ML13317A379
| ML13317A379 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/22/1982 |
| From: | Krieger R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-82-17, NUDOCS 8211010132 | |
| Download: ML13317A379 (1) | |
Text
00 Southern California Edison Company P.0, BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 October 22, 1982 Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
D. M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket No. 50-206 Requirements for Preparing Emergency Preparedness Program Audits San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1
Reference:
Letter, D. G, Eisenhut, NRC, to all Licensees of Operating Power Reactors, Inconsistency Between Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) and Standard Technical Specifications for Performing Audits of Emergency Preparedness Programs (Generic Letter No. 82-17),
October 1, 1982 The referenced letter informed us that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require an independent audit of their emergency preparedness program every 24 months. This audit interval is in conflict with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) which requires an independent review of the emergency preparedness program every 12 months. You stated that all licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t), not withstanding any provision that may be contained in their Technical Specifications.
You also stated that if our Technical Specifications contain a provision that is not consistent with the regulations, we should request the staff to modify our Technical Specifications to conform to the rule.
The purpose of this correspondence is to inform you that San Onofre Unit 1 can be classified as having plant-specific Technical Specifications which require an emergency preparedness Program Audit every 24 months. Thus, we will be submitting a proposed change to our Technical Specifications that will resolve the inconsistency with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t). We currently anticipate being able to submit the proposed change by December 1, 1982.
If you have any questions regarding the above discussed schedule, please let me know.
Aty (y ry truly yours, 210113 92 2.
W. Krieger 83211010132 821022 Supervising Engineer PDR ADOCK 05000206 F
PDR San Onofre Unit 1 Licensing