ML13324A654
| ML13324A654 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1985 |
| From: | Medford M SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-85-07, GL-85-7, NUDOCS 8506270224 | |
| Download: ML13324A654 (5) | |
Text
Southern California Edison Company P. 0. BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD. CALIFORNIA 91770 M.O.MEDFORD TELEPHONE MANAGER, NUCLEAR LICENSING June 25, 1985 (818) 302-1749 Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 and 3 The purpose of this letter is to provide our response to Generic Letter 85-07, Implementation of Integrated Schedules for Plant Modifications.
Our responses for San Onofre Unit 1 and San Onofre Units 2 and 3 are provided as Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively. San Onofre Unit 1 has implemented an ILS based upon the Westinghouse Analytical Ranking Process.
The ILS was originally developed in 1983 with followup submittals to NRC. A license condition application to place the ILS in effect was submitted to NRC in 1984. A revision to the ILS will be submitted in the near future. NRC approval of the ILS will establish the ILS as a central tool in SONGS 1 outage planning. Southern California Edison is purchasing the Westinghouse computer software to permit SCE to update the ILS. It is our intention to utilize this software to develop an ILS for San Onofre Units 2 and 3. Thus, the mechanism to develop and implement an ILS will be available when needed to support SCE's implementation of future NRC mandated changes.
It is anticipated that the software will be available for SCE use in the third quarter of 1985. SCE will decide whether to submit a license condition implementing an ILS for San Onofre 2 and 3 after application of the Westinghouse software to the project.
If you have any further questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, 8506270224 850625 PDR ADOCK 05000206 P
PDR Enclosures cc:
Mr. H. Rood, NRC Project Manager, Licensing Branch 3 Mr. W. Paulson, NRC Project Manager, Licensing Branch 5 Mr. J. B. Martin, USNRC Region V Administrator Mr. F. R. Huey, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station PLANT NAME:
San Onofre Unit 1 UTILITY:
Southern California Edison I. INTENTIONS A.
Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS X
B. Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C.
Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff D.
Plan to implement an informal ILS only II. STATUS A. If you answered I.A above:
- 1.
Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant(s)?
Circle One:
(9 No If yes, select best description:
Engineering judgment Analytic Hierarchy process X
Risk based analysis Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)
If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:
N/A Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:
N/A
- 2. What is your estimated date for making a Application submitted submittal to the NRC-May 23, 1984.
or If not presently available, planned date for scheduling a submittal to the NRC N/A
B. If you answered I.B above:
N/A
- 1.
Please explain your reservations on separate sheet(s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet(s) or Separate submittal scheduled for (Date)
- 2. If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact/Time Frame Phone Number C. If you answered I.C N/A
- 1. Would you be willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility(s)?
Circle One:
Yes No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.
Contact Time Frame Phone Number If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.
III. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Please make any suggestions you may have as to how a utility sponsored availability/reliability project might be credited for plant safety enhancement.
Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.
None.
PLANT NAME:
San Onofre Units 2 and 3 UTILITY:
Southern California Edison I. INTENTIONS A.
Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS X
B. Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C.
Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff D.
Plan to implement an informal ILS only II. STATUS A.
If you answered I.A above:
- 1. Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant(s)?
Circle One:
S No If yes, select best description:
Engineering judgment Analytic Hierarchy process X
Risk based analysis Cost-benefit analysis Other (please describe)
If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:
N/A Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:
N/A
- 2. What is your estimated date for making a submittal to the NRC or If not presently available, planned date for scheduling a submittal to the NRC During or after the Second Quarter 1986
8.* ' If you answered I.B above:
N/A
- 1.
Please explain your reservations on separate sheet(s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet(s) or Separate submittal scheduled for (Date)
- 2. If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact/Time Frame Phone Number C. If you answered I.C N/A
- 1. Would you be willing to meet with the staff to discuss the development of an ILS for your facility(s)?
Circle One:
Yes No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.
Contact Time Frame Phone Number If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.
III. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Please make any suggestions you may have as to how a utility sponsored availability/reliability project might be credited for plant safety enhancement. Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.
None.