employee and twelve (12) contract workers. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial.
Two (2) workers utilized the management review process and appealed the denial of access for a test failure, in both cases the management action was upheld.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were 42 samples collected confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, only 13 individuals were associated with MRO failed test declarations. Due to the SCE recollection procedure, several individuals submitted multiple positive samples resulting in a single declared individual failure. Two individuals tested positive for multiple substances. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
In reconciling THC results, it was noted that two (2) samples pre-screened negative for THC while the HHS lab analysis was positive. Although a negative pre-screen result for THC was obtained, all samples were sent for off-site analysis in accordance with Site program procedures for samples submitted as multiple collections.
In investigating the THC discrepancies, both HHS labs and on-site pre-screening utilized different EIA reagents for the detection of marijuana metabolites. Due to slight differences in sensitivity of the reagents used, in concert with borderline positive samples, the results were technically acceptable. On site pre-screen results and test protocol were verified by the reagent manufacturer and found to be accurate and consistent with the testing protocol. Appeal samples sent to a second HHS (appeal) lab