ML13317B160
| ML13317B160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1990 |
| From: | Morgan H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9008300136 | |
| Download: ML13317B160 (8) | |
Text
Southern California Edison Company P. 0.
BOX 128 SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672 H. E. MORGAN TELEPHONE VICE PRESIDENT AND SITE MANAGER 714-368-9470 SAN ONOFRE August 22, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness For Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data. This report covers the period January 1, 1990, through June 30, 1990.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely,
Enclosure:
10CFR26 Performance Data cc:
C. W. Caldwell (USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, SONGS)
J. B. Martin (Regional Administrator, USNRC Region V)
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)
S9008300136 9008§22 PDR ADOCK 05000206/L R
P-c (0
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern California Edison June 30, 1990 Company 6 Monts Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location T. M. Calloway, Access Authorization Manager (714) 368-9554 Conta Name Phone (include area code)
Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50
/
10 Amphetamines 1, 000
/ 500 (see attachment I)/
Cocaine 300
/ 150 Phencyclidine 25
/
25
/
Opiates 300 300 Alcohol(%BAC)
.04%
Long Term Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Licensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access f 123 N/A
- 1466, Referred Access Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-employment N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pre-badging 322 1
N/A N/A 1625 26 Periodic N/A N/A N/A N/A, N/A N/A For causeI 1
0 N/A N/A 4
1 Post accident 0
0 N/A N/A 1
0 Random 1331 6
N/A N/A 1091 12 Follow -up w89 3N/A N/A 45 0
Other Ote0 N/A N/A 33 0
Total 1832 10 8
0 N/A N/A 2799 39
ATTACHMENT I Additional Drugs:
Screen/
Substances Confirmation Barbiturates 300/300 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Methadone 300/300 Methaqualone 300/300 Propoxyphene 300/300
Random Testing Program Results mont----ri---------------------
- rPositive Posit1ve-Tests-for-Specific1Subst8nces
- OTested 02 2422 Gaphetamines-
-. 0 13 sb Pstanes Mariiuan2 50 1 23 Cocaine 0
11
- Opiates 0
20
- Amphetamines 0
13d Phencyclidine 0
0P**
Alcohol 0
4 *
(see attachment-1 for additionia-l substances)
- -Not performed lrn hspro
- ...Excludes Blind Performance Test Specimens.
ATTACHMENT II Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances (continued):
Positive Tests Substances Nov.-Dec. 1989 Jan.-June 1990 Barbiturates 0
15*
Benzodiazepine 0
22*
Methadone 0
0 Methaqualone 0
0 Propoxyphene 0
4 Excludes Blind Performance Test Specimens.
ATTACHMENT III
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND REPORTABLE EVENTS FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM (January 1990 -
June 1990 period)
- 1.
Twenty-two (22) withdrawals of unescorted protected area access were made during the current reporting period.
- 2.
Ten (10) investigatory suspensions of unescorted access were made during the current reporting period.
- 3.
Ten (10) disciplinary suspensions from employment were exercised during the current reporting period.
- 4.
Two (2) employee terminations were exercised during the current reporting period.
- 5.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) during the report period as a result of failed drug tests.
- 6.
Eight (8) employees were required to enroll in a rehabilitation program during the current reporting period.
- 7.
Six (6) employees were granted unescorted access during the current reporting period after having previously failed a drug or alcohol test at San Onofre (mainly employees) or elsewhere (mainly contractors).
- 8.
Management actions taken to modify the Fitness For Duty program:
In accordance with the guidelines for new programs, blind samples were processed beginning March 1990 and ending May 1990. Samples were processed and pre-screened on site, then transported to the Nichols Institute laboratory testing facility. The blind samples were provided by Bensinger, DuPont & Associates (BDA).
Some administrative difficulties were encountered in the re-sorting of the blind specimens due to the packaging methods of BDA-supplied positive and negative samples.
These difficulties involved some chain-of-custody discrepancies which have now been corrected and reconciled.
At no time was program testing adversely affected since the problems were strictly limited to the blind sample process.
All blind sample pre-screen results and NIDA-certified lab results are now in agreement. Additionally, internal administrative procedures have been strengthened and a kit packaging change has been instituted by the vendor to preclude further problems in this area of the program.
ATTACHMENT III (page 2)
- 9.
Three events were reported to the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 26.73 during the period January 1, 1990, to June 30, 1990:
- 1.
On March 28, 1990, an apparent controlled substance, thought to be the remains of a marijuana cigarette, was found in the protected area in the Units 2/3 safety equipment building. The material was confirmed to be marijuana by an offsite laboratory on April 4, 1990.
The material was found in a cable riser room by a security officer during the course of performing his routine duties on March 27, 1990.
The location where the material was found was not a Vital Area.
The room contains vertical cable trays and HVAC ductwork.
There have been no individuals identified as being responsible for the material. Security patrols were increased in the area and additional searches by drug detecting dogs were performed in the area. In addition, representatives of SCE's substance abuse program have inspected the area. Unit 1 was operating at 91% power, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power and Unit 3 was operating at 100% power when this discovery was made.
- 2.
On May 11, 1990, an apparent controlled substance, thought to be the remains of a marijuana cigarette, was found in the protected area at the top of the stairwell which provides access to a roof-top area of the Units 2/3 fuel handling building. The material was confirmed to be marijuana by an offsite laboratory on May 15, 1990.
The material was discovered by a contract watchperson during the course of performing his routine duties on May 11, 1990. The location where the material was found is a Vital Area.
There have been no individuals identified as being responsible for the material. Representatives of SCE's substance abuse program have inspected the area.
Security patrols were increased in the area and additional searches by drug detecting dogs were performed in the area. Unit 1 was operating at 91%
power, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power and Unit 3 was being refueled when this discovery was made.
ATTACHMENT III (page 3)
- 9.
(continued)
- 3.
On June 5, 1990, it was determined that an employee, who was a licensed senior reactor operator assigned to Units 2/3, had tested positive on a drug screen urinalysis test. The employee's protected and vital area unescorted access authorization was terminated within ten minutes. The employee had been performing operations support duties since approximately September 1986 and as such has not recently been performing licensed activities in the control room. The individual is a Shift Superintendent and holds a Senior Reactor Operator's license for San Onofre Units 2/3.
The employee, who has been employed by SCE since August 20, 1979, has not previously failed a drug screen urinalysis test. The individual is currently assigned to duties outside of the protected area. The individual's unescorted protected area access remains
-suspended, pending further management review. The drug screen urinalysis test was administered as part of the random testing program on May 30, 1990. The second portion of the sample taken on that day was submitted to an offsite laboratory on June 5, 1990, which confirmed the presence of controlled substances.
Unit 1 was operating at 91% power, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power and Unit 3 was in a refueling outage when this event occurred.